Remediation of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Soil by Washing with Novel Chemically Modified Humic Substances

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 1764-1771 ◽  
Author(s):  
César García-Díaz ◽  
Antonio Nebbioso ◽  
Alessandro Piccolo ◽  
Josefina Barrera-Cortés ◽  
Rafael Martínez-Palou
Author(s):  
Cácio Luiz Boechat ◽  
Vítor Caçula Pistóia ◽  
Ana Cristina Ludtke ◽  
Clesio Gianello ◽  
Flávio Anastácio de Oliveira Camargo

2016 ◽  
Vol 312 ◽  
pp. 307-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Bahemmat ◽  
Mohsen Farahbakhsh ◽  
Mehran Kianirad

Author(s):  
Ole K. Borggaard ◽  
Peter E. Holm ◽  
Julie K. Jensen ◽  
Mohsen Soleimani ◽  
Bjarne W. Strobel

2021 ◽  
Vol 625 (3) ◽  
pp. 53-56
Author(s):  
N. A. Likhacheva ◽  
◽  
E. A. Zaharova ◽  

The article presents the results of research on the oxidative modification of humic substances of brown coal of the Tyulgan deposit. The detoxifying effect of the obtained substances in relation to petroleum hydrocarbons was studied using the bioassay method. During the evaluation, a noticeable increase in the detoxifying ability was found in the result of chemical modification of humic substances. The greatest detoxifying effect in relation to oil pollution of the soil was observed for humic substances modified by oxidation and amounted to 19 and 42% at doses of 0.01 and 0.1% by weight. accordingly. The detoxifying effect of native humic substances is significantly lower: 9 and 2 % at doses of 0.01% and 0.1% by weight. accordingly. Thus, the prospects of using oxidized humic substances as sorbents-detoxicants during phytoremediation of oil-contaminated soil are shown.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Klik ◽  
Zygmunt M. Gusiatin ◽  
Dorota Kulikowska

AbstractRemoval of heavy metals (HMs) from soil is a priority in soil washing/soil flushing. However, for further management of remediated soil, it should be characterized in detail. This study presents, for the first time, an evaluation of soil quality after column flushing with new-generation washing agents (WAs) recovered from municipal sewage sludge (dissolved organic matter, DOM; soluble humic-like substances, HLS; soluble humic substances, SHS) and Na2EDTA as a standard benchmark. Sandy loam soil was spiked with industrial levels of Cu, Pb and Zn, then flushed in a column reactor at two WA flow rates (0.5 and 1.0 ml/min). Soil quality was assessed by determining both physico-chemical (pH, total HMs and their mobility, soil organic matter, OM, humic substances, HS and their fractions, macroelements) and biological indicators (dehydrogenase activity, DHA; germination rate, GR; and inhibition factors for roots and shoots of Triticum aestivum). Total residual HMs contents and HMs contents in the mobile fraction were significantly lower in soil flushed at 1.0 ml/min than in soil flushed at 0.5 ml/min. With all WAs, the decrease in Cu content was larger than that of the other HMs, however this HM most effectively was removed with DOM. In contrast, Pb most effectively was removed by HLS and Na2EDTA, and DOM should not be used to remediate Pb-contaminated soil, due to its very low effectiveness. Flow rate did not appear to affect the fertilizing properties of the soil, DHA activity or soil toxicity indicators. Soil flushing with all SS_WAs increased OM, HS, and exchangeable P, K and Na content in remediated soils, but decreased exchangeable Ca content, and in most cases, exchangeable Mg content. Soil flushing substantially improved DHA activity and GR, but only slightly improved the shoot and root inhibition factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document