scholarly journals Development and validity of the Korean Psychiatric Triage Algorithm

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeongmin Ha ◽  
Kyeongmin Jang ◽  
Misuk An
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Optimal Time ◽  
Clinical Validity ◽  
Emergency Room Nurses ◽  
Triage Algorithm ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Background Psychiatric triage algorithm can improve the quality of care by providing a systematic method for classifying the severity of patients experiencing psychiatric crisis in the emergency room and by determining the optimal time frame for intervention. The aim of the present study was to test the professional validity and clinical validity of a psychiatric triage algorithm developed for use in South Korea.Methods The initial algorithm was developed through systematic literature review. Its validity was then verified by 10 experts. Based on results of expert validity, the algorithm was modified and the final algorithm was developed.Results Its clinical validity was then verified by 30 emergency room nurses who had used triage. Four questions of expert validity results with a CVI of 0.8 or less were revised to reflect expert opinion. The clinical validity of the final modified algorithm was 2.9 ~ 3.47.Conclusion The use of highly validity psychiatric triage algorithm by ER (Emergency Room) nurses not only can improve the quality of care, but also can improve patient outcomes and experience.

scholarly journals Development and validity of the Korea psychiatric triage algorithm

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeongmin Ha ◽  
Kyeongmin Jang ◽  
Misuk An
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Room ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Classification Algorithms ◽  
Clinical Validity ◽  
Psychiatric Emergencies ◽  
Emergency Room Nurses ◽  
Triage Algorithm ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Background Psychiatric emergencies require timely intervention because of the risk of harm to individuals and society, including others. The aim of the present study was to test the content validity of a psychiatric triage algorithm developed for use in South Korea. Methods The initial algorithm was developed through systematic literature review. Its validity was then verified by 10 experts. Based on results of expert validity, the algorithm was modified and the final algorithm was developed. Results Its clinical validity was then verified by 37 emergency room nurses who had used triage. Four questions of expert validity results with a CVI of 0.8 or less were revised to reflect expert opinion. The usefulness, adequacy, and convenience of the final modified algorithm was 2.98 ~ 3.53. Conclusion After sufficiently validated by follow-up studies, it is expected that the use of psychiatric classification algorithms in emergency room nurses will not only improve the quality of care, but also can improve patient outcomes and experience.

Abstract P258: Racial Disparity in 90-Day Post-Stroke Readmission - An MUSC Perspective

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratik Y Chhatbar ◽  
Jihad S Obeid ◽  
Yujing Zhao ◽  
Daniel T Lackland ◽  
Robert J Adams
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
African Americans ◽  
Emergency Room ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
University Of South Carolina ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Hospital Readmission Rates ◽  
Classification Of Diseases

Background: Readmissions after acute hospitalizations are a cause of both risk and expense, and many of them are potentially preventable. Importantly, risk-standardized hospital readmission rates are sometimes used as a yardstick of the quality of care offered. However, racial variability in readmissions might involve factors beyond quality of care and has not been studied extensively. Objective: To identify differences in readmissions between African Americans and other races and determine preventable readmissions from a pragmatic viewpoint. Methods: We obtained deidentified data from Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Electronic Data Warehouse (EDW) on adult admissions with index diagnosis considered as an ischemic stroke (or closely related) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes 433.x, 434.x, 436.x, 437.x between January 2011 and June 2014. Of these, we determined readmission and reason for readmission over 90-day period. Readmission can be hospital or emergency room readmission. We obtained race as the only linked demographic. Results: Of the 1953 patients admitted with index diagnoses of stroke, 765 (39%), 1148 (59%) and 50 (1%) were African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. At 90-days, 256 patients were readmitted as in-patient, of which 128 (50%), 126 (49%) and 2 (1%) were African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. On the other hand, 241 patients visited Emergency Room, of which 175 (73%), 65 (26%) and 1 (1%) were African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively. On adjusting readmissions to index admissions, 17%, 11% and 4% of African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively, were readmitted in hospital, while 23%, 6% and 2% of African Americans, Caucasians and others, respectively, visited Emergency Room over 90-days period. Conclusions: 90-days readmission rates involve African Americans in a disproportionate manner. This demands further investigation on the etiology of readmission and the care offered.

Addressing the Scottish burden of wounds through the Lens of Profound Knowledge

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (Sup20) ◽  
pp. S34-S40
Author(s):  
Jenni MacDonald
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Theory Of Knowledge ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Profound Knowledge ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Growing Population

The prevalence of wounds and the cost of treating them are increasing year on year. Improving the quality of wound care will improve patient outcomes and is a financial necessity. The Lens of Profound Knowledge is a tool that can be used to support quality improvement and identify where action is needed. It allows exploration of an organisation through four aspects—appreciate the system, understanding variation, psychology, and theory of knowledge—and working on all four aspects simultaneously is believed to increase the likelihood of achieving improvement. Improvements at and between all levels—microsystem (such as frontline services), mesosystem (health boards) and macrosystem (NHS Scotland)—would reduce variation in practice and prove to be both clinically and cost-effective. Given the rapidly growing population of people with unhealed wounds, wound care needs to be valued at all system levels and be adequately resourced.

Health care process and patient experience

2013 ◽  
pp. 384-395
Author(s):  
Diana Delnoij
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Negative Experiences ◽  
Patient’S Perspective ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Improve Patient ◽  
Patients Perspective

This chapter will help you to analyse the health care process and, in particular, the quality of this process and its outcomes from the patient’s perspective. You will read how you can measure quality from the patient’s perspective, how to interpret the findings, and how to take action based on the results. This chapter provides hands-on guidance with respect to the development and implementation of surveys measuring patient experiences. However, keep in mind that this is only a first step in the quality cycle. The results of such a survey give you a ‘diagnosis’ of the quality of care from the patients’ perspective. It does not really tell you what you should do to improve patient experiences, however. To find effective remedies for negative experiences, often you will have to do additional research.

scholarly journals Review: Relation Between Quality-of-Care Indicators for Diabetes and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grigory Sidorenkov ◽  
Flora M Haaijer-Ruskamp ◽  
Dick de Zeeuw ◽  
Henk Bilo ◽  
Petra Denig
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Systematic Literature Review

scholarly journals Changing diabetes® barometer: A global quality monitoring framework for improving patient outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 01 (01) ◽  
pp. 044-047
Author(s):  
Pavika Jain ◽  
Niels Aamand
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Global Perspective ◽  
Quality Monitoring ◽  
Good Practices ◽  
Quality Of Diabetes Care

This article has a global perspective and includes examples from several continents i.e. Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe. The Changing Diabetes® Barometer (CDB) is a Novo Nordisk initiative that works as a worldwide quality monitoring system for diabetes management to measure the gains made in the fight against diabetes focusing on quality of care and patient outcomes. CDB provides a platform for countries to share local diabetes data and good practices. In doing so it aims to disseminate improved practices of care. CDB is conceptualised as a framework that can help change diabetes. Its three cornerstones are “Measure, Share, Improve” (MSI):• MEASURE the quality of diabetes care through patient outcomes and care processes.• SHARE data on the quality of diabetes care and good practices with all relevant stakeholders.• IMPROVE the quality of diabetes care by identifying and actively spreading good practices in diabetes care and inspire others to adopt and follow best practice examples.Italy and Algeria both constitute best practice examples of CDB initiatives. In Italy a registry solution is already solidly implemented and improvements in patient outcomes have been documented. The initiative in Algeria has recently been initiated including establishment of IT equipment in participating clinics to ensure all relevant measurements. This will enable transparency on current level of quality of diabetes care. Both initiatives have the common goal of driving improvements in quality of care and patient outcomes across clinics. India is another good example where data is collected through the CDB aimed at driving improvement of diabetes care in order to improve quality of life for people with diabetes. CDB in India is implemented in five states (Goa, Bihar, Gujarat, Puducherry and Andhra Pradesh) and is planned to be expanded to five additional states.

Studying physician effects on patient outcomes: Physician interactional style and performance on quality of care indicators

2006 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 422-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Franks ◽  
Anthony F Jerant ◽  
Kevin Fiscella ◽  
Cleveland G Shields ◽  
Daniel J Tancredi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
And Performance

Improving quality of care by obtaining patient-reported outcomes (PRO)-CTCAE chemotoxicities using tablet technology in daycare (DC) waiting rooms.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 165-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tian Qi Wang ◽  
Catherine Brown ◽  
Ashlee Vennettilli ◽  
Lauren Wong ◽  
Aein Zarrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Waiting Room ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Hematologic Cancer ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Age Range

165 Background: In a busy chemo DC, any efficient means of tracking important chemotoxicities can improve quality of care. The study goal was to evaluate whether tablet technology available in a DC waiting room is able to capture prevalent and severe toxicities associated with chemotherapy using the patient reported outcome (PRO) - common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE). Methods: This cross-sectional PRO-CTCAE study of 160 adult solid/hematologic cancer outpatients of all stages, who were undergoing chemotherapy (CT), focused on common chemotoxicities captured using touchscreen tablets in the DC waiting room of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (Toronto, CA). Individual health scores from the EQ-5D VAS tool and the prevalence of AEs experienced by cancer patients within the past seven days were captured. Symptoms that were listed as moderate to very severe were considered significant. Results: Across a wide range of tumours and patients on intravenous CT, the median age (range) was 56 (19-88) years; 38% were males.Patients reported a median (range) health score (100 = best health possible, 0 = worst) of 70 (4-100). The severity offiveprevalent, key side-effects of CT were tabulated (Table). 59% of patients felt their fatigue interfered significantly with their daily activities, and 30% felt decreased appetite interfered significantly. 32% experienced nausea occasionally to almost constantly. Conclusions: The common symptoms of CT were captured FEASIBLY, and found to be highly prevalent in this CT-treated population. Capturing additional symptom prevalence outside of the 7-day time frame may be important from a clinical standpoint. Administration of PRO-CTCAE instrument through tablet technology may be an excellent method to help collect such data systematically and reliably. Updated data on 300 patients will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice

Hematology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Dobrozsi ◽  
Julie Panepinto
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Physician Communication ◽  
Valuable Data ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Improve Patient

Abstract Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement plays an increasingly important role in health care and understanding health outcomes. PROs are any report of a patient's health status that comes directly from the patient, and can measure patient symptoms, patient function, and quality-of-life. PROs have been used successfully to assess impairment in a clinical setting. Use of PROs to systematically quantify the patient experience provides valuable data to assist with clinical care; however, initiating use of PROs in clinical practice can be daunting. Here we provide suggestions for implementation of PROs and examples of opportunities to use PROs to tailor individual patient therapy to improve patient outcomes, patient–physician communication, and the quality of care for hematology/oncology patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document