scholarly journals A new nomogram from the SEER database for predicting the prognosis of gallbladder cancer patients after surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (23) ◽  
pp. 738-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zunqiang Xiao ◽  
Zhan Shi ◽  
Linjun Hu ◽  
Yuling Gao ◽  
Junjun Zhao ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ren ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Qinglin Li ◽  
Ruixia Cui ◽  
Yingmu Tong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The effect of previous malignancy history on the survival of individuals with a second primary gallbladder cancer remains unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze the impact of previous malignancy history on the survival of individuals with gallbladder cancer and to compare the prognostic differences between gallbladder cancer patients with and without previous cancer.Methods: Extract the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015 for cases diagnosed with gallbladder cancer. The Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were used to compare the survival difference between gallbladder cancer individuals with and without previous malignancy. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to explore the risk factors of gallbladder cancer.Results: A total of 5861 patients with gallbladder cancer were enrolled, including 5622 (95.9%) patients without prior primary cancer and 239 (4.1%) patients with prior primary cancer. Patients with gallbladder cancer with prior primary malignancy were older, and the tumors were at localized and regional stages more frequently and more early stages. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that gallbladder cancer patients with prior cancer had better overall survival (OS) (P=0.027) and gallbladder cancer-specific survival (GCSS) (P<0.001) before propensity score matching (PSM), and gallbladder cancer patients with prior cancer had better GCSS (P<0.001), and there was no difference in OS (P=0.113) between gallbladder cancer patients with and without prior cancer after PSM. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed that prior malignancy history was not a risk factor for OS (HR=0.875, 95%CI: 0.752-1.018, P=0.084), but it was beneficial to GCSS (HR=0.404, 95%CI: 0.318-0.513, P<0.001).Conclusions: Gallbladder cancer individuals with previous primary malignancy have different clinical characteristics from those without previous primary malignancy. Gallbladder cancer patients with previous primary malignancy have better progress than those without previous malignancy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 470 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-112
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Yoshida ◽  
Kazuaki Shimada ◽  
Nobuyoshi Hiraoka

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
pp. 1167-1172
Author(s):  
Omar Abdel-Rahman ◽  
Winson Y Cheung

Aim: To examine the performance characteristics of alternative criteria for baseline staging, in a cohort of contemporary rectal cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: The SEER database (2010–2015) was accessed and patients with rectal cancer plus complete information on clinical T and N stages as well as metastatic sites were evaluated. We examined various performance characteristics of baseline imaging, including specificity, sensitivity, number needed to investigate (NNI), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value and accuracy. Results: A total of 15,836 rectal cancer patients were included. Based on current guidelines that suggest cross-sectional chest and abdominal imaging for all cases of invasive rectal cancer, these recommendations would yield a PPV of 11.9% for the detection of liver metastases and 6.2% for the detection of lung metastases. This would translate to an NNI of 8.4 for liver metastases and an NNI of 16.1 for lung metastases. When patients with T1N0 were excluded from routine imaging, this resulted in a PPV of 6.4% and an NNI of 15.6 to identify one case of lung metastasis. Likewise, this resulted in a PPV of 12.3% and an NNI of 8.0 to detect one case of liver metastasis. Similarly, when patients with either T1N0 or T2N0 were excluded from routine imaging, the PPV and NNI for lung metastases improved to 6.6% and 15.1, respectively, and the PPV and NNI for liver metastases improved to 12.6 and 7.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the specificity of the current imaging approach for rectal cancer staging is limited and that the omission of chest and abdominal imaging among selected early stage asymptomatic cases may be reasonable to consider.


Tumor Biology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 12867-12875 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shou-Hua Wang ◽  
Ming-Di Zhang ◽  
Xiao-Cai Wu ◽  
Ming-Zhe Weng ◽  
Di Zhou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document