Issues of pharmaceutical specialist admission to work

Author(s):  
Tatiana L. Moroz ◽  
Olga A. Ryzhova

A study was carried out to identify differences in training of resident physicians in the specialties: Management and Economics of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology, Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Pharmacognosy and under the specialist’s program Pharmacy and to explore the possibilities of granting pharmacy workers the right to transit from one specialty to another without compulsory completion of residency. The urgency of this article is associated with a large number of issues that are being faced by pharmacists who transit from one specialty to another.An analysis of the age and occupational structure of pharmacists improving their qualifications (2300 people) was conducted in the Irkutsk region and the Trans-Baikal Territory. The results of the study showed that it seems like a good idea not to associate the transition from one specialty to another with the obligatory completion of residency, but to provide an admission to work as a pharmacist-technologist after initial accreditation, taking into account the specifics of the work of pharmaceutical specialists in pharmacies, the need to ensure the interchangeability of workers and reduce staff turnover without falling off in quality of work.

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 383-412
Author(s):  
Ruwa Ahmed Ibrahim

The aim of this research is to identify the reality of the quality of work life in different dimensions and to know the importance of the quality of work life of the employees in the presidency of the University of Tikrit. The research adopted the analytical descriptive research methodology. To achieve the research objectives, the researcher designed a questionnaire for measuring the quality of working life consisting of (5) dimensions, And were applied to a sample of (30) employees of the two years randomly chosen from the research community. Data were statistically processed by calculating arithmetic averages, standard deviations, extraction of frequencies and percentages. In the light of the findings of the research, the researcher came out with a set of Among the recommendations that the decision-makers can make use of at Tikrit University is that improving the quality of the work in its psychological, social and natural dimensions constitutes a social, moral and moral responsibility for the organizations, and that the level of efficiency of the organization in carrying this responsibility can be reflected in tangible results on the Organization's efforts in terms of growth and prosperity And adapting to environmental requirements. The success of the organization in creating the right quality of work life can help it to unleash the capacity of its working members to achieve the goal of increasing productivity in quantity and quality. The current trends of organizations are no longer dependent solely on investment in good capital and modern technology but rather on changes in work in terms of content and dimensions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul White

Purpose – Advances the view that showing appreciation to employees makes sound business sense. Design/methodology/approach – Observes that many employee-recognition schemes currently fail to achieve their goal and explains how to rectify this. Findings – Explains that when employees do not feel appreciated, bad things happen in the organization, with higher rates of tardiness, more absenteeism, increased internal theft by employees and managers, higher staff turnover, more internal conflict and stress among team members, a drop in productivity and the quality of work and lower customer-satisfaction ratings. Practical implications – Describes how team members feel appreciated when appreciation is: communicated regularly; given in language and actions important to the recipient; delivered individually and about him or her personally; and viewed as being authentic. Social implications – Highlights how organizations can improve the performance of their employees. Originality/value – Concludes that the key is to communicate authentic appreciation in the ways that are meaningful to team members.


2015 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Milan Kubiatko

I would like to thank the editor for the place and possibility to write a brief contribution to the problematic of supervisors. I know it is possible to write about this topic more than one page. Here, only a very short kind of information is presented toward this problem and maybe in the future, it will be possible to read more about this. The right supervisor is one of the most important persons in the life of a PhD student. This cooperation aims to the quality of work (about the quality, I do not want to write, because this concept is very abstract and in the eyes of every person it means something else), next it influences the awareness, what the research work means. This relationship has an influence on the future life of students, as personal to work. We will be talking about the work life of the student. We can meet different types of supervisors, probably the worst one is the one, who has got students only for his own benefit (financial support – it depends on the country; the necessity for the next academic degree; publication purposes; students’ work on the department; etc.). In this case students are dependent on their own skills and help from the others, except the supervisor.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 444-465
Author(s):  
Hendry Dwicahyo Wanda ◽  
Rusdianto Sesung

Abstract: Land Acquisition Officer (PPAT) is often required to make the transfer of land right Letter C. As an official making an authentic deed, PPAT must have a precautionary attitude and good precision so that the deed made can guarantee the right of land for the community. In handling the land transfer of Letter C, PPAT needs to apply prudential principles in order to avoid problems in the future. PPAT should pay attention to the management in the kelurahan (officer in the level of village) associated with checking Letter C objects, documents related to the object, the identity of the parties, and permit applications. PPAT also needs to be careful in the management of the National Land Agency. The precautionary principles of PPAT are in need in order to avoid some possible problems in the future. It can also clarify the status of the object of sale and purchase, to avoid errors in the deed of sale of land made by PPAT, to create suitability of the contents of the deed of sale and purchase of land with legal deed taking place. These principles will maintain the dignity of the PPAT position and support the quality of work in making the deed and public services. Abstrak: Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) seringkali diminta melakukan pengurusan peralihan hak atas tanah Letter C. Sebagai pejabat yang membuat akta autentik, PPAT harus memiliki sikap kehati-hatian dan ketelitian yang baik agar akta yang dibuat dapat memberikan jaminan hak atas tanah bagi masyarakat. Dalam pengurusan peralihan hak atas tanah Letter C, PPAT perlu menerapkan prinsip kehati-hatian agar tidak terjadi permasalahan di kemudian hari. PPAT harus memperhatikan pengurusan di kelurahan/desa terkait dengan pengecekan obyek Letter C, dokumen terkait dengan objek, identitas para pihak, dan permohonan izin. PPAT juga perlu berhati-hati dalam pengurusan di Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Prinsip kehati-hatian perlu diterapkan dalam rangka menghindarkan PPAT dari permasalahan yang mungkin terjadi di kemudian hari, memperjelas status obyek jual beli, menghindarkan kesalahan dalam akta jual beli tanah yang dibuat oleh PPAT, dan menciptakan kesesuaian isi akta jual beli tanah dengan perbuatan hukum yang terjadi. Dengan prinsip kehati-hatian akan menjaga harkat dan martabat jabatan PPAT serta mendukung kualitas kerja dalam pembuatan akta dan pelayanan masyarakat.


2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
Irena Čerčikienė ◽  
Dalė Židonytė

Students from programme of Chemistry Analysis Technologies implement three course works during their three years studies in Vilnius College of Higher Education, Department of Chemistry. Analysis of the last few years shows students non-productivity in usage of time for consultations with mentors fruitfully. Students can hardly formulate their thoughts, to cite different literature, analyze and summarize different conclusions. Especially they lack competencies in taking concrete decisions. So naturally it raises the question – what causes such incompetence to systemize, analyze and summaries appropriate information to prepare final work successfully. Within implemented research was attained to find out the main reasons that cause lack of competences in preparing the final course work. There are seen clear tendency that most of students are very confident about their abilities to work independently and keep them self as competent. Lecturers’ positions are opposite – they tend to say that quality of work depends on not only on methodical literature, their abilities, independent work, but largely depends on masters advices. There are shown different positions of student and lecturers in training and evaluation of different parts of course work, and points to confrontation of different opinions in this article. All this leads towards finding the right way to promote students’ self-sufficiency and work efficiency in their studies. Key words: Course work, final work, sufficiency, Competency.


Author(s):  
Steven Dhondt ◽  
Geert Van Hootegem

Current thinking in several disciplines (organisational economics, sociology, psychology)about organisations is starting to converge. Organisations are no longer considered a blackbox, adapting to the economic environment as will-less objects. There is a role to play formanagers to choose the right organisational model. There is still some confusion in theresearch field regarding which organisational model will be most suited for future societaldemands. Workplace Innovation is positioned as a solution, not only stressingorganisational performance, but also delivering better quality of work. This article proposesa research agenda to help this positioning.


2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanya I. Gelsema ◽  
Margot van der Doef ◽  
Stan Maes ◽  
Simone Akerboom ◽  
Chris Verhoeven

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document