scholarly journals In Vivo Quantitative Estimation of DNA-Dependent Interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 Using BirA-Catalyzed Site-Specific Biotinylation

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arman Kulyyassov ◽  
Vasily Ogryzko
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Quantitative Estimation ◽  
Multiple Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Protein–protein interactions of core pluripotency transcription factors play an important role during cell reprogramming. Cell identity is controlled by a trio of transcription factors: Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog. Thus, methods that help to quantify protein–protein interactions may be useful for understanding the mechanisms of pluripotency at the molecular level. Here, a detailed protocol for the detection and quantitative analysis of in vivo protein–protein proximity of Sox2 and Oct4 using the proximity-utilizing biotinylation (PUB) method is described. The method is based on the coexpression of two proteins of interest fused to a biotin acceptor peptide (BAP)in one case and a biotin ligase enzyme (BirA) in the other. The proximity between the two proteins leads to more efficient biotinylation of the BAP, which can be either detected by Western blotting or quantified using proteomics approaches, such as a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) analysis. Coexpression of the fusion proteins BAP-X and BirA-Y revealed strong biotinylation of the target proteins when X and Y were, alternatively, the pluripotency transcription factors Sox2 and Oct4, compared with the negative control where X or Y was green fluorescent protein (GFP), which strongly suggests that Sox2 and Oct4 come in close proximity to each other and interact.

scholarly journals Measuring ligand-dependent and ligand-independent interactions between nuclear receptors and associated proteins using Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET2)

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. nrs.04021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Koterba ◽  
Brian G. Rowan
Keyword(s):  
Energy Transfer ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Resonance Energy Transfer ◽  
Resonance Energy ◽  
Renilla Luciferase ◽  
Receptor Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions

Bioluminescent resonance energy transfer (BRET2) is a recently developed technology for the measurement of protein-protein interactions in a live, cell-based system. BRET2 is characterized by the efficient transfer of excited energy between a bioluminescent donor molecule (Renilla luciferase) and a fluorescent acceptor molecule (a mutant of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP2)). The BRET2 assay offers advantages over fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) because it does not require an external light source thereby eliminating problems of photobleaching and autoflourescence. The absence of contamination by light results in low background that permits detection of very small changes in the BRET2 signal. BRET2 is dependent on the orientation and distance between two fusion proteins and therefore requires extensive preliminary standardization experiments to conclude a positive BRET2 signal independent of variations in protein titrations and arrangement in tertiary structures. Estrogen receptor (ER) signaling is modulated by steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1). To establish BRET2 in a ligand inducible system we used SRC-1 as the donor moiety and ER as the acceptor moiety. Expression and functionality of the fusion proteins were assessed by transient transfection in HEK-293 cells followed by Western blot analysis and measurement of ER-dependent reporter gene activity. These preliminary determinations are required prior to measuring nuclear receptor protein-protein interactions by BRET2. This article describes in detail the BRET2 methodology for measuring interaction between full-length ER and coregulator proteins in real-time, in an in vivo environment.

scholarly journals Application of a Chimeric Green Fluorescent Protein to Study Protein-Protein Interactions

BioTechniques ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 864-872 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Garamszegi ◽  
Z.P. Garamszegi ◽  
M.S. Rogers ◽  
S.J. De-Marco ◽  
E.E. Strehler
Keyword(s):  
Green Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Detecting Protein−Protein Interactions with a Green Fluorescent Protein Fragment Reassembly Trap:  Scope and Mechanism

2005 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Magliery ◽  
Christopher G. M. Wilson ◽  
Weilan Pan ◽  
Dennis Mishler ◽  
Indraneel Ghosh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Green Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Fragment ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Splicing signals and factors in plant intron removal

2002 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. S. Brown ◽  
C. G. Simpson ◽  
G. Thow ◽  
G. P. Clark ◽  
S. N. Jennings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Viral Vectors ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Splicing Factors ◽  
Small Nuclear Rna ◽  
Intron Removal ◽  
Arabidopsis Proteins ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Constitutive splicing of the potato invertase miniexon 2 (9 nt long) requires a branchpoint sequence positioned around 50 nt upstream of the 5′ splice site of the adjacent intron and a U11 element found just downstream of the branchpoint in the upstream intron [Simpson, Hedley, Watters, Clark, McQuade, Machray and Brown (2000) RNA 6, 422–433]. The sensitivity of this in vivo plant splicing system has been used to demonstrate exon scanning in plants, and to characterize plant intronic elements, such as branchpoint and poly-pyrimidine tract sequences. Plant introns differ from their vertebrate and yeast couterparts in being UA- or U-rich (up to 85% UA). One of the key differences in splicing between plants and other eukaryotes lies in early intron recognition, which is thought to be mediated by UA-binding proteins. We are adopting three approaches to studying the RNA-protein interactions in plant splicing. First, overexpression of plant splicing factors and, in particular, UA-binding proteins, in conjunction with a range of mini-exon mutants. Secondly, the sequences of around 65% of vertebrate and yeast splicing factors have high-quality matches to Arabidopsis proteins, opening the door to identification and analysis of gene knockouts. Finally, to discover plant-specific proteins involved in splicing and in, for example, rRNA or small nuclear RNA processing, green fluorescent protein-cDNA fusion libraries in viral vectors are being screened.

scholarly journals Docking and Assembly of the Type II Secretion Complex of Vibrio cholerae

2009 ◽  
Vol 191 (9) ◽  
pp. 3149-3161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne R. Lybarger ◽  
Tanya L. Johnson ◽  
Miranda D. Gray ◽  
Aleksandra E. Sikora ◽  
Maria Sandkvist
Keyword(s):  
Vibrio Cholerae ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Outer Membrane Proteins ◽  
Subcellular Location ◽  
Type Ii Secretion ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Protein Fusion ◽  
Green Fluorescent

ABSTRACT Secretion of cholera toxin and other virulence factors from Vibrio cholerae is mediated by the type II secretion (T2S) apparatus, a multiprotein complex composed of both inner and outer membrane proteins. To better understand the mechanism by which the T2S complex coordinates translocation of its substrates, we are examining the protein-protein interactions of its components, encoded by the extracellular protein secretion (eps) genes. In this study, we took a cell biological approach, observing the dynamics of fluorescently tagged EpsC and EpsM proteins in vivo. We report that the level and context of fluorescent protein fusion expression can have a bold effect on subcellular location and that chromosomal, intraoperon expression conditions are optimal for determining the intracellular locations of fusion proteins. Fluorescently tagged, chromosomally expressed EpsC and EpsM form discrete foci along the lengths of the cells, different from the polar localization for green fluorescent protein (GFP)-EpsM previously described, as the fusions are balanced with all their interacting partner proteins within the T2S complex. Additionally, we observed that fluorescent foci in both chromosomal GFP-EpsC- and GFP-EpsM-expressing strains disperse upon deletion of epsD, suggesting that EpsD is critical to the localization of EpsC and EpsM and perhaps their assembly into the T2S complex.

scholarly journals Intracellular Targeting of Gag Proteins of the Drosophila Telomeric Retrotransposons

2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (11) ◽  
pp. 6376-6384 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rashkova ◽  
A. Athanasiadis ◽  
M.-L. Pardue
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Cluster Formation ◽  
Intracellular Localization ◽  
Ltr Retrotransposons ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Gag Proteins ◽  
Intracellular Targeting ◽  
Identify Amino Acid ◽  
Green Fluorescent

ABSTRACT Drosophila has two non-long-terminal-repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposons that are unique because they have a defined role in chromosome maintenance. These elements, HeT-A and TART, extend chromosome ends by successive transpositions, producing long arrays of head-to-tail repeat sequences. These arrays appear to be analogous to the arrays produced by telomerase on chromosomes of other organisms. While other non-LTR retrotransposons transpose to many chromosomal sites, HeT-A and TART transpose only to chromosome ends. Although HeT-A and TART belong to different subfamilies of non-LTR retrotransposons, they encode very similar Gag proteins, which suggests that Gag proteins are involved in their unique transposition targeting. We have recently shown that both Gags localize efficiently to nuclei where HeT-A Gag forms structures associated with telomeres. TART Gag does not associate with telomeres unless HeT-A Gag is present, suggesting a symbiotic relationship in which HeT-A Gag provides telomeric targeting. We now report studies to identify amino acid regions responsible for different aspects of the intracellular targeting of these proteins. Green fluorescent protein-tagged deletion derivatives were expressed in cultured Drosophila cells. The intracellular localization of these proteins shows the following. (i) Several regions that direct subcellular localizations or cluster formation are found in both Gags and are located in equivalent regions of the two proteins. (ii) Regions important for telomere association are present only in HeT-A Gag. These are present at several places in the protein, are not redundant, and cannot be complemented in trans. (iii) Regions containing zinc knuckle and major homology region motifs, characteristic of retroviral Gags, are involved in protein-protein interactions of the telomeric Gags, as they are in retroviral Gags.

scholarly journals Targeting of the Visna Virus Tat Protein to AP-1 Sites: Interactions with the bZIP Domains of Fos and Jun In Vitro and In Vivo

1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Morse ◽  
L. M. Carruth ◽  
J. E. Clements
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Tat Protein ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Viral Promoter ◽  
Visna Virus ◽  
Cellular Transcription ◽  
Virus Promoter

ABSTRACT The visna virus Tat protein is required for efficient viral transcription from the visna virus long terminal repeat (LTR). AP-1 sites within the visna virus LTR, which can be bound by the cellular transcription factors Fos and Jun, are also necessary for Tat-mediated transcriptional activation. A potential mechanism by which the visna virus Tat protein could target the viral promoter is by protein-protein interactions with Fos and/or Jun bound to AP-1 sites in the visna virus LTR. Once targeted to the visna virus promoter, the Tat protein could then interact with basal transcription factors to activate transcription. To examine protein-protein interactions with cellular proteins at the visna virus promoter, we used an in vitro protein affinity chromatography assay and electrophoretic mobility shift assay, in addition to an in vivo two-hybrid assay, to show that the visna virus Tat protein specifically interacts with the cellular transcription factors Fos and Jun and the basal transcription factor TBP (TATA binding protein). The Tat domain responsible for interactions with Fos and Jun was localized to an alpha-helical domain within amino acids 34 to 69 of the protein. The TBP binding domain was localized to amino acids 1 to 38 of Tat, a region previously described by our laboratory as the visna virus Tat activation domain. The bZIP domains of Fos and Jun were found to be important for the interactions with Tat. Mutations within the basic domains of Fos and Jun abrogated binding to Tat in the in vitro assays. The visna virus Tat protein was also able to interact with covalently cross-linked Fos and Jun dimers. Thus, the visna virus Tat protein appears to target AP-1 sites in the viral promoter in a mechanism similar to the interaction of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 Tax with the cellular transcription factor CREB, by binding the basic domains of an intact bZIP dimer. The association between Tat, Fos, and Jun would position Tat proximal to the viral TATA box, where the visna virus Tat activation domain could contact TBP to activate viral transcription.

scholarly journals Strategies to improve the fluorescent signal of the tripartite sfGFP system

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (9) ◽  
pp. 998-1006
Author(s):  
Jing Shen ◽  
Wenlu Zhang ◽  
Chunyang Gan ◽  
Xiafei Wei ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Fluorescent Proteins ◽  
Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation ◽  
Fluorescence Signal ◽  
Recovery Efficiency ◽  
Good Recovery ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Bifc Assay ◽  
Green Fluorescent

Abstract Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) is a popular method used to detect protein–protein interactions. For a BiFC assay, a fluorescent protein is usually split into two parts, and the fluorescence is recovered upon the interaction between the fused proteins of interest. As an elegant extension of BiFC, a tripartite superfold green fluorescent protein (sfGFP) system that has the advantages of low background fluorescence and small fusion tag size has been developed. However, the tripartite system exhibits a low fluorescence signal in some cases. To address this problem, we proposed to increase the affinity between the two parts, G1–9 and G11, of the tripartite system by adding affinity pairs. Among the three affinity pairs tested, LgBiT-HiBiT improved both the signal and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio to the greatest extent. More strikingly, the direct covalent fusion of G11 to G1–9, which converted the tripartite system into a new bipartite system, enhanced the S/N ratio from 20 to 146, which is superior to the bipartite sfGFP system split at 157/158 or 173/174. Our results implied that the 10th β-strand of sfGFP has a low affinity and a good recovery efficiency to construct a robust BiFC system, and this concept might be applied to other fluorescent proteins with similar structure to construct new BiFC systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document