scholarly journals Karasor-2 Site in the Upper Tobol

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 636-647
Author(s):  
E. V. Podzuban
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Bronze Age ◽  
Archaeological Site ◽  
Stone Tools ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Cultural Layer ◽  
The West ◽  
Cultural Affiliation ◽  
Stone Industry ◽  
The Town

The present article introduces a collection of prehistoric material culture finds obtained at the Karasor-2 site during a stationary study of the Karasor archaeological site in 1998. A group of Karasor monuments is located near the town of Lisakovsk in the Upper Tobol river valley, which is in the northern Turgai depression. The territory of the Turgai depression connects the West Siberian and Turan plains. The Turgai depression borders on the Trans-Ural Plateau in the west and on the Kazakh hillocky area and the spur of the Ulutau mountains in the east. The local nature and geography destroy the cultural layer on the monuments. Thus, the finds represented by fragments of ceramics and stone products at the Karasor-2 site were collected from the surface, as the cultural layer had been destroyed. The article gives descriptive characteristics of the ceramics, while the stone tools were studied with the technical and typological method. Since the ceramic fragments are too small, the dating and cultural affiliation of the artifacts was based on the results of the technical and typological analysis of the stone tools. Most likely, the stone finds date back to the Mesolithic and Late Eneolithic periods. Most tools are similar to the stone industry of the Tersek culture and belong to the Eneolithic Age. The author believes that the time range of the stone tools and ceramics is from the Late Mesolithic to the Bronze Age.

scholarly journals Mesolithic Sites in the Upper Tobol

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 897-910
Author(s):  
E. V. Podzuban
Keyword(s):  
Bronze Age ◽  
Iron Age ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Archaeological Site ◽  
Stone Tools ◽  
Early Iron Age ◽  
Forest Steppe ◽  
Arrow Head ◽  
Stone Industry ◽  
The Town

The article introduces prehistoric artifacts from the sites of Karasor-5, Karasor-6, and Karasor-7 obtained in 1998. The archaeological site of Karasor is located in the Upper Tobol region, near the town of Lisakovsk. Stone tools, pottery fragments, a ceramic item, and a bronze arrow head were collected from a sand blowout, which had destroyed the cultural layer. The paper gives a detailed description of the pottery. The stone tools were examined using the technical and typological analysis, which featured the primary splitting, the morphological parameters and size of plates, the ratio of blanks, plates, flakes, and finished tools, the secondary processing methods, and the typological composition of the tools. The nature of the raw materials was counted as an independent indicator. The pottery fragments, the bronze arrow head, and the ceramic item belonged to the Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age. The stone industry of the Karasor archeological cluster proved to be a Mesolithic monument of the Turgai Trough. The technical and typological analysis revealed a close similarity with the Mesolithic sites of the Southern and Middle Trans-Urals, as well as the forest-steppe part of the Tobol-Irtysh interfluve. The stone artifacts were dated from the Mesolithic to the Early Iron Age.

scholarly journals Karasor-3 Site in the Upper Tobol

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
E. V. Podzuban
Keyword(s):  
Iron Age ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Stone Tools ◽  
Early Iron Age ◽  
Cultural Layer ◽  
The West ◽  
Stone Industry ◽  
The Town ◽  
Archeological Site ◽  
Independent Indicator

The paper introduces a collection of prehistoric artifacts from Karasor-3 archeological site (1999). The Karasor cluster is located in the Upper Tobol region near the town of Lisakovsk, in the northern part of the Turgai depression, which connects the West Siberian and Turan plains. The Turgai depression borders on the Trans-Ural Plateau on the west and on the Kazakh hummocks and the Ulutau Mountains on the east. This environment does not contribute to the preservation of the cultural layer. As a result, the pottery and stone fragments found at the Karasor 3 site were collected from the surface. The article contains a detailed description of the pottery. The stone tools underwent a technical and typological analysis based on the products of primary splitting, morphological parameters and size of plates, the ratio of blanks and tools made of plates and flakes, methods of secondary processing, and typological composition of the tool kit. The nature of the raw materials was considered as an independent indicator. The stone industry of the Late Eneolithic era proved similar to the Tersek culture. The pottery ranged from the Late Eneolithic to the Early Iron Age.

scholarly journals Diachronous Settlement on the Territory of the Turgay Trough

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 602-629
Author(s):  
Elena V. Podzuban ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Archaeological Site ◽  
The West ◽  
Secondary Processing ◽  
Field Season ◽  
Cultural Layers ◽  
Stone Industry ◽  
Primary Cleavage ◽  
Independent Indicator

The article introduces into the scholarship the collection of findings of prehistoric material culture obtained at Bestamak during the stationary studies of 2001 field season. The total area of the archaeological site is 260,000 m2. It was excavated by Turgay expedition in the 1980s. Bestamak settlement is situated on the Turgay trough connecting the West Siberian and Turan plains. In the west, the Turgay trough is bounded by the Trans-Ural Plateau; in the east — by the Kazakh upland and spurs of the Ulutau mountains. Natural and geographical features of Turgay trough allow for their cultural layers to mainly contain diachronous material, with Bestamak serving as an example. Due to this specificity, the collections of stone industry discovered in the monuments of the Turgay trough should be studied on the basis of technical and typological analysis, the main parameters of which being products of primary cleavage; morphological parameters of the plates, the size of plates and tools on the plates; percentage ratio of ingots and tools from plates and rock flakes; secondary processing methods; typological composition of tool kit. The composition of raw materials is used as an independent indicator. In the course of the research, the author concluded that the primary cleavage, nuclei “rejuvenation” and secondary processing of blanks were performed on the site of the settlement. Judging by the results of the technical and typological analysis, the stone industry was deposited from the end of the Mesolithic-the Early Neolithic to the Late Eneolithic. The Neolithic stone industries, starting from the early and late Eneolithic, are predominant at Bestamak. The presence of Mesolithic and Early Eneolithic stone industries on the site is just an assumption. Fragments of ceramics and metal products suggest that people stayed at Bestamak until Late Bronze.

Changes in Bronze Age Culture Before the Emergence of Lute-shaped Bronze Swords - Focusing on Weiyingzi Culture in Liaoxi area

2019 ◽  
pp. 127-167
Author(s):  
DAEYANG OH
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Bronze Age ◽  
Inner Mongolia ◽  
Migration Route ◽  
Community Group ◽  
The West ◽  
Flat Bottom ◽  
Ordos Plateau ◽  
Steppe Region ◽  
Surrounding Areas

Weiyingzi Culture was early Bronze Age culture developed around Dalinghe and Xiaolinghe River in the west of Yoha. The period was approximately between 1300 - 1000 B.C and the culture was characterized by dominance of Material Culture of the Steppe region, relics including Zhongyuan-style bronze ritual ware, tomb system using wooden coffins, and so on. The typical type of the Culture was earthen cookware with three legs which was represented by flower-pattern decoration along the mouth (huabiankouyanli, 花邊口沿 鬲 ), patternless blown belly (tongfuli, 筒腹 鬲 ), and combined form of flat-bottom and patternless rice bowel (bo, 鉢). This study attempted a preliminary study for reinvestigation on the characteristics and formation process of Weiyingzi Culture by removing differences in recognition and errors in previous studies on such themes and finding out inherent characteristics and external factors of the Culture. In conclusion, one of the reasons for the formation of Weiyingzi Culture in around 1300 B.C. was introduction of Material Culture of the Steppe region, which was also found in the surrounding areas such as Hebei, southeast of Inner Mongolia, and Fuxin. In consideration of the distribution status and characteristics of buried ritual bronzeware in Zhongyuan and that the Material Culture of the Steppe was widely found in Shanxi and north region of Shanxi along the migration route of the Steppe tribe, it was assumed that the migration route of the Weiyingzi Culture was via Ordos Plateau, passing through Liaoxi Zoulang region in the northeast of Hebei. Weiyingzi Culture is suspected to have brought by those who contacted Zhongyuan Culture. Meanwhile, it was noted that Weiyingzi Culture has a few significant factors inherent in Gaotaishan. Since Gaotaishan culture had also strong characteristics of Steppe Culture, it was suspected that the people who remained in that area could accept Steppe Culture easily. As for the surrounding areas, community group who had strong color of Upper Zhangjiayuan Culture advanced to the borderline region with Hebei. Xiquegou-decendant community group who had more connected with Lower Xiajiadian Culture advanced to the borderline regions with southeast of Inner Mongolia and Liaoxi. In the borderline regions with Liaoxi and Liadong, community group of Gaotaishan culture lived there. People in those areas accepted Material Culture of the Steppe region which started to get in from the west without much resistance while the Lower Xiajiadian Culture that had dominated these areas for about 500 years still remained. In that aspect, there was high possibility of significant level of affinity and cultural exchange, although the background cultures were different to each other. It was found that part of natives who remained in Liaoxi area after being subjected to Lower Xiajiadian Culture had blood ties and cultural connections with Gaotaishan culture in the East. Based on that, it was assumed that they selectively accepted Material Culture of the Steppe region flown into that area via Zhongyuan and Hebei and contributed to the formation of Weiyingzi Culture.

A review of the relationship between Pyeonggeo-dong site and Sinigai culture of Maritime Province

2018 ◽  
pp. 39-85
Author(s):  
Jae Youn Kim
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Stone Tools ◽  
Chronological Order ◽  
The West ◽  
Chipped Stone ◽  
Chronological Change ◽  
Ground Stone ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Maritime Province ◽  
Regional Boundary

It has been discussed that Pyeonggeo-dong site has the Northeastern factor but the characteristics of potteries are closed to the c factor, and the native ‘Pyeonggeodong double-rimmed pottery’ were dominated. However, some potteries of BAL styled pottery as well as pot styled pottery that were characterized by its rim of pottery, made of the same techniques, were found. There are BAL styled pottery and pot styled potteries that were not made with folded rim of pottery and attached clay ribbon. In addition to these potteries, not- doble rimmed pot typed pottery, little pottery, beak styled stoneware, chipped stone hole, polished stone knife, oval pestle, disk styled stoneware, etc. are the main factors found in Sinigai culture of Maritime Province. I believe that the reason why Pyeonggeo-dong is considered as the filiation of the Sinigai culture of Maritime Province is because that Sinigai culture has been not well known. Therefore, I want to review that culture in this paper. Sinigai culture has been studied only for its regional boundary and characteristics. However, it is needed to review the chronological change of the potteries and start period of the culture and then compare to Pyeonggeo-dong site. Sinigai culture can be divided in to two types in each region, the West and East, based on chronological order and artifacts. The West 1 type had lasted from 3,400 to 3,200 years ago when people still used Neolithic potteries and started to make MOOMOON pottery. DOLDAEMOON pottery with pattern neolithic, one handle pottery, big pottery, polished stone dagger, polished stone ax, stoneware shaped star, disk styled stoneware, chipped stone hole, etc. were used at the same timew. The West 2 type lasted from 3,200 to 2,500 years ago. This is dwelling pit of square-shaped fire pot with stone and foundation in HARIN site. DOLDAEMOON pottery with pattern neolithic, pot withwith pattern neolithic on the surface, one handle pottery, BAL styled pottery, pot styled pottery, bottle styled pottery etc. are MOOMOON pottery. There are difference in their types based on the length of rim and neck in pot styled pottery and bottle styled pottery. In terms of the stone tools, there are oval pestle, stoneware shaped arrow, polished stone spear, polished stone knife, disk styled stoneware, chipped stone hole, etc. The East 1 type had lasted from 3,300 to 3,000 years ago. The symbolic potteries of this type are pot styled pottery with folded rim of pottery, BAL styled pottery with attached clay ribbon Knapped stone tools had been continuously used while the ground axe were appeared. The East 2 type lasted from 3,000 to 2,500 years ago. When it comes to dwelling pits, there are 3 rectangular fire pit, with foundation, and 4 lined pillar holes on the ground. notdoble rimmed pot styled pottery and bottle styled pottery are also found. People used various ground stone tools including stone axe, stoneware shaped arrow, stone arrow, polished stone spear, polished stone knife and etc. in addition to the knapped tools. BAL and pot styled pottery of doble rimm wth clay ribon, pot typed pottery with folded rim, and smaller potteries are related to the East 1 type of Sinigai culture. not-doble rimmed pot styled pottery rectangular mano, polished stone knife, chipped stone hole, etc are the factor of the West 2 type of Sinigai culture. Therefore, is can be considered that the material culture of Pyeongggeo-dong is combined with the East 1 type and the West 2 type of Sinigai culture. It is assumed that the Sinigai culture came to the west Gyeongnam Provinec continuouly from about 3,300 years ago until the second type that includes bronze artifacts. On the other hand, Daepyeong site located alongside of the Nam river has Gokok bronze which can be the earlier than Korea Liaoning bronze dagger. It is possible that the Gokok bronze was also a remain of Sinigai culture.

scholarly journals Castro de Nossa Senhora das Necessidades (Sernancelhe): uma primeira análise artefactual

2020 ◽  
pp. 1127-1139
Author(s):  
Telma Susana O. Ribeiro
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Bronze Age ◽  
Archaeological Site ◽  
The Other ◽  
Late Bronze Age ◽  
The Hill ◽  
Metallic Artefacts

The Nossa Senhora das Necessidades settlement is to date the only archaeological site in the county of Sernancelhe (Viseu district) to be discussed in the archaeological literature. Referred to as a settlement from the Late Bronze Age, the site has been continually destroyed and has only superficial findings that have never been studied so that we know all of its occupations. This first study, made through ceramic, lithic and metallic artefacts that result from prospections at the hill, aims to reveal the other chronologies of this site, seeking to contribute to the comprehension of the material culture and settlement network of the Beira Alta region in some of its prehistoric and medieval times.

V.—Two Bronze Age Cairns in South Wales: Simondston and Pond Cairns, Coity Higher Parish, Bridgend

Archaeologia ◽  
1938 ◽  
Vol 87 ◽  
pp. 129-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cyril Fox
Keyword(s):  
Bronze Age ◽  
East Side ◽  
The West ◽  
Northern Margin ◽  
The North ◽  
Outstanding Feature ◽  
South Wales ◽  
The Town

In the angle between the rivers Ogwr and Ewenny on the northern margin of the Vale of Glamorgan, east of the town of Bridgend, Brackla Hill (287 ft.) is the outstanding feature. Its pastoral slopes are linked to higher ground on the north by a saddle, on the east side of which there is a gentle fall to a tributary of the Ewenny, and on the west to a rivulet which flows into the Ogwr. Coity village lies at the point where the saddle merges into the upland.

A Sarmatian Royal Burial at Novocherkassk

Antiquity ◽  
1963 ◽  
Vol 37 (148) ◽  
pp. 256-258
Author(s):  
S. I. Kaposhina
Keyword(s):  
Bronze Age ◽  
Systematic Study ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
The Other ◽  
Natural Soil ◽  
The West ◽  
Ancient Times ◽  
Burial Rites ◽  
The Town

There is a large cemetery of barrows near the town of Novocherkassk, and one of the barrows, locally known as Khokhlach, was partly excavated about a hundred years ago. The finds from this Khokhlach excavation are generally known as ‘the Novocherkassk hoard’. In the autumn of 1962 a systematic study was made of the whole cemetery, and in August-September of that year two barrows standing close to each other (to the west of and 2.2 km. from the Khokhlach barrow) were excavated. One of them contained burials of Bronze Age date; the other turned out to be Sarmatian. The Sarmatian barrow is of the most exceptional interest as the finds from it are closely paralleled by the finds of ‘the Novocherkassk hoard’ from the Khokhlach barrow.This Sarmatian barrow, known locally as the Sadovy Kurgan, was a low mound 2.20 m. in height. The top of the mound had been removed in recent times, and part of the remaining barrow had been ploughed away: the original dimensions of the barrow are therefore unknown. Excavation revealed one burial in a rectangular pit dug into the natural soil, covered with wooden planks which were in turn covered with reeds. This burial had already been robbed in ancient times, but during the original burial ceremony a ritual feast had taken place, and objects from this feast were preserved under the barrow on the original ground level. These included a large cast-bronze cauldron such as are commonly found in Sarmatian barrows, and a wrought-bronze cauldron decorated with an iron rim and ringshaped iron handles stood by the burial. Both cauldrons were covered in soot and clearly the food for the funeral feast had been cooked in them. Also placed around the burial pit were an ornamental bronze vase and a terra-cotta amphora which had once held the wine drunk at the feast. In the heaped-up soil of the barrow was a grey pottery hydria and also some other interesting objects. During the burial rites the barrow had been gradually heaped up, at first as a ring round the tomb, and then over the burial as well. During ail this the fire continued to bum, but when the feast was finished, several golden phalerae and eight silver bowls were placed in the mound. The silver bowls lay bottom upwards one on top of the other, and alongside were piled up the phalerae of gold (decorations for horses’ bridles). All this was covered by a silver louterion set upside down.

Памятники ранненеолитической среднедонкой культуры у села Доброе на верхнем Дону

Światowit ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 23-40
Author(s):  
Roman V. Smolyaninov ◽  
Aleksey A. Kulichkov ◽  
Yelizaveta S. Yurkina ◽  
Yevgeniya Yu. Yanish
Keyword(s):  
Material Culture ◽  
Cultural Layer ◽  
Early Neolithic ◽  
Bone Tools ◽  
Ancient Population ◽  
Ceramic Vessels ◽  
First Time ◽  
The Town ◽  
Neolithic Pottery

Nowadays there are 72 sites of the Neolithic Middle-Don Culture. Ceramic vessels are ornamented mostly using triangular pricks. These settlements are located on the banks of the rivers Voronezh and Don in their lower reaches. Not far from the town of Dobroe, a  concentration of Neolithic settlements was found. Three of them contained Early Neolithic pottery of the Middle-Don Culture (6th millennium BC). For the first time on the settlement Dobroe 9 a cultural layer was found in situ. Due to the discovery of the assemblage of pottery and stone and bone tools, new excavations allowed us to characterise the material culture of the ancient population of the Upper Don in a new way.

scholarly journals Lithic Industry of the Itomiura Site in the Lower Angara Region (Neolithic and Bronze Ages): Spatial Organization and Key Characteristics

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-30
Author(s):  
Dmitry A. Gurulev ◽  
Liliya A. Maksimovich ◽  
Polina O. Senotrusova ◽  
Pavel V. Mandryka
Keyword(s):  
Bronze Age ◽  
Spatial Organization ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Stone Tools ◽  
Industry Dynamics ◽  
Neolithic Period ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Lithic Industry ◽  
Stone Industry ◽  
The Bronze Age

The article presents the results of the analysis of the collection of the Itomiura site located in the Lower Angara region. As for today, no markers or concepts of stone industry dynamics in the Neolithic and Bronze Age have been described for the territory of the Lower Angara region. The materials of the Itomiura site allow us to define some of these concepts. Based on the spatial distribution of findings in the cultural layer of the site, we identified 12 areas of concentration of stone pieces (clusters). The areas differ in their composition and types of economic and production activities held. Knapping areas with large amounts of debitage, unfinished items and used microcores predominate. There are also areas that are likely to be more associated with the use of stone tools and their rejuvenating. The combined occurrence of stone pieces with pottery fragments made it possible to distinguish several cultural and chronological complexes. The most clearly identifiable complexes are one with net-impressed pottery, previously dated to the late – final Neolithic period (4th – first half of the 3rd millennium BC), and another with “pearl-ribbed” pottery of the Bronze Age (2nd millennium BC). The Neolithic complex is characterized by the use of various siliceous raw materials. The Bronze Age complex is marked by a wide use of purple-burgundy sedimentary rocks, the specificity of the industry in this period is also created by a series of bifacial items and thinned preforms. Stone industries of both assemblages include a variety of expedient flake tools and microblade production products, represented by different prismatic and edge-faceted cores. The data obtained, with their further correlation with the materials of other sites, can be used for the further study of stone industries of the Lower Angara region and the development of the concept of regional paleocultural dynamics

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document