scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Antibacterial Effect of Nano-Silver Irrigant, Sodium Hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilm

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 1503-1509
Author(s):  
Hadil Sabry ◽  
Yousra Nashaat ◽  
Nada Omar ◽  
Ahmed Negm ◽  
Neveen Shaheen
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Nano Silver

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Antimicrobial Effect of Three Irrigant Solutions (Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidinated MUMS)

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 436-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Jafarzadeh ◽  
Maryam Bidar ◽  
Sepideh Hooshiar ◽  
Mahboubeh Naderinasab ◽  
Mostafa Moazzami ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Candida Albicans ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Streptococcus Mutans ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Lactobacillus Casei ◽  
Antimicrobial Properties ◽  
Antimicrobial Effect ◽  
Canal Irrigation ◽  
The Difference

ABSTRACT Aim To compare the antimicrobial effect of 2% chlorhexidine, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and MUMS containing 2% chlorhexidine. Materials and methods All of the above irrigants were examined on Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, Lactobacillus casei and E.coli. A total of 0.5 CC of each solution and 0.5 CC of McFarland solution bacterium were added to each examination tube. After 15, 30 and 45 minutes, colony count was performed for each tube. The difference in the number of bacteria indicated the effect taken by disinfectant material. Results MUMS containing chlorhexidine showed the antimicrobial properties just like chlorhexidine's effect against E.coli, Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, Enterococcus faecalis and Lactobacillus casei in preventing these entire microorganisms to incubate. Sodium hypochlorite was not effective against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans incubated in 15, 30 and 45 minutes and Enterococcus faecalis in 15 minutes. Conclusion MUMS has antimicrobial properties similar to chlorhexidine. Clinical significance As MUMS containing chlorhexidine can transfer chlorhexidine through its own surfactant around apical area and it can open the dentinal tubules by its own chelator for more penetration of chlorhexidine, it may be a choice for canal irrigation. How to cite this article Bidar M, Hooshiar S, Naderinasab M, Moazzami M, Orafaee H, Naghavi N, Jafarzadeh H. Comparative Study of the Antimicrobial Effect of Three Irrigant Solutions (Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidinated MUMS). J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(4): 436-439.

Combined Antibacterial Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Root Canal Sealers against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms in Dentin Canals

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (8) ◽  
pp. 1294-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianfeng Du ◽  
Zhejun Wang ◽  
Ya Shen ◽  
Jingzhi Ma ◽  
Yingguang Cao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Root Canal Sealers

scholarly journals Comparison of Antibacterial Effects of Various Root Canal Irrigants on Enterococcus faecalis

2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Vinay Kumar ◽  
Veerendra Uppin ◽  
Arvind Shenoy
Keyword(s):  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Antibacterial Effects ◽  
Root Canal Preparation ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Aims To compare the antibacterial effects of various root canal irrigants against E.faecalis. Irrigants tested were 5.25% NaOCl, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 0.2% cetrimide individually and combined. Materials and methods Root canal preparation was performed on 120 extracted permanent maxillary central and lateral incisor teeth. Following root canal preparation, apical foramina were sealed with epoxy resin to prevent bacterial leakage. The root canals were then contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis. After incubation, the contaminated roots were divided into four groups of 30 each. 2 mm of irrigant was delivered which remained in the canal for 10 minutes. The canals were then irrigated with 1 ml saline solution and with size 45 sterile paper point bacteria were sampled. The growth of E. faecalis which occurred in the tubes was inoculated onto blood agar plates. Statistical analysis Difference between the antibacterial efficacies of irrigants was evaluated statistically using chi-square test. Results There was no significant difference between the antibacterial efficacies of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate alone and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate with 0.2% cetrimide, but both had a significantly lower antibacterial effect than 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate. This difference was statistically significant. Conclusions Within limitations of this study, it was concluded that the 5.25% sodium hypochlorite and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate had a higher antibacterial effect than 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate alone and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate with cetrimide. There was no significant difference between the antibacterial efficacies of 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate alone and 0.25% chlorhexidine with certrimide.

scholarly journals Antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on Enterococcus faecalis in endodontics: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Salma Fuad Al Nesser ◽  
Nada George Bshara ◽  
Özkan Adıgüzel
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Antibacterial Effect ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Publication Date ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite Solution ◽  
Root Canal Irrigant

Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the in vitro antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on Enterococcus faecalis during root canal treatment. Methods: An electronic databases (PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, CENTRAL, Health Advance) was performed (last updated was 1st April 2019). The reference lists of the included studies were hand-searched. Randomized in vitro studies that compared sodium hypochlorite gel to solution as a root canal irrigant were included. No limitation on publication date. Results: Out of 20741 articles, only two studies with 116 human teeth were included in this review. The studies showed 50% high risk of bias, and 50% medium risk of bias for the included studies. Both sodium hypochlorite gel and solution had some bacterial growth inhibition over E. faecalis. The heterogeneity in methodology of the included studies and the lack of high evidence led to contradictory results. However, sodium hypochlorite solution was better in enhancing the antibacterial effect according to the robust study. Conclusion: There is insufficient reliable evidence about the antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on enterococcus faecalis. Although the robust study included in this review revealed that sodium hypochlorite gel is less efficient than the solution as a root canal irrigant, further studies are needed to consider the most effective type, concentration, duration and treatment protocols in enhancing the antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite. How to cite this article: Al Nesser S, Bshara N, Adıgüzel Ö. Antibacterial effect of sodium hypochlorite gel on Enterococcus faecalis in endodontics: A systematic review. Int Dent Res 2020;10(1):22-29. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.2020.vol10.no1.3   Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.

Comparative Study of the Antibacterial effect of MTA, Nano-MTA, Portland cement, AND Nano-Portland cement

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 701-706
Author(s):  
Yousra Nashaat ◽  
Ahmed Labib ◽  
Nada Omar ◽  
Mostafa shaker ◽  
Neveen Helmy
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Portland Cement ◽  
Antibacterial Effect
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document