scholarly journals The Impact of Irregular Corneal Shape Parameters on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanita Liduma ◽  
Artis Luguzis ◽  
Gunta Krumina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Main Axis ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Visual Axis ◽  
Corneal Shape ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Corneal Apex

Abstract Background: To understand which irregular corneal parameters determine the visual quality in keratoconus subjects. Methods: The cross-sectional study examined thecovered eyes of 44 subjects, graded from the first to third keratoconus stages by Amsler-Krumeich classification. To characterize the shape of cornea, wWe obtained measurements in two ways: (a) by projectinged two perpendicular axes onto a cornea (– the main axis passed first, through the central point of the cornea (visual axis projection) and keratoconus apex; second, as , while the second axis was perpendicular to the main axis) to – and read the elevation values at points on theses axeis as parameters characterising the corneal surface; (b) by projectinged circles with different diameters around the central part of the cornea (1, 2, and 3 mm) and reading elevation values at points equally displaced on these circles as parameters characterising an anterior surface slope. Irregular corneal shape parameters’ correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were determined The measurements were used to calculate various elevation change (slope) parameters, in order to understand which corneal slope parameter has the strongest correlation with visual acuityquality and contrast sensitivity.Results: According to the acquired data, the visual acuity of a corrected eye does not have a strong correlation with the measured keratoconus apex slope. Parameters characterising the corneal surface’s correlations with contrast sensitivity were from r=0.25 (p=0.03) at 3 cpd to r=0.47 (p<0.01) at 9 cpd for the highest elevation and from r=0.33 (p=0.09) at 5 cpd to r=0.40 (p<0.01) at 11 cpd for the lowest elevation in all subjects together, while for visual acuity the parameters were r=0.30 (p<0.01) for the highest elevation and r=0.21 (p=0.06) for the lowest elevation in all subjects together. The correlation between contrast sensitivity and the highest and lowest corneal point in all measured cornea was stronger for subjects with a peripheral corneal apex than for those with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, Ccontrast sensitivity displayed a strong correlation with keratoconus slope in the central part of the cornea (with a radius of 1 mm). Correlations in different spatial frequencies ranging from 0.48 (p<0.01) at 3 cpd to 0.61 (p<0.01) at 9 cpd.Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity has a higher correlation with corneal shape parameters than with is more important parameter which describes the visual quality of keratoconus subjects than visual acuity. Subjects with a peripheral corneal apex had stronger correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity than did subjects with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, Tthe strongest correlation was for contrast sensitivity and elevation (slope) in the region most important region which determines the visual quality in keratoconus subjects is the region within a 1 mm radius of the corneal centre in the opposite direction of the keratoconus apex (direction (ax) CB).

scholarly journals The Impact of Irregular Corneal Shape Parameters on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanita Liduma ◽  
Artis Luguzis ◽  
Gunta Krumina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Optical Quality ◽  
Main Axis ◽  
Visual Axis ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Corneal Shape ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The image optical quality is affected by changes in corneal shape of patients with keratoconus. The goal of this study was to explore which corneal parameters determine the visual quality in keratoconus subjects, which corneal slope parameter has the strongest correlation with visual quality and contrast sensitivity. Methods: The study covered eyes of 77 subjects, graded from the first to third keratoconus stages. To characterize the shape of cornea, we obtained measurements in two ways: (a) projected two perpendicular axes onto a cornea – the main axis passed through the central point of the cornea (visual axis projection) and keratoconus apex, while the second axis was perpendicular to the main axis – and read elevation values at points on theses axis; (b) projected circles with different diameters around the central part of the cornea (1, 2 and 3 mm) and read elevation values at points equally displaced on these circles. The measurements were used to calculate various elevation change (slope) parameters. Results: According to the acquired data, the visual acuity of a corrected eye does not have a strong correlation with the measured keratoconus apex slope. Contrast sensitivity displayed a strong correlation with keratoconus slope in the central part of the cornea (with a radius of 1 mm). Correlations in different spatial frequencies ranging from 0.47 to 0.6. Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity is more important parameter which describes the visual quality of keratoconus subjects than visual acuity. The most important region which determines the visual quality in keratoconus subjects is the region with a 1 mm radius of the corneal centre in the opposite direction of keratoconus apex.

scholarly journals The Impact of Keratoconus Apex’s Slope on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanita Liduma ◽  
Artis Luguzis ◽  
Gunta Krumina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Strong Correlation ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Optical Quality ◽  
Main Axis ◽  
Visual Axis ◽  
Important Region ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: The image optical quality is affected by changes in corneal shape of patients with keratoconus. The goal of this study was to explore which corneal parameters determine the visual quality in keratoconus subjects, which corneal slope parameter has the strongest correlation with visual quality and contrast sensitivity. Methods: The study covered eyes of 77 subjects, graded from the first to third keratoconus stages. To characterize the shape of cornea, we obtained measurements in two ways: (a) projected two perpendicular axes onto a cornea – the main axis passed through the central point of the cornea (visual axis projection) and keratoconus apex, while the second axis was perpendicular to the main axis – and read elevation values at points on theses axis; (b) projected circles with different diameters around the central part of the cornea (1, 2 and 3 mm) and read elevation values at points equally displaced on these circles. The measurements were used to calculate various elevation change (slope) parameters. Results: According to the acquired data, the visual acuity of a corrected eye does not have a strong correlation with the measured keratoconus apex slope. Contrast sensitivity displayed a strong correlation with keratoconus slope in the central part of the cornea (with a radius of 1 mm). Correlations in different spatial frequencies ranging from 0.47 to 0.6. Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity is more important parameter which describes the visual quality of keratoconus subjects than visual acuity. The most important region which determines the visual quality in keratoconus subjects is the region with a 1 mm radius of the corneal centre in the opposite direction of keratoconus apex.

scholarly journals The impact of irregular corneal shape parameters on visual acuity and contrast sensitivity

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanita Liduma ◽  
Artis Luguzis ◽  
Gunta Krumina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Corneal Surface ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Corneal Shape ◽  
Different Diameters ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Corneal Apex

Abstract Background To understand which irregular corneal parameters determine the visual quality in keratoconus subjects. Methods The cross-sectional study examined the eyes of 44 subjects, graded from the first to third keratoconus stages by Amsler-Krumeich classification. We obtained measurements in two ways: (a) by projecting two perpendicular axes onto a cornea (first, through the central point of the cornea and keratoconus apex; second, as the perpendicular axis) to read the elevation values at points on these axes as parameters characterising the corneal surface; (b) by projecting circles with different diameters around the central part of the cornea (1, 2, and 3 mm) and reading elevation values at points equally displaced on these circles as parameters characterising an anterior surface slope. Irregular corneal shape parameters’ correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were determined in order to understand which corneal slope parameter has the strongest correlation with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Results Parameters characterising the corneal surface’s correlations with contrast sensitivity were from r = 0.25 (p = 0.03) at 3 cpd to r = 0.47 (p < 0.01) at 9 cpd for the highest elevation and from r = 0.33 (p = 0.09) at 5 cpd to r = 0.40 (p < 0.01) at 11 cpd for the lowest elevation in all subjects together, while for visual acuity the parameters were r = 0.30 (p < 0.01) for the highest elevation and r = 0.21 (p = 0.06) for the lowest elevation in all subjects together. The correlation between contrast sensitivity and the highest and lowest corneal point in all measured cornea was stronger for subjects with a peripheral corneal apex than for those with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, contrast sensitivity displayed a strong correlation with slope in the central part of the cornea (with a radius of 1 mm) ranging from 0.48 (p < 0.01) at 3 cpd to 0.61 (p < 0.01) at 9 cpd. Conclusion Contrast sensitivity has a higher correlation with corneal shape parameters than with visual acuity. Subjects with a peripheral corneal apex had stronger correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity than did subjects with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, the strongest correlation was for contrast sensitivity and elevation (slope) in the region within a 1 mm radius of the corneal centre in the opposite direction of the keratoconus apex (direction (ax) CB).

scholarly journals The Impact of Irregular Corneal Shape Parameters on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanita Liduma ◽  
Artis Luguzis ◽  
Gunta Krumina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Corneal Surface ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Corneal Shape ◽  
Different Diameters ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Corneal Apex

Abstract Background: To understand which irregular corneal parameters determine the visual quality in keratoconus subjects.Methods: The cross-sectional study examined the eyes of 44 subjects, graded from the first to third keratoconus stages by Amsler-Krumeich classification. We obtained measurements in two ways: (a) by projecting two perpendicular axes onto a cornea (first, through the central point of the cornea and keratoconus apex; second, as the perpendicular axis) to read the elevation values at points on these axes as parameters characterising the corneal surface; (b) by projecting circles with different diameters around the central part of the cornea (1, 2, and 3 mm) and reading elevation values at points equally displaced on these circles as parameters characterising an anterior surface slope. Irregular corneal shape parameters’ correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were determined in order to understand which corneal slope parameter has the strongest correlation with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.Results: Parameters characterising the corneal surface’s correlations with contrast sensitivity were from r=0.25 (p=0.03) at 3 cpd to r=0.47 (p<0.01) at 9 cpd for the highest elevation and from r=0.33 (p=0.09) at 5 cpd to r=0.40 (p<0.01) at 11 cpd for the lowest elevation in all subjects together, while for visual acuity the parameters were r=0.30 (p<0.01) for the highest elevation and r=0.21 (p=0.06) for the lowest elevation in all subjects together. The correlation between contrast sensitivity and the highest and lowest corneal point in all measured cornea was stronger for subjects with a peripheral corneal apex than for those with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, contrast sensitivity displayed a strong correlation with slope in the central part of the cornea (with a radius of 1 mm) ranging from 0.48 (p<0.01) at 3 cpd to 0.61 (p<0.01) at 9 cpd.Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity has a higher correlation with corneal shape parameters than with visual acuity. Subjects with a peripheral corneal apex had stronger correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity than did subjects with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, the strongest correlation was for contrast sensitivity and elevation (slope) in the region within a 1 mm radius of the corneal centre in the opposite direction of the keratoconus apex (direction (ax) CB).

scholarly journals The Impact of Irregular Corneal Shape Parameters on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanita Liduma ◽  
Artis Luguzis ◽  
Gunta Krumina
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Shape Parameters ◽  
Corneal Surface ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Corneal Shape ◽  
Different Diameters ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Corneal Apex

Abstract Background: To understand which irregular corneal parameters determine the visual quality in keratoconus subjects. Methods: The cross-sectional study examined the eyes of 44 subjects, graded from the first to third keratoconus stages by Amsler-Krumeich classification. We obtained measurements in two ways: (a) by projecting two perpendicular axes onto a cornea (first, through the central point of the cornea and keratoconus apex; second, as the perpendicular axis) to read the elevation values at points on these axes as parameters characterising the corneal surface; (b) by projecting circles with different diameters around the central part of the cornea (1, 2, and 3 mm) and reading elevation values at points equally displaced on these circles as parameters characterising an anterior surface slope. Irregular corneal shape parameters’ correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were determined in order to understand which corneal slope parameter has the strongest correlation with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.Results: .Parameters characterising the corneal surface’s correlations with contrast sensitivity were from r=0.25 (p=0.03) at 3 cpd to r=0.47 (p<0.01) at 9 cpd for the highest elevation and from r=0.33 (p=0.09) at 5 cpd to r=0.40 (p<0.01) at 11 cpd for the lowest elevation in all subjects together, while for visual acuity the parameters were r=0.30 (p<0.01) for the highest elevation and r=0.21 (p=0.06) for the lowest elevation in all subjects together. The correlation between contrast sensitivity and the highest and lowest corneal point in all measured cornea was stronger for subjects with a peripheral corneal apex than for those with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, contrast sensitivity displayed a strong correlation with slope in the central part of the cornea (with a radius of 1 mm) ranging from 0.48 (p<0.01) at 3 cpd to 0.61 (p<0.01) at 9 cpd.Conclusion: Contrast sensitivity has a higher correlation with corneal shape parameters than with visual acuity. Subjects with a peripheral corneal apex had stronger correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity than did subjects with a central apex. In keratoconus subjects, the strongest correlation was for contrast sensitivity and elevation (slope) in the region within a 1 mm radius of the corneal centre in the opposite direction of the keratoconus apex (direction (ax) CB).

The impact of cataract surgery on depressive symptoms for bilateral cataract patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 307-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kien Gia To ◽  
Lynn B. Meuleners ◽  
Michelle L. Fraser ◽  
Dat Van Duong ◽  
Dung Van Do ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Ho Chi Minh City ◽  
Bilateral Cataract ◽  
Vietnamese Population ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACTBackground:Depression is common among older populations with cataract. However, the impact of cataract surgery on depression in both developed and developing countries remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the impact of cataract surgery on depressive symptoms and to examine the association between objective visual measures and change in depressive symptoms after surgery among a Vietnamese population in Ho Chi Minh City.Methods:A cohort of older patients with bilateral cataract were assessed the week before and one to three months after first eye surgery only or first- and second-eye cataract surgeries. Visual measures including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and stereopsis were obtained. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). Descriptive analyses and a generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis were undertaken to determine the impact of cataract surgery on depressive symptoms.Results:Four hundred and thirteen participants were recruited into the study before cataract surgery. Two hundred and forty-seven completed the follow-up assessment after surgery. There was a significant decrease (improvement) of one point in the depressive symptoms score (p = 0.04) after cataract surgery, after accounting for potential confounding factors. In addition, females reported a significantly greater decrease (improvement) of two points in depressive symptom scores (p = 0.01), compared to males. However, contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and stereopsis were not significantly associated with change in depressive symptoms scores. First-eye cataract surgery or both-eye cataract surgery did not modify the change in depressive symptoms score.Conclusion:There was a small but significant improvement in depressive symptoms score after cataract surgery for an older population in Vietnam.

scholarly journals The Impact of Cataract Surgery on Contrast Visual Acuity and Retinal Sensitivity in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Gen Miura ◽  
Takayuki Baba ◽  
Tomoaki Tatsumi ◽  
Hirotaka Yokouchi ◽  
Shuichi Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Retinitis Pigmentosa ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Retinal Sensitivity ◽  
Zone Length ◽  
Ellipsoid Zone ◽  
Postoperative Visual Acuity ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Purpose. To determine the effects of cataract surgery on contrast visual acuity and retinal sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Methods. Retinal sensitivity and contrast visual acuity were determined by microperimetry (MAIA) and contrast sensitivity acuity tester (CAT-CP), respectively, before and after cataract surgery. The significance of the correlations between visual acuity, retinal sensitivity, contrast visual acuity, improvements after surgery, and macular structure before and after cataract surgery was determined. Results. Retinal sensitivity and contrast visual acuity were significantly improved after cataract surgery. The correlations among postoperative visual acuity, postoperative retinal sensitivities, and preoperative ellipsoid zone length were significant. The postoperative retinal sensitivity of the central 10° and the ellipsoid zone length was particularly significantly correlated. Preoperative contrast visual acuity and the amount of improvement and preoperative retinal sensitivity and the amount of improvement were significantly negatively correlated. The contrast visual acuity under both the 100% and 10% photopic and mesopic conditions improved significantly after cataract surgery. Conclusions. Cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa patients with preserved ellipsoid zones significantly improved retinal sensitivity and contrast visual acuity. Cataract surgery can be expected to improve retinal sensitivity and contrast visual acuity under various conditions, even if preoperative visual parameters are low, as long as the ellipsoid zone is preserved.

Photopic and Mesopic Performance of 2 Different Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose M. Martinez-de-la-Casa ◽  
Jesús Carballo-Alvarez ◽  
Javier Garcia-Bella ◽  
Jose M. Vazquez-Molini ◽  
Laura Morales ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Study Test ◽  
Distance Correction

Purpose To assess photopic and mesopic vision in patients implanted with 2 different trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods Fifty patients with cataract in both eyes had surgery with bilateral implantation of a trifocal FineVision (FV, n = 25) or AT LISA tri 839MP (LisaTri, n = 25) IOL. Three months after surgery, high-contrast photopic uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were determined using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study test. Intermediate (65 cm) and near (40 cm) visual acuity were also measured, both with best distance correction (DCIVA and DCNVA, respectively). The CSV1000 test chart was used for binocular and monocular contrast sensitivity. Defocus curves were constructed under photopic and mesopic conditions. Results Mean patient age was 68.4 ± 5.5 years (FV) and 67.3 ± 5.6 years (LisaTri) (p = 0.540). No differences were found in terms of visual acuity between the groups. The CDVA, DCIVA, and DCNVA were 0.05 ± 0.06, 0.25 ± 0.10, and 0.13 ± 0.10 logMAR for FV and -0.04 ± 0.11, 0.32 ± 0.09, and 0.12 ± 0.11 logMAR for LisaTri, respectively (p = 0.09, p = 0.08, and p = 0.12). Photopic and mesopic defocus curves were comparable between the 2 IOL groups (p>0.05). Mesopic values were significantly worse than photopic in both groups for all the measured values (p<0.001). No differences in contrast sensitivity were observed between the 2 IOL groups (p>0.05). Conclusions Both trifocal diffractive IOLs provided good visual quality with a statistically significant decrease in mesopic conditions.

Visual Function and Subjective Quality of Life in Chinese Cataract Patients after Implantation with Aspheric Intraocular Lenses

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 732-740
Author(s):  
Yanwen Fang ◽  
Yi Lu ◽  
Xinhua Wu ◽  
Aizhu Miao ◽  
Yi Luo
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Visual Function ◽  
Spherical Aberration ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Subjective Quality Of Life ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cataract Patients

Purpose. To evaluate and compare the objective and subjective visual function after implantation of 2 aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in Chinese cataract patients. Methods. Forty-one eyes of 28 patients with cataract were randomly assigned to receive either the MC X11 ASP IOL or the AcrySof IQ IOL. Three months postoperatively, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations, and subjective visual quality were measured. The degree of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) was recorded at last follow-up. Results. Postoperative mean monocular BCVA was 0.05±0.13 logMAR in the MC X11 group and 0.05±0.08 logMAR in the IQ group. There was no significant difference in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, subjective visual quality, and degree of PCO between the 2 groups. For a 6-mm pupil diameter, the mean spherical aberration (Z40) was 0.075±0.076 μm in the MC X11 group and 0.056±0.111 μm in the IQ group. However, 45.5% and 57.9% of the eyes in the MC X11 and IQ groups had values >0.10 μm, respectively. The mean RMS values of the high-order aberrations were similar between the 2 groups except the higher fifth- and sixth-order aberrations, which were significantly higher in the MC X11 group. Conclusions. Both IOLs provided similar and good visual outcomes. However, the data suggest that the amount of negative spherical aberration generated by current available aspheric IOLs might not be optimal for Chinese eyes.

scholarly journals Long-Term Visual Quality after Microincision Cataract Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Qing Huang ◽  
Ruili Li ◽  
Liwen Feng ◽  
Na Miao ◽  
Wei Fan
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Visual Quality ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Absolute Residual ◽  
One Year

Purpose. Few studies have focused on long-term postoperative visual quality. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term visual quality after microincision cataract surgery (MICS). Methods. 96 patients (144 eyes) diagnosed with age-related cataracts were enrolled in this one-year study. The patients underwent MICS and received aspheric monofocal intraocular lens implants. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was evaluated together with best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), best-corrected near visual acuity (BCNVA), contrast sensitivity, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA). Results. Compared to preoperative measurements, UDVA, BCDVA, and BCNVA were significantly better after surgery (P<0.001), and they remained stable throughout follow-up. Contrast sensitivity was also significantly better after surgery (P<0.001). Mean SIA during follow-up was 0.57 ± 0.33 D at 1 week, 0.36 ± 0.25 D at 3 months, and 0.18 ± 0.16 D at 1 year. SIA decreased significantly during the postoperative period (P<0.001). The 1-year postoperative absolute residual diopter value was 0.32 ± 0.28 D. Conclusion. MICS can provide excellent visual quality as soon as on postoperative day 1, which persists during the follow-up period of 1 year. In contrast to previous studies, SIA decreases over time and may not completely stabilize for as long as 1 year postoperatively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document