scholarly journals Percutaneous Lead Extraction in Infection of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: a Systematic Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antônio da Silva Menezes Júnior ◽  
Thaís Rodrigues Magalhães ◽  
Alana de Oliveira Alarcão Morais
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Lead Extraction ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

scholarly journals Lead-Related Infective Endocarditis in Latvia: A Single Centre Experience

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 566
Author(s):  
Nesterovics ◽  
Nesterovics ◽  
Stradins ◽  
Kalejs ◽  
Ansabergs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infective Endocarditis ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Lead Extraction ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Common Location

Background and Objectives: Over the last five decades cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) have become established as the mainstay for the treatment of permanent bradycardias, chronic heart failure and dangerous heart rhythm disturbances. These devices improve survival and quality of life in many patients. However, infections associated with CIED implantation, particularly lead-related infective endocarditis (LRIE), can offset all benefits and make more harm than good for the patient. To date, there are no other studies in Latvia, addressing patients with lead-related infective endocarditis. The objective of this study was to identify the most common pathogens associated with LRIE and their antimicrobial resistance and to identify possible risk factors of patients who present with LRIE. Materials and Methods: The study was performed retrospectively at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital (PSCUH). The study included patients who were referred to PSCUH due to LRIE for lead extraction. Patients were identified from procedural journals. Information about isolated microorganisms, patient comorbidities and visual diagnostics data was taken from patient records. Results: Forty-nine patients with CIED related infective endocarditis were included in the study, 34 (69.4%) were male, median age of all patients was 65.0 (50.5–73.0) years, median hospital stay was 15.5 (22.0–30.5) days. Successful and complete lead extraction was achieved in all patients. Thirty-two (65.3%) had received antibiotics prior to blood sample. Only in 31 (63.3%) positive culture results were seen. The most common isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (23.5%) and coagulase negative staphylococci (23.5%). Other bacteria were isolated considerably less often. The atrial lead was most common location for lead vegetations, seen in 50.0% of cases. Five (10.2%) patients have died due to the disease. Conclusions: Lead-related infective endocarditis is a major complication of cardiac implantable electronic devices with considerable morbidity and mortality, which in our study was as high as 10.2%.

Comparison of outcomes in infected cardiovascular implantable electronic devices between complete, partial, and failed lead removal: an ESC-EHRA-EORP ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTrolled) registry

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 1876-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyal Nof ◽  
Maria Grazia Bongiorni ◽  
Angelo Auricchio ◽  
Christian Butter ◽  
Nikolaos Dagres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Lead Extraction ◽  
Lead Removal ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Failure Group ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Locking Stylet

Abstract Aims The present study sought to determine predictors for success and outcomes of patients who underwent cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) extraction indicated for systemic or local CIED related infection in particular where complete lead removal could not be achieved. Methods and results ESC-EORP ELECTRa (European Lead Extraction ConTRolled Registry) is a European prospective lead extraction registry. Out of the total cohort, 1865/3510 (52.5%) patients underwent removal due to CIED related infection. Predictors and outcomes of failure were analysed. Complete removal was achieved in 1743 (93.5%) patients, partial (<4 cm of lead left) in 88 (4.7%), and failed (>4 cm of lead left) in 32 (1.8%) patients. Removal success was unrelated to type of CIED infection (pocket or systemic). Predictors for failure were older leads and older patients [odds ratio (OR) 1.14 (1.08–1.19), P < 0.0001 and OR 2.68 (1.22–5.91), P = 0.0146, respectively]. In analysis by lead, predictors for failure were: pacemaker vs. defibrillator removal and failure to engage the locking stylet all the way to the tip [OR 0.20 (0.04–0.95), P = 0.03 and OR 0.32 (0.13–0.74), P = 0.008, respectively]. Significantly higher complication rates were noted in the failure group (40.6% vs. 15.9 for partial and 8.7% for success groups, P < 0.0001). Failure to remove a lead was a strong predictor for in hospital mortality [hazard ratio of 2.05 (1.01–4.16), P = 0.046]. Conclusion A total of 6.5% of infected CIED patients failed attempted extraction. Only were >4 cm of lead remained resulted in higher procedural complications and mortality rates.

scholarly journals 444 Epidemiology of subclinical atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review and meta-regression

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Borgi ◽  
Marco Proietti ◽  
Giulio Francesco Romiti ◽  
Marco Vitolo ◽  
Arianna Di Rocco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
History Of ◽  
Meta Regression ◽  
Meta Regression Analysis

Abstract Aims In recent years, attention to subclinical atrial fibrillation (SCAF), defined as the presence of atrial high-rate episodes (AHREs), in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), has gained much interest as a determinant of clinical AF and stroke risk. To perform a systematic review and meta-regression of the available scientific evidence regarding the epidemiology of SCAF in patients receiving CIEDs. Methods and results PubMed and EMBASE were searched for all studies documenting the incidence of AHREs in patients (n = 100 or more) with CIEDs without any previous history of AF from inception to 20 August 2021, screened by two independent blind reviewers. This study was registered in PROSPERO: CRD42019106994. Among the 2614 results initially retrieved, 54 studies were included, with a total of 72 784 patients. Meta-analysis of included studies showed a pooled prevalence of SCAF of 28.1%, with an incidence rate (IR) of 16 new SCAF cases per 100 patient-years (I2 = 100%). Multivariate meta-regression analysis showed that age and follow-up time were the only significant determinants of IR, explaining a large part of the heterogeneity (R2 = 61.5%, P < 0.001), with higher IR at earlier follow-up and in older patients, decreasing over follow-up time and increasing according to mean age. Older age, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, history of AF, hypertension, CHF, and stroke/TIA were all associated with SCAF occurrence. Conclusions In this systematic review and meta-regression analysis, IR of SCAF increased with age and decreased over longer follow-up times. SCAF was associated with older age, higher thromboembolic risk, and several cardiovascular comorbidities.

scholarly journals Upper extremity dysfunctions in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Praveen Jayaprabha Surendran ◽  
Prasobh Jacob ◽  
Dineshkumar Selvamani ◽  
Theodoros Papasavvas ◽  
Narasimman Swaminathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Electronic Device ◽  
Electronic Devices ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device ◽  
Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices ◽  
Shoulder Range Of Motion

Background/Aims The prevalence of cardiac implantable electronic devices has risen considerably during recent years. This has revolutionised the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, which in turn reduced the incidence of sudden cardiac death. There are several complications associated with cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. Upper extremity dysfunction is one of the complications associated with this procedure and it should be addressed, since it can affect activities of daily living. This systematic review analysed the prevailing evidence pertaining to the common upper extremity dysfunctions associated with receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device. Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE (through Cochrane) and Google Scholar for original research published in the English language. The Rayyan QCRI web application was used for study selection and the decision-making process. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct and report this review. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for analytic cross-sectional studies and case reports. Results This systematic review included eight studies with a total of 696 participants. The most common upper extremity dysfunctions associated with receiving a cardiac implantable electronic device were pain and limitation of shoulder range of motion. Limitation of range of motion could be persisted even in the long term after having a cardiac implantable electronic device implanted. Conclusions Contributing factors of upper extremity dysfunctions included size of the device, pectoral site of implantation and upper extremity immobilisation practices. Upper extremity dysfunction is an overlooked complication, as it received a relatively low priority, although it may negatively impact quality of life.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document