scholarly journals Appropriate sites for the active surveillance of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joung Ha Park ◽  
Hye-Suk Choi ◽  
Hyejin Yang ◽  
Hyun-Ju Lee ◽  
Sun Hee Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Negative Group ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Transmission Rates

Abstract Background: Active surveillance tests for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are recommended in patients showing risk factors for colonization by these bacteria. There are limited data however on whether surveillance tests for anatomic sites other than the stool would be useful to detect CPE colonization, and we investigated this in our present study.Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on cases at our tertiary care hospital during a 5-year period. Patients with CPE colonization had been admitted to our surgical intensive care unit (SICU) or sub-ICU for liver transplantation in this period and undergone surveillance tests for both the stool and other sites. Patients were grouped as stool CPE negative (but which included CPE positive cases from initial sputum and other site tests) or positive. Results: Among the total study cohort of 158 patients, 138 (87.3%) were included in the stool CPE positive group and the remaining 20 (12.7%) in the stool CPE negative group. While the sensitivity of CPE surveillance testing of the stool was 87.3% (95% CI 81.1-92.1), the sensitivity when combining stool and sputum samples was 93.7% (88.7-96.9). The transmission rates were similar for patients showing CPE positivity in the stool, sputum and other sites, at 4.8% (27/557), 4.7% (3/64), and 6.7% (1/15), respectively (p = 0.95).Conclusions: The sensitivity of CPE detection in a stool sample is suboptimal for ruling out CPE colonization and the transmission rates are similar between stool-positive or -negative cases. Thus, combining surveillance of the stool with other sites may be needed for detecting CPE.

scholarly journals 817. Appropriate Sites for the Active Surveillance of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S501-S502
Author(s):  
Joung Ha Park ◽  
Hye-Suk Choi ◽  
Hyejin Yang ◽  
Hyun-Ju Lee ◽  
Sun Hee Kwak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Negative Group ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Transmission Rates

Abstract Background Active surveillance tests for carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are recommended in patients showing risk factors for colonization by these bacteria. There are limited data however on whether surveillance tests for anatomic sites other than the stool would be useful to detect CPE colonization, and we investigated this in our present study. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on cases at our tertiary care hospital during a 5-year period. The study patients with CPE colonization had been admitted to our surgical intensive care unit (SICU) or sub-ICU for liver transplantation in this period and undergone surveillance tests for both the stool and other sites. Patients were grouped as stool CPE negative (but which included CPE positive cases from initial sputum and other site tests) or positive. Results Among the total study cohort of 158 patients, 138 (87.3%) were included in the stool CPE positive group and the remaining 20 (12.7%) in the stool CPE negative group. While the sensitivity of CPE surveillance testing of the stool was 87.3% (95% CI 81.1-92.1), the sensitivity when combining stool and sputum samples was 93.7% (88.7-96.9). The transmission rates were similar for patients showing CPE positivity in the stool, sputum and other sites, at 4.8% (27/557), 4.7% (3/64), and 6.7% (1/15), respectively (p = 0.95). Conclusion The sensitivity of CPE detection in a stool sample is suboptimal for ruling out CPE colonization and the transmission rates are similar between stool-positive or -negative cases. Combining surveillance of the stool with other sites may be needed for detecting CPE. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DRUG USE OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
Nimin Paul ◽  
Santhosh Kumar V
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Total Drug ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care

 Objective: To identify the pattern of drug utilization of antimicrobials in prescriptions of patients admitted at medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) department and to analyze the utilization of different classes of drugs.Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in 10 bedded medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of tertiary care hospital, Adayar, from October 1st 2016 to March 1st 2016. The study was performed in 100 prescriptions. The relevant data on drug prescription of each patient were collected from in-patient records. The demographic data, disease data, and the utilization of different classes of antimicrobial agents (AMAs) were analyzed.Results: In MICU, a total of 648 drugs were prescribed during the period of stay and AMAs accounted for 15% of total drug. The average length of stay was found to be 8 (±8.73). The mean number of drugs received by patients is 11.6 ± 2 drugs. The most frequently prescribed AMAs were ceftriaxone followed by meropenem and clindamycin. Cephalosporin is commonly prescribed due to their relatively lower toxicity and broader spectrum activity. The generally prescribed AMA combination was amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (32.50%) and piperacillin + tazobactam (27.50%). The laboratory reported positive cultures for 30 patients. The most prevailing organisms were Escherichia coli (50%). In SICU, a total of 780 drugs were prescribed during the period of stay and AMAs accounted for 18% of total drug. An average of 5 (±2.0) drugs was prescribed for each patient and each prescription contains an average of 2 (±0.9) AMAs. The results indicated that ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed AMAs (22%), followed by meropenem (18%), ciprofloxacin (18%), and colistin (8%). A total of five AMA combination therapies were used in SICU. Among them, piperacillin+clavulanic acid (36.84%) was the most commonly prescribed combination. In the study, 30 (60 %) cases had microbial growth and have performed sensitivity test.Conclusion: A wide class and percentage of AMAs were prescribed in ICUs. There is a need of antimicrobial agent’s usage guidelines and restriction policies for the rational prescribing of antimicrobials in critically ill patients.

scholarly journals Effects of Supervision by Attending Anesthesiologists on Complications of Emergency Tracheal Intubation

2008 ◽  
Vol 109 (6) ◽  
pp. 973-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich H. Schmidt ◽  
Kanya Kumwilaisak ◽  
Edward Bittner ◽  
Edward George ◽  
Dean Hess
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Teaching Hospitals ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Resident Physicians ◽  
Attending Physician ◽  
Anesthesia Residents

Background Emergent intubation is associated with a high complication rate. These intubations are often performed by resident physicians in teaching hospitals. The authors evaluated whether supervision by an anesthesia-trained intensivist decreases complications of emergent intubations. Methods The authors performed a prospective cohort study in an Academic Tertiary Care Hospital. They enrolled 322 consecutive patients who required emergent intubation between November 1, 2006, and April 15, 2008. Emergency intubations are performed by anesthesia residents during their surgical intensive care unit rotation. An attending anesthesiologist was assigned to supervise these intubations at predetermined periods. A respiratory therapist assisted with airway management and ventilation. Information related to the intubation, detailing patient demographics, indication for intubation, attending anesthesiologist presence, medications used, and immediate complications, was recorded. Disposition and duration of mechanical ventilation were also recorded. Results There were no differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, or illness severity among patients intubated with and without attending supervision. Attending physician supervision was associated with a significant decrease in complications (6.1% vs. 21.7%; P = 0.0001). There was no difference in ventilator-free days or 30-day mortality. Conclusion Supervision by an attending anesthesiologist was associated with a decreased incidence of complications during emergent intubations.

scholarly journals A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON DRUG USE OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS IN MEDICAL AND SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNITS OF A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL.

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 310
Author(s):  
Nimin Paul ◽  
Santhosh Kumar V
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clavulanic Acid ◽  
Antimicrobial Agents ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Total Drug ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care

 Objective: To identify the pattern of drug utilization of antimicrobials in prescriptions of patients admitted at medical intensive care unit (MICU) and surgical intensive care unit (SICU) department and to analyze the utilization of different classes of drugs.Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out in 10 bedded medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) of tertiary care hospital, Adayar, from October 1st 2016 to March 1st 2016. The study was performed in 100 prescriptions. The relevant data on drug prescription of each patient were collected from in-patient records. The demographic data, disease data, and the utilization of different classes of antimicrobial agents (AMAs) were analyzed.Results: In MICU, a total of 648 drugs were prescribed during the period of stay and AMAs accounted for 15% of total drug. The average length of stay was found to be 8 (±8.73). The mean number of drugs received by patients is 11.6 ± 2 drugs. The most frequently prescribed AMAs were ceftriaxone followed by meropenem and clindamycin. Cephalosporin is commonly prescribed due to their relatively lower toxicity and broader spectrum activity. The generally prescribed AMA combination was amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (32.50%) and piperacillin + tazobactam (27.50%). The laboratory reported positive cultures for 30 patients. The most prevailing organisms were Escherichia coli (50%). In SICU, a total of 780 drugs were prescribed during the period of stay and AMAs accounted for 18% of total drug. An average of 5 (±2.0) drugs was prescribed for each patient and each prescription contains an average of 2 (±0.9) AMAs. The results indicated that ceftriaxone was the most commonly prescribed AMAs (22%), followed by meropenem (18%), ciprofloxacin (18%), and colistin (8%). A total of five AMA combination therapies were used in SICU. Among them, piperacillin+clavulanic acid (36.84%) was the most commonly prescribed combination. In the study, 30 (60 %) cases had microbial growth and have performed sensitivity test.Conclusion: A wide class and percentage of AMAs were prescribed in ICUs. There is a need of antimicrobial agent’s usage guidelines and restriction policies for the rational prescribing of antimicrobials in critically ill patients.

scholarly journals A study of wound infections and its antibiogram in surgical intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. 473-478
Author(s):  
Dr. Upasana Bhumbla ◽  
◽  
Dr. Safaa Muneer Ahmed ◽  
Dr. Dinesh Raj Mathur ◽  
Dr. A.S. Dalal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document