Comparision of Fetal Weight Estimation at Term by Clinical Method, Ultrasound and after Delivery

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-87
Author(s):  
Naga Prathyusha ◽  
◽  
Prashant Joshi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation

scholarly journals Sonographic Versus Clinical Fetal Weight Estimation Accuracy

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Amr abd el Fattah El Helali ◽  
Amal el Shabrawi El Sayed ◽  
Wesal Hamdi Ali Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Altman Plot ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Plot Analysis ◽  
Ultrasound Assessment ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Sonographic fetal weight estimation is an important component of antenatal care. It was found to be more reliable method to establish fetal weight at term and more consistent in various period of gestations. Aim of study: to compare clinical and sonographic methods for assessment of fetal weight regarding sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Subjects and Methods: The study recruited 100 women scheduled for delivery from ante-natal care clinic with 38 weeks or more of gestation. Fetal weight was assed clinically and by ultrasound. Both techniques were compared and analyzed. Results: Ultrasound assessment of fetal weight showed better performance than the clinical method regarding absolute errors and error percentages. Ultrasound assessment showed better sensitivity and specificity in detecting fetal weight > 3500 gm. Moreover, it showed less bias on Bland–Altman plot analysis. Conclusions: Ultrasound assessment of fetal weight is safe, reliable and sensitive method of fetal weight estimation.

scholarly journals Clinical versus ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation and its correlation with actual birth weight

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Ashwini Ingale ◽  
Shweta Avinash Khade ◽  
Sneha Shirodkar
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mean Absolute Percentage Error ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Absolute Percentage Error

Background: This is a prospective study was conducted at Obstetrics and Gynecology department, tertiary care Hospital, to compare the accuracy of clinical and ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight at term with actual birth weight.Methods: The present study is a prospective comparative study of fetal weight estimation in Antenatal women with term gestation (37week to 42week of gestation) singleton pregnancy with vertex presentation, who had gestational age confirmed by dates and ultrasound scanning of< 22weeks admitted in tertiary care center from March 2016 to November 2016. Patients with Polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios, Antepartum hemorrhage, Congenital anomalies of fetus, Obese (Body mass index >30 kilogram/meter2) are excluded from the study. Estimation of fetal weight is done by clinical method and ultrasonography. Birth weight after delivery was recorded in grams by electronic weighing machine and tabulated.Results: Clinical as well as ultrasonography estimates observed to be strongly correlate with actual birth weight. Both the methods had more sensitivity in birth weight range 2500-4000gm than <2500g and >4000g. The overall mean absolute percentage error of the clinical method (7.2±7.7) was smaller than that of the sonographic method (16.2±11.1). In low birth-weight (<2,500g) group, mean absolute percentage error was 9.0±11.3 with USG and same with clinical was 11.7±9.0. No statistically significant difference was observed.Conclusions: The present study concludes that clinical estimation of birth-weight is as accurate as routine ultrasonographic estimation.Clinical palpation should be considered as diagnostic tool for FWE and is equally reliable even when done by trained medical person. It is cheap and easy to teach. The need is to practically apply this method in obstetrics and guide the management decisions.

scholarly journals Clinical Estimation of Fetal Weight with Reference to Johnson’s Formula: An Alternative Solution Adjacent to Sonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-12
Author(s):  
A. Dongol ◽  
R. Bastakoti ◽  
N. Pradhan ◽  
N. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation

Background Fetal weight estimation plays a significant role in the antenatal management of high risk pregnancies. It is also an important parameter for predicting the neonatal outcome and informs decision for the mode of intra-partum management of the pregnant women. Among the various methods of prenatal fetal weight estimation, the most commonly used are clinical estimation and sonography. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of clinical estimation of fetal weight using Johnson’s formula and sonographic estimation with actual birth weight. Method This prospective study was conducted at Dhulikhel Hospital, Kathmandu University Hospital, from January 2017 to August 2018. The study included 335 pregnant women at term gestation. Result The estimation of fetal weight at term pregnancy using Johnson’s formula is as effective as sonological method. For clinical method, the fetal weight falls between 95 gm and 183 gm at 95% confidence interval. With respect to ultrasound method, the fetal weight is found to be 45 gm and 132 gm at 95% confidence interval at p value < 0.001. Conclusion Clinical estimation of fetal weight can be utilized as an alternative to sonological estimation in the management of labor and delivery. Johnson’s formula is a simple, easy, cost-effective, and universally applicable method to predict fetal birth weight and can be used anywhere by doctors, nurses, midwives and paramedics in centers where ultrasound is not available.

scholarly journals Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight and correlation with the birth weight: a research article

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 3595
Author(s):  
Alvencia Vaz ◽  
Aheibam Bidya Devi ◽  
Naorem Nabakishore Singh ◽  
Wahengbam Jatishwor Singh ◽  
Laiphrakpam Ranjit Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Developing Countries ◽  
Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Clinical Method ◽  
Ultrasound Method ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Method R

Background: Accurate estimation of fetal weight is of paramount importance in the management of labour and childbirth. In developing countries including India, estimation of fetal weight by clinical method is important as ultrasound is not available in all health care settings. In view of this, the present study was conducted to estimate the fetal weight assessed by clinical and ultrasound method and correlating with the birth weight.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate fetal weight clinically by using Johnson’s formula and sonographically based on Hadlock’s formula in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in collaboration with Department of Radiodiagnosis, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Imphal from October 2016 to March 2018. The study consisted of 525 pregnant women between 37 to 40 weeks of gestation in whom delivery was anticipated within one week of fetal weight estimation by clinical and ultrasound method and correlating it with the baby’s birth weight measured immediately after delivery. Analysis was done using Chi-square and Student’s t-test and p-value of <0.05 was taken as significant.Results: Both methods showed positive correlation with birth weight but clinical method (r=0.925) had stronger correlation compared with ultrasound method (r=0.508).Conclusions: Fetal weight estimation using Johnson’s formula had stronger correlation with the birth weight than ultrasound method and hence, useful for developing countries and all health care workers may be sensitized about the method. 

Macrosomia – a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation

2008 ◽  
Vol 68 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
NC Hart ◽  
J Siemer ◽  
B Meurer ◽  
TW Goecke ◽  
RL Schild
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
New Formula

Discrepancy Analysis between Clinical Versus Ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight and Actual Birth Weight at 3rd Trimester

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Naznin Rashid Shewly ◽  
Menoka Ferdous ◽  
Hasina Begum ◽  
Shahadat Hossain Khan ◽  
Sheema Rani Debee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: In obstetric management fetal weight estimation is an important consideration when planning the mode of delivery in our day to day practice. In Bangladesh low birth weight is a major public health problem & incidence is 38% - 58%. Neonatal mortality and morbidity also yet high. So accurate antenatal estimation of fetal weight is a good way to detect macrosomia or small for date baby. Thus to improve the pregnancy outcome and neonatal outcome decreasing various chance of neonatal mortality and morbidity antenatal fetal weight prediction is an invaluable parameter in some situation where to identify the at risk pregnancy for low birth weight become necessary. Reliable method for prenatal estimation of fetal weight two modalities have got popularity - Clinical estimation and another one is ultrasonic estimation. This study was designed to determine the accuracy of clinical versus ultrasound estimated fetal weight detecting the discrepancy with actual birth weight at third trimester. So that we can verify more reliable and accurate method. Objectives: To find out more accurate and reliable modality of fetal weight estimation in antenatal period during obstetric management planning. To compare clinical versus ultrasound estimated fetal weight & to determine discrepancy of both variable with actual birth weight. Method: This prospective, cross sectional analytical study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January 2006 to December 2006. By purposive sampling 100 pregnant women fulfilling inclusion criteria were included in my study in third trimester (29wks-40wks). In clinical weight estimation procedure SFH (Symphysio Fundal Height) was measured in centimeter. On pervaginal finding whether vertex below or above the ischial spine was determined. By Johnson’s formula fetal weight in grams was estimated. Then by ultrasound scan different biometric measurements were taken and finally by Hadlock’s formula fetal weight was estimated. Eventually actual birth weight was taken after birth by Globe Brand weighing machine. Accuracy of both modalities were compared and which one was more reliable predictor was determined by statistical analysis. Results: After data collection were analyzed by computer based software (SPSS). There was gradual and positive relationship between symphysiofundal height and estimated birth weight. Discrepancy between clinical and actual birth weight at third trimester was statistically significant – Paired Student’s ‘t’ test was done where p value was <0.001. Whereas discrepancy between sonographically estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight was not statistically significant (by paired ‘t’ test where p value was >0.05). That implies discrepancy between ultrasound estimated fetal weight and actual birth weight was significantly less than that of clinically estimated fetal weight. 14% clinically and 46% sonographically estimated fetal weight were observed within £ 5% of actual birth weight. 31% clinical and 42% sonographically estimates observed within 6% to 10% of actual birth weight and 55% clinical and 12% sonographically estimate were >10% of actual birth weight. That is about 88% sonographical versus 45% clinical estimates were within 10% of actual birth weight. Conclusion: There is no doubt about importance of fetal weight in many obstetric situations. Clinical decisions at times depends on fetal weight. Whether to use oxytocin, to use forceps or vacuum for delivery or extend of trial or ended by Caesarian section immediately or no scope of trial to be largely depend on fetal size and weight. So more accurate modality for antenatal fetal weight estimation has paramount importance. In my study sonographically estimated weight have more accuracy than that of clinical estimate in predicting actual birth weight. Sonographically estimated fetal weight is more reliable, accurate and reproducible rather than other modality. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, June 2019, Vol.11(1); 32-38

scholarly journals Differences in Biometric Fetal Weight Estimation Accuracy and Doppler Examination Results in Uncomplicated Term Singleton Pregnancies between Vertex and Breech Presentation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3252
Author(s):  
Lukas Jennewein ◽  
Simon Theissen ◽  
Hemma Roswitha Pfeifenberger ◽  
Nadja Zander ◽  
Kyra Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Middle Cerebral Artery ◽  
Cerebral Artery ◽  
Umbilical Artery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Estimation Accuracy ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Presentation Group ◽  
Chi2 Test

Doppler examination of the umbilical artery and the fetal middle cerebral artery is evaluated predominantly in pregnancies with fetuses in cephalic presentation and never has been elucidated in breech presentation. Evidence on the accuracy of fetal weight estimation in dependence of the fetal presentation is controversial. Nevertheless, clinical decisions including recommendations for a cesarean section or labor induction based on these examinations are applied to pregnancies with fetuses in breech presentation. The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of the fetal presentation on fetal weight estimation accuracy, umbilical artery and middle cerebral artery resistance indices (RI) in a prospective case control study. Ultrasound examinations in 305 uncomplicated term pregnancies (153 vertex presentations, 152 breech) were investigated. Non-parametric variables were compared using Pearson’s chi2 test and Wilcoxon chi2 test, depending on variable scaling. Fetal weight estimation accuracy was not significantly different between vertex presentation group (VP) (6.97%) and breech presentation group (BP) (7.96%, p = 0.099). Fetal head circumference measurements were significantly larger in BP (350 mm vs. 341 mm in VB, p > 0.0001) while abdominal circumferences were significantly smaller (VP: 338 mm, BP: 331 mm, p = 0.0039) and weight estimation was not significantly different. Umbilical artery RIs were not significantly different between VP (54.5) and BP (55.3, p = 0.354). Fetal middle cerebral artery RIs also showed no significant differences (VP: 71.2, BP: 70.7, p = 0.335). Our study shows that fetal Doppler (RI) and weight estimation ultrasound originally calibrated in cephalic pregnancies are applicable to pregnancies with fetuses in breech presentation.

Effect of Ob/Gyn Residents’ Fatigue and Training Level on the Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahi Ben-Aroya ◽  
David Segal ◽  
Amnon Hadar ◽  
Mordechai Hallak ◽  
Michael Friger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Training Level ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
And Training
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document