Best Practices in Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalil Koohpayehzadeh ◽  
Saber Azami-Aghdash ◽  
Naser Derakhshani ◽  
Aziz Rezapour ◽  
Riaz Alaei Kalajahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Financial Protection ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Population Coverage ◽  
Service Coverage ◽  
Universal Health

Abstract Background: Universal health coverage (UHC) is a very important and effective policy in the health system of countries worldwide. Using the experiences and learning from the best practices of successful countries in the UHC can be very helpful. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to provide a scoping review of successful global interventions and practices in achieving UHC.Methods: The present study is a scoping review study has conducted using the Arkesy and O'Malley framework. To gather information the databases of Embase, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Scopus, SID and MagIran have searched using the keywords of Universal health coverage, Universal healthcare coverage, Universal health care coverage, Strength*, Transfer*, interventions, improve*, program*, innovations, initiative, Financing, "Service delivery", Stewardship, "Resource generation", from 2000 to 2019. Content-Analysis was also used to analyze the data.Results: Out of 4257 articles, 57 evidence finally included in the study. The results showed that of the 40 countries that had successful interventions, most were Asian. The interventions were financial protection (40 interventions that categorized to 14 items), service coverage (31 interventions that categorized to 7 items), population coverage (36 interventions that categorized to 9 items) and quality (18 interventions that categorized to 7 items) respectively. Also, the successful result were conducted financial protection (14 items), service coverage (7 items), population coverage (9 items) and quality (7 items)) respectively.Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive and clear view of successful interventions in achieving to UHC. Therefore, with consideration to lessons learned from successful interventions, policymakers can be designing appropriate interventions to their country.

scholarly journals Are we advancing universal health coverage through cataract services? Protocol for a scoping review

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e039458
Author(s):  
Chan Ning Lee ◽  
Jacqueline Ramke ◽  
Ian McCormick ◽  
Justine H Zhang ◽  
Ada Aghaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Global Health ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Financial Protection ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Surgical Services ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Service Data ◽  
Universal Health

IntroductionUniversal health coverage (UHC) includes the dimensions of equity in access, quality services that improve health and protection against financial hardship. Cataract continues to be the leading cause of blindness globally, despite cataract surgery being an efficacious intervention. The aim of this scoping review is to map the nature, extent and global distribution of data on cataract services for UHC in terms of equity, access, quality and financial protection.Methods and analysisThe search will be constructed by an Information Specialist and undertaken in MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health databases. We will include all published non-interventional primary research studies and systematic reviews that report a quantitative assessment of access, equity, quality or financial protection of cataract surgical services for adults at the subnational, national, regional or global level from population-based surveys or routinely collected health service data since 1 January 2000 and published through to February 2020.Screening and data charting will be undertaken using Covidence systematic review software. Titles and abstracts of identified studies will be screened by two authors independently. Full-text articles of potentially relevant studies will be obtained and reviewed independently by two authors against the inclusion criteria. Any discrepancies between the authors will be resolved by discussion, and with a third author as necessary. A data charting form will be developed and piloted on three studies by three authors and amendments made as necessary. Data will be extracted by two reviewers independently and summarised narratively and using maps.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was not sought as the scoping review will only use published and publicly accessible data. The review will be published in an open access peer-reviewed journal. A summary of the results will be developed for website posting, stakeholder meetings and inclusion in the ongoing Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health.

scholarly journals Advancing universal health coverage in China and Vietnam: lessons for other countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhui Mao ◽  
Yuchen Tang ◽  
Tra Tran ◽  
Michelle Pender ◽  
Phuong Nguyen Khanh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Insurance ◽  
National Health ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
World Health ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Political Commitment ◽  
Population Coverage ◽  
Service Coverage ◽  
Universal Health

Abstract Background China and Vietnam have made impressive progress towards universal health coverage (UHC) through government-led health insurance reforms. We compared the different pathways used to achieve UHC, to identify the lessons other countries can learn from China and Vietnam. Methods This was a mixed method study which included a literature review, in-depth interviews and secondary data analysis. We conducted a literature search in English and Chinese databases, and reviewed policy documents from internal contacts. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 16 policy makers, government bureaucrats, health insurance scholars in China and Vietnam. Secondary data was collected from National Health Statistics Reports, Health Insurance Statistical Reports and National Health Household Surveys carried out in both countries. We used population insurance coverage, insurance policies, reimbursement rates, number of households experiencing catastrophic heath expenditure (CHE) and incidence of impoverishment due to health expenditure (IHE) to measure the World Health Organization’s three dimensions of UHC: population coverage, service coverage, and financial coverage. Results China has increased population coverage through strong political commitment and extensive government financial subsidies to expand coverage. Vietnam expanded population coverage gradually, by prioritizing the poor and the near-poor in an incremental way. In China, insurance service packages varied across regions and schemes and were greatly determined by financial contributions, resulting in limited service coverage in less developed areas. Vietnam focused on providing a comprehensive and universal service packages for all enrollees thereby approaching UHC in a more equitable manner. CHE rate decreased in Vietnam but increased in China between 2003 and 2008. While Vietnam has decreased the CHE gap between urban and rural populations, China suffers from persistent disparities among population income levels and geographic location. CHE and CHE rates were still high in lower income groups. Conclusion Political commitment, sustainable financial sources and administrative capacity are strong driving factors in achieving UHC through health insurance reform. Health insurance schemes need to consider covering essential health services for all beneficiaries and providing government subsidies for vulnerable populations’ in order to help achieve health for all.

scholarly journals Implementation research approaches to promoting universal health coverage in Africa: a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chukwudi A. Nnaji ◽  
Charles S. Wiysonge ◽  
Joseph C. Okeibunor ◽  
Thobile Malinga ◽  
Abdu A. Adamu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Reference Lists ◽  
Political Support ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Hand Search ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Universal Health

Abstract Background Implementation research has emerged as part of evidence-based decision-making efforts to plug current gaps in the translation of research evidence into health policy and practice. While there has been a growing number of initiatives promoting the uptake of implementation research in Africa, its role and effectiveness remain unclear, particularly in the context of universal health coverage (UHC). Hence, this scoping review aimed to identify and characterise the use of implementation research initiatives for assessing UHC-related interventions or programmes in Africa. Methods The review protocol was developed based on the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley, as enhanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute. The review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). MEDLINE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched. The search also included a hand search of relevant grey literature and reference lists. Literature sources involving the application of implementation research in the context of UHC in Africa were eligible for inclusion. Results The database search yielded 2153 records. We identified 12 additional records from hand search of reference lists. After the removal of duplicates, we had 2051 unique records, of which 26 studies were included in the review. Implementation research was used within ten distinct UHC-related contexts, including HIV; maternal and child health; voluntary male medical circumcision; healthcare financing; immunisation; healthcare data quality; malaria diagnosis; primary healthcare quality improvement; surgery and typhoid fever control. The consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) was the most frequently used framework. Qualitative and mixed-methods study designs were the commonest methods used. Implementation research was mostly used to guide post-implementation evaluation of health programmes and the contextualisation of findings to improve future implementation outcomes. The most commonly reported contextual facilitators were political support, funding, sustained collaboration and effective programme leadership. Reported barriers included inadequate human and other resources; lack of incentives; perception of implementation as additional work burden; and socio-cultural barriers. Conclusions This review demonstrates that implementation research can be used to achieve UHC-related outcomes in Africa. It has identified important facilitators and barriers to the use of implementation research for promoting UHC in the region.

scholarly journals Best Practices in Achieving Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jalil Koohpayezadeh ◽  
Saber Azami-Aghdash ◽  
Naser Derakhshani ◽  
Aziz Rezapour ◽  
Riaz Alaei Kalajahi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Universal Health

scholarly journals Protocol for a scoping review of implementation research approaches to universal health coverage in Africa

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e041721
Author(s):  
Chukwudi A Nnaji ◽  
Charles S Wiysonge ◽  
Joseph Okeibunor ◽  
Thobile Malinga ◽  
Abdu A Adamu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Implementation Research ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
African Region ◽  
Quantitative Evidence ◽  
Scoping Reviews ◽  
Universal Health

IntroductionImplementation research has emerged as part of evidence-based decision-making efforts to plug current gaps in the translation of research evidence into health policy and practice. While there has been a growing number of institutions and initiatives promoting the uptake of implementation research in Africa, their role and effectiveness remain unclear, particularly in the context of universal health coverage (UHC). This review aims to extensively identify and characterise the nature, facilitators and barriers to the use of implementation research for assessing or evaluating UHC-related interventions or programmes in Africa.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be developed based on the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O’Malley and enhanced by the Joanna Briggs Institute. It will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search of the following electronic databases will be conducted: Medline (via PubMed), Scopus and the Cochrane Library. Relevant grey literature and reference lists will also be searched. All publications describing the application of implementation research in the context of UHC will be considered for inclusion. Findings will be narratively synthesised and analysed using a predefined conceptual framework. Where applicable, quantitative evidence will be aggregated using summary statistics. There will be consultation of stakeholders, including UHC-oriented health professionals, programme managers, implementation researchers and policy-makers; to provide methodological, conceptual and practical insights.Ethics and disseminationThe data used in this review will be sourced from publicly available literature; hence, this study will not require ethical approval. Findings and recommendations will be disseminated to reach a diverse audience, including UHC advocates, implementation researchers and key health system stakeholders within the African region. Additionally, findings will be disseminated through an open-access publication in a relevant peer-reviewed journal.

scholarly journals Strengthening health systems to achieve Universal Health Coverage: Lessons from four Latin American countries.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramiro Gilardino ◽  
Rifkin Susan B ◽  
Pilar Valanzasca
Keyword(s):  
Health Systems ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Financial Protection ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Service Coverage ◽  
Latin American Countries ◽  
Universal Health

Abstract Background: During the 1990s, health systems within several Latin American countries changed to expand service coverage and reach more people. These changes are considered the antecedent of the Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Seven years after the United Nations’ call for UHC, healthcare services in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico are generally accessible and affordable. However, these countries increasingly struggle to meet their populations’ growing health needs while also addressing rising health care costs. This research aims to describe measures taken by these four countries to commit by UHC, addressing their barriers and challenges. Methods: This study examined literature review data, supplemented with survey data collected from regional stakeholders. Data were analyzed within an ad-hoc matrix.Results: These four countries increased healthcare services coverage by strengthening their primary healthcare systems. They also expanded coverage for non-communicable diseases, provided community outreach, and increased the number of skilled healthcare workers. New pharmaceutical support programs provided access to treatments for chronic conditions at zero cost, while high-costs drugs and cancer treatments were partially guaranteed. However, these measures did not achieve full financial protection to all, leaving citizens exposed to possible catastrophic expenditures, despite increased service coverage. UHC is funded primarily through taxes and polling resources, and these four countries still struggle to find mechanisms that could increase pooling mechanisms capable of increasing service coverage, while reducing financial inequities among people. Conclusions: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico have made progress towards UHC. Nevertheless, additional mechanisms to sustain financial protection are urgently required. The decentralization of the primary healthcare system, the development of public-private partnerships, and the implementation of progressive financing mechanisms like conditional cash transfers are potential manners to improve service delivery and financial protection contributing to effective UHC.

scholarly journals 20.F. Workshop: Dental care – coverage and access across countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
North America ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Universal Health Coverage ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Financial Protection ◽  
Health Coverage ◽  
Universal Health

Abstract Oral health is a central element of general health with significant impact in terms of pain, suffering, impairment of function and reduced quality of life. Although most oral disease can be prevented by health promotion strategies and routine access to primary oral health care, the GBD study 2017 estimated that oral diseases affect over 3.5 billion people worldwide (Watt et al, 2019). Given the importance of oral health and its potential contribution to achieving universal health coverage (UHC), it has received increased attention in public health debates in recent years. However, little is known about the large variations across countries in terms of service delivery, coverage and financing of oral health. There is a lack of international comparison and understanding of who delivers oral health services, how much is devoted to oral health care and who funds the costs for which type of treatment (Eaton et al., 2019). Yet, these aspects are central for understanding the scope for improvement regarding financial protection against costs of dental care and equal access to services in each country. This workshop aims to present the comparative research on dental care coverage in Europe, North America and Australia led by the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Three presentations will look at dental care coverage using different methods and approaches. They will compare how well the population is covered for dental care especially within Europe and North America considering the health systems design and expenditure level on dental care, using the WHO coverage cube as analytical framework. The first presentation shows results of a cross-country Health Systems in Transition (HiT) review on dental care. It provides a comparative review and analysis of financing, coverage and access in 31 European countries, describing the main trends also in the provision of dental care. The second presentation compares dental care coverage in eight jurisdictions (Australia (New South Wales), Canada (Alberta), England, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, and the United States) with a particular focus on older adults. The third presentation uses a vignette approach to map the extent of coverage of dental services offered by statutory systems (social insurance, compulsory insurance, NHS) in selected countries in Europe and North America. This workshop provides the opportunity of a focussed discussion on coverage of dental care, which is often neglected in the discussion on access to health services and universal health coverage. The objectives of the workshop are to discuss the oral health systems in an international comparative setting and to draw lessons on best practices and coverage design. The World Conference on Public Health is hence a good opportunity for this workshop that contributes to frame the discussion on oral health systems in a global perspective. Key messages There is large degree of variation in the extent to which the costs of dental care are covered by the statutory systems worldwide with implications for oral health outcomes and financial protection. There is a need for a more systematic collection of oral health indicators to make analysis of reliable and comparable oral health data possible.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document