scholarly journals The value of local consolidative therapy in Osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer with oligo-residual disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Zeng ◽  
JianJiao Ni ◽  
Fan Yu ◽  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Residual Lesions

Abstract Background: There was no study investigating real-world utilization and outcome of LCT in Osimertinib-treated NSCLC with oligo-residual disease. This study was to analyze the clinical value of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in Osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oligo-residual disease. Methods: Patients receiving standard Osimertinib treatment and developing oligo-residual disease (five or fewer residual metastatic lesions) were retrospectively reviewed. Local therapies performed to the oligo-residual tumor lesions or primary lung site before Osimertinib treatment failure were considered as LCT. Results: Of 108 patients recruited, first-line and second-line Osimertinib were administered in 25 and 83 patients, respectively, while LCT was performed in 14 patients. With a median follow-up of 43.6 months, 69 patients developed progressive disease. LCT significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (NR vs 12.8 months, p=0.01) and was independently associated with prolonged PFS (HR=0.29, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.68, p=0.004). Patients receiving LCT had a numerically longer overall survival (OS) (85.8 vs 77.1 months, p=0.58) and after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, LCT was associated with a non-significantly prolonged OS (HR=0.37, 95%CI 0.12-1.16, p=0.089). Pattern of failure analyses indicated that progressive disease developed at the originally existed oligo-residual lesions in 76.2% of the 63 patients who didn’t receive LCT and had Osimertinib treatment failure. Of note, 7 (70%) of the 10 patients who had oligo-residual cranial disease but didn’t receive LCT, developed more than five progressive lesions in the brain, which were no longer suitable for stereotactic radiosurgery. Conclusion: Among Osimertinib-treated NSCLC patients having oligo-residual lesions, LCT could improve local control and significantly increase PFS, which need to be verified by further investigations.

scholarly journals The value of local consolidative therapy in Osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer with oligo-residual disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Zeng ◽  
Jianjiao Ni ◽  
Fan Yu ◽  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Residual Lesions

Abstract Background There was no study investigating real-world utilization and outcome of LCT in Osimertinib-treated NSCLC with oligo-residual disease. This study was to analyze the clinical value of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in Osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oligo-residual disease. Methods Patients receiving standard Osimertinib treatment and developing oligo-residual disease (five or fewer residual metastatic lesions) were retrospectively reviewed. Local therapies performed to the oligo-residual tumor lesions or primary lung site before Osimertinib treatment failure were considered as LCT. Results Of 108 patients recruited, first-line and second-line Osimertinib were administered in 25 and 83 patients, respectively, while LCT was performed in 14 patients. With a median follow-up of 43.6 months, 69 patients developed progressive disease. LCT significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (NR vs 12.8 months, p = 0.01) and was independently associated with prolonged PFS (HR = 0.29, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.68, p = 0.004). Patients receiving LCT had a numerically longer overall survival (OS) (85.8 vs 77.1 months, p = 0.58) and after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, LCT was associated with a non-significantly prolonged OS (HR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.12–1.16, p = 0.089). Pattern of failure analyses indicated that progressive disease developed at the originally existed oligo-residual lesions in 76.2% of the 63 patients who didn’t receive LCT and had Osimertinib treatment failure. Of note, 7 (70%) of the 10 patients who had oligo-residual cranial disease but didn’t receive LCT, developed more than five progressive lesions in the brain, which were no longer suitable for stereotactic radiosurgery. Conclusion Among Osimertinib-treated NSCLC patients having oligo-residual lesions, LCT could improve local control and significantly increase PFS, which need to be verified by further investigations.

scholarly journals The Value of Local Consolidative Therapy in Osimertinib-treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Oligo-residual Disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya Zeng ◽  
JianJiao Ni ◽  
Fan Yu ◽  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Yang Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Residual Lesions

Abstract Background: There was no study investigating real-world utilization and outcome of LCT in Osimertinib-treated NSCLC with oligo-residual disease. This study was to analyze the clinical value of local consolidative therapy (LCT) in Osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with oligo-residual disease.Methods: Patients receiving standard Osimertinib treatment and developing oligo-residual disease (five or fewer residual metastatic lesions) were retrospectively reviewed. Local therapies performed to the oligo-residual tumor lesions or primary lung site before Osimertinib treatment failure were considered as LCT.Results: Of 108 patients recruited, first-line and second-line Osimertinib were administered in 25 and 83 patients, respectively, while LCT was performed in 14 patients. With a median follow-up of 43.6 months, 69 patients developed progressive disease. LCT significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) (NR vs 12.8 months, p=0.01) and was independently associated with prolonged PFS (HR=0.29, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.68, p=0.004). Patients receiving LCT had a numerically longer overall survival (OS) (85.8 vs 77.1 months, p=0.58) and after adjusting for potentially confounding factors, LCT tended to increase OS (HR=0.37, 95%CI 0.12-1.16, p=0.089). Pattern of failure analyses indicated that progressive disease developed at the originally existed oligo-residual lesions in 76.2% of the 63 patients who didn’t receive LCT and had Osimertinib treatment failure. Of note, 7 (70%) of the 10 patients who had oligo-residual cranial disease but didn’t receive LCT, developed more than five progressive lesions in the brain, which were no longer suitable for stereotactic radiosurgery. Conclusion: Among Osimertinib-treated NSCLC patients having oligo-residual lesions, LCT could significantly improve PFS and has a tendency to prolong OS, which need to be verified by further investigations.

Monitoring immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer patients using 5-hydroxymethylcytosine signatures in circulating cell free DNA.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21505-e21505
Author(s):  
Gulfem Guler ◽  
David Haan ◽  
Yuhong Ning ◽  
Jeremy Ku ◽  
Erin McCarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Dna ◽  
Nsclc Patients

e21505 Background: Liquid biopsies are gaining prominence for not only cancer diagnosis but also patient monitoring. Mutational signals derived from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) show promise to assess response to cancer treatment, including immunotherapy. However, reliance of these methods on mutational data from tissue biopsies limit their applicability when a tumor biopsy is unavailable, or when mutational landscape of tumor changes under the selective pressures of cancer drug treatment. Epigenomic approaches have the potential to address these shortcomings. Methods: Blood draws were obtained from a cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (n = 19) who went on to anti-PD1 treatment prior to therapy start and while on therapy. cfDNA was isolated from plasma and was subsequently processed to generate 5hmC genome-wide profiles. Results: We analyzed cfDNA from NSCLC patients undergoing anti-PD1 therapy to investigate whether immunotherapy response can be detected from plasma. Using a predictive model trained on lung cancer and non-cancer samples, we were able to detect changes in prediction scores in patient treated with immunotherapy that were consistent with RECIST. Patients with progressive disease (n = 3), determined by RECIST, had prediction scores that increased while they received treatment. On the other hand, majority of the patients that exhibited partial response to treatment (n = 12) had predictive scores that decreased with treatment, again consistent with RECIST. Furthermore, score changes consistent with RECIST was observed one cycle prior to the RECIST timepoint in all except one patient, where an extra blood draw after baseline was available (n = 7). Annotation of the regions that account for differential scoring identified enhancer, 5’UTR and promoter regions. Comparison of partial responders to patients with progressive disease revealed genes involved in metastasis, oncogenes and tumor suppressors that change in opposing directions between these patient groups, consistent with the underlying biology. Conclusions: Our results suggest that 5hmC profiles from cfDNA can be used to determine immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Compared with mutation based liquid biopsy methods to assess response, epigenomics-based methods have the advantage of being agnostic to starting tumor mutations, and not relying on a mutational analysis from tumor biopsy. Future work will help determine applicability of this method to other kinds of therapies and cancer types.

scholarly journals Biomarkers and Gene Signatures to Predict Durable Response to Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3828
Author(s):  
Anello Marcello Poma ◽  
Rossella Bruno ◽  
Iacopo Pietrini ◽  
Greta Alì ◽  
Giulia Pasquini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Pembrolizumab has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 and in the absence of other targetable alterations. However, not all patients that meet these criteria have a durable benefit. In this monocentric study, we aimed at refining the selection of patients based on the expression of immune genes. Forty-six consecutive advanced NSCLC patients treated with pembrolizumab in first-line setting were enrolled. The expression levels of 770 genes involved in the regulation of the immune system was analysed by the nanoString system. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Patients with durable clinical benefit had a greater infiltration of cytotoxic cells, exhausted CD8, B-cells, CD45, T-cells, CD8 T-cells and NK cells. Immune cell scores such as CD8 T-cell and NK cell were good predictors of durable response with an AUC of 0.82. Among the immune cell markers, XCL1/2 showed the better performance in predicting durable benefit to pembrolizumab, with an AUC of 0.85. Additionally, CD8A, CD8B and EOMES showed a high specificity (>0.86) in identifying patients with a good response to treatment. In the same series, PD-L1 expression levels had an AUC of 0.61. The characterization of tumor microenvironment, even with the use of single markers, can improve patients’ selection for pembrolizumab treatment.

scholarly journals Circulating Biomarkers of Response and Toxicity of Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Comprehensive Review

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1794
Author(s):  
Alice Indini ◽  
Erika Rijavec ◽  
Francesco Grossi
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Liquid Biopsy ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Circulating Biomarkers ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed cell death (PD)-1 protein and its ligand, PD-L1, and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4, have revolutionized the management of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, only a small portion of NSCLC patients respond to these agents. Furthermore, although immunotherapy is usually well tolerated, some patients experience severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Liquid biopsy is a non-invasive diagnostic procedure involving the isolation of circulating biomarkers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTC), cell-free DNA (cfDNA), and microRNAs (miRNAs). Thanks to recent advances in technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), liquid biopsy has become a useful tool to provide baseline information on the tumor, and to monitor response to treatments. This review highlights the potential role of liquid biomarkers in the selection of NSCLC patients who could respond to immunotherapy, and in the identification of patients who are most likely to experience irAEs, in order to guide improvements in care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document