scholarly journals The Impact of Social Prescribing on Mental Health: A Protocol for Two Randomised Wait-List Controlled Feasibility Studies, Social Prescribing in Mental Health Study (SPRING) and Mental Health Through Social Prescribing Project (PROSPECT)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Elliott ◽  
Mark Llewellyn ◽  
Carolyn Wallace ◽  
Sarah Wallace ◽  
E Mark Williams
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Health Study ◽  
Randomised Control Trial ◽  
Wait List ◽  
Social Prescribing ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health And Well Being

Abstract BackgroundSocial prescribing aims to connect citizens with sources of support in their communities to benefit their health and well-being. Despite its ongoing implementation within the United Kingdom, the evidence base for social prescribing has been criticised, citing a lack of rigour, high risk of bias and inconclusive findings to date.MethodsThis study protocol aims to examine the feasibility of using large, randomised control studies to assess the mental health and well-being impacts of social prescribing. Two wait-list control studies, each consisting of two parallel arm groups, SPRING and PROPSECT were designed. Participants were referred via their consulting healthcare professionals. The participants were randomised to receive the intervention immediately or after a delay of four weeks. The intervention in the SPRING study was a personal “what-matters” interview by a Link Worker consultation leading to a prescribed social service. Three month and six month follow up of service use was proposed. In PROPSECT, the intervention was a holistic social prescribing service. In both trials the primary outcomes were quality of life, service uptake, and participant experience.DiscussionSocial prescribing is becoming popular in community health and care services. It is believed to be an effective resource, and this is first randomised control trial to attempt to demonstrate the effectiveness of social prescribing for people with Mental Health and/or emotional well-being issues. A waiting-list control study is feasible in this context but would be suitable for larger randomised controlled trials.Trial Registration: SPRING, Clinical Trials, NCT04062903. Registered 17th September 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04062903?term=NCT04062903&draw=2&rank=1. PROSPECT, Clinical Trials, NCT04099095. Registered 23rd September 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04099095?term=NCT04099095&draw=2&rank=1

scholarly journals The Impact of the Sars Cov-2 Pandemic on the Mental Health and Well-Being of Seniors in Social Care Facilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 104-110
Author(s):  
Z. Budayova ◽  
L. Ludvigh Cintulova
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Open Coding ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health And Well Being

The research study analyses the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic and identifies changes in the life satisfaction of seniors in social services facilities. The research sample consisted of 79 seniors in social services facilities, the sample consisted of ten participants, data collection took place in the period from November 2020 to April 2021, where the method of qualitative research was used in empirical research, through semi-structured interviews to determine the impact of Covid-19 on We collected the data collected by open coding and pointed to those dimensions of the lives of seniors that were most marked by pandemic measures against the spread of Covid-19.

Introduction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Bolton
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Northern Ireland ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Social Worker ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Conflict Processes ◽  
Post Conflict ◽  
Personal Experiences ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health And Well Being

In the Introduction, the author describes the background to the book and his personal experiences of violence in Northern Ireland - as a social worker and health and social services manager in Enniskillen and Omagh. He addresses the impact of loss and trauma linked to conflict and the implications for mental health and well-being. The structure of the book is outlined and the author sets the rest of the book in the argument that the mental health of conflict affected communities should be an early and key consideration in peace talks, politics and post-conflict processes.

The impact of fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) on the health and well-being of employees: what organisations can do to mitigate the risks and improve outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Brook ◽  
Melanie Freeman ◽  
Graeme Ditchburn
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Perceived Support ◽  
Work Family Conflict ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Work Family ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Levels Of Support ◽  
Health And Well Being

Concerns about the increased risk to mental health in fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) workers in the construction and resources industries led to increased public and government scrutiny, resulting in Western Australia’s adoption of a code of practice. In general, research has found that a higher incidence of psychological distress in FIFO workers has resulted from high compression rosters and work–family conflict, as well as feelings of isolation. Risk controls, such as perceived levels of support, have been found to be significantly related to improved mental health and organisational outcomes. Organisations need to address the non-financial needs of their workers and look to develop their perceived support, job satisfaction and adjustment to the FIFO lifestyle. This paper outlines practical risk controls and interventions organisations can take to improve psychological and organisational outcomes.

scholarly journals Health and well-being of parents with 4-year-old children – a nationwide study in 2018 in Finland

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Klemetti ◽  
M Vuorenmaa ◽  
R Ikonen ◽  
J Oksanen ◽  
J Lammi-Taskula
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Mental Distress ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Poor Health ◽  
Highly Educated ◽  
Upper Secondary Education ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Health And Well Being

Abstract Background A nation-wide data collection on small children and their families’ health and well-being has been lacking in Finland. The aim of this study was to examine health and determinants of health among parents with a four-year-old child. Methods A nation-wide study for 4-year-old children (N = 8720) and their parents (N = 10 737) conducted in 2018. The families were recruited by public health nurses at child health clinics. Both parents had a possibility to answer a questionnaire considering questions on health, well-being and service use. General health of the parent was measured by one question (How do you find your general state of health?), depressive disorders by PHQ-2 and mental health by MHI-5. Data were analyzed by cross-tabulation. Results of logistic regression will be presented in the conference. Results Most participants were female (72%) and most families had two adults (93%). Mean age was 35 years and 58% were highly educated. Around 10% reported their health as average or poor, 19% had had depressive disorders within 12 months, and 6% had experienced mental distress. Single parents reported mental distress and depressive disorders significantly more often than the other parents. Average or poor health was reported significantly more often by female parents. Those with average or poor health or depressive disorders were significantly more likely to have one child, upper secondary education or less, or be outside of work. They felt themselves significantly more often lonely and unsatisfied with their life and family’s economic situation. They were also significantly more likely to report need of support for their own parenthood and partnership. Conclusions Health challenges among the parents were quite similar than those among the adults in same ages. However, detailed analysis is needed to find out the specific determinants affecting the parents and whole family’s life to be able to better support the families. Key messages Most parents with children aged 4-year-old were healthy and satisfied with their life. The parents having poor physical or mental health had also challenges in family life.

scholarly journals The Influence of Gender and Age on the Outcomes of and Adherence to a Digital Interdisciplinary Mental Health Promotion Intervention in an Australasian Nonclinical Setting: Cohort Study (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldine Przybylko ◽  
Darren Morton ◽  
Jason Morton ◽  
Melanie Renfrew
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Promotion ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mental Health Promotion ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Clinical Trials Registry ◽  
Health And Well Being

BACKGROUND The global prevalence of mental health disorders is at a crisis point, particularly in the wake of COVID-19, prompting calls for the development of digital interdisciplinary mental health promotion interventions (MHPIs) for nonclinical cohorts. However, the influence of gender and age on the outcomes of and adherence to MHPIs is not well understood. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the influence of gender and age on the outcomes of and adherence to a 10-week digital interdisciplinary MHPI that integrates strategies from positive psychology and lifestyle medicine and utilizes persuasive systems design (PSD) principles in a nonclinical setting. METHODS This study involved 488 participants who completed the digital interdisciplinary MHPI. Participants completed a pre and postintervention questionnaire that used: (1) the “mental health” and “vitality” subscales from the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey; (2) the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21); and (3) Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWL). Adherence to the digital interdisciplinary MHPI was measured by the number of educational videos the participants viewed and the extent to which they engaged in experiential challenge activities offered as part of the program. RESULTS On average, the participants (N=488; mean age 47.1 years, SD 14.1; 77.5% women) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all mental health and well-being outcome measures, and a significant gender and age interaction was observed. Women tended to experience greater improvements than men in the mental health and well-being measures, and older men experienced greater improvements than younger men in the mental health and vitality subscales. Multiple analysis of variance results of the adherence measures indicated a significant difference for age but not gender. No statistically significant interaction between gender and age was observed for adherence measures. CONCLUSIONS Digital interdisciplinary MHPIs that utilize PSD principles can improve the mental health and well-being of nonclinical cohorts, regardless of gender or age. Hence, there may be a benefit in utilizing PSD principles to develop universal MHPIs such as that employed in this study, which can be used across gender and age groups. Future research should examine which PSD principles optimize universal digital interdisciplinary MHPIs. CLINICALTRIAL Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000993190; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377889 and Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001009101; http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12619001009101.aspx

scholarly journals The Influence of Gender and Age on the Outcomes of and Adherence to a Digital Interdisciplinary Mental Health Promotion Intervention in an Australasian Nonclinical Setting: Cohort Study

10.2196/29866 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e29866
Author(s):  
Geraldine Przybylko ◽  
Darren Morton ◽  
Jason Morton ◽  
Melanie Renfrew
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Promotion ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mental Health Promotion ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Clinical Trials Registry ◽  
Health And Well Being

Background The global prevalence of mental health disorders is at a crisis point, particularly in the wake of COVID-19, prompting calls for the development of digital interdisciplinary mental health promotion interventions (MHPIs) for nonclinical cohorts. However, the influence of gender and age on the outcomes of and adherence to MHPIs is not well understood. Objective The aim of this study was to determine the influence of gender and age on the outcomes of and adherence to a 10-week digital interdisciplinary MHPI that integrates strategies from positive psychology and lifestyle medicine and utilizes persuasive systems design (PSD) principles in a nonclinical setting. Methods This study involved 488 participants who completed the digital interdisciplinary MHPI. Participants completed a pre and postintervention questionnaire that used: (1) the “mental health” and “vitality” subscales from the Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey; (2) the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21); and (3) Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWL). Adherence to the digital interdisciplinary MHPI was measured by the number of educational videos the participants viewed and the extent to which they engaged in experiential challenge activities offered as part of the program. Results On average, the participants (N=488; mean age 47.1 years, SD 14.1; 77.5% women) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in all mental health and well-being outcome measures, and a significant gender and age interaction was observed. Women tended to experience greater improvements than men in the mental health and well-being measures, and older men experienced greater improvements than younger men in the mental health and vitality subscales. Multiple analysis of variance results of the adherence measures indicated a significant difference for age but not gender. No statistically significant interaction between gender and age was observed for adherence measures. Conclusions Digital interdisciplinary MHPIs that utilize PSD principles can improve the mental health and well-being of nonclinical cohorts, regardless of gender or age. Hence, there may be a benefit in utilizing PSD principles to develop universal MHPIs such as that employed in this study, which can be used across gender and age groups. Future research should examine which PSD principles optimize universal digital interdisciplinary MHPIs. Trial Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000993190; http://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377889 and Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619001009101; http://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12619001009101.aspx

scholarly journals The impact on the mental health and well-being of unpaid carers affected by social distancing, self-isolation and shielding during the COVID 19 pandemic in England – a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tabo Akafekwa ◽  
Elizabeth Dalgarno ◽  
Arpana Verma
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Poor Mental Health ◽  
List Type ◽  
Digital Platforms ◽  
Health And Wellbeing ◽  
The People ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Health And Well Being

AbstractObjectiveThis study explores the impact of the COVID 19 lockdown measures on the mental health and well-being of unpaid carers, who make up the largest number of the carer population in England.Study designA systematic review research protocol was designed and used to conduct the review along with the Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the synthesis of Qualitative Research - ENTREQ statement [43]. Pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used. EndNote X9 reference management was used and the search process was represented using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram [76]. Appraisal of the included research was carried out using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) [57]. Line by line coding was done using inductive thematic synthesis and EPPI Reviewer 4 software [60].ResultsFour themes emerged; immediate worries or fears, adapting to change, post pandemic fears and use of technology.ConclusionThe measures put in place during the first lockdown period have had detrimental impacts on unpaid carers, putting them at greater risk of burnout. However, use of digital platforms could have a positive impact on well-being. Recommendations for further research are provided.What is new?Key findings?Discontinued or reduced access to activities and services during the first lockdown during the pandemic has had a negative impact on both people who require care and their carers.Carers prioritise the mental health and wellbeing needs of the people they care for over their own.Further qualitative research from different groups of carers would be useful to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic measures on unpaid carers.Use of digital technology and digital platforms may be useful tools for carers both during the pandemic and after.What this adds to what is known?There have been very few qualitative studies on the impact of the COVID 19 pandemic on the mental health and wellbeing of unpaid carers, this review has synthesised their findings and will contribute to future research.Unpaid carers are known to be at risk of poor mental health and wellbeing outcomes, this review demonstrates that they are even more at risk due to the increased reliance on them during the pandemic.What is this implication and what should change?There is limited qualitative data available from a range of different groups of carers for example, spouse carers, parent carers, carers of people who have specific needs or conditions. Therefore, purposeful sample research to determine the needs of groups of carers during the COVID 19 pandemic could be valuable.Unpaid carers who do not have appropriate support are more at risk of poor mental health and wellbeing outcomes. During the pandemic services have had to adapt to the various rules implemented. Digital adaptations to the provision of support to both carers and the people they care for could be beneficial both during and after the pandemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document