THE IMPACT OF DISTANCE TEACHING AND LEARNING ON THE WELL-BEING OF TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW PROTOCOL OF COVID-19-RELATED RESEARCH

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Philipp Czakert ◽  
Giovanna Paglioli Ballesteiros ◽  
Rita Berger
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Distance Teaching ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Related Research ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Systematic review protocol exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the wellbeing of general practitioners

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Jefferson ◽  
Su Golder ◽  
Veronica Dale ◽  
Holly Essex ◽  
Elizabeth McHugh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Health And Wellbeing ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
The Impact

Background Over recent years chronic stress and burnout have been reported by doctors working in general practice in the UK NHS and internationally. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed general practitioners working lives; adding potential pressures from avoiding infection and addressing pent-up demand for care, but also changing processes such as rapidly taking up remote consultations. To date, there has been a focus on exploring the impact of the pandemic on the wellbeing of hospital clinicians. No registered systematic reviews currently focus on exploring the impact of the pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of general practitioners. Aims and objectives To synthesise the current international evidence base exploring the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health and wellbeing of general practitioners, and which factors are associated with their reported mental health and wellbeing during the pandemic. Methods In this paper we report a systematic review protocol, following PRISMA guidance. In our search strategy we will identify primary research studies or systematic reviews exploring the mental health and wellbeing of general practitioners during the COVID-19 pandemic in four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsychInfo and Medrxiv) and Google Scholar. We will hand-search reference lists and grey literature. Two reviewers will undertake all stages including study selection, data extraction and quality assessment, with arbitration by a third reviewer where necessary. We will use standardised quality assessment tools to ensure transparency and reduce bias in quality assessment. Depending on the quality of included studies, we may undertake a sensitivity analysis by excluding studies from narrative synthesis that are rated as low quality using the checklists. We will describe the findings across studies using narrative thematic data synthesis, and if sufficiently homogenous data are identified, we will pool quantitative findings through meta-analysis.

scholarly journals Impact of canine-assisted interventions on the health and well-being of older people residing in long-term care: a mixed methods systematic review protocol

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 2140-2147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Stern ◽  
Lucylynn Lizarondo ◽  
Judith Carrier ◽  
Christina Godfrey ◽  
Kendra Rieger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Older People ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
Health And Well Being

scholarly journals Screening strategies for hypertension: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e025043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bey-Marrié Schmidt ◽  
Solange Durão ◽  
Ingrid Toews ◽  
Charlotte M Bavuma ◽  
Joerg J Meerpohl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Systematic Review Protocol ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Review Protocol ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionIt is unclear whether early detection of hypertension, through screening, leads to healthier behaviours and better control of blood pressure levels. There is a need to learn from studies that have assessed the impact of different screening approaches on patient important outcomes. This systematic review protocol outlines the methods that will be used to assess the comparative effectiveness of different screening strategies (mass, targeted or opportunistic) for hypertension to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension.Methods and analysisWe will primarily search Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). Relevant randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after, interrupted time series and prospective analytic cohort studies regardless of publication date, language and geographic location, will be included. We are interested in clinical, adverse event and health system outcomes. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles against inclusion criteria; perform data extraction and assess risk of bias in included studies. We will assess the certainty of the overall evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and report findings accordingly.Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval will be sought, as only secondary studies will be used. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018093046.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document