Comparison of T Tube Ileostomy and Bishop Koop Ileostomy for the Management of Uncomplicated Meconium Ileus

Background: Meconium ileus is a common cause of neonatal intestinal obstruction. Various surgical procedures are in practice for uncomplicated meconium ileus. Bishop Koop ileostomy allows distal passage of gut content and uses the distal absorptive area. T tube ileostomy avoids the need for gut resection and formal closure of stoma. The aim of this prospective interventional study was to compare the outcome of T-tube ileostomy and Bishop Koop ileostomy for the treatment of uncomplicated meconium ileus.Materials and methods: It was a prospective interventional study from January 2015 to December 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to the T-tube ileostomy group (group A) and Bishop Koop ileostomy group (group B). The patients were followed up for 6 weeks post-operatively. Surgical outcomes between the two groups were compared.Results: The age range of the patients was 1 to 7 days; majority of the patients were males. Mean operation time of group A (60.76±5.81 minutes) and group B (87.05±6.49 minutes) showed significant difference (p =0.0001). After operation, mean time to start bowel movements in group A (4.90±1.41days) and group B (6.53±2.58 days) showed significant difference (p= 0.020). Times to establish oral feeding, irrigation tube removal and postoperative complications showed no significant difference. All patients that survived in the group B required formal stoma closure, while in the group A stomas closed spontaneously. One patient in the group A had intraperitoneal leakage leading to mortality after second operation. Four patients had leakage in the group B; 2 of them died.Conclusions: T-tube ileostomy was found as an effective and safe procedure for the management of uncomplicated meconium ileus.

Download Full-text

Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis.

Urologia Journal ◽

10.1177/03915603211001677 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 039156032110016

Author(s):

Francesco Chiancone ◽

Marco Fabiano ◽

Clemente Meccariello ◽

Maurizio Fedelini ◽

Francesco Persico ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Operation Time ◽

Renal Tumors ◽

Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽

Estimated Blood Loss ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Operative Complications ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Post Operative Complications

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time ( p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy ( p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins ( p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss ( p = 0.0205), intra-operative ( p = 0.0104), and post-operative ( p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time ( p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (<0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar ( p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (<0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications ( p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.

Download Full-text

Comparison of early versus standard timing for silicone stent removal following External Dacrocystorhinostomy under local anaesthesia

Nepalese Journal of Ophthalmology ◽

10.3126/nepjoph.v11i1.25413 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 24-28

Author(s):

Ben Limbu ◽

Hannah S Lyons ◽

Mohan Krishna Shrestha ◽

Geoffrey C Tabin ◽

Rohit Saiju

Keyword(s):

Success Rate ◽

Financial Burden ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Nasolacrimal Duct ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Tube Removal ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Silicone Stent ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Introduction: The first line treatment for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) is external dacrocystorhinostomy (DCR). Following DCR, patients are required to return to Tilganga Institute of Ophthalmology (TIO) six weeks postoperatively for the removal of a silicone stent. As the majority of patients travel large distances at significant cost to reach TIO, most often patients remain within Kathmandu during this six weeks interval. This places a large financial burden on patients. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was designed to compare patient outcomes after early (two weeks postoperatively) versus standard (six weeks postoperatively) removal of silicone stents. 50 selected patients were randomized into two equal groups. Results: At the time of publication, 31 patients (14 in group A and 17 in group B) had completed three months follow up. A success rate of 92.9% was noted in Group A and a success rate of 94.1% observed in group B. No significant difference was found between the two groups for success rate and rate of complications. Conclusion: Early tube removal post DCR appears to cause no significant difference in outcome or complication rates compared to standard tube removal.

Download Full-text

Primary Closure Versus T-Tube Drainage Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients With Previous Biliary Surgery

The American Surgeon ◽

10.1177/0003134820947396 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 000313482094739

Author(s):

Wan Zhen ◽

Wang Xu-Zhen ◽

Fu Nan-Tao ◽

Li Yong ◽

Xiao Wei-Dong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bile Duct ◽

Common Bile Duct ◽

Primary Closure ◽

Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽

Biliary Surgery ◽

Tube Drainage ◽

T Tube ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been recently introduced for management of CBD stone in patients with previous biliary surgery history. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of primary closure in patients with previous biliary surgery history compared to T-tube drainage. Eighty patients with previous biliary surgery history including laparoscopic cholecystectomy, open cholecystectomy, or open common bile duct exploration were enrolled in the retrospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the methods of choledochotomy closure. Group A: patients with primary closure after LCBDE (n = 51); group B: patients with T-tube drainage after LCBDE (n = 29). Group A exhibited a shorter postoperative hospital stay and lower hospitalization expenses compared to group B. There was no significant difference in conversion rate to open surgery, operating time, intraoperative blood loss, bile leakage rate, overall complication rate, and stone recurrence rate between the 2 groups. Biliary stricture was not observed in the 2 groups during the follow-up period. Primary closure following LCBDE is safe and effective for the management of CBD stones in patients with previous biliary surgery history.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Combined Clopidogrel and Aspirin Therapy after Off-Pump Coronary Surgery

Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery ◽

10.1097/imi.0b013e3181bbc754 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 4 (5) ◽

pp. 265-268 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Emir Mujanovic ◽

Midhat Nurkic ◽

Jasmin Caluk ◽

Ibrahim Terzic ◽

Emir Kabil ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Artery Bypass ◽

Postoperative Bleeding ◽

Median Sternotomy ◽

Operation Time ◽

Graft Patency ◽

Off Pump ◽

Number Of Patients ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Objective The purpose of this randomized study was to evaluate the effect on graft patency by adding clopidogrel to aspirin in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting and the possible side effects of such therapy. Methods Twenty patients who underwent standard OPCAB through median sternotomy were randomized immediately after surgery in two groups. Patients in group A (n = 10) received 100 mg of aspirin starting preoperatively, continuing indefinitely. Patients in group B received 100 mg of aspirin and, in addition, 75 mg of clopidogrel starting immediately after the operation and for 3 months. Postoperative bleeding and other perioperative parameters were compared. Angiography was repeated 3 months after surgery to determine the patency and quality of grafts. Results Preoperative risk factors were similar in the two groups. There was no significant difference in average number of distal anastomosis (P = 0.572), operation time (P = 0.686), postoperative bleeding (P = 0.256), ventilation time (P = 0.635), and intensive care unit stay (P = 0.065). Length of stay was shorter in group B (P = 0.024). There was no postoperative complication in either groups. Eight of 27 grafts in group A and 2 of 29 grafts in group B (P = 0.037) were occluded at the time of control angiography. Conclusions Early administration of a combined regimen of clopidogrel and aspirin after OPCAB grafting is not associated with increased postoperative bleeding or other major complications. Despite the small number of patients in this study and small number of examined grafts, the results suggest that the addition of clopidogrel may increase graft patency after OPCAB grafting.

Download Full-text

Clinical Effect of Suture Anchor and Double-Pulley Technique in the Treatment of Inferior Patellar Fracture

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine ◽

10.1155/2021/4964195 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Hang Yu ◽

Hui Dong ◽

Binjia Ruan ◽

Xiaohang Xu ◽

Yongxiang Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Fracture Healing ◽

Suture Anchor ◽

Alternative Therapy ◽

Operation Time ◽

Healing Time ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B ◽

Clinical Healing

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of suture anchor combined with double-pulley technique for subpatellar comminuted fractures compared with wire vertical suture and Krachow in the treatment of subpatellar fractures. Methods. Retrospectively selected 48 patients with subpatellar pole comminuted fracture admitted in our hospital from February 2013 to July 2019, 25 patients with double-pulley technique (group A), and 23 patients with vertical wire suture with Krachow suture. Patient age, gender, AT/OTA typing, injury mechanism, follow-up time, surgical time, bleeding volume, mean fracture healing time, and postoperative complications were recorded. The Insall-Salvati index immediately and 6 weeks after surgery. Bostman scores and knee activity were recorded at each follow-up, and month 12 was taken as the final result. Results. Time of surgery in group A (46.52 min) was significantly shorter than in group B (76.30 min). Intraoperative bleeding in group 15.1 ml, B, group 15.9 ml. Both incisions healed in stage I, averaging clinical healing of patella fracture within 10 weeks. There was no significant difference in mean Bostman score and knee activity at month 12 (group A: 28.4, 124.8°; group B: 28.1, 125.7°). There was no significant statistical difference in the Insall-Salvati index immediately or 6 weeks between the two groups. Group B patients had two wire fractures, fracture healing and the wire removed one year after surgery, and the remaining patients had no complications such as internal fixation loosening, fracture, delayed healing, or nonhealing of fracture. Conclusion. Compared with the treatment of subpatellar fracture with wire vertical suture and Krachow method, suture anchor with double-pulley technique has short operation time, reliable fixation, and less complications. Patients can have early functional exercise and good knee function recovery without secondary surgery. It can be considered as an alternative therapy for this fracture and deserves clinical adoption and promotion.

Download Full-text

A Modified Method to Treat Severe Asymptomatic Pre-existing Degeneration of Adjacent Segment: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-70798/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Xinliang Zhang ◽

Jinwen Zhu ◽

Yibing Li ◽

Dingjun Hao ◽

Wenjie Gao

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Operation Time ◽

Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Retrospective Case ◽

Modified Method ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Abstract Background: Pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment is an important risk factor for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), but limited and controversial studies have addressed its management.Methods: Patients with symptomatic degeneration of the L5/S1 segment warranting surgical interference and severe asymptomatic degeneration of the L4/5 segment were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, those who underwent interbody fusion in the causative (L5/S1) segment and distraction of the intervertebral space and facet fusion in the adjacent L4/5 segment were included as Group A (n=103). Patients who underwent interbody fusion in both L5/S1 and L4/5 segments were included as Group B (n=81). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated.Results: Mean follow-up was 58.5 months (range, 48-75 m). No significant difference in clinical outcomes or the incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in L3/4 segment was found between Groups A and B. Compared with Group B, less bleeding (315±84 vs. 532±105 ml), shorter operation time (107±34 vs. 158±55 min) and lower costs (13,830±2640 vs. 16,020±3380 US$) were found in Group A (P<0.05). In Group A, disc height ratio (DHR) of L4/5 segment was significantly increased from preoperative value of 0.40±0.13 to last follow-up value of 0.53±0.18 (P<0.05), while the degree of canal stenosis (DCS) was decreased from preoperative value of 34.3±11.2% to last follow-up value of 15.9±9.3% (P<0.05). Conclusions: This modified method could be effective in treating severe asymptomatic pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment in lumbar spine.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of the Bridge-type ROI-C Interbody Fusion Cage System and Titanium Mesh Graft With Titanium Plate Fixation in 2-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating and Cage System: A Retrospective Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-48049/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Shuangjun He ◽

Zhangzhe Zhou ◽

Xiaofeng Shao ◽

Changhao Zhang ◽

Xinfeng Zhou ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Operation Time ◽

Fusion Rate ◽

Cage System ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Bridge Type ◽

Group B ◽

Fusion Cage

Abstract Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and radioactive results of the bridge-type ROI-C interbody fusion cage (ROI-C) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating and cage system (ACDF) for cervical spondylopathy. Methods From January 2014 to January 2018, 45 patients undergoing ACDF were retrospectively analyzed, including 24 cases of ROI-C (group A) and 21 cases of ACDF (group B). The operation time, blood loss, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA), postoperative complications, imaging results including cervical Cobb angle and fusion were compared between groups. Results All patients were successfully treated with surgery, and no cerebrospinal fluid leakage, esophageal fistula, or hoarseness occurred after surgery. The operation time and blood loss in group A were lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). During the follow-up period, JOA score increased and NDI score decreased after operation (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of dysphagia in group A was lower than that in group B at 1 month and 3 months after operation (P < 0.05), but the final follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of dysphagia between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group A, the fusion rate was 83.3% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 12.5%. In group B, the fusion rate was 85.7% 3 months after surgery and 100% at the last follow-up. The rate of adjacent level ossification development was 23.8%. Conclusion Both ROI-C and ACDF can achieve satisfactory results, but ROI-C has shorter operation time, less bleeding and lower incidence of dysphagia in the short term.

Download Full-text

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients (YSURG1401 study).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2016.34.4_suppl.725 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 725-725

Author(s):

Yosuke Atsumi ◽

Masakatsu Numata ◽

Toru Aoyama ◽

Tsutomu Hayashi ◽

Naoto Yamamoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Laparoscopic Surgery ◽

Elderly Patients ◽

Surgical Outcomes ◽

Operation Time ◽

University Hospital ◽

Age Group ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

725 Background: The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) for colorectal cancer has not yet been fully evaluated in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to compare the short term surgical outcomes of LAP and evaluate the safety and feasibility of LAP in colorectal cancer patients aged > 75 years. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between April 2013 and March 2014 at Yokohama City University Hospital and its related general hospitals. The patients were categorized into two groups: elderly patients (≧75 years of age: group A) and non-elderly patients ( < 75 years of age: group B). Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. The severity of complications was evaluated using the Clavien–Dindo classification. Results: A total of 237 patients were evaluated in the present study. Eighty-four patients were classified into group A, and 153 into group B. Preoperative clinicopathological outcomes demonstrated no significant differences except for the ASA score. When comparing the surgical outcomes between group A and group B, the rate of conversion to open procedure (3.6 % vs 5.2 %, P = 0.751), median operation time (232 min vs 232 min, P = 0.318), median blood loss (20 ml vs 12 ml, P = 0.353). There was no significant difference in the surgical outcomes. Although the incidence of Japanese D3 dissection was significantly lower in Group A (56 % vs 69.3 %, P = 0.047), the incidences of postoperative surgical complications of grade ≧ Ⅱ were similar between two groups (15.5 % vs 11.8 %, p = 0.427). The length of postoperative hospital stay was also similar (10days vs 10days, p = 0.347). Conclusions: The present study suggested that laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is safe and feasible, regardless of the age of the patient, especially for elderly patients who may be candidates for colorectal cancer surgery.

Download Full-text

Local Excision Procedure for Warthin's Tumor of the Parotid Gland

Otolaryngology ◽

10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.071 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 132 (4) ◽

pp. 577-580 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Hiroshi Iwai ◽

Toshio Yamashita

Keyword(s):

Facial Nerve ◽

Local Excision ◽

Operation Time ◽

Warthin’S Tumor ◽

Parotid Tumors ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Warthin's Tumor ◽

Group A ◽

Surgical Field ◽

Group B

The aim of this work is to establish a local excision procedure (LEP) and indications of this procedure for Warthin's tumor. Seventy-three patients (82 sides) with Warthin's tumor were studied. Point I was located 1 cm from the intertragal notch in the direction indicated by the notch. Point S was located 5 mm superior to the inferior end of the mandibular angle. The trunk of the facial nerve and the marginal mandibular branch run at the points I and S, respectively. In surgical maneuvers below the I-S line, the marginal mandibular and colli branches may exist within the surgical field, but the trunk and other peripheral branches of the facial nerve will not be encountered. For Warthin's tumor estimated to be below the I-S line (Group A), LEP was used, involving resection of the tumor after locating and dissecting the marginal mandibular and colli branches. For tumors not meeting these criteria (Group B), partial superficial parotidectomy was performed. Results indicated that mean volume of hemorrhage was significantly smaller, and that mean operation time was significantly shorter in Group A than in Group B. Conversely, no significant difference in tumor size or incidence of postoperative facial paresis was identified between the 2 groups. Recurrence has not yet been noted in either group. In conclusion, LEP is useful for Warthin's tumor below the I-S line. This procedure seems applicable not only to Warthin's tumors, but also to other benign parotid tumors in the surgical field below the I-S line, such as pleomorphic adenoma and lymphoepithelial cyst.

Download Full-text

A modified method to treat severe asymptomatic pre‐existing degeneration of adjacent segment: a retrospective case‐control study

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01163-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Xinliang Zhang ◽

Jinwen Zhu ◽

Yibing Li ◽

Dingjun Hao ◽

Wenjie Gao

Keyword(s):

Interbody Fusion ◽

Operation Time ◽

Adjacent Segment Degeneration ◽

Adjacent Segment ◽

Retrospective Case ◽

Modified Method ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group A ◽

Group B

Abstract Background Pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment is an important risk factor for adjacent-segment degeneration (ASD), but only limited and controversial studies have addressed its management. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with symptomatic degeneration of the L5/S1 segment warranting surgical interference and severe asymptomatic degeneration of the L4/5 segment. Of these patients, those who underwent interbody fusion of the causative (L5/S1) segment and distraction of the intervertebral space and facet fusion of the adjacent L4/5 segment were included in Group A (n = 103), while those who underwent interbody fusion of both the L5/S1 and L4/5 segments were included in Group B (n = 81). Clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated. Results Mean follow-up time was 58.5 months (range, 48–75 months). We found no significant difference in clinical outcomes or incidence of ASD in the L3/4 segment between Groups A and B. Compared with Group B, Group A experienced less bleeding (315 ± 84 ml vs. 532 ± 105 ml), shorter operation time (107 ± 34 min vs. 158 ± 55 min) and lower costs (US $13,830 ± $2640 vs. US $16,020 ± $3380; P < 0.05). In Group A, the disc height ratio (DHR) of the L4/5 segment was significantly increased from a preoperative value of 0.40 ± 0.13 to a last–follow-up value of 0.53 ± 0.18 (P < 0.05), while the degree of canal stenosis (DCS) was decreased from a preoperative value of 34.3 ± 11.2% to a last–follow-up value of 15.9 ± 9.3 % (P < 0.05). Conclusions This modified method could be effective in treating severe asymptomatic pre-existing degeneration of adjacent segment in the lumbar spine.

Download Full-text