Natural Dumpflood in Malaysia Succeeds as Low-Cost Offshore Oil-Recovery Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (01) ◽  
pp. 51-52
Author(s):  
Judy Feder

This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Judy Feder, contains highlights of paper SPE 196498, “First Natural Dumpflood in Malaysia: A Successful Breakthrough for Maximizing Oil Recovery in an Offshore Environment With Low-Cost Secondary Recovery,” by Muhammad Abdulhadi, SPE, Toan Van Tran, SPE, and Najmi Mansor, Dialog Group, et al., prepared for the 2019 SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bali, Indonesia, 29–31 October. The paper has not been peer reviewed. The complete paper describes the first successful implementation of natural dumpflooding offshore Malaysia as a case study to provide insight into the value of using the approach to maximize oil recovery in a mature field, particularly in a low-margin business climate. Background Field B, located offshore Balingian province approximately 80 km northwest of Bintulu, has a water depth of 90 ft and is highly compartmentalized and faulted, with almost 100 faults present. The field features three subfields further divided into nine major fault compartments. Eight primary reservoirs exist, with more than 20 subreservoirs stacked atop one another with multiple drive mechanisms, including water drive, gas-cap drive, and solution gas drive. Several of these subreservoirs are thick sands between which communication exists through juxtapositions, shared gas caps, or aquifer. Other subreservoirs are isolated by thin layers of shale apparent in certain wells but absent in others. The high complexity of Field B requires any opportunity identified to be thoroughly evaluated and examined before execution. Field B is a moderately sized field discovered in 1976, with production commencing in 1984. During the 30 years of oil production, the field peaked at 30,000 B/D in 1990 and dipped to 3,000 B/D in late 1999. The facilities consist of four drilling platforms, a processing platform, and a compressor platform. A total of 48 wells were drilled in the field, with most wells completed as dual-string producers. The recovery factor (RF) of the reservoirs ranges from 10% for solution gas drive to 50% for strong water drive. The behaviors of these reservoirs are starkly different. The solution gas-drive reservoirs have poor-quality sand (less than 200 md), a low productivity index, limited sand thickness (less than 30 ft), limited sand connectivity, and sharp pressure decline after 2 to 3 years of production. The water-drive reservoirs, however, have good-quality sand (up to 5,000 md), a high productivity index, thick sand (greater than 40 ft), extensive sand connectivity, and limited pressure decline. The stark differences in the reservoirs’ behavior further complicate field management. The field currently is in late life, with recovery to date of 19% with an RF of 23%. Most of the water-drive reservoirs are already swept up to the crest, while the solution gas-drive reservoirs are depleted nearly to abandonment pressure. After 30 years of production, the total field water cut was at 80%, while oil production was approximately 5,000 B/D, signifying the diminishing economic life of the field.

SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 1236-1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Wook Kim ◽  
E.. Vittoratos ◽  
A. R. Kovscek

Summary Recovery processes with a voidage-replacement ratio (VRR) (VRR = injected volume/produced volume) of unity rely solely on viscous forces to displace oil, whereas a VRR of zero relies on solution-gas drive. Activating a solution-gas-drive mechanism in combination with waterflooding with periods of VRR less than unity (VRR < 1) may be optimal for recovery. Laboratory evidence suggests that recovery for VRR < 1 is enhanced by emulsion flow and foamy (i.e., bubbly) crude oil at pressures under bubblepoint for some crude oils. This paper investigates the effect of VRR for two crude oils referred to as A1 (88 cp and 6.2 wt% asphaltene) and A2 (600 cp and 2.5 wt% asphaltene) in a sandpack system (18-in. length and 2-in. diameter). The crude oils are characterized with viscosity, asphaltene fraction, and acid/base numbers. A high-pressure experimental sandpack system (1 darcy and Swi = 0) was used to conduct experiments with VRRs of 1.0, 0.7, and 0 for both oils. During waterflood experiments, we controlled and monitored the rate of fluid injection and production to obtain well-characterized VRR. On the basis of the production ratio of fluids, the gas/oil and /water relative permeabilities were estimated under two-phase-flow conditions. For a VRR of zero, the gas relative permeability of both oils exhibited extremely low values (10−6−10−4) caused by internal gas drive. Waterfloods with VRR < 1 displayed encouraging recovery results. In particular, the final oil recovery with VRR = 0.7 [66.2% original oil in place (OOIP)] is more than 15% greater than that with VRR = 1 (55.6% OOIP) with A1 crude oil. Recovery for A2 with VRR = 0.7 (60.5% OOIP) was identical to the sum of oil recovery for solution-gas drive (19.1% OOIP) plus waterflooding (40.1% OOIP). An in-line viewing cell permitted inspection of produced fluid morphology. For A1 and VRR = 0.7, produced oil was emulsified, and gas was dispersed as bubbles, as expected for a foamy oil. For A2 and VRR < 1, foamy oil was not clearly observed in the viewing cell. In all cases, the water cut of VRR = 1 is clearly greater than that of VRR = 0.7. Finally, three-phase relative permeability was explored on the basis of the experimentally determined two-phase oil/water and liquid/gas relative permeability curves. Well-known algorithms for three-phase relative permeability, however, did not result in good history matches to the experimental data. Numerical simulations matched the experimental recovery vs. production time acceptably after modification of the measured krg and krow relationships. A concave shape for oil relative permeability that is suggestive of emulsified oil in situ was noted for both systems. The degree of agreement with experimental data is sensitive to the details of gas (gas/oil system) and oil (oil/water system) mobility.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suwardi ◽  
Indah Widiyaningsih ◽  
Ratna Widyaningsih ◽  
Atma Budi Arta

SPE Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 170-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songyan Li ◽  
Zhaomin Li

Summary Foamy-oil flow has been successfully demonstrated in laboratory experiments and site applications. On the basis of solution-gas-drive experiments with Orinoco belt heavy oil, the effects of temperature on foamy-oil recovery and gas/oil relative permeability were investigated. Oil-recovery efficiency increases and then decreases with temperature and attains a maximum value of 20.23% at 100°C. The Johnson-Bossler-Naumann (JBN) method has been proposed to interpret relative permeability characteristics from solution-gas-drive experiments with Orinoco belt heavy oil, neglecting the effect of capillary pressure. The gas relative permeability is lower than the oil relative permeability by two to four orders of magnitude. No intersection was identified on the oil and gas relative permeability curves. Because of an increase in temperature, the oil relative permeability changes slightly, and the gas relative permeability increases. Thermal recovery at an intermediate temperature is suitable for foamy oil, whereas a significantly higher temperature can reduce foamy behavior, which appears to counteract the positive effect of viscosity reduction. The main reason for the flow characteristics of foamy oil in porous media is the low gas mobility caused by the oil components and the high viscosity. High resin and asphaltene concentrations and the high viscosity of Orinoco belt heavy oil increase the stability of bubble films and prevent gas breakthrough in the oil phase, which forms a continuous gas, compared with the solution-gas drive of light oil. The increase in the gas relative permeability with temperature is caused by higher interfacial tensions and the bubble-coalescence rate at high temperatures. The experimental results can provide theoretical support for foamy-oil production.


2016 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 113-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teng Lu ◽  
Zhaomin Li ◽  
Songyan Li ◽  
Peng Wang ◽  
Zhuangzhuang Wang ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (03) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hussain Sheikha ◽  
Mehran Pooladi-Darvish

Summary Heavy-oil recovery under solution-gas drive is affected by several interacting factors including pressure-decline rate and pressure gradients. It has been suggested that a high pressure decline rate (dp/dt) generates larger supersaturation and faster nucleation that leads to more-dispersed gas bubbles, while a high pressure gradient (?p) increases the viscous forces acting on the gas phase, enhancing bubble break up and gas dispersion. Both effects lead to lower gas mobility, affecting oil recovery; however, the relative importance of each is not known. Finding this is important to develop mathematical models and to allow extrapolation of experimental results to field conditions, where the relative importance of these factors changes with time and space. Previous experimental studies were affected by a combination of the two effects. In this paper, we distinguish between the effect of the pressure-decline rate and pressure gradient on gas mobility and oil recovery by varying these independently. In the experimental work reported in this paper, change in confining pressure is used to create a change in pressure-decline rate, and a change in production rate is used to change the pressure gradient. Several depletion experiments at varying pressure-decline rates and production rates are reported here. At a constant pressure-decline rate, the recovery factor tripled when the flow rate was increased by one order of magnitude. Similar experiments were conducted when the pressure-decline rate was increased by one order of magnitude but the flow rate was kept constant. In this case, the recovery factor did not change significantly. The results of this study clearly indicate that the pressure gradient has a much greater effect on gas mobility and oil recovery than pressure-decline rate has. This paper presents the experimental results and their analysis, along with the implications of these findings on modeling of solution-gas drive in heavy oils.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document