scholarly journals Global Health Classroom: Mixed Methods Evaluation of an Interinstitutional Model for Reciprocal Global Health Learning Among Samoan and New Zealand Medical Students

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshit Bothara ◽  
Malama Tafuna'i ◽  
Tim Wilkinson ◽  
Jen Desrosiers ◽  
Susan Jack ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Global health education partnerships should be collaborative and reciprocal to ensure mutual benefit. Utilisation of digital technologies can overcome geographic boundaries and facilitate collaborative global health learning. Global Health Classroom (GHCR) is a collaborative global health learning model involving medical students from different countries learning about each other’s health systems, cultures, and determinants of health via videoconference. Principles of reciprocity and inter-institutional partnership informed the development of GHCR. This study explores learning outcomes and experiences in GHCR between students from New Zealand and Samoa. Methods The study used a mixed methods approach employing post-GHCR questionnaires and semi-structured face-to-face interviews to explore self-reported learning and experiences among medical students in GHCR. The GHCR collaboration studied was between the medical schools at the University of Otago, New Zealand and the National University of Samoa, Samoa.ResultsQuestionnaire response rate was 85% (74/87). Nineteen interviews were conducted among New Zealand and Samoan students. Students reported acquiring the intended learning outcomes relating to patient care, health systems, culture, and determinants of health with regards to their partner country. There was evidence of attitudinal changes including cultural curiosity and humility. Some reported a vision for progress regarding their own health system. Students reported that interacting with their international peers in the virtual classroom made learning about global health real and tangible. Mutual benefit to students from both countries indicated reciprocity.Conclusions The study demonstrates GHCR to be a promising model for collaborative and reciprocal global health learning using a student-led format and employing digital technology to create a virtual classroom. The self-reported learning outcomes align favourably with those recommended in the literature. In view of our positive findings, we present GHCR as an adaptable model for equitable, collaborative global health learning between students in internationally partnered institutions.

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshit K. Bothara ◽  
Malama Tafuna’i ◽  
Tim J. Wilkinson ◽  
Jen Desrosiers ◽  
Susan Jack ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Global health education partnerships should be collaborative and reciprocal to ensure mutual benefit. Utilisation of digital technologies can overcome geographic boundaries and facilitate collaborative global health learning. Global Health Classroom (GHCR) is a collaborative global health learning model involving medical students from different countries learning about each other’s health systems, cultures, and determinants of health via videoconference. Principles of reciprocity and interinstitutional partnership informed the development of the GHCR. This study explores learning outcomes and experiences in the GHCR between students from New Zealand and Samoa. Methods This study used a mixed methods approach employing post-GHCR questionnaires and semi-structured face-to-face interviews to explore self-reported learning and experiences among medical students in the GHCR. The GHCR collaboration studied was between the medical schools at the University of Otago, New Zealand and the National University of Samoa, Samoa. Results Questionnaire response rate was 85% (74/87). Nineteen interviews were conducted among New Zealand and Samoan students. Students reported acquiring the intended learning outcomes relating to patient care, health systems, culture, and determinants of health with regards to their partner country. Interview data was indicative of attitudinal changes in relation to cultural humility and curiosity. Some reported a vision for progress regarding their own health system. Students in the GHCR reported that learning with their international peers in the virtual classroom made learning about global health more real and tangible. The benefits to students from both countries indicated reciprocity. Conclusions This study demonstrates GHCR to be a promising model for collaborative and reciprocal global health learning using a student-led format and employing digital technology to create a virtual classroom. The self-reported learning outcomes align favourably with those recommended in the literature. In view of our positive findings, we present GHCR as an adaptable model for equitable, collaborative global health learning between students in internationally partnered institutions.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e48-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Eric Dawe ◽  
Andrea Pike ◽  
Monica Kidd ◽  
Praseedha Janakiram ◽  
Eileen Nicolle ◽  
...  

Introduction: Global health addresses health inequities in the care of underserved populations, both domestic and international. Given that health systems with a strong primary care foundation are the most equitable, effective and efficient, family medicine is uniquely positioned to engage in global health. However, there are no nationally recognized standards in Canada for postgraduate family medicine training in global health.Objective: To generate consensus on the essential components of a Global Health/Health Equity Enhanced Skills Program in family medicine.Methods: A panel comprised of 34 experts in global health education and practice completed three rounds of a Delphi small group process.Results: Consensus (defined as ≥ 75% agreement) was achieved on program length (12 months), inclusion of both domestic and international components, importance of mentorship, methods of learner assessment (in-training evaluation report, portfolio), four program objectives (advocacy, sustainability, social justice, and an inclusive view of global health), importance of core content, and six specific core topics (social determinants of health, principles and ethics of health equity/global health, cultural humility and competency, pre and post-departure training, health systems, policy, and advocacy for change, and community engagement).Conclusion: Panellists agreed on a number of program components forming the initial foundation for an evidence-informed, competency-based Global Health/Health Equity Enhanced Skills Program in family medicine.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Soi ◽  
Jessica Shearer ◽  
Baltazar Chilundo ◽  
Vasco Muchanga ◽  
Luisa Matsinhe ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 1022-1027
Author(s):  
Alison M. Bales ◽  
Anthony R. Oddo ◽  
David J. Dennis ◽  
Robert C. Siska ◽  
Echo VanderWal ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 55 ◽  
Author(s):  
GeorgeM. Ibrahim ◽  
Shawn Hoffart ◽  
RussellA. Lam ◽  
EvanP. Minty ◽  
MichelleTheam Ying ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
S. Folsom ◽  
S. Schoenhals ◽  
L. Jensen ◽  
B. Fassl ◽  
T. Dickerson

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  

Abstract Background Global health is the study, research, and practice of medicine focused on improving health and achieving health equity for all persons worldwide. International and national bodies stipulate that global health be integrated into medical school curricula. However, there is a global paucity of data evaluating the state of global health teaching in medical schools. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of global health teaching activities at United Kingdom (UK) medical schools. Methods A national, cross-sectional study assessing all timetabled teachings sessions within UK medical courses for global health content during the academic year 2018/19. Global health content was evaluated against a comprehensive list of global health learning outcomes for medical students. Results Data from 39 medical courses representing 86% (30/36) of eligible medical schools was collected. Typically, medical courses reported timetabled teaching covering over three-quarters of all global health learning outcomes. However, a wide degree of variation existed among granular global health learning objectives covered within the different medical courses. On average, each learning outcome had a 79% [95% CI: 73, 83%] probability of being included in course curricula. There were a number of learning outcomes that had a lower probability, such as ‘access to surgeons with the necessary skills and equipment in different countries’ (36%) [95% CI: 21, 53%], ‘future impact of climate change on health and healthcare systems’ (67%) [95% CI: 50, 81%], and ‘role of the WHO’ (54%) [95% CI: 28, 60%]. Conclusions This study served as the first national assessment of global health education and curricula within UK medical schools. Through a formalised assessment of teaching events produced by medical schools around the country, we were able to capture a national picture of global health education, including the strengths of global health prioritisation in the UK, as well as areas for improvement. Overall, it appears broad-level global health themes are widely discussed; however, the granularities of key, emerging areas of concern are omitted by curricula. In particular, gaps persist relating to international healthcare systems, multilateral global health agencies such as the WHO, global surgery, climate change and more.


2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric R. Houpt ◽  
Richard D. Pearson ◽  
Thomas L. Hall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document