scholarly journals EFFECT OF N, P AND CU FERTILIZATION ON ONION YIELD, QUALITY AND NUTRIENTS UPTAKE

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. El-Hadidi ◽  
M. El-Shazly ◽  
Heba Hegazy
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
ROSITA SMD ◽  
OTIH ROSTIANA ◽  
W. HARYUDIN W. HARYUDIN

<p>ABSTRAK<br />Kencur (Kaempferia galanga) banyak dimanfaatkan oleh rumah<br />tangga, industri obat maupun makanan serta minuman dan industri rokok<br />kretek. Peningkatan pemakaian simplisia kencur dalam berbagai industri di<br />dalam negeri akan meningkatkan konsumsi simplisia ini, sehingga upaya<br />peningkatan produksi masih perlu dilakukan melalui budidaya, di<br />antaranya dengan penggunaan varietas unggul yang didukung dengan<br />pemupukan yang optimal. Di dalam penelitian ini dikaji respon lima<br />nomor unggul kencur terhadap paket pemupukan organik dan anorganik<br />pada tanah latosol di dataran rendah, Cileungsi, Bogor, Jawa Barat.<br />Penelitian dilaksanakan mulai bulan Oktober 2003 sampai Agustus 2004,<br />dengan RAK dalam pola faktorial. Faktor I nomor unggul kencur (V1, V2,<br />V3, V4 dan V5) dan faktor II paket pemupukan (6 paket), diulang 2 kali.<br />Jarak tanam yang digunakan 20 x 20 cm, ukuran petak 4 x 1,2 m. Hasil<br />penelitian menunjukkan, empat nomor unggul kencur (V1, V3, V4, V5),<br />dari lima nomor yang diuji, mempunyai kemampuan untuk menghasilkan<br />rimpang segar dan kering yang sama, dengan kisaran bobot rimpang segar<br />62,27-70,22 g/tanaman dan kisaran bobot rimpang kering 16,95-19,33 g/<br />tanaman. Paket pemupukan yang dianjurkan untuk semua nomor yang<br />diuji adalah pupuk kandang 20 ton/ha + urea 250 kg/ha + SP36 200 kg/ha<br />+ KCl 200 kg/ha, atau pemupukan organik dengan pupuk kandang kerbau<br />40 ton/ha. Respon lima nomor unggul kencur terhadap aplikasi paket<br />pemupukan memberikan mutu dengan hasil yang berbeda, yaitu kadar<br />minyak atsiri V3 (2,03%) tergolong mutu I, sedangkan empat nomor<br />lainnya tergolong mutu II (1,08 -1,97%), dengan hasil minyak atsiri 0,325<br />– 0,466 ml/tanaman. Serapan hara lima nomor unggul kencur terhadap<br />paket teknologi yang diuji memperlihatkan, serapan hara N berkisar antara<br />149,60 – 415,60 mg/tanaman, hara P 41,50 – 112,50 mg/tanaman, hara K<br />236,10 – 571,70 mg/tanaman.<br />Kata kunci : Kencur, Kaempferia galanga, varietas unggul, pemupukan,<br />serapan hara, produksi, mutu</p><p><br />ABSTRACT<br />Response of five galanga promising lines to fertilization<br />India galanga (Kaempferia galanga) is commonly used for<br />household consumption, medicines, food and drink supplement industries<br />as well as cigarette sauce. Increase in demand of this commodity for<br />domestic industries will raise the consumption of symplicia. Therefore,<br />effort in increasing yield of the plant through cultivation technique<br />improvement, i.e. application of superior variety and fertilization, is worth<br />to be accomplished. In this experiment five Galanga promising lines of<br />India galanga were subjected to organic and inorganic fertilizations at<br />low land latosol soil, Cileungsi, Bogor, West Java. Experiment was carried<br />out from October 2003 – August 2004 and arranged in randomized block<br />in factorial design, with two replications. First factor is the promising lines<br />(V1, V2, V3, V4 and V5); factor II is fertilization packages (6 packages).<br />Plot size of 4 x 1.2 m and plant spacing of 20 x 20 cm, were applied. The<br />results showed that four of five tested promising lines yielded the same<br />results of fresh and dry weight of rhizomes ranged from 62.27-70.22<br />g/plant, and the dry weight was 16.95-19.33 g/plant respectively.<br />Fertilization packages of dung manure 20 t/ha + urea 250 kg/ha + SP36<br />200 kg/ha + KCl 200 kg/ha, or organic fertilizer by using dung manure 40<br />ton/ha, are recommended. Application of fertilization package resulted in<br />different response to the plant for their qualities. The essential oil content<br />of promising lines V3 belongs to the first grade of quality (2.03%), while<br />the others are the second one (1.08-1.97%), with the yield of essential oil<br />ranged from 0.325 – 0.466 ml/plant. The nutrients uptake of the promising<br />lines to the applied technology package were 149.60 – 415.60 mg/plant of<br />N, 41.50 – 112.50 mg/plant of P, and 236.10 – 571.70 mg/plant of K<br />nutrients.<br />Key words: Kaempferia galanga , superior variety, fertilization, nutrient<br />up take, yield, quality</p>


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 1141-1154
Author(s):  
M. W. Sh. Mahmowd ◽  
F. Sh. Sedeck ◽  
E.E.E. Khafagy ◽  
I. S. M. Mosaad

2010 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Klupács ◽  
Á. Tarnawa ◽  
I. Balla ◽  
M. Jolánkai

Water supply of crop plants is the most essential physiological condition influencing quality and quantity performance of grain yield. In a 12-year experimental series of winter wheat agronomic trials run at the Nagygombos experimental site (Hungary) the effect of water availability has been studied. The location represents the typical average lowland conditions of the country, the annual precipitation of the experimental site belonging to the 550–600 mm belt of the Northern edges of the Great Hungarian Plain, while the average depth of groundwater varies between 2 to 3 metres. Crop years with various precipitation patterns have had different impacts on crop yield quality and quantity. Yield figures were in positive correlation with annual precipitation in general. Water availability had diverse influence on quality manifestation. Good water supply has often resulted in poorer grain quality, especially wet gluten and Hagberg values have been affected by that. Drought reduced the amount of yield in general, but contributed to a better quality manifestation in some of the crop years.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeynep Dumlu Gul ◽  
Halil Yolcu ◽  
Mustafa Tan ◽  
Yunus Serin ◽  
Ismail Gul

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Gang AN ◽  
Fu JING ◽  
Yi DING ◽  
Yi XIAO ◽  
Hao-Hao SHANG ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 765-769
Author(s):  
Yu-Feng ZHANG ◽  
Liang DONG ◽  
Zhao-Hui LIU ◽  
Guang-Si CHEN ◽  
Yan LI ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document