scholarly journals Cloud-Based Implementation of New Frontline Clinical Workflows: Standardizing Practice at Scale to Improve Patient Safety (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie Yoo ◽  
Mary Han ◽  
Gemma Jamena ◽  
Phyllis Pei ◽  
Hillary Baldocchi ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Implementation of new practices in large health care settings is difficult. Staff are already overwhelmed, and practice deviation is common. With time-constrained visits, providers struggle to address complex problems. Three scenarios were identified where frontline practice standardization would improve patient outcomes: sedation and analgesia for intubated patients (inpatient), colorectal cancer screenings (outpatient), and safety measures for opioid prescriptions (outpatient). We implemented these practices through a cloud-based solution designed for frontline health care staff, fostering peer-accountability and transparency of processes. OBJECTIVE 1) Introduce a standard approach to sedation and analgesia for intubated patients. 2) Increase colorectal cancer screenings for the clinic population. 3) Improve opioid safety for patients with chronic opioid use. METHODS Practices were implemented through a cloud-based app (Elemeno Health, Oakland, CA) that allows frontline health care teams to access an organization’s best practices through interactive decision guides, smart checklists, and how-to videos from any device. In a pediatric ICU, we first delivered a Critical Care Comfort Algorithm (CALM) for titrating sedative and analgesia medications, a bottom-up self-assessment for frontline staff to evaluate their performance, and a top-down audit checklist for charge nurses to complete. For multiple community health centers, we created colorectal cancer screening practice decision guides for medical assistants (MA) and providers, and deployed the practices through a 3-week gamified contest between individual clinics conducted through the app. For the opioid safety initiative, we created a Provider Chronic Pain Management Workflow checklist, Provider Pain Evaluation Guide, and a MA checklist for medication reconciliation; implementation was paired with a 2-month inter-clinic competition. RESULTS Within 2 weeks of the formal roll-out of the Pediatric ICU charge nurse audit tool, 107 checklists were completed and 83% of intubated patients were on the sedation protocol. During the gamified 3 weeks for colorectal cancer screening, 2107 checklists were completed with engagement from 74% of MAs and 80% of providers. MAs appeared to habituate to the practice with ongoing practice post-competition; there was a 70% increase in colorectal cancer screenings 1 year post-intervention. During the contest period for increased opioid safety, naloxone prescription increased from <10/month to 27/month for new prescriptions and 21/month for renewals. Opioid contracts with historically negligible adherence increased to 45/month for new contracts and 53/month for renewed contracts. There was also a 70% increase in referrals to the Behavioral Health Pain Management Program. CONCLUSIONS Our clinical improvement initiative using cloud-based real-time actionable and trackable decision guides facilitated staff engagement with standardized protocols for pediatric analgesia and sedation, led to a significant increase in colorectal cancer screenings with high levels of provider and staff participation, and improved opioid safety and utilization of behavioral support resources for patients with chronic opioid use. The cloud-based application empowers staff with just-in-time access to microlearning tools and resources to manage patient care, simplifying management’s ability to train staff at scale. Standardizing practice and streamlining workflows liberalizes valuable face-to-face time with patients and improves patient safety.

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 174550652096589
Author(s):  
Stephanie J Estes ◽  
Ahmed M Soliman ◽  
Marko Zivkovic ◽  
Divyan Chopra ◽  
Xuelian Zhu

Objectives: Evaluate all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and costs among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients with high-risk versus low-risk opioid use or patients with chronic versus non-chronic opioid use. Methods: A retrospective analysis of IBM MarketScan® Commercial Claims data from 2009 to 2018 was performed for females aged 18 to 49 with newly diagnosed endometriosis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition code: 617.xx; International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition code: N80.xx). Two sub-cohorts were identified: high-risk (⩾1 day with ⩾90 morphine milligram equivalents per day or ⩾1-day concomitant benzodiazepine use) or chronic opioid utilization (⩾90-day supply prescribed or ⩾10 opioid prescriptions). High-risk or chronic utilization was evaluated during the 12-month assessment period after the index date. Index date was the first opioid prescription within 12 months following endometriosis diagnosis. All outcomes were assessed over 12-month post-assessment period while adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Out of 61,019 patients identified, 18,239 had high-risk opioid use and 5001 chronic opioid use. Health care resource utilization drivers were outpatient visits and pharmacy fills, which were higher among high-risk versus low-risk patients (outpatient visits: 17.49 vs 15.51; pharmacy fills: 19.58 vs 16.88, p < 0.0001). Chronic opioid users had a higher number of outpatient visits (19.53 vs 15.00, p < 0.0001) and pharmacy fills (23.18 vs 16.43, p < 0.0001) compared to non-chronic opioid users. High-risk opioid users had significantly higher all-cause health care costs compared to low-risk opioid users (US$16,377 vs US$13,153; p < 0.0001). Chronic opioid users also had significantly higher all-cause health care costs compared to non-chronic opioid users (US$20,930 vs US$12,272; p < 0.0001). Similar patterns were observed among endometriosis-related HCRU, except pharmacy fills among high-risk and chronic sub-cohorts. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrates significantly higher all-cause and endometriosis-related health care resource utilization and total costs for high-risk opioid users compared to low-risk opioid users among newly diagnosed endometriosis patients over 1 year. Similar trends were observed for comparing chronic opioid users with non-chronic opioid users, except for endometriosis-related pharmacy fills and associated costs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J.M. Sollid ◽  
Peter Dieckman ◽  
Karina Aase ◽  
Eldar Søreide ◽  
Charlotte Ringsted ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (22;4) ◽  
pp. E351-E360
Author(s):  
Daniel I. Rhon

Background: There is a relationship between sleep, pain, and chronic opioid utilization. This has been poorly explored in general, and especially in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Fewer studies have investigated this relationship based on a sleep diagnosis present both before and after surgery. Objectives: To identify the association between insomnia and sleep apnea and downstream opioid use and medical utilization (visits and cost) in the 2 years following arthroscopic hip surgery. Study Design: A retrospective cohort. Setting: The US Military Health System. Methods: This was a consecutive cohort of individuals undergoing hip arthroscopy in the Military Health System (MHS). Medical utilization data were abstracted from the MHS Data Repository between 2003 and 2015, representing 1 year prior and 2 years after surgery for every individual. Sleep disorder diagnoses (insomnia and sleep apnea) were identified using International Classification of Disease codes, and opioid utilization was determined from pharmacy data based on American Hospital Formulary Service codes 280808 and 280812. Sleep disorders present before surgery were used as predictors in multivariate logistic regression, and sleep disorders present after surgery were examined for associations with the outcomes using the Chi-square tests. The dependent variables in both cases were downstream medical utilization (costs, visits, and opioid use). Results: Of 1870 eligible patients (mean age 32.3 years; 44.5% women), 165 (8.8%) had a diagnosis of insomnia before surgery and 333 (17.8%) after surgery; whereas 93 (5.0%) had a diagnosis of apnea before surgery and 268 (14.3%) after surgery. A diagnosis of insomnia before surgery predicted having at least 3+ opioids prescriptions after surgery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.97 [95% confidence interval, 1.39, 2.79]) and greater downstream total medical visits and costs in the 2 years after surgery. However, the number of individuals with a diagnosis of insomnia or apnea after surgery more than doubled, and was significantly associated with chronic opioid use, all-cause medical and all hip-related medical downstream visits and costs in the 2 years after surgery. Limitations: The use of observational data and claims data are only as good as how it was entered. Conclusions: Sleep disorders prior to surgery predicted chronic opioid use and medical utilization after surgery. However, a much higher rate of individuals had sleep apnea and insomnia present after surgery, which were significantly associated with chronic opioid use and greater total and hip-related medical utilization (visits and costs). Screening for sleep disorders prior to surgery may be important, but an even higher rate of sleep disorders may be developed after surgery, and continued screening after surgery may have greater clinical merit. Assessing quality of sleep during perioperative management may provide a unique opportunity to decrease pain and chronic opioid use after surgery. Key words: Pain, opioid use, insomnia, sleep apnea, orthopaedic surgery, military medicine, health care utilization Pain Physician 2019


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrés Mauricio González Vargas ◽  
Ana María Sánchez Benavides ◽  
Andrés Felipe Betancourt Hernández ◽  
Carlos David Mantilla Ramirez

This paper presents the results of a survey about technovigilance carried out in 21 clinical institutions from the southwest of Colombia. It also provides an analysis of how these programs take into account different risk management methodologies in order to create awareness of the importance of patient safety in all members of the staff and improve the quality of the health services provided.


Author(s):  
Yodang Yodang ◽  
Nuridah Nuridah

Background: Nurse leader has an important role in encouraging patient’s safety culture among nurses in the healthcare system. This literature review aims to identify the nursing leadership model and to promote and improve patient safety culture to improve patient outcomes in health care facilities including hospitals, primary health care, and nursing home settings. Methods: Searching appropriate journals through some journal databases were applied including DOAJ, GARUDA, Google Scholar, MDPI, Proquest, Pubmed, Sage Journals, ScienceDirect, and Wiley Online Library, which were published from 2015 to 2020. Results: Fourteen articles meet the criteria and are included in this review. The majority of these articles were retrieved from western countries, the US, Canada, and Finland. This review identifies three nursing leadership models that seem useful to promote and improve patient safety culture in health care facilities which are transformational, authentic, and ethical leadership models. Conclusion: The patient safety influences health care outcomes. The evidence shows the leadership has positive relation to patient satisfaction and patient safety outcomes improvement. The transformational, authentic, and ethical leadership models seem to be more useful in promoting, maintaining, and improving patient safety culture in health care facilities.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H Poirier ◽  
Clint S Brown ◽  
Yleana T Baggenstos ◽  
Sarah G Walden ◽  
Nicole Y Gann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document