Detecting Protein-Protein Interaction Based on Protein Fragment Complementation Assay

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 598-610
Author(s):  
Tianwen Wang ◽  
Ningning Yang ◽  
Chen Liang ◽  
Hongjv Xu ◽  
Yafei An ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Form Of Life ◽  
Tev Protease ◽  
Fragment Complementation ◽  
Protein Fragment Complementation Assay ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Proteins are the most critical executive molecules by responding to the instructions stored in the genetic materials in any form of life. More frequently, proteins do their jobs by acting as a roleplayer that interacts with other protein(s), which is more evident when the function of a protein is examined in the real context of a cell. Identifying the interactions between (or amongst) proteins is very crucial for the biochemistry investigation of an individual protein and for the attempts aiming to draw a holo-picture for the interacting members at the scale of proteomics (or protein-protein interactions mapping). Here, we introduced the currently available reporting systems that can be used to probe the interaction between candidate protein pairs based on the fragment complementation of some particular proteins. Emphasis was put on the principles and details of experimental design. These systems are dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), β-lactamase, tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease, luciferase, β- galactosidase, GAL4, horseradish peroxidase (HRP), focal adhesion kinase (FAK), green fluorescent protein (GFP), and ubiquitin.

scholarly journals Application of a Chimeric Green Fluorescent Protein to Study Protein-Protein Interactions

BioTechniques ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 864-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Garamszegi ◽  
Z.P. Garamszegi ◽  
M.S. Rogers ◽  
S.J. De-Marco ◽  
E.E. Strehler
Keyword(s):  
Green Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Detecting Protein−Protein Interactions with a Green Fluorescent Protein Fragment Reassembly Trap:  Scope and Mechanism

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Magliery ◽  
Christopher G. M. Wilson ◽  
Weilan Pan ◽  
Dennis Mishler ◽  
Indraneel Ghosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Green Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Fragment ◽  
Green Fluorescent

scholarly journals In Vivo Quantitative Estimation of DNA-Dependent Interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 Using BirA-Catalyzed Site-Specific Biotinylation

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arman Kulyyassov ◽  
Vasily Ogryzko
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Quantitative Estimation ◽  
Multiple Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Protein–protein interactions of core pluripotency transcription factors play an important role during cell reprogramming. Cell identity is controlled by a trio of transcription factors: Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog. Thus, methods that help to quantify protein–protein interactions may be useful for understanding the mechanisms of pluripotency at the molecular level. Here, a detailed protocol for the detection and quantitative analysis of in vivo protein–protein proximity of Sox2 and Oct4 using the proximity-utilizing biotinylation (PUB) method is described. The method is based on the coexpression of two proteins of interest fused to a biotin acceptor peptide (BAP)in one case and a biotin ligase enzyme (BirA) in the other. The proximity between the two proteins leads to more efficient biotinylation of the BAP, which can be either detected by Western blotting or quantified using proteomics approaches, such as a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis. Coexpression of the fusion proteins BAP-X and BirA-Y revealed strong biotinylation of the target proteins when X and Y were, alternatively, the pluripotency transcription factors Sox2 and Oct4, compared with the negative control where X or Y was green fluorescent protein (GFP), which strongly suggests that Sox2 and Oct4 come in close proximity to each other and interact.

scholarly journals Intracellular Targeting of Gag Proteins of the Drosophila Telomeric Retrotransposons

2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 6376-6384 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rashkova ◽  
A. Athanasiadis ◽  
M.-L. Pardue
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Cluster Formation ◽  
Intracellular Localization ◽  
Ltr Retrotransposons ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Intracellular Targeting ◽  
Identify Amino Acid ◽  
Green Fluorescent

ABSTRACT Drosophila has two non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons that are unique because they have a defined role in chromosome maintenance. These elements, HeT-A and TART, extend chromosome ends by successive transpositions, producing long arrays of head-to-tail repeat sequences. These arrays appear to be analogous to the arrays produced by telomerase on chromosomes of other organisms. While other non-LTR retrotransposons transpose to many chromosomal sites, HeT-A and TART transpose only to chromosome ends. Although HeT-A and TART belong to different subfamilies of non-LTR retrotransposons, they encode very similar Gag proteins, which suggests that Gag proteins are involved in their unique transposition targeting. We have recently shown that both Gags localize efficiently to nuclei where HeT-A Gag forms structures associated with telomeres. TART Gag does not associate with telomeres unless HeT-A Gag is present, suggesting a symbiotic relationship in which HeT-A Gag provides telomeric targeting. We now report studies to identify amino acid regions responsible for different aspects of the intracellular targeting of these proteins. Green fluorescent protein-tagged deletion derivatives were expressed in cultured Drosophila cells. The intracellular localization of these proteins shows the following. (i) Several regions that direct subcellular localizations or cluster formation are found in both Gags and are located in equivalent regions of the two proteins. (ii) Regions important for telomere association are present only in HeT-A Gag. These are present at several places in the protein, are not redundant, and cannot be complemented in trans. (iii) Regions containing zinc knuckle and major homology region motifs, characteristic of retroviral Gags, are involved in protein-protein interactions of the telomeric Gags, as they are in retroviral Gags.

scholarly journals Strategies to improve the fluorescent signal of the tripartite sfGFP system

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 998-1006
Author(s):  
Jing Shen ◽  
Wenlu Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Gan ◽  
Xiafei Wei ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Fluorescent Proteins ◽  
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation ◽  
Fluorescence Signal ◽  
Recovery Efficiency ◽  
Good Recovery ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Bifc Assay ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Abstract Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) is a popular method used to detect protein–protein interactions. For a BiFC assay, a fluorescent protein is usually split into two parts, and the fluorescence is recovered upon the interaction between the fused proteins of interest. As an elegant extension of BiFC, a tripartite superfold green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) system that has the advantages of low background fluorescence and small fusion tag size has been developed. However, the tripartite system exhibits a low fluorescence signal in some cases. To address this problem, we proposed to increase the affinity between the two parts, G1–9 and G11, of the tripartite system by adding affinity pairs. Among the three affinity pairs tested, LgBiT-HiBiT improved both the signal and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio to the greatest extent. More strikingly, the direct covalent fusion of G11 to G1–9, which converted the tripartite system into a new bipartite system, enhanced the S/N ratio from 20 to 146, which is superior to the bipartite sfGFP system split at 157/158 or 173/174. Our results implied that the 10th β-strand of sfGFP has a low affinity and a good recovery efficiency to construct a robust BiFC system, and this concept might be applied to other fluorescent proteins with similar structure to construct new BiFC systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document