Persoalan Desain Kebijakan Carry Over Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang di Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Aspek Politik Hukum

As a policy that bridges the legislation program between periods, carry over in Law No. 15 of 2019 is projected to be able to prevent waste and ineffectiveness of resources as well as provide certainty for promulgation in the legislation making. However, in practice, the carry over policy has not had a significant impact by only being able to pass one of the four bills with carry over status in the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) 2020. That is related to the design of the carry over policy which contain several problems. This paper attempts to analyze the extent of the carry over policy can be realized in the legal politics of sustainable legislation making in Indonesia. The method used is juridical-sociological research with qualitative-descriptive data analysis. The result of this analysis show that the current design of carry over policy needs to be evaluated and adjusted with the established permanent and temporary legal policy, to make it capable to realizing savings and effectiveness of resources as well as providing certainty in the effort to realize the sustainability on legislation making in Indonesia.

Peran Lapas dan Lapasustik Pada Residivis Narkoba Pengguna

Prisons and Drug Abuse Correctional Centre (DACC) play a significant role in recidivism. This study aims to understand the role of prisons and DACC in drug user recidivists, the implementation of Law no. 12 of 1995 concerning correctional facilities, and the law. No. 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics to find out how the process of guidance in prisons and DACC for drug user recidivists, and to find out the effectiveness of coaching in both prisons. This qualitative research uses a case study approach. The data collection method used interviews with 8 subjects and observations on the subject and prison conditions. The data analysis method combines the analysis stages of Morse and Miles and Huberman. Purposive sampling technique was used, with the criteria of the research subjects: drug user recidivists; have experienced convictions in prisons and DACC; of legal age; case of article 127 of Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics or article 36 of Law No. 5 of 1997 concerning Psychotropics and in conjunction with other articles; BI and BIIa classification; the level of drug use is not addiction. The results showed that these two laws have not been fully implemented in prisons and DACC. This is evidenced by the different treatment of prison officers, while the treatment of DACC officers is the same and more humane to DACC so that it has an impact on recidivism. In both, there is personality development and independence but still emphasizes religious development. Medical and social rehabilitation is perceived as ineffective. The two correctional institutions do not raise self-contempt but do raise a cognitive bias. Prison and DACC are different environments that play an important role in becoming drug user recidivists, but DACC is an environment that is more conducive to achieve the correctional goals for drug user recidivists

Problematika Yuridis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Perundang-Undangan

Covid-19 pandemic outbreak is a new phenomenon for Indonesian Government. Although Indonesia already has regulations, The 2018 Health Quarantine Act Number 6. However, the law requires government regulations to be implemented. Based on this, President issued The 2020 Government Regulation Number 21, as a legal basis for the enactment of Large-Scale Social Restrictions. However, formally and materially, many problems on The 2020 Government Regulation Number 21. In addition, the material regulated in Government Regulations does not answer the questions contained on The 2018 Health Quarantine Act Number 6. Therefore, this article wants to answer questions related to how the juridical analysis of The 2020 Government Regulation Number 21 in the perspective of legislation. The method of research in this article is normative juridical by analyzing a number of laws and regulations. The conclusion in this article is that The 2020 Government Regulation Number 21 does not meet the minimum requirements as a implementing regulation, it is necessary to make a new government regulation to replace it. Abstrak: Wabah pandemi Covid-19 merupakan fenomena baru bagi Pemerintah Indonesia. Meskipun pada hakikatnya, Indonesia telah mempunyai regulasi yang mengatur hal tersebut yaitu Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Kekarantinaan Kesehatan. Akan tetapi, Undang-Undang tersebut memerlukan peraturan pemerintah untuk dapat dilaksanakan. Berdasarkan hal tersebutlah, Presiden kemudian menerbitkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 sebagai landasan hukum diberlakukannya Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar. Namun, secara formil maupun materiil, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 menyimpan banyak persoalan. Selain itu, materi yang diatur dalam Peraturan Pemerintah sama sekali belum menjawab pertanaan yang terdapat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2018. Oleh karena itulah, artikel ini hendak menjawab pertanyaan terkait bagaimanakah analisis yuridis Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 dalam perspektif ilmu perundang-undangan. Metode penelitian dalam artikel ini adalah yuridis normatif yaitu dengan menganalisis sejumlah peraturan perundang-undangan. Kesimpulan dalam artikel ini adalah Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 21 Tahun 2020 belum memenuhi syarat minimal sebagai suatu peraturan pelaksana yang layak, oleh karena itulah perlu di buat peraturan pemerintah baru untuk menggantikannya.

Implementasi Hak Politik Mantan Narapidana Korupsi Dalam Pemilihan Umum di Jawa Timur

The right to be voted and to be elected is a human right guaranteed by the Constitution. However, there are limitations to implementation. Research on the implementation of the political rights of ex-convicts in the general election aims to address the problem; first, regulations on the rights of former corruption convicts to be elected in legislation. Second, Implementation of the rights of elected ex-convicts of corruption in the election after the decision of the Supreme Court in East Java. This research is empirical legal research or socio-legal research. The Data obtained through document studies and subsequently, the interviews analyzed with an existing legal theory with a statute approach and a case approach. Data analysis techniques are using inductive thinking patterns. The results of this study indicate that the political rights of ex-convicted corruption are guaranteed in article 28 letter D point 3 of the 1945 Constitution, and article 43 of Law No. 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights and the Election Law, where everyone has the right to be elected and to vote in elections based on the principle of equality. However, in its implementation, there are several variants such as the General Election Commission which issued a regulation prohibiting ex-corruption convicts from running, even though the regulation was canceled by the Supreme Court. Likewise, some political parties consistently did not nominate members who have been exposed to corruption as a preventive measure in preventing corruption.

Legal Gap: Pertentangan Hukum Masyarakat dan Hukum Negara

This article highlights the controversy of revised act of corruption commission (UU KPK) and of the Book of Criminal Law (KUHP) which had heated up. By using legal gap theory, this writing uncovers the legal gap between the contents of revised KUHP and living laws. Consequently, people in the grassroots level seem more enthusiastic about the issue, for example, the fines because livestock entering other people yards than weakening KPK issues that drive a wave of demonstrations at the level of well-educated people. Many studies in the sphere of sociology of law that have conducted gave much attentions to the living law or norm in the mods of society. However there is not much of them which gave attention to the legal gap phenomena, it is the incompatibility between living law and formal one. Whereas, such an approach tend to be considered late if it we aim to put the sociology of law as one discipline of social science which is useful in strengthening the law enforcement. In the hilt of the matter, there is an issue of the legal gap which should have been expressed from the beginning, mainly as to the compatibility between formal and informal law when legislation was going on. By utilizing literature study, the research found that; firstly, the resistance against revised KUHP is the logical consequence of legal gap phenomena that has potential legal conflict. Secondly, there are four major manners could be done to resolve the gap; repression, counseling, reformation and restorative justice.

Status Akta Notaris yang dibuat oleh Notaris yang Merangkap Jabatan Sebagai Advokat

Notary deed as an authentic deed is often used as a means of proof in a trial, because it is the most powerful and perfect. Considering the importance of a notarial deed as a means of proof, the making of a notary deed must be done properly and carefully. The phenomenon of notary that doubles the position as an advocate of course also affects the authentic deed that was made by the notary. A notary who concurrently serves as an advocate is considered to violate the provisions in the Act, so that the notary becomes unauthorized and no longer has power in making a notarial deed. That a deed which is due to the inability of the employee / official who made it or because of a defect in its form, then the deed cannot be treated as an authentic deed, and only has power as a deed under the hand if it is signed by the parties and is no longer has the power of proof that is perfect. For that, those who feel aggrieved can file a lawsuit and claim for compensation to the notary. And for violations of dual positions committed, if it is proven that the notary may also be subject to sanctions.

Sengkarut Pola Hubungan Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus

This article seeks to analize the pattern of relations and authority of election agencies in special autonomous regions in Indonesia. The difference in the pattern of relations between election agencies in the special sutonomy region coincided with the implementation of asymmetric decentralization policies in Indonesia. As a result, differences in authority and specificity that is owned by one region with other regions. Whereas the Indonesian constitution based on Article 22E paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that all regulations relating to the electoral institutions in Indonesia apply nationally. The research method used is normative and empirical. This study found similarities and differences in the pattern of relationships and authority of election agencies in the special sutonomy Region. The similarity is that the election agencies in this Special Autonomous Region has lost certain duties and authorities that affect the pattern of their relationship. The difference lies in the lost duties and authority. In DKI Jakarta, the duties and responsibilities of the election organizers in the Regency/City are only in the context of assisting the Election organizing tasks in the Province. The duties and authority of the election organizers in DIY are reduced in the case of the Governor General Election. While in Aceh, the task of supervision is divided between two organizing agencies, namely the Aceh Panwaslih and the Aceh Province Panwaslih. In the future, this pattern of relations and authority will become a source of conflict and dispute. While in Papua Province, the election organize did not hold general elections due to the implementation of the noken system in some of these areas.

Hudud Terhadap Pencurian dan Penodongan atau Perampokan Dibandingkan Dengan Ketentuan Hukum Pidana Positif Indonesia

Allah exaggerated the threat of punishment for the perpetrators of the hijab above the threat of punishment for the perpetrators of murder or theft. This threat applies not only if the acts of hirabah are committed to Muslims, but also if they are carried out to other religious people who live under Islamic rule. Allah has mentioned the forms of punishment for the perpetrators of hirabah crimes, namely being killed (if they are only human lives without robbery), killed by crucifixion (if killing and seizing the victim's property), crossing their arms and legs crossed (those who only seizing property and not killing the victim), disposed of (if only the perpetrator commits terror or scares the victim by threatening). The threat of punishment for violent theft according to Article 365 of the Criminal Code is: Article 365 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (imprisonment for a maximum of nine years), Article 365 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code (imprisonment for a maximum of twelve years), Article 365 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Code (jail sentence of fifteen years at the most). Article 365 paragraph (4) of the Criminal Code (capital punishment or life imprisonment or for a certain period of twenty years at the most).

Peran Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota Dalam Pengawasan Tenaga Kerja Asing di Indonesia

Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia implies that the natural resources which belong to the State are used for the prosperity of the people of Indonesia. Thus, in carrying out the mandate of the Constitution to create justice for the community and national economic development of employment including foreign workers, the government should provide a good mechanism and supervision so that there will be no gap between the mandate of the constitution and the acceleration of economic development involving foreign workers. Labor inspection done by a separate working unit in the agency whose scope of duties and responsibilities is in the field of employment is in the central government, provincial government, and district/ city government. This study used a normative-empirical approach, where the researcher examined the law and its implementation regarding the roles of district/ city governments in the supervision of foreign workers. The purpose of this study was to examine the extent of the roles of district/ city governments in overseeing foreign workers in their regions. The results of the study showed that the roles of district/ city governments in carrying out the supervision of foreign workers in Indonesia were not regulated by laws of No. 23 of 2014 concerning regional government, PP No. 20 of 2018 concerning the use of foreign workers, and Minister of Manpower Regulation No.10 of 2018 concerning procedures for the use of foreign workers. Thus, its implementation made it difficult for district/ city governments to oversee the presence of foreign workers in their areas.

Penerapan UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak di Wilayah Kabupaten Pamekasan

The problems of children are increasing and increasingly diverse. It causes them to be classified as Children in Conflict with Law (ABH), either as perpetrators or victims. The problems are sexsual crime, theft, scuffelling, mugging, and drug addictive cases.The existance of Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Act of Children Criminal Justice System (UU-SPPA) in lieu of Law No. 3 of 1997, is expected to give more rights to ABH. UU-SPPA has been implemented as it has been stated in the Act, such as the implementation of Diversification as regulated in the UU-SPPA and also Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversity in the Children Criminal Justice System (UU-SPPA). The judges spesialized for Juvenil courts are already available, but the prosecutors and the police are not yet available. During the legal process, ABH is not detained except in certain cases (ultimum remidium). However, the implementation of the decision cannot be carried out perfectly due to the unavailability of facilities and infrastructure which are mandated by the SPPA, such as vocational training institutions, the Child Welfare Organization (LPKA).