Boosting Gas Processing Energy Efficiency by Waste Heat Recovery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waneya Abdulla Al Ketbi ◽  
Saqib Sajjad ◽  
Eisa Salem Al Jenaibi

Abstract A continual improvement in energy efficiency of existing plants is imperative to achieve ADNOC target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) intensity of operations by 25% in year 2030. The waste heat recovery (WHR) from incinerator stacks of existing Sulphur Recovery Units (SRUs) in ADNOC Gas Processing exhibits a substantial potential & contributor of energy savings and emission abatement. A high level assessment was carried out for various heat sources, results showed substantial WHR potential can be availed from SRUs. Consequently, a feasibility study was carried out to evaluate several options to recover energy from incinerator stacks of existing Sulphur Recovery Units (SRUs). The feasibility study addressed three options of recovering energy from SRUs incinerator stack exhaust; generating saturated steam, generating power and combined solution of steam & power. Those options were assessed in terms of technical feasibility and commercial viability. The study indicated that steam generation by HRSGs is technically viable and economically feasible, and considered as the best option for WHR from the existing SRU Incinerator Stacks. The WHR benefits that can be realized from just one incinerator stack by recovering the waste heat and reducing the flue gas temperature by 400 °C only (from 700 to 300 °C) are: More than 80 TPH saturated HP steam generationFuel gas savings and corresponding monetary benefitsSignificant abatement in GHG emissions The study revealed that WHR does not pose acid condensation risk due to the safe margin between the acid dew point and the actual flue gas temperature. The study also established that other constraints like pressure drop, space, tie-in location and emissions dispersion are not the showstoppers.

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayou Liu ◽  
Fengzhong Sun

Controlling the exhaust gas temperature (EGT) of coal–fired boilers at a reasonable value is beneficial to ensuring unit efficiency and preventing acid corrosion and fouling of tail heating surfaces in power plants. To obtain the operation regulation of coupled high–low energy flue gas waste heat recovery system (CWHRS) under a given EGT, experimental equipment was designed and built. Experiments were carried out to maintain the exhaust gas temperature under different flue gas flow, flue gas temperature and air temperature conditions. As the flue gas flows, the flue gas temperatures and air temperatures increased, and the bypass flue gas flow proportions or the water flows of the additional economizer were increased to maintain the EGT at about 85 °C. An improved low temperature economizer (LTE) and front located air heater (FAH) system were put forward. As the flow of the crossover pipe increased, the EGT and the inlet water temperature of the LTE increased. As the flow of the circulating loop increased, the EGT and the inlet water temperature of the LTE decreased. Operation regulations of LTE–FAH system under four cases were given. The operation regulations of CWHRS and LTE–FAH system can provide references for power plant operation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 150 ◽  
pp. 200-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Yan ◽  
Chunyuan Ma ◽  
Qiuwan Shen ◽  
Zhanlong Song ◽  
Jingcai Chang

Author(s):  
Lei Deng ◽  
Chunli Tang ◽  
Xiaowen Tan ◽  
Ke Sun ◽  
Song Wu ◽  
...  

For a better utilization of Zhundong coals which have high fouling and slagging tendency, the slag-tap boiler has attracted much attention. To avoid the high sensible heat loss of discharged molten slag, an air-cooling waste heat recovery system is proposed. Energy and economic analyses are conducted to investigate the effectiveness of heating the desulfurized flue gas by hot air and the influences of partially substituting the secondary air by hot air on heat transfer of air preheater and thermal efficiency of boiler. A case study is performed by referring to a typical 50 MW cyclone boiler with nine types of low fusion temperature coals. The results show that for coals with low ash content, the temperature increment of desulfurized flue gas can be over 7 ℃. While for coals with high ash content, the flue gas temperature can be heated to more than 70 ℃, and the surplus hot air can be sent to the furnace. When the hot air is introduced to partially substitute the secondary air, an instantaneous impact on the air preheater will give rise to a decrement of quantity of heat transferred and increments of temperatures of exit flue gas and hot secondary air. The variations of these thermodynamic parameters become smaller with increasing hot air temperature. After introduction of hot air, the thermal efficiency of boiler can increase, resulting in a decrease of fuel consumption rate. In addition, the heating surface area of air preheater can be reduced.


Author(s):  
Helen Skop ◽  
James Pezzuto ◽  
Valeriy G. Oleynikov-White ◽  
John F. Cavallo ◽  
Robert Fesjian

The baking industry is considered as one of the major energy consuming food industries in North America. More than 40% of bakery fuel consumption is used to evaporate water in the processes [1]. In addition to the baking process’ vapor the oven stack gas contains water vapor from combustion products. Overall the content of water vapor in the typical oven stack gas is about 20% by volume. Most bakeries waste this vapor and its latent heat. Bakeries’ ovens have wide diversity in power and design. Off-the-shelve heat exchangers are not considered as cost effective equipment for stack gas cooling below gas’ dew point temperature. At typical oven stack gas composition water vapor condensation begins to condense at about 72° C. Not using the latent heat of stack water vapor and the heat from gas cooling from dew point temperature to ambient temperature results in low effectiveness of waste heat recovery. Mainly the effect from the recovery of stack gas cooling prior to condensation is considered as non cost effective and waste heat recovery is neglected.


2019 ◽  
Vol 196 ◽  
pp. 649-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yiyu Men ◽  
Xiaohua Liu ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Xi Xu ◽  
Yi Jiang

Energy ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaojun Wang ◽  
Boshu He ◽  
Shaoyang Sun ◽  
Ying Wu ◽  
Na Yan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document