scholarly journals FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM OF STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES IN THE PHILIPPINE EASTERN VISAYAS REGION

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Donald Patimo
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
State Universities ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Universities And Colleges ◽  
Performance Evaluation System ◽  
Research Questions

The main concern of this study was the assessment of the faculty performance evaluation system of State Universities and Colleges in the Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. Specifically, the study sought answers to research questions on how the faculty performance is evaluated with regards to evaluation procedures, instruments, and criteria and what is the present and desired faculty performance evaluation system considering the standards on utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. In search of answers to the abovementioned research questions, the researcher made use of the descriptive-assessment research design. The respondents of this study were administrators, faculty members, and students from the main campuses of State Universities and Colleges in Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. As result, the researcher found out that the most common evaluation procedure used were administrative observation in the class and the administration of appraisal instrument. Rating scales were extensively employed evaluation instrument and the most commonly used evaluation criteria were teaching commitment, mastery of the subject matter, teaching for independent learning, and classroom management. In addition, the SUCs in the Eastern Visayas Region of the Philippines unanimously expressed their desire to implement a faculty performance evaluation system that adheres to the standards of utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. At the present, the existing faculty performance evaluation system of SUCs in the Eastern Visayas Region of the Philippines generally followed the standards on utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy.

scholarly journals FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM OF STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES IN THE PHILIPPINE EASTERN VISAYAS REGION

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167
Author(s):  
Donald Patimo
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
State Universities ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Universities And Colleges ◽  
Performance Evaluation System ◽  
Research Questions

The main concern of this study was the assessment of the faculty performance evaluation system of State Universities and Colleges in the Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. Specifically, the study sought answers to research questions on how the faculty performance is evaluated with regards to evaluation procedures, instruments, and criteria and what is the present and desired faculty performance evaluation system considering the standards on utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. In search of answers to the abovementioned research questions, the researcher made use of the descriptive-assessment research design. The respondents of this study were administrators, faculty members, and students from the main campuses of State Universities and Colleges in Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. As result, the researcher found out that the most common evaluation procedure used were administrative observation in the class and the administration of appraisal instrument. Rating scales were extensively employed evaluation instrument and the most commonly used evaluation criteria were teaching commitment, mastery of the subject matter, teaching for independent learning, and classroom management. In addition, the SUCs in the Eastern Visayas Region of the Philippines unanimously expressed their desire to implement a faculty performance evaluation system that adheres to the standards of utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. At the present, the existing faculty performance evaluation system of SUCs in the Eastern Visayas Region of the Philippines generally followed the standards on utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy.

scholarly journals PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION INSTRUMENT OF STATE UNIVERSITIES AND COLLEGES IN THE PHILIPPINE EASTERN VISAYAS REGION

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-77
Author(s):  
Donald M. Patimo
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
State Universities ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Evaluation Instrument ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
Universities And Colleges ◽  
Research Questions

The main concern of this study was the assessment of the faculty performance evaluation instrument of State Universities and Colleges in the Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. Specifically, the study sought answers to research questions on what are the psychometric properties of the evaluation instrument and what are the problems identified with regards to the faculty performance evaluation instrument. In search of answers to the abovementioned research questions, the researcher made use of the descriptive-assessment research design. The respondents of this study were administrators, faculty members, and students from the main campuses of State Universities and Colleges in Philippine Eastern Visayas Region. As result, the researcher found out that the faculty performance evaluation instrument of the SUCs was valid and administrable, but not yet tested for reliability. The serious problems identified on the faculty performance evaluation system of SUCs in Philippine Eastern Visayas Region were primarily related to the evaluation criteria and procedure such as the lack of involvement of administrators, faculty, and students in the construction of the evaluation system.

scholarly journals Developing And Implementing Faculty Performance Evaluation: A Collaborative Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Caldwell Jr. ◽  
Michael Schulte
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Evaluation System ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Faculty Performance ◽  
New Faculty ◽  
Performance Evaluation System ◽  
High Quality Education ◽  
Core Property ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Viable System

The quality of education is a core property of what makes a university operate, sustain, and grow. To evaluate and measure this core property encompasses a wide range of critical aspects, but one of the control mechanisms will always involve the faculty, the deliverers of education to the primary customer, the student, but also collaboratively to other faculty, other educators, staff, and the community itself. Faculty, like students constantly change, the challenge being how to inculcate a viable system of performance evaluation that provides a consistently high quality education in the ever changing and information oriented world we live in. This paper illustrates the process, and problems weve experienced and solutions we have used in implementing a new faculty performance evaluation system at our university. We describe the development of the system; its components, the intended outcomes, issues and resistance encountered as the system was implemented and now, how we envision the growth of the system, and what it needs to remain viable and in tune with our overall strategic plan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document