scholarly journals On Correctly Adjusting the Squared Multiple Correlation Coefficient in Linear Regression: Effect Size Estimation and Significance Testing with Application to Substance Abuse Research

2016 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
James B Hittner
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Bertoldo ◽  
Claudio Zandonella Callegher ◽  
Gianmarco Altoè

It is widely appreciated that many studies in psychological science suffer from low statistical power. One of the consequences of analyzing underpowered studies with thresholds of statistical significance, is a high risk of finding exaggerated effect size estimates, in the right or in the wrong direction. These inferential risks can be directly quantified in terms of Type M (magnitude) error and Type S (sign) error, which directly communicate the consequences of design choices on effect size estimation. Given a study design, Type M error is the factor by which a statistically significant effect is on average exaggerated. Type S error is the probability to find a statistically significant result in the opposite direction to the plausible one. Ideally, these errors should be considered during a prospective design analysis in the design phase of a study to determine the appropriate sample size. However, they can also be considered when evaluating studies’ results in a retrospective design analysis. In the present contribution we aim to facilitate the considerations of these errors in the research practice in psychology. For this reason we illustrate how to consider Type M and Type S errors in a design analysis using one of the most common effect size measures in psychology: Pearson correlation coefficient. We provide various examples and make the R functions freely available to enable researchers to perform design analysis for their research projects.


(1) In a paper communicated to the Royal Society in 1903 I gave very briefly in a footnote the properties of the correlation ratio . These properties were discussed more at length in my memoir, “On the General Theory of Skew Correlation and Non-linear Regression,” published in 1905. The two papers dealt only with the total correlation ratio , or the relation between two variates without consideration of any other correlated variates. The introduction of the correlation ratio enabled the measure of the relationship between two variates to be expressed by a single number, measuring its total intensity, in cases where the regression line was of any form. The ratio passed into the usual correlation coefficient when the regression line became straight. This correlation ratio has been generally accepted by statisticians as a useful measure of relationship in cases of skew correlation and non-linear regression. Shortly after the appearance of the above memoirs I generalised this coefficient in a manner comparable with the generalisation of the coefficient of correlation, namely, by the definitions of the multiple correlation ratio and of the partial correlation ratio . These ratios correspond to the multiple correlation coefficient and the partial correlation coefficient in multiple linear regression. Their importance is very considerable, as they enable us to measure the intensity of association between two variates when other correlated variates are considered as constant without any assumption that the regression is linear, still less that the frequencies follow the normal (or Laplace-Gaussian) surface. I had not intended to discuss the results of the present paper before the probable errors had been provided, but the recent revival of interest in skew regression, and its fundamental importance in all higher statistical inquiry, justifies, at least, the publication of those formulæ which are fundamental to the subject. (2) I deal first with the problem of three variates, although the extension to any number is not hard to make.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-311
Author(s):  
Yenny Iskandar ◽  
Sry Windartini ◽  
Suharmiyati Suharmiyati

This research was conducted at office Desa Sei Guntung Tengah,  Kecamatan Rengat  Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. The aim is to determine the effect of Compensation on the performance of village officials in the success of Village Fund Distribution in desa Sungai Guntung Tengah, Kec. Rengat, Kabupaten Indragiri Hulu. The results of the study obtained by linear regression equation is that SPSS knows that constant (a) is 1.361. and the coefficient of X (b) is 0.355 with a multiple regression equation is Y = 1.361 + 0.355 X. The correlation coefficient is known that (X) compensation has a relationship with (Y) the performance of village officials. This can be seen from the value of the multiple correlation coefficient R is 0.813 meaning that it has a very strong and direct relationship. and then tested with a multiple coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.661. this shows (X) compensation can contribute to the variable (Y) the performance of the village apparatus by 66.1%. And the remaining 33.9% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study. t count for compensation variable is 2.239, in table t with db 35 and significant level 0.025 is obtained 2.034. because t count (2,239)> from t table (2,034) then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, which means compensation has a significant influence on the performance of the village apparatus.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (01) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Ramlan Ruvendi

The study was carried out to find out whether there were influence and correlation bet-ween : a) Reward received by the IRDABI’s employees on their job satisfaction. b) style of the leader-ship on the job satisfaction. c) Reward together with style of leadership on the job satisfaction of IR-DABI’s employees.The result of the study showed that there was significant correlation and influence between the reward on the job satisfaction with was shown by the value of partial correlation coefficient of 0.6185 and coefficient of multiple regression for reward variable (β1) of 0.412. The influence of variable for style of leadership on the job satisfaction was also significant with the partial correlation coefficient of 0.5495 and coefficient of multiple regression (β2) of 0.355.In the test of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) on the equation of multiple regression show that F-value was bigger that F-table (F = 58.97 > F-table = 3.098) or the Probability Value smaller than 0.05. At showed that there was significant correlation and influence between reward variables all together with style of leadership on the job satisfaction of employees. The value of multiple correlation coefficient (R) was 0.751 and R Square (R2) was 0.564. Value of R Square (0.564) meant that 56.5% of variation pro-portion total of job satisfaction can be eliminated of equation of multiple regression was used as the es-timator rather than using average value of job satisfaction as the estimator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document