scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Biologic Agents in Chronic Urticaria, Asthma and Atopic Dermatitis – A Real-life Experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Mohamed Abuzakouk ◽  
Omar K.H.A. Ghorab ◽  
Ali S. Wahla ◽  
Zaid Zoumot ◽  
Mohsen Nasir ◽  
...  

Introduction: Several biologic agents have been approved for the treatment of asthma, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis. These therapeutic agents are especially useful for patients with severe or refractory symptoms. We present the real-life experience of four of the commonly used biologic agents in the United Arab Emirates. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we reviewed the demographic, clinical, laboratory and treatment parameters for all patients treated with biologic agents. Results: 270 patients received biologics at our centre between May 2015 and December 2019 with a median age of 36.5 years. Omalizumab was the most prescribed agent (n=183, 67.8%) followed by dupilumab (n=54, 20%), benralizumab (n=22, 8.1%) and mepolizumab (n=11, 4.1%). Urticaria was the commonest treatment indication (n=148, 55%) followed by asthma (n=105, 39%) and atopic dermatitis (n=13, 5%). All chronic urticaria patients were treated with omalizumab and showed improvement in the mean urticaria control test score from 6.7±4.47 to 12.02±4.17, with a p-value of 0.001. Dupilumab was found to be the most commonly prescribed drug for asthma (37%), followed by omalizumab (32%), benralizumab (21%) and mepolizumab (10%). The mean Asthma control test score for all asthmatics combined increased from 17.06 ± 5.4 to 19.44 ± 5.6, with p-value 0.0012 with treatment; FeNO reduced from 60.02 ± 45.74 to 29.11 ± 27.92, with p-value 0.001 and mean FEV1 improved from 2.38L ± 0.8 to 2.67L ± 0.78, with p-value 0.045. Only 4 patients in the entire cohort reported adverse events. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that biological agents are a safe and effective treatment for atopic asthma, chronic urticaria and atopic dermatitis.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Stingeni ◽  
Katharina Hansel ◽  
Elettra Antonelli ◽  
Giacomo Dal Bello ◽  
Cataldo Patruno ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4164-4164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianpaolo Nadali ◽  
Gessica Marchesini ◽  
Davide Facchinelli ◽  
Francesca Farina ◽  
Maria Chiara Tisi ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: in the last 5 years new "target drugs" to treat lymphoproliferative disorders have been introduced in clinical practice, such as monoclonal antibodies (obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, brentuximab), BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib) and PI3K inhibitors (idelalisib). Efficacy and safety of these drugs were assessed in registrative trials and data regarding infectious complications in the "real life" experience are currently unavailable. We aimed to assess the incidence of major infections in patients treated with the above mentioned drugs. Methods: 555 patients were treated, for registered indications, with idelalisib, ibrutinib, brentuximab, ofatumumab and obinutuzumab (single agents or in combination as licensed) in 13 hematology centres in Italy, from time of their commercial availability to December 2016. The observation period was one year after study entry. Patients in clinical trials or treated within patient named programs were excluded as well as patients with active infections at beginning of treatment. Results: in 132/555 patients (24%) infections occurred for a total number of 187 events, 56% of whom were of grade 3. The median age was 64 years (range 20-86), 46,2% (61/132) of patients were treated with 3 or more previous lines of therapy, 55/132 (42%) experienced 2 or more infective episodes. A bacterial cause of infection was reported in 35% of cases, viral in 22% and an invasive fungal infection (IFI) in 9% (17/187). In 2% of cases the infection was of mixed origin (bacterial/viral or bacterial/fungal) while in 32% of cases there was not microbiological documentation. The lower respiratory tract was the most frequent site of infection in 39% of cases (73/187) while the upper respiratory tract was involved in 30% of events (39/187). The urinary tract infections were 13% (24/187). Other sites involved were skin and soft tissue 7%, sepsis 7%, gastrointestinal site 5%, central nervous system 2% and fever of unknown origin 6%. Patients treated with idelalisib were 106 (80% affected by chronic lymphocytic leukemia - CLL- and 20% follicular lymphoma) and 35 (33%) experienced one ore more infections for a total of 49 episodes. The incidence of bacterial infections was 37%, of viral infections 37% and of IFI 6%. In 235 patients treated with ibrutinib, 70 (30%) had one ore more events for a total of 102 infective episodes. 60/70 (86%) patients had CLL and 10/70 (14%) had indolent or mantle cell lymphoma The incidence of bacterial infections was 50%, viral 20% and IFI 16%. Focusing on IFI, 17 events were reported in 15 patients. According to the EORTC criteria, 11 cases (4 possible, 1 probable, 6 proven) were reported in patients treated with ibrutinib, 3 cases of possible IFI in patients treated with idelalisib and 3 cases of proven IFI in patients treated with brentuximab. The incidence of IFI in patients treated with ibrutinib (11/102 events) and idelalisib (3/49 events) was not different (11% vs. 6% respectively; p-value = 0.55) even considering proven/probable cases only (3% in ibrutinib vs. 0% in idelalisib p-value = 0.11). The incidence of bacterial infections in patients treated with ibrutinib (35/102) was not statistically different compared to patients treated with idelalisib (18/49) (34% vs. 37% respectively p-value =0.87). Noteworthy, the incidence of viral infections in patients treated with idelalisib (18/49) was significantly higher compared to patients treated with ibrutinib (14/102) (37% vs. 14% respectively; p-value =0.015). Brentuximab was used in 175 patients, 70% of cases for Hodgkin Lymphoma and 30% for T cell lymphoma. The rate of infections was 11% for a total of 27 infection episodes. The incidence of bacterial, viral and fungal infections was 37%, 30% and 11% respectively. In 22% of cases the cause of infection could not be established. Patients treated with ofatumumab or obinutuzumab were 39 and in 7/39 (18%) an infective episode was reported (four of bacterial origin, one viral and four undetermined). All patients were affected by CLL. Conclusions: this "real life" experience confirm that the incidence of infections in patients treated with "target drugs" is not negligible. Ongoing analysis that take into account patient's clinical and demographical characteristics, may give insights on risk factors that will contribute to better characterizing patients at different risk levels. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Cattaneo: GILEAD: Other: Advisory Board. Candoni:Pfizer: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Merck SD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Fanci:Gilead: Honoraria; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Del Principe:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Busca:Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merk: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.


2015 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. e42-e43
Author(s):  
M. Stanić ◽  
N. Skočibušić ◽  
T. Zekić ◽  
S. Novak ◽  
V. Vlahović-Palčevski

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1230-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Irani ◽  
Souheil Hallit ◽  
Karsten Weller ◽  
Marcus Maurer ◽  
Carla El Haber ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-116
Author(s):  
Musrafidin Simanullang

This research is A Classroom Action Research held at SMP Negeri 4 Sipoholon in Academic Year 2018/2019. The problem of the research is; Does experiential outdoor activities significantly improve the students’ vocabulary achievement of the eight grade students at SMP Negeri 4 Sipoholon? And the objective is to find out whether experiential outdoor activities significantly improve the students’ vocabulary achievement. The subject of the research is 20 students of the eight grade students of SMP N. 4 Sipoholon in academic year 2018/2019. This research was only acted in one cycle in which, that in pre-test there was not student who got good and very good interpretation yet there are one who was fail and 8 students who were poor, in the minimum criterion used in the school is 70, so the researcher concluded that based on the students’ pre-test score they are fail. In fact based on the data analysis of the post-test that there are 11 students who got very good (80 – 100) and 9 students got good (66 – 79), and none of the students got fair (56-65), poor (40-55), and fail (39). It means all the students passed the minimum criterion applied in that school. On the other hand, it can be concluded that experiential out-activities significantly improves the students’ vocabulary mastery. Besides, by analyzing the data through t-test, it can be concluded that the mean of students’ post test score is higher than the mean of students’ pre-test score or 78.25 55.25. In addition, p-value under df (degree of freedom) is 19 or 1.729, it was found t-value has a significant different with t-table or 78.25 1.729. On the other hand, it can be said that the Ho (null hypothesis) is rejected and the Ha (alternative hypothesis) is accepted, in which there is a significant improvement of students’ vocabulary achievement taught by experiential outdoor activities. Keyword: Experiential Outdoor Activities, Students’ Vocabulary Achievement


2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. A7.2-A7
Author(s):  
Hughes Rhiannon ◽  
Maguire Melissa ◽  
Geldard Jo ◽  
Reuber Markus

BackgroundBrivaracetam received its UK licence as an adjuvant drug for focal epilepsy in adults in 2016. There is little data on its efficacy and tolerability in ‘real life’ settings. We present an interim analysis of a multicentre service evaluation of brivaracetam.MethodsData was retrospectively collected from clinical records at two UK centres of consecutive patients treated with brivaracetam and at least one follow up. Data were also extracted on previous levetiracetam use. Seizure frequency was categorised at baseline and follow-up (daily/weekly/monthly/yearly/none).Results: Of the 44 patients identified (17 male, mean age 39, range 19–66), 75% had a history of levetiracetam exposure (LE+) and 25% did not (LE−). Mean brivaracetam exposure was 10.3 months (2–21), the mean daily dose was 200 mg (50–400). Retention was 91% vs 100% in LE+ versus LE− groups at 3 months and 82% in both groups at 6 months. Seizure category improvements were seen in 20%/36.4% in the LE+ vs LE− groups, seizure category deteriorations in 0% vs 9%. There were no serious adverse events.ConclusionBrivaracetam emerges as a potentially useful adjuvant medication for focal epilepsy. It may be better tolerated by some patients than Levetiracetam and more effective than this drug.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar Arturo Lozano-Cruz ◽  
José Víctor Jiménez ◽  
Antonio Olivas-Martinez ◽  
Edgar Ortiz-Brizuela ◽  
José Luis Cárdenas-Fragoso ◽  
...  

Background: Antimalarial drugs were widely used as experimental therapies against COVID-19 in the initial stages of the pandemic. Despite multiple randomized controlled trials demonstrating unfavorable outcomes in both efficacy and adverse effects, antimalarial drugs are still prescribed in developing countries, especially in those experiencing recurrent COVID-19 crises (India and Brazil). Therefore, real-life experience and pharmacovigilance studies describing the use and side effects of antimalarials for COVID-19 in developing countries are still relevant.Objective: To describe the adverse effects associated with the use of antimalarial drugs in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia at a reference center in Mexico City.Methods: We integrated a retrospective cohort with all adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia from March 13th, 2020, to May 17th, 2020. We compared the baseline characteristics (demographic and clinical) and the adverse effects between the groups of patients treated with and without antimalarial drugs. The mortality analysis was performed in 491 patients who received optimal care and were not transferred to other institutions (210 from the antimalarial group and 281 from the other group).Results: We included 626 patients from whom 38% (n = 235) received an antimalarial drug. The mean age was 51.2 ± 13.6 years, and 64% were males. At baseline, compared with the group treated with antimalarials, the group that did not receive antimalarials had more dyspnea (82 vs. 73%, p = 0.017) and cyanosis (5.3 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.009), higher respiratory rate (median of 28 vs. 24 bpm, p < 0.001), and lower oxygen saturation (median of 83 vs. 87%, p < 0.001). In the group treated with antimalarials, 120 patients had two EKG evaluations, from whom 12% (n = 16) prolonged their QTc from baseline in more than 50 ms, and six developed a ventricular arrhythmia. Regarding the trajectories of the liver function tests over time, no significant differences were found for the change in the mean value per day between the two groups. Among patients who received optimal care, the mortality was 16% (33/210) in those treated with antimalarials and 15% (41/281) in those not receiving antimalarials (RR 1.08, 95% 0.75–1.64, and adjusted RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.69–1.82).Conclusion: The adverse events in patients with COVID-19 treated with antimalarials were similar to those who did not receive antimalarials at institutions with rigorous pharmacological surveillance. However, they do not improve survival in patients who receive optimal medical care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document