scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of cinepazide maleate injection in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ni ◽  
Huisheng Chen ◽  
Guofang Chen ◽  
Yong Ji ◽  
Fei Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Barthel Index ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind

Abstract Background: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Thrombolytic therapy improves disability and survival rates; however, to be effective, it must be given within 4.5 hours of onset. Moreover, thrombolytic therapy is frequently contraindicated. Therefore, alternative therapeutic options are required. In China, cinepazide maleate injection has been shown to improve the cerebral collateral circulation and further reduce disability in stroke patients; however, very few studies investigating this therapy have been conducted to date. Therefore, this study aimed to further confirm the efficacy and safety of cinepazide maleate injection in patients with acute ischemic stroke.Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were administered an intravenous infusion of 320 mg cinepazide maleate or placebo once daily for 14 days. All patients were also administered basic therapy (citicoline sodium). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2 on day 90. Secondary efficacy endpoints included Barthel Index ≥95. Safety was evaluated by recording all adverse events (AEs), monitoring laboratory parameters and vital signs, and electrocardiogram.Results: In total, 937 patients with an acute ischemic stroke were included, with a mean (standard deviation, SD) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 8.8 (2.4) and a mean (SD) stroke onset of 30.9 (11.4) hours prior. Following treatment for 90 days, the proportion of patients with an mRS score ≤2 was significantly higher in the cinepazide maleate group than in the control group (60.9% vs. 50.1%; p=0.0004). Moreover, the proportion of patients with a Barthel Index of ≥95 on day 90 was also significantly higher in the cinepazide maleate group than in the control group (53.4% vs. 46.7%; p=0.0230). There were no statistically significant differences in safety parameters between the cinepazide maleate and control groups.Conclusions: The results of this study show that cinepazide maleate injection is superior to placebo in improving neurological function and activities of daily living, reducing disability, and promoting functional recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cinepazide maleate injection was safe and well tolerated with no unexpected AEs reported.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry CTR20160292 and ChiCTR1900023827. Retrospectively registered June 13, 2019.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of cinepazide maleate injection in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ni ◽  
Huisheng Chen ◽  
Guofang Chen ◽  
Yong Ji ◽  
Fei Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Barthel Index ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind

Abstract Background: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Thrombolytic therapy improves disability and survival rates; however, to be effective, it must be given within 4.5 hours of onset. Moreover, thrombolytic therapy is frequently contraindicated. Therefore, alternative therapeutic options are required. In China, cinepazide maleate injection has been shown to improve the cerebral collateral circulation and further reduce disability in stroke patients; however, very few studies investigating this therapy have been conducted to date. Therefore, this study aimed to further confirm the efficacy and safety of cinepazide maleate injection in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were administered an intravenous infusion of 320 mg cinepazide maleate or placebo once daily for 14 days. All patients were also administered basic therapy (citicoline sodium). The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2 on day 90. Secondary efficacy endpoints included Barthel Index ≥95. Safety was evaluated by recording all adverse events (AEs), monitoring laboratory parameters and vital signs, and electrocardiogram. Results: In total, 937 patients with an acute ischemic stroke were included, with a mean (standard deviation, SD) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 8.8 (2.4) and a mean (SD) stroke onset of 30.9 (11.4) hours prior. Following treatment for 90 days, the proportion of patients with an mRS score ≤2 was significantly higher in the cinepazide maleate group than in the control group (60.9% vs. 50.1%; p=0.0004). Moreover, the proportion of patients with a Barthel Index of ≥95 on day 90 was also significantly higher in the cinepazide maleate group than in the control group (53.4% vs. 46.7%; p=0.0230). There were no statistically significant differences in safety parameters between the cinepazide maleate and control groups. Conclusions: The results of this study show that cinepazide maleate injection is superior to placebo in improving neurological function and activities of daily living, reducing disability, and promoting functional recovery in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cinepazide maleate injection was safe and well tolerated with no unexpected AEs reported.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Jie-du-qing-nao granules for first-episode schizophrenics: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziyan Li ◽  
Yanzhe Ning ◽  
Pei Chen ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Dongqing Yin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Symptoms ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Symptom Scale ◽  
Double Blind

Abstract BackgroundAt present, the focus and difficulty of schizophrenia (SCZ) treatment is to improve cognitive function and negative symptoms. Jie-du-qing-nao granules(JQG) , a traditional Chinese medicine(TCM) prescription , has a good clinical effectiveness in enhancing the cognition and negative symptoms of patients with SCZ. However, its clear effectiveness and safety have not been adequately supported by clinical studies. The main objective of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of JQG for first-episode schizophrenics.Methods/designThis trial is a prospective, randomized, single-centered, parallel-controlled clinical study with double-blind design. A total of 96 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the study group or the control group in a ratio of 1:1. Participants allocated to the study group will receive JQG and aripiprazole, control group will receive placebo and aripiprazole. The treatment course will last 12 weeks, with follow-up every 4 weeks. Outcome measurements include Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), self face test , MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), TNFα, IL-6, IL-1β, BDNF, vital signs, complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, urinalysis, and electrocardiograph. Adverse reactions will be evaluated using the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS).DiscussionThis study will provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of JQG as a complementary approach, which can be initiated following with antipsychotics therapy. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ID: ChiCTR1900028250 . Registered on December 16, 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=41880&htm=4 .

Effect of Nimodipine on Regional Cerebral Glucose Metabolism in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke as Measured by Positron Emission Tomography

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. -D. Heiss ◽  
V. Holthoff ◽  
G. Pawlik ◽  
M. Neveling
Keyword(s):  
Positron Emission Tomography ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Barthel Index ◽  
Focal Ischemia ◽  
Emission Tomography ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Median Change

In a randomized double-blind placebocontrolled study of 27 patients with acute ischemic stroke, the effect on regional CMRglc (rCMRglc) of the calcium channel blocking agent nimodipine administered in addition to routine treatment was investigated. Following computed tomography-supported diagnosis of focal ischemia in the middle cerebral artery territory, positron emission tomography (PET) of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) was performed, and the patients were entered into the study within 48 h after onset of symptoms, randomly receiving either nimodipine (2 mg/h constant i.v. infusion for 5 days, 120 mg/day orally for another 16 days) or carrier/placebo. FDG PET was repeated after completion of therapy. The clinical course was followed during the treatment period and for 6 months after the stroke, using the Mathew Score for early and the Barthel Index for late assessment. During that observation period, five patients died in the nimodipine group and four in the control group. Subsequently, the code was broken, and the clinical and PET data were analyzed in relation to treatment assignment, with the nimodipine group comprising 11 and the control group 12 eligible cases. The two groups were similar with respect to age and sex distribution, initial clinical deficit, and infarct size and location. While the infarct rCMRglc showed comparable slight increases over time in both groups, the metabolic changes in the other evaluated regions (contralateral infarct mirror region, ipsi- and contralateral cerebral gray matter, contra- and ipsilateral cerebellar hemispheres) differed significantly between treatment groups (side x region x treatment interaction p < 0.025). In the control group, major improvement was found only in contralateral cerebrum (7.4%), whereas the nimodipine group had bilaterally increased rCMRglc of morphologically intact cerebral (14.6 and 17.1%, respectively) and, to a lesser degree, cerebellar (6.9 and 10.0%, respectively) structures. Likewise, progress of (postacute) rehabilitation was significantly (p1 < 0.05) better in the nimodipine treated patients (median change of Barthel Index = 40 vs. 2.5), although their clinical improvement during the first 3 weeks did not differ from the controls' (median change of Mathew Score = 12 and 11.5, respectively). These results lend further support to the notion that nimodipine treatment is of benefit in acute ischemic stroke. Since action on the infarct proper is unlikely when the drug is given many hours after the ischemic attack, it may be concluded that nimodipine exerts its beneficial effect by ameliorating the functional impairment of morphologically intact tissue surrounding the focal ischemia and by improving the metabolic deactivation of remote brain structures.

Comparative Analysis on Low- and Standard-Dose Regimes of Alteplase Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Efficacy and Safety

2017 ◽  
Vol 79 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 68-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangjian Zhao ◽  
Tingfen Huang ◽  
Mei Zheng ◽  
Yansen Cui ◽  
Yunyong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Thrombolytic Therapy ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Intravenous Alteplase

Objective: This study analyzed the efficacy and safety of low-dose and standard-dose alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: Patients with AIS who underwent intravenous alteplase thrombolysis from July 2012 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed and correspondingly divided into low-dose (0.6–0.89 mg/kg) group and standard-dose group (0.9 mg/kg) according to alteplase dosage. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days after onset. The safety index was the mortality at 90 days after onset and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) within 7 days. Results: A total of 1,486 patients were included (1,115 cases in low-dose group and 371 cases in standard-dose group). There were no significant differences in baseline data between the 2 groups. As mRS, good outcome rate as well as mortality rate in both groups had no significant difference (36.1 vs. 37.6%; χ2 = 10.882, p = 0.890; 5.5 vs. 7.3%; χ2 = 2.163, p = 0.076), but the incidence of SICH in low-dose group was significantly lower than that of the standard-dose group (2.2 vs. 5.9%; χ2 = 3.157, p = 0.001). Conclusion: The efficacy of low-dose alteplase intravenous thrombolytic therapy for AIS was equivalent to the standard-dose regimen but with higher safety.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Panax Notoginseng Saponins (Xueshuantong) in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke (EXPECT) Trial: Rationale and Design

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luda Feng ◽  
Fang Han ◽  
Li Zhou ◽  
Shengxian Wu ◽  
Yawei Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Panax Notoginseng ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Panax Notoginseng Saponins ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Patient Reported

Background: Although revascularization treatment is recommended as the first-line therapy for patients with non-minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS), it only benefits a minority of patients. Previous studies have reported the positive effects of Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) (Xueshuantong lyophilized powder) on AIS, however, there have been no rigorous trials. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of PNS therapy for patients with AIS.Methods: The Evaluation of Xueshuantong in Patients with acutE ischemiC sTroke (EXPECT) trial is a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study aiming to enroll 480 patients in China. Eligible patients with AIS within 72 h of symptom onset will randomly receive either PNS or PNS placebo for 10 days and subsequently be followed up to 90 days. The primary outcome will be a change in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score from baseline to 10 post-randomization days. The secondary outcomes include early neurological improvement (proportion of patients with NIHSS score 0–1), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Scale for Stroke score at 10 post-randomization days, the proportion of patients with life independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–1), the proportion of patients with a favorable outcome (Barthel Index ≥90), and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life score at 90 days. Adverse events or clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory parameters, regardless of the severity, will be recorded during the trial to assess the safety of PNS.Conclusions: To our knowledge, this study is the first double-blind trial to assess the efficacy and safety of PNS in patients with AIS. Findings of the EXPECT trial will be valuable in improving evidence regarding the clinical application of PNS therapy in patients with AIS ineligible for revascularization treatment in the reperfusion era.

scholarly journals Early Mobilization in Ischemic Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Trial of Safety and Feasibility in a Public Hospital in Brazil

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Rosa Poletto ◽  
Letícia Costa Rebello ◽  
Maria Júlia Monteiro Valença ◽  
Daniele Rossato ◽  
Andrea Garcia Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Control Group

Background: The effect of early mobilization after acute stroke is still unclear, although some studies have suggested improvement in outcomes. We conducted a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial seeking to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and benefit of early mobilization for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in a public teaching hospital in Southern Brazil. This report presents the feasibility and safety findings for the pilot phase of this trial. Methods: The primary outcomes were time to first mobilization, total duration of mobilization, complications during early mobilization, falls within 3 months, mortality within 3 months, and medical complications of immobility. We included adult patients with CT- or MRI-confirmed ischemic stroke within 48 h of symptom onset who were admitted from March to November 2012 to the acute vascular unit or general emergency unit of a large urban emergency department (ED) at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. The severity of the neurological deficit on admission was assessed by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The NIHSS and modified Rankin Scale (mRS, functional outcome) scores were assessed on day 14 or at discharge as well as at 3 months. Activities of daily living (ADL) were measured with the modified Barthel Index (mBI) at 3 months. Results: Thirty-seven patients (mean age 65 years, mean NIHSS score 11) were randomly allocated to an intervention group (IG) or a control group (CG). The IG received earlier (p = 0.001) and more frequent (p < 0.0001) mobilization than the CG. Of the 19 patients in the CG, only 5 (26%) underwent a physical therapy program during hospitalization. No complications (symptomatic hypotension or worsening of neurological symptoms) were observed in association with early mobilization. The rates of complications of immobility (pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis) and mortality were similar in the two groups. No statistically significant differences in functional independence, disability, or ADL (mBI ≥85) were observed between the groups at the 3-month follow-up. Conclusions: This pilot trial conducted at a public hospital in Brazil suggests that early mobilization after acute ischemic stroke is safe and feasible. Despite some challenges and limitations, early mobilization was successfully implemented, even in the setting of a large, complex ED, and without complications. Patients from the IG were mobilized much earlier than controls receiving the standard care provided in most Brazilian hospitals.

scholarly journals Breast Microecology Improvement Using Probiotics Following Needle Aspiration in Patients With Lactational Breast Abscess: a Multi-center Randomized Double-blind Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Yajun Gao ◽  
Jing Qin ◽  
Xiaoting Li ◽  
Fei Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Reaction Rates ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Healing Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Cure Rate ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Clinical Trial Registry ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
And Control

Abstract Background: Studies show that oral probiotics can improve the breast microecology and thus alleviate the inflammatory response; however, there is a lack of experimental data corresponding to cases with existing abscesses. We aimed to investigate the effect of Lactobacillus fermentum CECT5716 during needle aspiration in patients with lactational breast abscesses.Methods: Patients (aged 20–41 years) with lactational single-cavity breast abscesses (diameter 3–6 cm) from 12 hospitals were randomly assigned to the experimental (n=51) and control groups (n=50). Outcome measures included the abscess cure rate on day-5 of treatment, delactation rate, relieving pain rate, and the number of needle aspirations until day-28.Results: The experimental group’s 5-day cure rate (43.1%, 22/51) was significantly higher (p<0.05). The breastfeeding continuation on day-5 did not differ significantly (experimental group: 88.2%, 45/51; control group: 96.0%, 48/50; p=0.269). In the experimental and control groups, 19.6% and 14.0% of patients experienced moderate to severe pain on day-5, respectively, with no statistically significant differences (p=0.451). The median number of needle aspirations up to day-28 was two in the experimental (1–3 times) and control (1–4 times) groups, with no statistically significant differences (Mann–Whitney U test, p=0.322). Four patients in each group developed diarrhea, with adverse reaction rates of 7.84% (4/51) and 8.0% (4/50), respectively. No adverse reactions were reported in the infants.Conclusion: L. fermentum can shorten the healing time in patients with lactational breast abscesses.Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn), registration number: ChiCTR2000032682, registration date: May 6, 2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document