PRODUCTION EVALUATION OF NILE TILAPIA OREOCHROMIS NILOTICUS UTILIZED FRESH AND DRIED AZOLLA PINNATA IN SEMI-INTENSIVE FISH CULTURE

The effect of different phytoplankton species on growth, survival and fatty acids composition of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) was evaluated for 24 weeks. Treatment-1 was fed with commercial feed as Control, treatment-2 was fed with Spirulina platensis, treatment-3 was fed with Chlorella vulgaris and treatment-4 was fed with mixed phytoplankton (Chlorella vulgaris, Spirulina platensis, Azolla pinnata and Pistia stratiotes). The condition factor of fish found in treatment-3 with Chlorella vulgaris (1.73 ± 0.02) was significantly higher than that of treatment-1 as control (1.56 ± 0.02) at 24 weeks culture period. The specific growth rate of treatment-4 with mixed phytoplankton diet (2.00 ± 0.10) was significantly higher than treatment-3 with Chlorella vulgaris (1.13 ± 0.05) after 24 weeks of rearing. There was no significant difference among the four treatments in case of average daily gain, feed conversion ration and survival rate. The use of different phytoplankton such as Spirulina platensis, Chlorella vulgaris and Azolla pinnata influence the fatty acid profiles of Nile tilapia. Findings also showed that the amount of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in treatment-3 fed with Chlorella vulgaris (1.83 ± 0.22) was highly significant than the other treatments. The highest amount of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) was found in treatment-1 fed with commercial feed (2.70 ± 0.53%) and lowest in treatment-2 with Spirulina platensis (0.06 ± 0.02%). Among 19 unsaturated fatty acid, the highest concentration of PUFAs were recorded in treatment-3 (42.55 ± 3.46%) fed with Chlorella vulgaris. The findings of this study suggest that raising Nile tilapia with Chlorella vulgaris and Spirulina platensis in ponds may improve the growth and fatty acid profile of the fish. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 26(1): 13-27, 2017 (January)

Download Full-text

Lab-scale periphyton-based system for fish culture

Ciência Rural ◽

10.1590/s0103-84782011005000146 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 41 (12) ◽

pp. 2177-2182

Author(s):

Davi de Holanda Cavalcante ◽

Suzete Roberta da Silva ◽

Paloma Damasceno Pinheiro ◽

Ádila da Cunha Martins ◽

Marcelo Vinícius do Carmo e Sá

Keyword(s):

Water Quality ◽

Primary Productivity ◽

Oreochromis Niloticus ◽

Nile Tilapia ◽

Fish Culture ◽

Scale Model ◽

Feeding Rates ◽

Final Body Weight ◽

Nile Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus ◽

Feeding Regimes

The present research aimed to assess a lab-scale model to study periphyton-based systems for fish culture. Twenty-five liters plastic aquaria were stocked with three Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, juveniles (0.77±0.09g; 12 fish m-2) for 6 weeks in a 2x2 factorial design. Small plastic bottles were placed in some aquaria for periphyton development. Two feeding regimes were employed: "full-fed" (standard feeding rates were fully adopted) and "half-fed" (50% of standard feeding rates). Growth performance and limnological variables were observed in each aquarium. There werefive replicates per treatment. Fish have fed actively on periphyton, especially in the half-fed aquaria. The placement of periphyton bottles had no significant effects on the water quality variables, except by the gross primary productivity which became lower. Half-fed aquaria presented lower concentrations of ammonia (0.28-0.29mg L-1), nitrite (0.33-0.37mg L-1) and phosphorus (0.42-0.43mg L-1) than full-fed aquaria (0.57-0.60mg L-1; 0.75-0.77mg L-1; 0.67-0.70mg L-1, respectively). The final body weight of fish in half-fed aquaria with periphyton bottles (6.22±0.64g) was significantly higher than in aquaria without bottles (4.65±0.36g). Although the growth rate of fish was lower in the half-fed aquaria (4.27-4.72 vs. 5.29-5.61% BW day-1), survival was significantly higher when compared to the full-fed aquaria (93.3-100.0 vs. 80.0-83.4%). Only in the aquaria with periphyton the feed conversation ratio was improved by the feeding restriction regime.

Download Full-text

Characterization of Francisella noatunensis subsp. orientalis isolated from Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus farmed in Lake Yojoa, Honduras

Diseases of Aquatic Organisms ◽

10.3354/dao03333 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 133 (2) ◽

pp. 141-145 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

E Soto ◽

K Shahin ◽

JJ Talhami ◽

MJ Griffin ◽

A Adams ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Oreochromis Niloticus ◽

Nile Tilapia ◽

Nile Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus

Download Full-text

The effect of vaccination in controling bacterial disease caused by Aeromonas hydrophila in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

AQUATIC SCIENCE & MANAGEMENT ◽

10.35800/jasm.0.0.2014.7302 ◽

2014 ◽

pp. 27

Author(s):

Arne A Ratulangi ◽

Reiny Tumbol ◽

Hengky Manoppo ◽

Henneke Pangkey

Keyword(s):

Survival Rate ◽

Aeromonas Hydrophila ◽

Oreochromis Niloticus ◽

Nile Tilapia ◽

Bacterial Disease ◽

Immersion Method ◽

Nile Tilapia Oreochromis Niloticus ◽

Different Ages ◽

Motile Aeromonas Septicaemia

This study aims to apply vaccination against bacterial disease. The purpose of vaccination is to trigger the immune respone both non-specific and specific of fish against bacteria Motile Aeromonas Septicaemia (MAS) caused by Aeromonas hydrophila. The vaccination for fish with different ages: 2-3 weeks and 5 weeks were done using immersion method. The fish were re-vaccinated (booster) after two weeks of the first vaccination. The survival rate was < 50 % for juveniles 2-3 weeks and > 50% for juveniles 5 weeks. Survival rate for juveniles 5 weeks was higher than juveniles of 2-3 weeks. This shows that organs of juveniles of 5 weeks were more complete than the 2-3 weeks juveniles. The age of fish is one of the important factors for successfully vaccination. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan penerapan vaksinasi terhadap penyakit bakterial. Vaksinasi ditujukan untuk merangsang respon kekebalan non- spesifik dan spesifik pada tubuh ikan terhadap penyakit Motile Aeromonas Septicaemia (MAS) yang disebabkan oleh bakteri Aeromonas hydrophila. Vaksin diberikan pada benih ikan nila yang berbeda umur yaitu 2-3 minggu dan 5 minggu dengan menggunakan metode perendaman. Ikan divaksinasi ulang (booster) setelah 2 (dua) minggu dari vaksinasi yang pertama. Prosentase kelangsungan hidup < 50 % untuk benih umur 2-3 minggu dan > 50% untuk benih umur 5 minggu. Jumlah kematian benih umur 2-3 minggu lebih tinggi dari 5 minggu. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa fungsi organ benih umur 5 minggu telah lebih lengkap dari pada benih umur 2-3 minggu. Umur ikan merupakan salah satu faktor penting penentu keberhasilan suatu kegiatan vaksinasi.

Download Full-text