scholarly journals Determinan Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using Fraud Pentagon Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
Fidyah Quraini ◽  
Yuni Rimawati
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Report ◽  
External Auditors ◽  
Monitoring Quality

This research aimed at knowing factors of fraudulent financial reporting using pentagon fraud analysis. This research analyzed the influence of financial target, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external auditors, change of auditors, change of directors, and number of CEO’s picture in fraudulent financial report. Sample in this research were 14 go public government companies from 2013 to 2017. Source of data in this research were secondary data in form of annual report in official website of Indonesia Stock Exchange. The examination of this research used logistic regression. The result of this study showed that the influence of external pressure expected fraudulent financial report, while financial target, financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external auditors, changing auditors, changing directors, and a number of CEO’s picture often did not influence the fraudulent financial reporting.

Pengaruh fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi fraudulent financial reporting

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-25
Author(s):  
Antonius Dwi Maryadi ◽  
◽  
Pratana Puspa Midiastuty ◽  
Eddy Suranta ◽  
Anton Robiansyah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Pressure Change ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
External Audit ◽  
Monitoring Quality

Purpose: This study aims to provide empirical evidence of the influence of financial targets, financial stability, external pressure, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audits, change in auditors, change of director and frequent number of CEO's picture in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Research methodology: This study proves that financial targets, external pressure, change in auditors, and frequent numbers of CEO's picture have an effect on detecting fraudulent financial reporting while financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audit, and change of director are not influential in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Results: This study proves that financial targets, external pressure, change in auditors, and frequent numbers of CEO's picture have an effect on detecting fraudulent financial reporting while financial stability, institutional ownership, ineffective monitoring, quality of external audit, and change of director are not influential in detecting fraudulent financial reporting. Limitations: This study used logistic regression analysis using a combined model of Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score that still contained an inaccurate classification of fraud and non-fraud. In the research, the R-Square value was low which meant that the ability of independent variables to influence the dependent variable was still low. Contribution: This research is expected to enrich the literature and references that can be used as a reference in other studies as well as in the company. The results of this study are expected to provide a deeper understanding of how to predict fraudulent financial reporting using the Beneish M-Score and Altman Z-Score. Keywords: Fraudulent financial reporting, Fraud pentagon, Beneish M-Score, Altman Z-Score

scholarly journals ANALISIS ELEMEN-ELEMEN FRAUD PENTAGON SEBAGAI DETERMINAN FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING

KEBERLANJUTAN ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 950
Author(s):  
Khusnatul Zulfa ◽  
Amira Bayagub
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Auditor Change ◽  
External Auditor

AbstractThis study aims to examine the influence of externalxpressure, institutionalownership, xfinancial stability, xquality of external auditor, xchange inxauditor, change in director and frequentxnumber of CEO’s picture on the fraudulent financial reporting among the property and real estate firms listed in Indonesia stock exchange during 2014-2016. The data used in this study is secondary data obtained from the firms’ annual report which was accessed through www.idx.co.id. The data analysis method used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. SPSS ver 2.0 was used to analyze the data. The samples were selected using a non-probability sampling technique with a purposive sampling method and obtained a sample of 41 property and real estate companies during 2014-2016. The results of variable test indicates that external pressure and change in director partially influences fraudulent financial reporting, while institutional ownership, financial stability, quality of external auditor, change in auditor, and frequent number of CEO’s picture partially does not influence fraudulent financial reporting. The Simultaneous test shows that external pressure, institutional ownership, financial stability, quality of external auditor, change in auditor, change in director and frequent number of CEO’s picture Keywords: External Pressure, Institutional Ownership, Financial Stability, Quality of External Auditor, Change in Auditor, Change in Director, Frequent Number of CEO’s Picture, Fraudulent Financial Reporting.

scholarly journals DETEKSI FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS FRAUD PENTAGON : STUDI KASUS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG LISTED DI BEI TAHUN 2014-2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-106
Author(s):  
Erma Setiawati ◽  
Ratih Mar Baningrum
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Variable Pressure ◽  
Fraud Triangle ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Auditor Change ◽  
External Auditor

This study aimed to analyze and obtain empirical evidence about the effect of pentagon fraud elements (pressure, opportunity, rationalization, competence, and arrogance) on detected fraudulent financial reporting. This research analyzes the influence of variable pressure proxied by financial stability, financial target, external pressure and personal financial needs, variable opportunity proxied by nature of industry, ineffective monitoring, and, quality of external auditor, variable rationalization proxied by change in auditor, variable arrogance proxied by frequent number of CEO’s pictures.Population of this study manufactured company in Indonesia Stock Exchange during year period 2014-2016 with a total sample 252 manufacture company by using purposive sampling method. Data analysis technique used was logistic regression analysis processed by using program SPSS 23  for Windows. The results of this study show that only the variable financial target have an effect to detected fraudulent financial reporting. This study hasn’t shown that financial stability, external pressure , personal financial needs, nature of industry, ineffective monitoring, quality of external auditor, change in auditor, change of directors, frequent number of CEO’s pictures have an effect to detected fraudulent financial reporting.Keywords: Fraud Pentagon, Fraud Diamond, Fraud Triangle, Fraudulent Financial Reporting, Manufactured Sector Fraud.

scholarly journals Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 625-646
Author(s):  
Erni Suryandari Fathmaningrum ◽  
Gupita Anggarani
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Auditor Change ◽  
External Auditor ◽  
Financial Need

Research aims: This study aims to examine the influence of fraud pentagon concept on fraudulent financial reporting.Design/Methodology/Approach: This study’s population was manufacturingcompanies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and Malaysia Stock Exchange. 120 manufacturing companies in Indonesia and 118 manufacturing companies in Malaysia were involved as samples. The data analysis method used in this study is multiple linear regression.Research findings: The results showed that financial target, financial stability, quality of external auditor, external pressure, and nature of industry variables influenced fraudulent financial reporting. In contrast, personal financial need, ineffective monitoring, change in auditor, change in director, and frequent number of CEO’s pictures variables had no effect on fraudulent financial reporting. For Indonesia, it was found that financial target, financial stability, and the quality of external auditor influenced fraudulent financial reporting. While, in Malaysia, the results showed that financial stability, external pressure, and nature of industry variables influenced fraudulent financial reporting in Malaysia.Theoretical contribution/Originality: These results support the financial target and quality of external auditor hypothesis in Indonesia, financial stability hypothesis in Indonesia and Malaysia, external pressure and nature of industry hypotheses in Malaysia, stating that fraud pentagon factors affect fraudulent financial reporting. It is also proved that there are different levels of fraudulent financial reporting in Indonesia and Malaysia. Indonesia has fraudulent financial reporting cases higher than Malaysia.

scholarly journals Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Akuntabilitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-152
Author(s):  
Wulanda Maya Sari ◽  
Anik Irawati
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Spss Software ◽  
Score Model

This study aims to empirically prove the influence of financial stability, external pressure, and ineffective monitoring on fraudulent financial reporting. Financial stability was measured using a comparison of total assets. External pressure was measured using leverage. Meanwhile, ineffective monitoring was measured using the ratio of independent commissioners’ number. The dependent variable in this study was fraudulent financial reporting. It was measured using the F-Score Model. The sample in this study were 21 State Owned Enterprises (BUMN) listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in period of 2017-2019. The data analysis method used in this study was Logistic Regression using SPSS software version 20. The results of this study indicate that financial stability has no influence on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, external pressure and ineffective monitoring influence fraudulent financial reporting.How to cite:Sari, W. M., & Irawati, A. (2021). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Akuntabilitas: Jurnal Ilmu Akuntansi, 14(2), 139-152.

FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING ON PROPERTY, REAL ESTATE, AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 132
Author(s):  
Anik Mega Cahyani ◽  
Elva Nuraina ◽  
Farida Styaningrum
Keyword(s):  
Real Estate ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Building Construction ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
External Auditors ◽  
Construction Companies ◽  
Data Collection Technique

<p class="JurnalASSETSABSTRAK"><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p><p>The purpose of this research is to detect fraudulent financial reporting in the property, real estate, and building construction sectors listed on the IDX based on the perspective of the fraud pentagon theory. The data collection technique used purposive sampling and data analysis using logistic regression. The results indicate that external pressure factors, ineffective monitoring, quality of external auditors, auditor turnover, rationalization proxied by auditor opinion, change of directors, and political connections affected FFR. Meanwhile, financial target factors, financial stability, institutional ownership, and the frequency of the appearance of the CEO image in the annual report do not affect FFR.</p><p class="JurnalASSETSABSTRAK"><strong><em>ABSTRAK</em></strong><em></em></p><p><em>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan pada sektor properti, real estate, dan konstruksi bangunan yang terdaftar di BEI berdasar perspektif teori fraud pentagon. Pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dan analisis data menggunakan regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor tekanan eksternal, pengawasan yang tidak efektif, kualitas auditor eksternal, pergantian auditor, rasionalisasi yang diproksikan dengan opini auditor, pergantian direksi, dan hubungan politik berpengaruh terhadap FFR. Sedangkan faktor target keuangan, stabilitas keuangan, kepemilikan institusional, dan frekuensi kemunculan gambar CEO dalam laporan tahunan tidak berpengaruh terhadap FFR.</em></p>

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH FRAUD PENTAGON DALAM MENDETEKSI FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING PADA PERUSAHAAN JASA NONKEUANGAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-124
Author(s):  
Yuliamos Tirta Wijaya Pasaribu ◽  
Synthia Madya Kusumawati ◽  
L. Jade Faliany
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Service Companies ◽  
Positive Effect

Abstract– This research aimed at analyzing the effect of fraud pentagon proxied by nine variables, namely financial stability, personal financial needs, external pressure, financial targets, ineffective monitoring, industry characteristics, auditor changes, director changes, and frequent number of CEO’s picture towards fraudulent financial reporting proxied by Beneish M-Score at non-financial service companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) period 2015-2017. The data used were secondary data obtained from annual reports and financial statements of nonfinancial service companies period 2015-2017 with a total of 285 eligible samples. The data analysis methods used were descriptive statistical analysis and logistic regression analysis. The results showed that the variables of financial stability and the nature of the industry generated a significant and positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting. Meanwhile, the variables of personal financial needs, external pressure, financial targets, ineffective monitoring, auditor changes, director changes, and often the CEO's image were not significant to fraudulent financial reporting. Keywords: Fraud Pentagon, Fradulent Financial Reporting, Beneish M-Score

scholarly journals Detecting the Likelihood of Fraudulent Financial Reporting: An Analysis of Fraud Diamond

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-68
Author(s):  
Reni Yendrawati ◽  
◽  
Huda Aulia ◽  
Hendi Yogi Prabowo ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Earnings Management ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Pressure Factor

This paper aims to analyze the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting using the fraud diamond analysis. Fraud diamond is a concept explaining factors that cause someone to commit fraud, namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability. In this research, pressure factor was proxied by using financial stability, external pressure, and financial target. Opportunity factor was proxied by using the nature of industry and effectiveness of monitoring. Rationalization factor was proxied by rationalization and capability was proxied by capability. This research made use of earnings management to discover the likelihood of financial statement frauds. Earnings management was measured by using F-score indicator. The population in this research were manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) from the year 2014 – 2016. From the population, 31 companies were selected as the research samples by using the purposive sampling method. This quantitative method-using research was analyzed using multiple regression analysis and T-tests for hypotheses testing. The research findings reveal that only the opportunity variable proxied by industrial nature is proven to have an influence in detecting the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. In the meantime, other variables have no influence in detecting the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Keywords: fraud diamond, likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting, f-score

scholarly journals Analisa teori fraud pentagon sebagai pendeteksi kecurangan pada laporan keuangan

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ananda Putra Nindhita Aulia Haqq ◽  
Gideon Setyo Budiwitjaksono
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Internal Control ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Political Connection ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Auditor Change ◽  
Report Data

Financial statements are the results of financial reporting that can describe the results of an entity’s financial performance for a period. In other hand, it can cause managers in an entity to fraudulent financial reporting because they want to describe good financial performance. This proves that fraudu-lent financial reporting cases in Indonesia are a matter of weak internal control in an entity. This study aims to test fraud pentagon theory in de-tecting fraudulent financial reporting. The object of this research is testing on financial target, financial stability, external pressure, ineffective moni-toring, nature of industry, change in auditor, change in director, frequent number of CEO, political connection and company existence against fraud-ulent financial reporting of companies classified in the LQ45 index on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) during the period 2015-2017. This study uses 78 annual report data taken with proportional random sampling based on the number of proportions in each sector of the company. Data analysis using multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that financial stability and frequent number of CEO can be used to detect fraudulent financial reporting. While, financial target, external pressure, ineffective monitoring, nature of industry, change in auditor, change in director, political connection and company existence cannot be used to de-tect fraudulent financial reporting.

scholarly journals Fraud diamond: Detection analysis on the fraudulent financial reporting

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 116-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefani Lily Indarto ◽  
Imam Ghozali
Keyword(s):  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Stability ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
External Pressure ◽  
Fraudulent Financial Reporting ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Public Accountant

The accounting scandal became one of the reasons for analyzing financial statements in order to minimize fraud against the financial reporting. Therefore, companies use the services of a public accountant to audit the financial statements of companies that are expected to limit the fraudulent practices that increase the public’s confidence in the company’s financial statements. This study aims to detect fraud by using analysis of fraud diamond . This study takes banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2009-2014, with a total sample of 149 banks. Based on the results the external pressure, financial stability and capability have influence on fraudulent financial reporting. While target financial, ineffective monitoring and rationalization does not affect the fraudulent financial reporting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document