scholarly journals Big Data, Large-Scale Text Analysis, and Public Health Research

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (S2) ◽  
pp. S126-S127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merlin Chowkwanyun
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract About 90% of the biomedical data accessible to researchers was created in the last two years. These data have a very meaningful impact both in creating public policies on health, as well as public health research. This certainly implies complex technical problems on how to store, analyse and distribute data, but it also brings relevant epistemological issues. In this workshop we will present some of such problems and discuss how epistemic innovation is key in order to tackle ethical issues related to the use of big data in public health research. Databases implied in public health research are so huge that they rise relevant questions about how scientific method is applied, such as what counts as evidence of a hypothesis when data can not be directly apprehended by humans, how to distinguish correlation from causation, or in which cases the provider of a database can be considered co-author of a research paper. To consider such issues nowadays, current protocols do not hold, and we need innovation in methodological and epistemic procedures. At the same time, due to the fact that a relevant deal of such biomedical data is linked to individual people, and how medical data can be used to predict and transform human behavior, there are ethical questions difficult to solve as they imply new challenges. Some of them are related to communication issues, so patients and citizens understand these new ethical problems that didn't arise before the development of big data; others relate to the way in which public health researchers can and can't store, analyse and distribute information, and some others relate to the limits on which technologies are ethically, safe and which ones bring erosion of basic human rights. The four contributions in the workshop analyse these questions in some detail. During the workshop we will present a coherent understanding on what is epistemic innovation, some logical tools necessary for its development, and then we will discuss several cases on how epistemic innovation applies to different aspects of public health research, also commenting its relevance when tackling ethical problems that may arise. Key messages The workshop deepens the ethical and epistemological innovations involved in public health policies and research, specially related to big data. The workshop analyses novel aspects of public health ethics


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (S1) ◽  
pp. S37-S38 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Rosen ◽  
Mara Buchbinder ◽  
Eric Juengst ◽  
Stuart Rennie

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract As for many other scientific domains, public health is nowadays contemplating the opportunities of using but also the challenges of mastering large routinely collected data ('big data') in order to generate knowledge, and to inform and evaluate decisions and policies. In a wide perspective, “public health relevant big data” extends from the “omics” to social network postings. In this workshop we will concentrate on electronic health records and medical claims data (hereafter referred to as eHRs) which are increasingly being used in public health research and practice. Depending of the national and historical contexts, eHRs encompass details pertaining not only to hospital admissions but also to deaths and infectious diseases registrations, prescriptions and contacts with health services. As a result, eHRs datasets are both long (ie, vast number of records) and wide (i.e., vast amount of information per record). Although the usual public health and epidemiological concepts of inference and causation are still relevant for the analysis of big health data and interpretation of their results, a new set of methodological approaches is also necessary to tackle them. These include for instance quasi-experimental/natural experimental analysis, data mining and machine learning. Recent reviews have demonstrated that these data science terms have corresponding concepts in public health research. This workshop will discuss the use of large routinely collected data in public health with a specific focus on eHRs. The objectives are: to understand the specificity of eHRs in the wider domain of big data; to discuss the challenges imposed when using such data (e.g., data heterogeneity, fragmentation, handling, access, privacy), to discuss how the analysis of big data can assist public health researchers, evaluators and policy-makers; to discuss their advantages and limitations; to outline the methodological, legal and ethical challenges that this entails. Following a brief introduction, the workshop will continue with 5 presentations drawing from a variety of national contexts. The spectrum will spread from countries where eHRs and data linkage have been applied for some years (e.g., Finland, Singapore), to others where development are more recent (France) or even being initiated (Brazil). Together, the presentations will address issues related to the development of big data set, access and training of users and implementation in public health research and practice. The remaining time will be dedicated to interaction with the audience and conclusion. Key messages Access and use of big data in the context of public health practice and research is spreading fast. The challenges ahead consist of maintaining and securing vast amount of heterogeneous health and related data, and in building the capacity to analyse them using old and new analytical approaches.


Author(s):  
Effy Vayena ◽  
Lawrence Madoff

“Big data,” which encompasses massive amounts of information from both within the health sector (such as electronic health records) and outside the health sector (social media, search queries, cell phone metadata, credit card expenditures), is increasingly envisioned as a rich source to inform public health research and practice. This chapter examines the enormous range of sources, the highly varied nature of these data, and the differing motivations for their collection, which together challenge the public health community in ethically mining and exploiting big data. Ethical challenges revolve around the blurring of three previously clearer boundaries: between personal health data and nonhealth data; between the private and the public sphere in the online world; and, finally, between the powers and responsibilities of state and nonstate actors in relation to big data. Considerations include the implications for privacy, control and sharing of data, fair distribution of benefits and burdens, civic empowerment, accountability, and digital disease detection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Amri ◽  
Christina Angelakis ◽  
Dilani Logan

Abstract Objective Through collating observations from various studies and complementing these findings with one author’s study, a detailed overview of the benefits and drawbacks of asynchronous email interviewing is provided. Through this overview, it is evident there is great potential for asynchronous email interviews in the broad field of health, particularly for studies drawing on expertise from participants in academia or professional settings, those across varied geographical settings (i.e. potential for global public health research), and/or in circumstances when face-to-face interactions are not possible (e.g. COVID-19). Results Benefits of asynchronous email interviewing and additional considerations for researchers are discussed around: (i) access transcending geographic location and during restricted face-to-face communications; (ii) feasibility and cost; (iii) sampling and inclusion of diverse participants; (iv) facilitating snowball sampling and increased transparency; (v) data collection with working professionals; (vi) anonymity; (vii) verification of participants; (viii) data quality and enhanced data accuracy; and (ix) overcoming language barriers. Similarly, potential drawbacks of asynchronous email interviews are also discussed with suggested remedies, which centre around: (i) time; (ii) participant verification and confidentiality; (iii) technology and sampling concerns; (iv) data quality and availability; and (v) need for enhanced clarity and precision.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 89-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna F. Stroup ◽  
C. Kay Smith ◽  
Benedict I. Truman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document