scholarly journals Bevacizumab in the Management of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 09 (02) ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Maurie Markman ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Optimal Dose ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant

Preclinical investigations have provided strong support for the hypothesis that angiogenesis is a potent driver of epithelial ovarian cancer progression. Phase II data have revealed the activity of single-agent bevacizumab in previously treated and clinically defined platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Several reported phase III randomized trials, involving primary and both ‘platinum-sensitive’ recurrent and platinum-resistant disease, have demonstrated the addition of bevacizumab to a cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen improves progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone. While there continues to be considerable debate regarding the optimal dose, timing, and duration of bevacizumab administration in ovarian cancer, the existing data provide strong support for an important role for this agent in the overall management paradigm for this malignancy.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2811-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Mutch ◽  
Mauro Orlando ◽  
Tiana Goss ◽  
Michael G. Teneriello ◽  
Alan N. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Points ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose Ovarian cancer (OC) patients experiencing progressive disease (PD) within 6 months of platinum-based therapy in the primary setting are considered platinum resistant (Pt-R). Currently, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is a standard of care for treatment of recurrent Pt-R disease. On the basis of promising phase II results, gemcitabine was compared with PLD for efficacy and safety in taxane-pretreated Pt-R OC patients. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 195) with Pt-R OC were randomly assigned to either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8; every 21 days) or PLD 50 mg/m2 (day 1; every 28 days) until PD or undue toxicity. Optional cross-over therapy was allowed at PD or at withdrawal because of toxicity. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included tumor response, time to treatment failure, survival, and quality of life. Results In the gemcitabine and PLD groups, median PFS was 3.6 v 3.1 months; median overall survival was 12.7 v 13.5 months; overall response rate (ORR) was 6.1% v 8.3%; and in the subset of patients with measurable disease, ORR was 9.2% v 11.7%, respectively. None of the efficacy end points showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups. The PLD group experienced significantly more hand-foot syndrome and mucositis; the gemcitabine group experienced significantly more constipation, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and neutropenia but not febrile neutropenia. Conclusion Although this was not designed as an equivalency study, gemcitabine and PLD seem to have a comparable therapeutic index in this population of Pt-R taxane-pretreated OC patients. Single-agent gemcitabine may be an acceptable alternative to PLD for patients with Pt-R OC.

scholarly journals A New Therapeutic Strategy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer―Bevacizumab beyond Progressive Disease

Healthcare ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoji ◽  
Eto ◽  
Sato ◽  
Soma ◽  
Fukagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant

Treatment beyond progressive disease (PD) is a concept that even after drugs become ineffective, their continued use is more beneficial for patients than their discontinuation. In recent years, a concept of bevacizumab beyond PD (BBP) has attracted attention in the treatment of various cancers, and the usefulness of this concept has been evaluated. BBP has been proven to prolong overall survival (OS) in recurrent colorectal cancer and progression-free survival (PFS) in recurrent breast and lung cancers. With regard to the treatment of ovarian cancer, the MITO16/MaNGO-OV2B study (the Multicenter Phase III Randomized Study with Second Line Chemotherapy Plus or Minus Bevacizumab in Patients with Platinum Sensitive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Recurrence After a Bevacizumab/Chemotherapy First Line) was conducted in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrence and the JGOG3023 study (the Open-Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Standard of Care with or Without Bevacizumab in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Patients Previously Treated with Bevacizumab for Front-Line or Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer) was conducted in patients with platinum-resistant recurrence. The MITO16/MaNGO-OV2B study, reported in the 2018 annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, showed that BBP achieved prolonged PFS. In the JGOG3023 study, enrollment of patients was completed in December 2018, and the follow-up period has been initiated. Proving the effectiveness of BBP in the treatment of ovarian cancer may provide a new therapeutic strategy and contribute to improved treatment outcomes in patients with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options.

scholarly journals Evaluation of pemetrexed in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanmei Wu ◽  
Jie Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Fallopian Tube Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Pemetrexed Disodium

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer.Results: Patients with platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer who received pemetrexed disodium chemotherapy at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between January 2015 and December 2018 were identified. Dose delay and adjustment were permitted when serious side effects occurred. To observe the efficacy rate and follow up on its side effects, progression-free survival and overall survival after chemotherapy were monitored. A total of 96 cases were collected, and 340 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. The overall response rate (ORR) was 32.29% (31 patients), where 16 patients (16.67%) had a complete response, and 15 patients (15.62%) had a partial response. There were 68 platinum-resistant patients and 28 platinum-sensitive patients. The ORRs of platinum-sensitive and platinum-resistant patients were 42.86% (12 patients) and 27.94% (19 patients), respectively, p = 0.16. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.52 months and 2.97 months (HR0.62, 95% CI, 0.37-1.02), respectively, and there was no significant difference (P = 0.06). The median overall survival (OS) of the two groups was 36 months and 18 months, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.01). There was no drug-related death in all patients, and all of the side effects were mild. The most common side effects were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions and hepatotoxicity.Conclusion: Pemetrexed disodium is effective not only for platinum-sensitive but also platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer. And the side effects are tolerable. Pemetrexed disodium may be a choice for epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, and primary peritoneal cancer.

Phase II consolidation trial with anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody (hu3S193) in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer after a second remission

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002239
Author(s):  
Oren Smaletz ◽  
Gustavo Ismael ◽  
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz ◽  
Ivana L O Nascimento ◽  
Ana Luiza Gomes de Morais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Lewis Y

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of hu3S193, a humanized anti-Lewis-Y monoclonal antibody, as a consolidation strategy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after salvage platinum-doublet chemotherapy.MethodsThis single-arm phase II study accrued patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer with Lewis-Y expression by immunohistochemistry who had achieved a second complete response after five to eight cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received intravenous infusions of hu3S193, 30 mg/m2 every 2 weeks starting no more than 8 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy and continuing for 12 doses, until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival of the second remission. Secondary objectives were safety and pharmacokinetics.ResultsTwenty-nine patients were enrolled. Most had a papillary/serous histology tumor (94%), stage III disease at diagnosis (75%), and five (17%) underwent secondary cytoreduction before salvage chemotherapy. Two patients were not eligible for efficacy but were considered for toxicity analysis. Eighteen patients (62%) completed the full consolidation treatment while nine patients progressed on treatment. At the time of analysis, 23 patients (85%) of the eligible population had progressed and seven of these patients (26%) had died. Median progression-free survival of the second remission was 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.6–13.9), with a 1-year progression-free survival of the second remission rate of 50.1%. The trial was terminated early since it was unlikely that the primary objective would be achieved. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were nausea (55%) and vomiting (51%).ConclusionsHu3S193 did not show sufficient clinical activity as consolidation therapy in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer who achieved a second complete response after platinum-based chemotherapy.Trial registrationNCT01137071.

scholarly journals Early clearance of serum HE4 and CA125 in predicting platinum sensitivity and prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Rong ◽  
Li Li
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Platinum Sensitivity ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Sensitive Group

Abstract Objectives: To assess the clinical value of early clearance of HE4 and CA125 for platinum sensitivity and prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.Method: HE4 and CA125 value including clinical data of 89 patients with ovarian cancer were collected. The clearance of HE4 and CA125 were assessed base on the platinum sensitivity, two-year PFS, PFS and OS.Results: 16 patients were classified as platinum resistant and 73 as platinum sensitive according to the response to platinum-base chemotherapy. When HE4 clearance after 3rd cycle chemotherapy or CA125 clearance after 1st cycle chemotherapy, it gave the highest AUC of 0.788, with 100% of sensitivity and 57.5% of specificity respectively between platinum resistant and platinum sensitive group. In addition, 59 patients were classified as two-year PFS group and 30 as not achieved two-year PFS group according to obtaining two-year PFS or not. It gave the highest AUC of 0.730, with 83.3% of sensitivity and 62.7% of specificity respectively when HE4 clearance after 3rd cycle chemotherapy or CA125 clearance after 1st cycle. The prolonged PFS and OS were significantly associated by the clearance of HE4 after 3rd cycle chemotherapy (p<0.0001, p<0.0001) as well as CA125 after 1st cycle chemotherapy (p<0.0001, p<0.0001).Conclusions: Our data suggested that the early clearance of HE4 and CA125 could predict platinum response and prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. Monitoring the HE4 and CA125 during first-line chemotherapy might be helpful in predicting platinum sensitivity and risk to progress and relapse.

Subgroup analysis of rucaparib versus chemotherapy as treatment for BRCA-mutated, advanced, relapsed ovarian carcinoma: Effect of platinum sensitivity in the randomized, phase 3 study ARIEL4.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5517-5517
Author(s):  
Amit M. Oza ◽  
Alla Sergeevna Lisyanskaya ◽  
Alexander A. Fedenko ◽  
Mikhail Dvorkin ◽  
Andreia Cristina de Melo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Carcinoma ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitivity ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

5517 Background: In ARIEL4 (NCT02855944), rucaparib significantly improved the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) vs chemotherapy (CT) in patients with advanced, relapsed ovarian carcinoma (OC) harboring a deleterious BRCA1/2 (BRCA) mutation (median PFS 7.4 [95% CI 7.3–9.1] vs 5.7 [5.5–7.3] months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.64 [95% CI 0.49–0.84]; P=0.001). This prespecified exploratory analysis investigated the effect of platinum sensitivity on the efficacy of rucaparib vs CT in ARIEL4. Methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to oral rucaparib 600 mg twice daily or CT and stratified based on progression-free interval (≥1 to <6 months = platinum resistant; ≥6 to <12 months = partially platinum sensitive; ≥12 months = fully platinum sensitive). In the CT group, patients with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive disease received weekly paclitaxel 60–80 mg/m2; patients with fully platinum-sensitive disease received investigator’s choice of platinum-based CT (single-agent carboplatin or cisplatin, or platinum doublet). Patients could crossover from CT to rucaparib following radiologic disease progression. Efficacy endpoints were explored in patients with a confirmed BRCA mutation (patients with a reversion mutation were excluded), based on the randomization strata of platinum sensitivity. Results: The visit cutoff date was September 30, 2020. PFS and objective response rates (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 for rucaparib vs CT across subgroups are presented in the Table. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the rucaparib group were anemia/decreased hemoglobin (platinum-resistant patients: rucaparib 47% vs CT 40%; partially platinum-sensitive patients: 63% vs 27%; fully platinum-sensitive patients: 58% vs 20%) and nausea (52% vs 21%; 51% vs 23%; 60% vs 68%). In the intent-to-treat population, 74/116 (64%) patients in the CT group crossed over to receive rucaparib: 39/59 (66%) with platinum-resistant, 25/31 (81%) with partially platinum-sensitive, and 10/26 (38%) with fully platinum-sensitive disease. Conclusions: Results from this exploratory subgroup analysis suggest that rucaparib is a reasonable treatment option for heavily pretreated patients across all platinum sensitivity subgroups. Safety was consistent with prior rucaparib studies. Clinical trial information: NCT02855944. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Bevacizumab use in the frontline, maintenance and recurrent settings for ovarian cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 225-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn E Haunschild ◽  
Krishnansu S Tewari
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Fda

On 13 June 2018, Genentech, Inc. issued a press release announcing that the US FDA had approved the antiangiogenesis drug, bevacizumab, in combination with chemotherapy for frontline and maintenance therapy for women with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Regulatory approval was based on the National Cancer Institute-sponsored Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 0218, the Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multi-center and multi-national clinical trial that met its primary end point, progression-free survival. Bevacizumab is now approved in the frontline, platinum-sensitive recurrent and platinum-resistant recurrent settings for epithelial ovarian cancer. This review will address the broad range of clinical trials addressing the efficacy of bevacizumab use in ovarian cancer.

Is FDA-Approved Bevacizumab Cost-Effective When Included in the Treatment of Platinum-Resistant Recurrent Ovarian Cancer?

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e775-e783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole P. Chappell ◽  
Caela R. Miller ◽  
Aaron D. Fielden ◽  
Jason C. Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Willingness To Pay ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Value Assessment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
The Cost

Purpose: Although the Food and Drug Administration has approved incorporation of bevacizumab (BEV) into the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC), cost-value measures are an essential consideration, as evidenced by the recent ASCO Value Framework initiative. We assessed the cost-effectiveness and reviewed the net health benefit (NHB) of this expensive treatment. Methods: A cost-effectiveness decision model was constructed using results from a phase III trial comparing BEV plus cytotoxic chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in patients with PROC. The Avastin Use in Platinum-Resistant Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (AURELIA) trial demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival and quality of life in patients receiving BEV. Costs, paracentesis rates, and adverse events were incorporated, including subgroup analysis of different partner chemotherapy agents. Results: Inclusion of BEV in the treatment of platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer meets the common willingness-to-pay incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) threshold of $100,000 per progression-free life-year saved (LYS) for 15-mg/kg dosing and approaches this threshold for 10-mg/kg dosing, with an ICER of $160,000. In sensitivity analysis, reducing the cost of BEV by 13% (from $9,338 to $8,100 per cycle) allows 10-mg/kg dosing to reach a $100,000 ICER. Exploratory analysis of different BEV chemotherapy partners showed an ICER of $76,000 per progression-free LYS (6.5-month progression-free survival improvement) and $54,000 per LYS (9.1-month overall survival improvement) for the addition of BEV to paclitaxel once per week. Using the ASCO framework for value assessment, the NHB score for BEV plus paclitaxel once per week is 48. Conclusion: Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 ICER, the addition of BEV to chemotherapy either demonstrates or approaches cost-effectiveness and NHB when added to the treatment of patients with PROC.

scholarly journals Activation of STAT3 and STAT5 Signaling in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Progression: Mechanism and Therapeutic Opportunity

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Jui Wu ◽  
Vignesh Sundararajan ◽  
Bor-Ching Sheu ◽  
Ruby Yun-Ju Huang ◽  
Lin-Hung Wei
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Progression ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Microenvironmental Factors ◽  
Therapeutic Opportunity ◽  
Molecular Therapeutic

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal of all gynecologic malignancies. Despite advances in surgical and chemotherapeutic options, most patients with advanced EOC have a relapse within three years of diagnosis. Unfortunately, recurrent disease is generally not curable. Recent advances in maintenance therapy with anti-angiogenic agents or Poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors provided a substantial benefit concerning progression-free survival among certain women with advanced EOC. However, effective treatment options remain limited in most recurrent cases. Therefore, validated novel molecular therapeutic targets remain urgently needed in the management of EOC. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) and STAT5 are aberrantly activated through tyrosine phosphorylation in a wide variety of cancer types, including EOC. Extrinsic tumor microenvironmental factors in EOC, such as inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, hormones, and oxidative stress, can activate STAT3 and STAT5 through different mechanisms. Persistently activated STAT3 and, to some extent, STAT5 increase EOC tumor cell proliferation, survival, self-renewal, angiogenesis, metastasis, and chemoresistance while suppressing anti-tumor immunity. By doing so, the STAT3 and STAT5 activation in EOC controls properties of both tumor cells and their microenvironment, driving multiple distinct functions during EOC progression. Clinically, increasing evidence indicates that the activation of the STAT3/STAT5 pathway has significant correlation with reduced survival of recurrent EOC, suggesting the importance of STAT3/STAT5 as potential therapeutic targets for cancer therapy. This review summarizes the distinct role of STAT3 and STAT5 activities in the progression of EOC and discusses the emerging therapies specifically targeting STAT3 and STAT5 signaling in this disease setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document