A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis: The Role of anti- angiogenic agents in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
Abstract BackgroundThe efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents (AAAs) in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains unclear. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to synthesize evidence of their comparative effectiveness for improving overall survival (OS) among EOC patients. MethodsWe searched six databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to February 2021. We performed a NMA with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate comparative effectiveness among different AAAs in two disease settings, chemotherapy naïve, and recurrent EOC. P-score was used to provide an effectiveness hierarchy ranking. Sensitivity NMA was carried out by focusing on studies that reported high-risk disease chemotherapy-naïve, platinum-resistant, and platinum-sensitive EOC. The primary outcome was OS.FindingsWe identified 23 RCTs (n=11,560) which assessed effectiveness of eight different AAAs. NMA results showed no significant OS difference among anti-angiogenic agents in chemotherapy-naïve. In recurrent EOC, concurrent use of trebananib (10mg/kg) and chemotherapy was likely to be the best option (P-score: 0.88, NMA estimate versus chemotherapy: HR= 1.67, 95% CI: 0.94; 2.94). The sensitivity NMA indicated that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy with maintenance treatment (P-score: 0.99) and pazopanib plus chemotherapy (P-score: 0.79) had the highest probability of being the best intervention for improving OS in high-risk chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-resistant setting, respectively. InterpretationAAAs may not play a significant clinical role in chemotherapy-naïve and platinum-sensitive EOC. Conversely, the concurrent use of trebananib with chemotherapy was likely to be the best intervention in recurrent EOC.