scholarly journals Do We Need Fluid Restriction After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy? A Pilot, Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nien-Ying Tsai ◽  
Shu-Wen Jao ◽  
Chao-Yang Chen ◽  
Chia-Cheng Wen ◽  
Chien-Chang Kao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Fluid Restriction ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Restriction Group

Abstract Background: Conventional hemorrhoidectomy leads to a high urinary retention rate and fluid restriction is commonly recommended to minimize complications. However, the need for postoperative fluid restriction among patients who have undergone stapled hemorrhoidopexy is unclear. We aimed to determine whether fluid restriction after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with/without partial external hemorrhoidectomy could reduce urinary retention and postoperative pain.Patients And Methods: In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled patients who had grade III or IV hemorrhoids and underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy with/without partial external hemorrhoidectomy; 250 mL/12 h of sterile 0.9% saline was administered to the fluid restriction group after the operation, and 1000 mL/12 h was given to the non-fluid-restriction group. We focused on the need for fluid restriction after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.Results: Fifty patients were studied in two groups. The surgical outcomes of the two groups were no different. The median subjective pain scores at 0, 8, 16, 24 h after the operation showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.55 at 0 h; p = 0.38 at 8 h; p = 0.98 at 16 h; and p = 0.66 at 24 h). The mean times to first urination after the operation were 700.04 ± 455.03 min in the non-fluid-restriction group and 737.16 ± 426.32 min in the fluid-restriction group (no significant difference; p = 0.67). No postoperative urinary retention was found in either group of patients.Conclusions: Fluid restriction after stapled hemorrhoidopexy is unnecessary.Trial registration: This study was reviewed and approved by the Tri-Service General Hospital Institutional Review Board for human subjects (No. 2-106-05-063). This study also had trial registration with clinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04459039).

scholarly journals Follicular flushing leads to higher oocyte yield in monofollicular IVF: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 2253-2261
Author(s):  
A S Kohl Schwartz ◽  
I Calzaferri ◽  
M Roumet ◽  
A Limacher ◽  
A Fink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Transfer Rate ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Follicular Aspiration ◽  
Oocyte Yield ◽  
Single Lumen ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does follicular flushing increase the number of mature oocytes in monofollicular IVF? SUMMARY ANSWER Follicular flushing increases the number of mature oocytes in monofollicular IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Flushing increases neither the oocyte yield nor the pregnancy rate in polyfollicular IVF or in poor responder patients. In monofollicular IVF, the effect of flushing has so far been addressed by two studies: (i) a prospective study with minimal stimulation IVF demonstrated an increased oocyte yield, and (ii) a retrospective study with natural cycle (NC)-IVF showed an increased oocyte yield and an increased transfer rate. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Randomized controlled trial including 164 women who were randomized for either aspiration with or without flushing from 2016 to 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Infertile women 18–42 years of age with an indication for IVF treatment at a university-based infertility unit. Women undergoing monofollicular IVF were randomized to either follicular aspiration only or follicular aspiration directly followed by five follicular flushes at a 1:1 ratio. The intervention was done without anaesthesia, using a gauge 19 single-lumen needle. Flushing volume was calculated (sphere formula) based on the size of the follicle. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 164 women were included; 81 were allocated to ‘aspiration only’ and 83 to additional ‘flushing’. Primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat: oocyte yield, defined as the collected mature oocyte rate, was higher (n = 64/83, 77.1%) in the flushing group compared to the aspiration only group (n = 48/81, 59.3%, adjusted risk difference (RD): 18.2% (95% CI 3.9–31.7%), P-value = 0.02). In the flushing group, most oocytes were retrieved within the first three flushes (63/83, 75.8%). Fertilization rate was higher in the flushing group (n = 53/83, 63.9% vs n = 38/81, 46.9%; adjusted RD: 16.8% (96% CI 1.5–31.4%), P = 0.045). Transfer rate was also higher in the flushing group (n = 52/83, 62.7% vs n = 38/81, 46.9%; RD: 15.71 (95% CI 0.3–30.3%)), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.06). The clinical pregnancy rate n = 9/83 versus n = 9/81 (RD: −0.3% (95% CI −9.9% to 9.5%)) and live birth rate n = 7/83 versus n = 8/81 (RD: −1.5% (95% CI −10.4% to 7.1%)) were not significantly different between the flushing and the aspiration group. The median duration of the intervention was significantly longer with flushing (2.38 min; quartiles 2.0, 2.7) versus aspiration only (0.43 min; quartiles 0.3, 0.5) (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the mean (±SD) visual analogue scales pain score between the follicular flushing (3.4 ± 1.8) and the aspiration group (3.1 ± 1.89). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Blinding of the procedure was not possible. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our study proved that flushing of single follicles in NC-IVF increases the oocyte yield. In contrast to polyfollicular IVF flushing seems to be beneficial in a monofollicular setting if the technique used in our study (single-lumen needle, 5 flushings with flushing volume adaptation) is applied. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study was funded by the financial sources of the division and in part by a research grant provided by NMS Biomedical SA, Switzerland. The company did not have any roles in design or conduct of the study or in the preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no other conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Clinicaltrials.gov NCT 02641808. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 29 December 2015 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 22 August 2016

scholarly journals Paracetamol versus Nalbuphine in Relieving Pain in the First Stage of Labour in Primigravida: Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Nadim ◽  
N A M Elghareeb ◽  
S H M Eid
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
P Value ◽  
Disability Score ◽  
Uterine Contractions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tendon Thickness ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Latent Phase

Abstract Background First stage of labor begins with regular uterine contractions and ends with complete cervical dilatation at 10 cm. It is divided into a latent phase and an active phase. The latent phase begins with mild, irregular uterine contractions that soften and shorten the cervix. Objectives To compare between intravenous nalbuphine and paracetamol in relieving pain in first stage of labour. Patients and Methods This double-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted on 120 women primigravida with term and viable pregnancy, presenting with the vertex attending the labor ward for delivery in Ain Shams Maternity Hospital. Results Our study showed remarkably noticeable change on comparing the pre-injection and post-injection SPADI Scoring system at 4,8,12 and 24 weeks. There is highly statistically significant pain and disability score and percentage improvement, yet on the other hand the radiological improvement shows no statistically significant difference found between baseline tendon thickness and its follow up at 4, 8 and 12 weeks while only there was statistically significant decrease in tendon thickness found at 24 weeks with p-value = 0.043. Conclusion The ultrasound-guided PRP injection for supraspinatus tendinopathy cases is a safe, cheap, and easily prepared outpatient procedure which showed competitive, promising, and well-proved results when compared to other modalities outcomes such as conventional surgeries, arthroscopic procedures, and physiotherapy. It deserves our attention to its value and efficacy for the sake of the patient as a minimally invasive procedure providing better quality of life.

scholarly journals The The Effectiveness of Early Mobilization Time on Balance and Functional Ability after Ischemic Stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 1088-1092
Author(s):  
Umi Budi Rahayu ◽  
Samekto Wibowo ◽  
Ismail Setyopranoto
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Functional Ability ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Berg Balance Scale ◽  
Early Mobilisation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation (EM) after-ischemic stroke is a motor learning intervention aimed to restore nerve cells and to improve balance and functional ability. Unfortunately, the study of when this intervention began has not been widely studied. AIM: On this study was compared the effect of EM started at 24 hours and 48 hours after an ischemic stroke on balance and functional ability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized controlled trial involving 40 patients on 2 groups meeting predefined inclusion criteria. The levels of balance were measured using the Berg Balance Scale, and the functional ability was measured using the Barthel Index, at 5th and 7th day. RESULTS: A significant difference was observed in both balance (p = 0.038) and functional ability (p = 0.021) obtained on the 7th day of assessment between both groups. A significant difference on the 5th day was observed only in the functional ability (p = 0.002) and not in the balance (p = 0.147), between the groups. CONCLUSION: EM started at 24 hours after the ischemic stroke has been found to have a better impact on balance and functional ability compared to that at 48 hours.

scholarly journals Effect of leg wrapping technique on prevention of spinal induced hypotension and fetal acidosis during cesarean section: Randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 70
Author(s):  
Samah Nasser Abd El-Aziz El-Shora ◽  
Amina Mohamed Rashad El-Nemer
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Induced Hypotension ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Wrapping Technique

Background and aim: Hypotension during cesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia has been a subject of scientific study for more than 50 years and the search for the most effective strategy to achieve hemodynamic stability remains challenging. Aim: The study was carried out to apply leg wrapping technique for the prevention of spinal-induced hypotension (SIH) during CS.Methods: Randomized Controlled Trial design was utilized at cesarean delivery operating room Mansoura General Hospital in El-Mansoura City during the period from May 2018 to November 2018. A purposive sample of 88 pregnant women, assigned randomly to an intervention group (n = 44) in which their legs wrapped with elastic crepe bandage and control group (n = 44) in which no wrapping was done. Data collected for maternal, neonatal hemodynamic and signs of hypotension, the feasibility of application and cost analysis.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of SIH and Ephedrine use among both groups (18.20% in leg wrapping group whereas 75% in control group). In addition, neonatal acidosis and NICU admission were less among leg wrapping group (11.40%, 9.10% respectively). Economically, leg wrapping technique was cost effective compared to the cost of the hospital regimen for treating SIH and admission to (NICU).Conclusion and recommendations: Leg wrapping technique was cost effective and an efficient method for decreasing SIH, neonatal acidosis and Ephedrine administration. It is recommended to apply leg wrapping technique in maternal hospitals' protocol of care for decreasing SIH during CS.

scholarly journals Boxing vs Sensory Exercise for Parkinson’s Disease: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 154596832110231
Author(s):  
Kishoree Sangarapillai ◽  
Benjamin M. Norman ◽  
Quincy J. Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Motor Symptoms ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Double Blinded

Background. Exercise is increasingly becoming recognized as an important adjunct to medications in the clinical management of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Boxing and sensory exercise have shown immediate benefits, but whether they continue beyond program completion is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of boxing and sensory training on motor symptoms of PD, and whether these benefits remain upon completion of the intervention. Methods. In this 20-week double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 40 participants with idiopathic PD were randomized into 2 treatment groups, (n = 20) boxing or (n = 20) sensory exercise. Participants completed 10 weeks of intervention. Motor symptoms were assessed at (week 0, 10, and 20) using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III). Data were analyzed using SPSS, and repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted. Results. A significant interaction effect between groups and time were observed F(1, 39) = 4.566, P = .036, where the sensory group improved in comparison to the boxing group. Post hoc analysis revealed that in comparison to boxing, the effects of exercise did not wear off at washout (week 20) P < .006. Conclusion. Future rehabilitation research should incorporate similar measures to explore whether effects of exercise wear off post intervention.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document