scholarly journals Health-Related Quality of Life Among Rural Chinese Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases at Different Pathological Stages: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tingting Qin ◽  
Yuchen Shao ◽  
Nan Zhang ◽  
Jialin Wang ◽  
Nengliang Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) among rural Chinese patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) diseases at different pathological stages and to determine the factors influencing HR-QoL in this population.Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in two counties in Shandong province in China from July to September 2018. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, and HR-QoL of patients was assessed using a set of questionnaires, including the EORTC QLQ-C30 (V3.0), the QLQ-OES18 and the QLQ-STO22. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and Kruskal–Wallis test were used to compare the HR-QoL of patients of different pathological stage subgroups, and multivariate regression analyses were used to determine influencing factors.Results: A total of 406 patients were included in this study. The mean scores for patients with upper GI diseases were 74.88 (SD=19.15), 8.04 (SD=16.17) and 8.64 (SD=16.96) for the global QoL scale of EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-OES18 and QLQ-STO22, respectively. There was no significant difference in most of the scales between the precancerous and early stage groups, but a significant difference in HR-QoL between the precancerous and advanced groups as well as between early and advanced groups. Residence area, age, education level and pathological stage were the significant factors influencing HR-QoL scores, controlling for other variables.Conclusions: The overall HR-QoL of patients with advanced upper GI cancer needs to be managed as a component of cancer care. Measures should be taken to routinely identify patient symptoms so that follow-up care can alleviate patient symptom burden. Tailored treatment and care for patients with upper GI diseases of different age, educational level and pathological stage may be needed to help improve HR-QoL.

scholarly journals Health Related Quality of Life among Blood Cancer Patients in Pakistan: A Cross Sectional Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 004695802110252
Author(s):  
Madeeha Malik ◽  
Ifrah Rizwan ◽  
Azhar Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Blood Cancer ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Eortc Qlq

The importance of health-related quality of life and its determinants including physical, emotional, and functional domains has long been recognized among blood cancer patients in the developed world but this concept is still in infancy in developing countries, including Pakistan. The objective of the study was to assess health related quality of life among blood cancer patients. A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used. A pre-validated questionnaire that is EORTC-QLQ-C30 was self-administered to a sample of 400 blood cancer patients selected using convenience sampling technique. After data collection, data was cleaned, coded, and entered in SPSS. Descriptive statistics comprising of frequency and percentages were calculated. Non-parametric tests Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests ( P ≤ .05) were performed to find out the differences among different variables. The results highlighted that lowest scores for EORTC-QLQ-C30 were observed in the domain of emotional functioning (3.38, ±35.790), followed by cognitive function (4.56, ±30.368) whereas highest scores were observed in the domain of physical functioning (40.92, ±35.484). Significant difference ( P ≤ .05) was observed among different domains of health-related quality of life of blood cancer patients treated in different sectors, provinces, setting, gender, and with different comorbidities. The present study concluded that blood cancer patients had poor health related quality of life in Pakistan. Emotional functioning and cognitive function were the most compromised health related quality of life domains among blood cancer patients. Females having blood cancer, those patients treated in private sector healthcare facilities, patients residing in tribal and rural setting had relatively better health related quality of life. No appropriate psychosocial care program for the blood cancer patients are available in Pakistan.

scholarly journals Psychometric validation of the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in colorectal Cancer patients: cross-sectional study and systematic literature review

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yacir El Alami ◽  
Hajar Essangri ◽  
Mohammed Anass Majbar ◽  
Saber Boutayeb ◽  
Said Benamr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background Health-related quality of life is mainly impacted by colorectal cancer which justified the major importance addressed to the development and validation of assessment questionnaires. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Moroccan Arabic Dialectal version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study using the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 on colorectal cancer patients from the National Oncology Institute of Rabat, in the period from February 2015 to June 2017. The QLQ-C30 was administered to 120 patients. Statistical analysis included reliability, convergent, and discriminant validity as well as known-groups comparisons. Results In total, 120 patients with colorectal cancer were included in the study with 38 (32%) patients diagnosed with colon cancers. Eighty-two patients (68%) had rectal cancer, among which 29 (24%) patients with a stoma. The mean age of diagnosis was 54 years (+/− 13.3). The reliability and validity of the Arabic dialectal Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 were satisfactory. [Cronbach’s alpha (α =0.74)]. All items accomplished the criteria for convergent and discriminant validity except for question number 5, which did not complete the minimum required correlation with its own scale (physical functioning). Patients with rectal cancer presented with bad Global health status and quality of life (GHS/QOL), emotional functioning as well as higher fatigue symptoms compared to patients with colon cancer. The difference between patients with and without stoma was significant for diarrhea and financial difficulty. Conclusions The Moroccan Arabic Dialectal version of the QLQ-C30 is a valid and reliable measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Randomized Trial Assessing the Impact of Routine Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3826
Author(s):  
Oumar Billa ◽  
Franck Bonnetain ◽  
Jérôme Chamois ◽  
Angeline Ligey ◽  
Valérie Ganansia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Routine Assessment ◽  
Eq Vas

The impact of routine assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on satisfaction with care and the HRQoL of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiotherapy was assessed. Patients with HNC were randomly assigned to two arms, with stratification on sex, cancer localization, and stage of the disease. In the intervention arm, the patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires first before randomization, then before each medical appointment during radiotherapy (7 weeks), and then every 3 months until 1 year and at 2 years thereafter. In the control arm, the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires were completed before randomization and at 1 year and 2 years thereafter. The primary endpoint was mean change in HRQoL at score at 2 years from baseline assessed by EQ VAS from the EuroQol questionnaire. The secondary endpoint was mean change in satisfaction with care at 2 years from baseline assessed by QLQ-SAT32. Two hundred patients with head and neck cancers were involved in this study (mean age, 58.83 years (range, 36.56–87.89)), of whom 100 were assigned to the intervention arm and 100 to the control arm. Patients in the intervention arm were reported to have a statistically significant increase in EQ VAS at 2 years (p < 0.0001) and exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (mean change at 2 years from baseline = 10.46). In the two arms, mean differences between arms were not statistically significant, but minimal clinically important differences in favor of the intervention arm were found for EQ VAS (mean change difference (MD) = 5.84), satisfaction with care, in particular waiting times (MD = 10.85) and satisfaction with accessibility (MD = 6.52). Routine assessment of HRQoL improves HRQoL and satisfaction with care for patients with HNC treated with radiotherapy.

scholarly journals Reliability and validity of Amharic version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 modules for assessing health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa ◽  
Esayas Tadesse Gebremariam ◽  
Getnet Yimer Ali
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Abstract Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women and it affects quality of life of those women. So far, the two most frequently used tools for assessing health related quality of life in breast cancer patients, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 modules, were not validated in Ethiopia. Hence, the present study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the tools among Ethiopian breast cancer patients. Methods Institutional based longitudinal study was conducted from January 1 to May 1, 2017 GC at only nationwide oncology center, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. A total of 146 patients who visited the facility during that period, with no missing quality of life data, were selected for analysis. The psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 were evaluated in terms of reliability, convergent, divergent, construct and clinical validity using SPSS version 22. Results Satisfactory internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α coefficients > 0.7) was confirmed, except for cognitive function (α = 0.516) of EORTC QLQ-C30 and body image (α = 0.510) of EORTC QLQ-BR23. Multiple-trait scaling analysis demonstrated a good convergent and divergent validity. No scaling errors were observed. Most items in EORTC QLQ-BR23 possessed a weak or no correlation with its own dimension in EORTC QLQ-C30 (r < 0.4) except with some of symptom scales. A statistically significant chemotherapy induced quality of life scores changes (P ≤ 0.05) were observed in all dimensions of both instruments between baseline and the end of first cycle chemotherapy, except for body image (P = 0.985) and sexual enjoyment (P = 0.817) of EORTC QLQ-BR23, indicating clinical validity. Conclusion Amharic version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23 modules are valid and adequately reliable tool and can be used for clinical and epidemiological cancer researches to study the health related quality of life (HRQoL) of women with breast cancer in Ethiopia.

Health-Related Quality of Life As a Survival Predictor for Patients With Localized Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Radiation Therapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (18) ◽  
pp. 2970-2976 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Meyer ◽  
André Fortin ◽  
Michel Gélinas ◽  
Abdenour Nabid ◽  
François Brochet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Purpose To assess the added prognostic value for overall survival (OS) of baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and of early changes in HRQOL among patients with localized head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with radiation therapy. Patients and Methods All 540 patients with HNC who participated in a randomized trial completed two HRQOL instruments before radiation therapy: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Head and Neck Radiotherapy Questionnaire. Six months after the end of radiation therapy, 497 trial participants again completed the two HRQOL instruments. During the follow-up, 179 deaths were observed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to test whether HRQOL variables, baseline and change, provided additional prognostic value beyond recognized prognostic factors. Results The baseline EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning (PF) score was an independent predictor of OS. The hazard ratio (HR) associated with a 10-point increment in baseline PF was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.94). In multivariate models, the change in HRQOL was significantly associated with OS for most HRQOL dimensions. Among these, PF change was the strongest predictor. The magnitude of the association between PF change and survival decreased over time. At 1 year, the HR associated with a positive PF change of 10 points was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.83). After PF is taken into account, no other HRQOL variable was associated with survival. Conclusion Our findings indicate that both baseline PF and PF change provide added prognostic value for OS beyond established predictors in patients with HNC. Assessing HRQOL could help better predict survival of cancer patients.

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of pembrolizumab (pembro) versus physician choice single-agent paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan in subjects with advanced/metastatic adenocarcinoma (ACC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the esophagus that has progressed after first-line standard therapy (KEYNOTE-181).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4048-4048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Adenis ◽  
Amit Kulkarni ◽  
Gustavo Colagiovanni Girotto ◽  
Christelle De La Fouchardiere ◽  
Helene Senellart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cox Regression ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Open Label ◽  
P Values ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Health Related ◽  
Eortc Qlq

4048 Background: KEYNOTE-181 (NCT02564263) is an open-label, randomized, phase 3 trial in ACC and SCC of the esophagus that evaluated IV pembro 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years vs investigator choice of single-agent paclitaxel/docetaxel/irinotecan (control). Pembro was superior to control for OS in patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 (N = 222; median 9.3 vs 6.7 months; P= 0.0074). Here we present results of prespecified HRQoL analyses in this population. Methods: The EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-OES18 were administered at baseline; weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18; every 9 weeks up to 1 year/end of treatment; and 30-day safety follow-up visit. Data from patients receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment and completing ≥1 HRQoL assessment were analyzed. Least squares mean (LSM) score change from baseline to week 9, 95% CI, and nominal P values were calculated. Time to deterioration (TTD) (≥10-point decline from baseline) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. HRs, 95% CIs, and nominal P values are provided. Results: The HRQoL population included 218 PD-L1 CPS ≥10 patients (107 pembro, 111 control). QLQ-C30 compliance at week 9 was 88.9% for pembro and 83.9% for control. There was no significant difference in LSM between arms (3.68; 95% CI –2.28, 9.64; P= 0.2248) in global health status (GHS)/QoL score. Week 9 QLQ-OES18 compliance was 88.4% for pembro and 83.3% for control. QLQ-OES18 scores were not significantly different between arms. TTD for pain (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.58, 1.81; P= 0.5282), reflux (HR 1.69; 95% CI 0.83, 3.47; P= 0.9254), and dysphagia (HR 1.81; 95% CI 0.97, 3.37; P= 0.9693) subscales were not significantly different between arms. Conclusions: Over 9 weeks, patients treated with pembro had stable GHS/QoL scores similar to those of patients treated with single-agent docetaxel/paclitaxel/irinotecan. Combined with the superior OS and lower rate of treatment-related AEs seen with pembro, these data support clinically meaningful benefit of pembro in esophageal cancer patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥10. Clinical trial information: NCT02564263.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document