scholarly journals Comparitive Study Of Short-Term Outcomes Of Preterm Babies ≤30 Weeks In A Tertiary Care Hospital Between India And The U.K

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
shivshankar diggikar ◽  
Karthik Nagesh ◽  
Arun Kumar ◽  
Narendra Aladangady

Abstract Large numbers of preterm babies are born in middle income countries and neonatal care is improving in these countries. However, comparative clinical outcomes of preterm babies between a tertiary neonatal unit from middle income country and higher income country is limited. Objective: To compare the clinical profile and short-term outcomes of preterm babies ≤ 30 weeks gestation admitted to a tertiary care hospital in India and the U.K. Design: Retrospective cohort observational study using anonymised data from Electronic Patient Records. Setting: Regional tertiary neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of Manipal Hospitals, Bangalore, India and Homerton University Hospital, London, UK. Participants: Preterm babies born at ≤ 30 weeks gestation admitted to NICUs over five year period (January 2011 to December 2015). Infants with major congenital abnormalities were excluded. Intervention: This is an observational study and routine care was provided as per departmental standard protocols. Main outcome measures: Comparison of neonatal unit mortality between two centres, infant morbidities till discharge from neonatal unit. Results: A total of 740 babies from the U.K centre and 294 babies from Indian centre were enrolled into the study. The mean gestational age in the U.K cohort was 26.6 ± 2.16 weeks, whereas in Indian cohort was 28.4 ± 1.66 weeks (p,<0.001). A significantly lower number of mothers received antenatal steroid (37% v 73%), and higher number of babies were inborn (78.6%) in Indian centre compared to the UK centre (67.3%; p < 0.001). Incidence of BPD and IVH ≥ grade 2 was significantly lower, and ROP needing treatment was significantly higher in Indian centre. Higher number of babies were treated for ductus arteriosus and incidence of culture positive sepsis was significantly high in Indian cohort babies. Survival of babies born at gestational age > 28 weeks was comparable between the U.K and Indian centres. Survival of babies born at ≤ 28 weeks gestation was lower in Indian centre. Conclusions and relevance: The survival of babies above 28 weeks prematurity was comparable between a tertiary care centre in India and the U.K. However, survival of babies ≤ 28 weeks gestation was lower in Indian centre. Incidence of ROP and sepsis was higher in Indian centre.

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4 (oct 2020 - dec 2020)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzana Latif ◽  
Sadia Ilyas ◽  
Saeed Mehmood ◽  
Hammad Arif ◽  
Nuzhat Parveen Khawaja ◽  
...  

Objectives: To audit the obstetric hysterectomies in a tertiary care hospital during one year. Methods: It was an observational retrospective study design, where all the pregnant women were assessed for fetomaternal outcomes, indications and complications for peripartum hysterectomy. The records were retrieved from Jan 2015 to Dec 2015 by using hospital record system. The study duration was of one year. The venue of the study was Lahore General hospital, Lahore. The exclusion criteria included all unmarried women, women with chronic kidney disease or renal failure, past surgical history of heart disease, whereas all the women who delivered in hospital, private clinic or at home after atleast 28 weeks of gestational age and experience hysterectomy at the time of delivery or after delivery in the puerperium, were included in the study. Results: The data over 32 women were retrieved from the hospital record system. The mean age of the women was 30.34+2.23 with range 26-34. The average number of parity was 3 of all females. The range of parity was 2 to 7. The average gestational age was 36.18 weeks. All the deliveries were done by cesarean section whereas 4 (12.5%) were elective and 28 (87.5%) were with emergency indications. 13 (40.6%) of the deliveries were in private clinic, 9 (28.1%) were done by LHV/ mid wife, 5(15.6%) were in private hospitals, 4(12.5%) were in LGH and only 1(3.1%) was at home. 18(56.3%) of the women were having at least one abortion in previous history. Conclusion: We concluded that emergency peripartum hysterectomy is very vital procedure that saves lives and manage life threatening obstetrical hemorrhage when other methods failed to control it.The major indications for emergency peripartum hysterectomy were placental abruption, placenta praevia/accrete, uterine atony and ruptured uterus. Key Words: Uterine artery embolization, Emergency peripartum hysterectomy, maternal morbidity and mortality, healthcare providers How to Cite: Latif F, Ilyas S, Mehmood S. Arif H. Khawaja P. Nuzhat. Jawad Z. J Clinical audit of obstetrical hysterectomies for a period of one year in a tertiary care hospital. Esculapio.2020;16(04):50-53.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document