scholarly journals Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Obese and Nonobese Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiong Huang ◽  
Wanjin Qin ◽  
Huilin Yang ◽  
Minjie Shen
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Nonobese Patients

Abstract Background: Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of obese and nonobese patients following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF).Methods: Relevant studies comparing the outcome of MIS-TLIF between obese and nonobese patients were involved to make a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. All of the comparative studies published in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases as recently as 10 July 2020, were included. Primary outcomes (complications) and secondary outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, the length of hospital stay, the duration of surgery, and the estimated blood loss) were assessed between obese patients and nonobese patients. Statistical analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 and forest plots were made for each outcome.Results: Nine studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. BMI correlated significantly with complications, and postoperative complications occurred more frequently in obese patients. Additionally, obese patients after MIS-TLIF were associated with similar Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, Visual Analog Scale score for back pain(BP-VAS), and Visual Analog Scale score for leg pain(LP-VAS) scores in early (≤6 months after MIS-TLIF) and late period (≥24 months after MIS-TLIF). There was no significant difference in intraoperative complications, duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and estimated blood loss between the two groups.Conclusion: Obese patients should not be excluded from MIS-TLIF procedures due to worry about higher postoperative complication rates. Understanding common postoperative complications after MIS-TLIF will improve the treatment of obese patients with the degenerative lumbar disease.

Obesity Is Associated with Significant Morbidity after Multiligament Knee Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 525-530
Author(s):  
Jayson Lian ◽  
Neel K. Patel ◽  
Michael Nickoli ◽  
Ravi Vaswani ◽  
James J. Irrgang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Lateral Meniscus ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Nonobese Patients

AbstractThe objective was to report the effect of obesity, utilizing a body mass index (BMI) threshold of 35 kg/m2, on outcomes and complications of multiple ligament knee injury (MLKI). It was hypothesized that obese patients would have longer intraoperative times and hospital length of stay, greater estimated blood loss, and higher rates of wound infection requiring irrigation and debridement (I&D) and revision ligament surgery. A retrospective review was performed on 143 individuals who underwent surgery for an MLKI between 2011 and 2018 at a single academic center. Patients were included if there was a plan for potential surgical repair/reconstruction of two or more ligaments. Patients with prior surgery to the affected knee or intra-articular fracture requiring reduction and fixation were excluded. Comparisons between obese and nonobese patients were made using two-sample t-test and either chi-square or Fisher's exact test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Of 108 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 83 had BMI < 35 kg/m2 and 25 had BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2. Obese patients sustained higher rates of MLKI due to ultralow velocity mechanisms (28.0 vs. 1.2%; p = 0.0001) and higher rates of concomitant lateral meniscus injury (48.0 vs. 25.3%; p = 0.04). Among patients undergoing single-staged surgery, obese patients had significantly longer duration of surgery (219.8 vs. 178.6 minutes; p = 0.02) and more wound infections requiring I&D (20.0 vs. 4.8%; p = 0.03). In contrast, nonobese patients had higher rates of arthrofibrosis requiring manipulation under anesthesia and/or arthrolysis (25.3 vs. 0%; p = 0.003). Obese patients undergoing surgery of an MLKI have longer operative times, greater rates of wound infection requiring I&D, and lower rates of arthrofibrosis. Surgeons may consider these results when counseling patients on their postoperative course and risk for complications. Future research might focus on strategies to reduce complication rates in obese patients with MLKI. This is a Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Treating traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures using minimally invasive percutaneous stabilization plus balloon kyphoplasty: a 102-patient series

2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-017238
Author(s):  
Henri Salle ◽  
Alexandre Meynard ◽  
Emilie Auditeau ◽  
Clément Gantois ◽  
Aymeric Rouchaud ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Body Height ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Balloon Kyphoplasty ◽  
Expected Improvement ◽  
Thoracolumbar Fractures ◽  
Analog Scale

BackgroundThere is no consensus on the treatment for spinal injuries resulting in thoracolumbar fractures without neurological impairment. Many trauma centers are opting for open surgery rather than a neurointerventional approach combining posterior percutaneous short fixation (PPSF) plus balloon kyphoplasty (BK).ObjectiveTo assess the safety and efficacy of PPSF+BK and to estimate the expected improvement by clarifying the factors that influence improvement.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent PPSF+BK for the treatment of single traumatic thoracolumbar fractures from 2007 to 2019. Kyphosis, loss of vertebral body height (VBH), clinical and functional outcomes including visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index were assessed. We examined the overall effects in all patients by constructing a linear statistical model, and then examined whether efficacy was dependent on the characteristics of the patients or the fractures.ResultsA total of 102 patients were included. No patient experienced neurological worsening or wound infections. The average rates of change were 74.4% (95% CI 72.6% to 76.1%) for kyphosis and 85.5% (95% CI 84.4% to 86.6%) for VBH (both p<0.0001). The kyphosis treatment was more effective on Magerl A3 and B2 fractures than on those classified as A2.3, as well as for fractures with slight posterior wall protrusion on the spinal canal. A higher postoperative visual analog scale score was predictive of poorer outcome at 1 year.ConclusionsThis is the largest series reported to date and confirms and validates this surgical treatment. All patients exhibited improved kyphosis and restoration of VBH. We advise opting for this technique rather than open surgery.

scholarly journals Pruritus is common in patients with chronic liver disease and is improved by nalfurafine hydrochloride

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhei Yoshikawa ◽  
Takeharu Asano ◽  
Mina Morino ◽  
Keita Matsumoto ◽  
Hitomi Kashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alkaline Phosphatase ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Analog Scale

AbstractPruritus is known to be a common complication in hepatitis patients, but the exact frequency and degree are not fully elucidated. Thus, we evaluated pruritus of 450 patients with chronic liver disease at our hospital. Pruritus was observed in 240 (53%) of the patients. Pruritus was significantly associated with males (OR = 1.51, P = 0.038) and patients with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 200 U/L (OR = 1.56, P = 0.0495) and was significantly less in HBsAg-positive patients (OR = 0.449, P = 0.004). Seasonally, there was no difference in the frequency of pruritus between summer and winter. Of the 24 refractory pruritus patients treated with nalfurafine, 17 (71%) indicated improvement of itch, which is defined as a decrease in the visual analog scale score ≥ 30 mm. Pruritus was improved by nalfurafine both during daytime and nighttime in the Kawashima’s scores evaluation. All patients who received nalfurafine exhibited improved Kawashima’s scores ≥ 1 point during the daytime or nighttime. In conclusion, pruritus occurred in > 50% of patients with chronic liver disease, and predictors of pruritus were males and ALP ≥ 200 U/L. Nalfurafine may be useful for pruritus, regardless of whether daytime or nighttime.

scholarly journals Is Obesity a Risk Factor for Spinal Surgeries? A Retrospective Study in a Specialized Orthopedic Spine Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Hasan Ghandhari ◽  
◽  
Ebrahim Ameri ◽  
Mohsen Motalebi ◽  
Mohamad-Mahdi Azizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Obese Group ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Various studies have shown the effects of morbid obesity on the adverse consequences of various surgeries, especially postoperative infections. However, some studies have shown that the complications of spinal surgery in obese and non-obese patients are not significantly different. Objectives: This study investigated and compared the duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications after common spinal surgeries by orthopedic spine fellowship in obese and non-obese patients in a specialized spine center in Iran. Methods: All patients who underwent decompression with or without lumbar fusion were included in this retrospective study. These patients were classified into two groups: non-obese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). The data related to type and levels of surgery, 30-day hospital complications, length of hospital stay, rate of postoperative wound infection, blood loss, and need for transfusion were all extracted and compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 148 patients (74%) were in the non-obese group and 52 patients (26%) in the obese group. The number of patients that need packed cells was significantly higher in the obese group (51.8% vs 32.6%) (P=0.01). Otherwise, there were not a significant difference between type of treatment (fusion or only decompression) (P=0.78), interbody fusion (P=0.26), osteotomy (P=0.56), duration of surgery (P=0.25), length of hospital stay (P=0.72), mean amount of blood loss (P=0.09), and postoperative complications (P=0.68) between the two groups. Conclusion: Our results suggest that duration of surgery, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications are not associated with the BMI of the patients.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Percutaneous Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 441-452
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Lumbar Interbody Fusion ◽  
Degenerative Lumbar Disease

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) has been increasingly used to treat degenerative lumbar disease in recent years. However, there are still controversies about whether PE-TLIF is superior to minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical outcomes and complications of PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in treating degenerative lumbar disease. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of online databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify related studies reporting the outcomes and complications of PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF for degenerative lumbar disease. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index. In addition, the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to ambulation, length of hospital stay, fusion rate, and surgery-related complications were summarized. Forest plots were constructed to investigate the results. RESULTS: A total of 28 studies involving 1,475 patients were included in this meta-analysis. PE-TLIF significantly reduced operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay compared to MIS-TLIF. Moreover, PE-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF in the early postoperative relief of back pain. However, there were no significant differences in medium to long-term clinical outcomes, fusion rate, and incidence of complications between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF. LIMITATIONS: The current evidence is heterogeneous and most studies included in this meta-analysis are nonrandomized controlled trials. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis indicates that medium to long-term clinical outcomes and complication rates of PE-TLIF were similar to MIS-TLIF for the treatment of degenerative lumbar disease. However, PE-TLIF shows advantages in less surgical trauma, faster recovery, and early postoperative relief of back pain. KEY WORDS: Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, degenerative lumbar disease, chronic pain, systematic review, meta-analysis

Effect of Normal Saline Injections on Lateral Epicondylitis Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 3094-3102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Acosta-Olivo ◽  
Juan Manuel Millán-Alanís ◽  
Luis Ernesto Simental-Mendía ◽  
Neri Álvarez-Villalobos ◽  
Félix Vilchez-Cavazos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Tennis Elbow ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Lateral Epicondylitis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Meaningful Improvement

Background: Lateral epicondylitis, or tennis elbow, is a painful degenerative disorder that commonly occurs in adults between 40 and 60 years of age. Normal saline (NS) injections have been used as placebo through a large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Purpose: This meta-analysis of RCTs aimed to assess the therapeutic effect of NS injections on lateral epicondylitis symptoms and compare results with established minimal clinically important difference criteria. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched for clinical trials reporting pain and joint function with the visual analog scale, Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in patients with lateral epicondylitis. The meta-analysis was conducted with a random effects model and generic inverse variance method. Heterogeneity was tested with the I2 statistic index. Results: A total of 15 RCTs included in this meta-analysis revealed a significant improvement in pain (mean difference, 3.61 cm [95% CI, 2.29-4.92 cm]; P < .00001; I2 = 88%; visual analog scale) and function (mean difference, 25.65 [95% CI, 13.30-37.99]; P < .0001; I2 = 82%; Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation / Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) after NS injection (≥6 months). Conclusion: NS injections yielded a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in pain and functional outcomes in patients with lateral epicondylitis. New research should focus on better methods to diminish the potential confounders that could lead to this effect because NS injections could mask the real effect of an active therapeutic intervention in RCT. Registration: CRD42019127547 (PROSPERO).

Transdermal Nitroglycerine Enhances Spinal Neostigmine Postoperative Analgesia following Gynecological Surgery

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 943-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela R. Lauretti ◽  
Ana-Paula M. Oliveira ◽  
Maria-do-Carmo C. Julião ◽  
Marlene P. Reis ◽  
Newton L. Pereira
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Postoperative Analgesia ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Spinal Pain ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
American Society

Background Intrathecal neostigmine causes analgesia by inhibiting the breakdown of acetylcholine. Experimental data suggest that the production of endogenous nitric oxide is necessary for tonic cholinergic inhibition of spinal pain transmission. The purpose of this study was to determine whether association of transdermal nitroglycerine would enhance analgesia from a low dose of intrathecal neostigmine in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery during spinal anesthesia. Methods Forty-eight patients were randomized to one of four groups. Patients were premedicated with use of 0.05-0.1 mg/kg intravenous midazolam and received 15 mg bupivacaine plus 1 ml test drug intrathecally (saline or neostigmine, 5 microgram). Twenty to 30 min after the spinal puncture, a transdermal patch of either 5 mg nitroglycerin or placebo was applied. The control (Con) group received spinal saline and transdermal placebo. The neostigmine group received spinal neostigmine and transdermal placebo. The nitroglycerin group received spinal saline and a transdermal nitroglycerine patch. Finally, the neostigmine-nitroglycerin group received spinal neostigmine and transdermal nitroglycerine. Pain and adverse effects were evaluated using a 10-cm visual analog scale. Results Patients in the groups were similar regarding age, weight, height, and American Society of Anesthesiologists status. Sensory level to pin prick at 10 min, surgical duration, anesthetic duration, and visual analog scale score for pain at the time of administration of first rescue medication were statistically the same for all groups. The time to administration of first rescue analgesic (min) was longer in the neostigmine-nitroglycerin group (550 min; range, 458-1,440 min; median, 25-75th percentile) compared with the other groups (P &lt; 0.001). The neostigmine-nitroglycerin group required fewer rescue analgesics in 24 h than did the control group (P &lt; 0.0005), whereas the neostigmine group required less analgesics compared with the control group (P &lt; 0.02). The incidence of perioperative adverse effects (nausea, vomiting, headache, back pain) was similar among groups (P &gt; 0.05). Conclusion Although neither intrathecal 5 microgram neostigmine alone nor transdermal nitroglycerine alone (5 mg/day) delayed the time to administration of first rescue analgesics, the combination of both provided an average of 14 h of effective postoperative analgesia after vaginoplasty, suggesting that transdermal nitroglycerin and the central cholinergic agent neostigmine may enhance each other's antinociceptive effects at the dose studied.

scholarly journals Awake Fiberoptic or Awake Video Laryngoscopic Tracheal Intubation in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Airway Management

2012 ◽  
Vol 116 (6) ◽  
pp. 1210-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte V. Rosenstock ◽  
Bente Thøgersen ◽  
Arash Afshari ◽  
Anne-Lise Christensen ◽  
Claus Eriksen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Scale Score ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Difficult Intubation ◽  
Visual Analog Scale Score ◽  
Difficult Tracheal Intubation ◽  
Fiberoptic Intubation ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Intubation Success

Background Awake flexible fiberoptic intubation (FFI) is the gold standard for management of anticipated difficult tracheal intubation. The purpose of this study was to compare awake FFI to awake McGrath® video laryngoscope, (MVL), (Aircraft Medical, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom) intubation in patients with an anticipated difficult intubation. The authors examined the hypothesis that MVL intubation would be faster than FFI. Methods Ninety-three adult patients with anticipated difficult intubation were randomly allocated to awake FFI or awake MVL, patients were given glycopyrrolate, nasal oxygen, topical lidocaine orally, and a transtracheal injection of 100 mg lidocaine. Remifentanil infusion was administered intravenously to a Ramsay sedation score of 2-4. Time to tracheal intubation was recorded by independent assessors. The authors also recorded intubation success on the first attempt, investigators' evaluation of ease of the technique, and patients reported intubation-discomfort evaluated on a visual analog scale. Results Eighty-four patients were eligible for analysis. Time to tracheal intubation was median [interquartile range, IQR] 80 s [IQR 58-117] with FFI and 62 s [IQR 55-109] with MVL (P = 0.17). Intubation success on the first attempt was 79% versus 71% for FFI and MVL, respectively. The median visual analog scale score for ease of intubation was 2 (IQR 1-4) versus 1 (IQR 1-6) for FFI and MVL, respectively. The median visual analog scale score for patients' assessment of discomfort for both techniques was 2, FFI (IQR 0-3), MVL (IQR 0-4). Conclusions The authors found no difference in time to tracheal intubation between awake FFI and awake MVL intubation performed by experienced anesthesiologists in patients with anticipated difficult airway.

The Self-Retaining Barbed Suture for Parenchymal Repair in Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 744-752
Author(s):  
Hailun Zhan ◽  
Chunping Huang ◽  
Tengcheng Li ◽  
Fei Yang ◽  
Jiarong Cai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
The Self ◽  
Barbed Suture ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Objectives. The warm ischemia time (WIT) is key to successful laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the self-retaining barbed suture (SRBS) with a non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Methods. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to March 2018. Inclusion criteria for this study were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational comparative studies assessing the SRBS and non-SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN. Outcomes of interest included WIT, complications, overall operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and change of renal function. Results. One RCT and 7 retrospective studies were identified, which included a total of 461 cases. Compared with the non-SRBS, use of the SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN was associated with shorter WIT ( P < .00001), shorter overall operative time ( P < .00001), lower estimated blood loss ( P = .02), and better renal function preservation ( P = .001). There was no significant difference between the SRBS and non-SRBS with regard to complications ( P = .08) and length of hospital stay ( P = .25). Conclusions. The SRBS for parenchymal repair during LPN can significantly shorten the WIT and overall operative time, decrease blood loss, and preserve renal function.

scholarly journals Is Endoscopic Discectomy the Next Gold Standard in the Management of Lumbar Disc Disease? Systematic Review and Superiority Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822094881
Author(s):  
Sathish Muthu ◽  
Eswar Ramakrishnan ◽  
Girinivasan Chellamuthu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Lumbar Disc Disease ◽  
Endoscopic Discectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Objectives: We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate whether endoscopic discectomy (ED) shows superiority compared with the current gold standard of microdiscectomy (MD) in management of lumbar disc disease. Materials and Methods: We conducted independent and duplicate electronic database search including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from 1990 till April 2020 for studies comparing ED and MD in the management of lumbar disc disease. Analysis was performed in R platform using OpenMeta[Analyst] software. Results: We included 27 studies, including 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 7 nonrandomized prospective, and 9 retrospective studies involving 4018 patients in the meta-analysis. We stratified the results based on the study design. Considering the heterogeneity in some results between study designs, we weighed our conclusion essentially based on results of RCTs. On analyzing the RCTs, superiority was established at 95% confidence interval for ED compared with MD in terms of functional outcomes like Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score ( P = .008), duration of surgery ( P = .023), and length of hospital stay ( P < .001) although significant heterogeneity was noted. Similarly, noninferiority to MD was established by ED in other outcomes like visual analogue scale score for back pain ( P = .860) and leg pain ( P = .495), MacNab classification ( P = .097), recurrences ( P = .993), reoperations ( P = .740), and return-to-work period ( P = .748). Conclusion: Our meta-analysis established the superiority of endoscopic discectomy in outcome measures like ODI score, duration of surgery, overall complications, length of hospital stay and noninferiority in other measures analyzed. With recent advances in the field of ED, the procedure has the potential to take over the place of MD as the gold standard of care in management of lumbar disc disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document