scholarly journals A rapid response team is associated with reduced overall hospital mortality in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a 9-year cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 317-317
Author(s):  
Xiao-Yan Gong ◽  
Yong-Gang Wang ◽  
Hong-Yi Shao ◽  
Peng Lan ◽  
Ru-Shuang Yan ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 692-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger J. Smith ◽  
John D. Santamaria ◽  
Espedito E. Faraone ◽  
Jennifer A. Holmes ◽  
David A. Reid ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 352-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel P. Davis ◽  
Steve A. Aguilar ◽  
Patricia G. Graham ◽  
Brenna Lawrence ◽  
Rebecca E. Sell ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Sessim Filho ◽  
Renato P Azevedo ◽  
Antonildes N Assuncao ◽  
Marcia M Sa ◽  
Felipe D Silva ◽  
...  

Introduction: Early recognition of clinical deterioration in inpatient subjects seems to be one of the main factors associated with prevention of in-hospital severe adverse events occurrence. Previous studies failed to demonstrate that the implementation of a rapid response team (RRT) could reduce in-hospital mortality rate. Hypothesis: Could a RRT implementation reduces in-hospital mortality and/or hospitalizations costs in a private general hospital in Brazil? Methods: This is a retrospective cohort built from data of electronic medical database of consecutive adult inpatients admitted to general wards who had to be transferred to an ICU after an acute clinical deterioration between May 1st, 2012 and June 30th, 2016. Subjects were divided into two groups as follows: group 1 (G1) with those admitted to ICU before RRT implementation on June 1st, 2014 and group 2 (G2) with the ones admitted to ICU after the implementation. All patients in G2 received care by the RRT before ICU admittance. In cases in which a patient had more than one hospital admission, only the first admittance was used for analyses. Results: Patients data are shown in table 1.Outcome data are shown in table 2. Conclusions: From these data, it is possible to infer that this RRT implementation at this hospital was associated with improvement in clinical outcomes of inpatients who needed an ICU admittance after an acute clinical deterioration, as well as a significant reduction of their hospitalization costs. These data reinforce the hypotheses that MERIT study was underpowered. Further multicenter randomized trials, with appropriate statistical power, shall be proposed to address these questions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo David Scatena Gonçales ◽  
Joyce Assis Polessi ◽  
Lital Moro Bass ◽  
Gisele de Paula Dias Santos ◽  
Paula Kiyomi Onaga Yokota ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the implementation of a rapid response team on the rate of cardiorespiratory arrests in mortality associated with cardiorespiratory arrests and on in-hospital mortality in a high complexity general hospital. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of cardiorespiratory arrests and in-hospital mortality events before and after implementation of a rapid response team. The period analyzed covered 19 months before intervention by the team (August 2005 to February 2007) and 19 months after the intervention (March 2007 to September 2008). RESULTS: During the pre-intervention period, 3.54 events of cardiorespiratory arrest/1,000 discharges and 16.27 deaths/1,000 discharges were noted. After the intervention, there was a reduction in the number of cardiorespiratory arrests and in the rate of in-hospital mortality; respectively, 1.69 events of cardiorespiratory arrest/1,000 discharges (p<0.001) and 14.34 deaths/1,000 discharges (p=0.029). CONCLUSION: The implementation of the rapid response team may have caused a significant reduction in the number of cardiorespiratory arrests. It was estimated that during the period from March 2007 to September 2008, the intervention probably saved 67 lives.


Resuscitation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice LeGuen ◽  
Yvonne Ballueer ◽  
Richard McKay ◽  
Glenn Eastwood ◽  
Rinaldo Bellomo ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 182S ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Meredith ◽  
Steven Q. Simpson ◽  
Carol Cleek ◽  
Timothy Williamson ◽  
Amy O’Brien-Ladner

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merlina Sulistio ◽  
Michael Franco ◽  
Amanda Vo ◽  
Peter Poon ◽  
Leeroy William

Background: Approximately one-third of rapid response team consultations involve issues of end-of-life care. We postulate a greater occurrence in patients with a life-limiting illness, in whom the opportunity for advance care planning and palliative care involvement should be offered. Aims: We aim to review the characteristics and compare outcomes of rapid response team consultations on patients with and without a life-limiting illness. Design/Setting: A 3-month retrospective cohort study of all rapid response team consultations was conducted. The sample population included all adult inpatients in a major teaching hospital network. Results: We identified 351 patients – including 139 with a life-limiting illness – receiving a total of 456 rapid response team consultations. The median time from admission to the first rapid response team consultation was 3 days. Patients with a life-limiting illness had a significantly higher mortality rate (41.7% vs 13.2%), were older (72.6 vs 63.5 years), more likely to come from a residential aged-care facility (29.5% vs 4.1%) and had a shorter hospital stay (10 vs 13 days). Rapid response team consultations resulted in a change to more palliative goals of care in 28.5% of patients, of whom two-thirds had a life-limiting illness. Conclusion: Patients with a life-limiting illness had worse outcomes post–rapid response team consultation. Our findings suggest that a routine clarification of goals of care for this cohort, within 3 days of hospital admission, may be advantageous. These discussions may provide clarity of purpose to treating teams, reduce the burden of unnecessary interventions and promote patient-centred care agreed upon in advance of any deterioration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document