scholarly journals Evaluation of a novel e-learning program for physiotherapists to manage knee osteoarthritis via telehealth: A qualitative study nested in the PEAK randomised controlled trial (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Elizabeth Jones ◽  
Penny K Campbell ◽  
Alexander J Kimp ◽  
Kim Bennell ◽  
Nadine E Foster ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The delivery of physiotherapy via telehealth could provide more equitable access to services for patients. Video conference based telehealth has been shown to be an effective and acceptable mode of service delivery for exercise-based interventions for chronic knee pain, however specific training in telehealth is required for physiotherapists to effectively and consistently deliver care using Telehealth. The development and evaluation of training programs to upskill healthcare professionals in the management of osteoarthritis (OA) has also been identified as an important priority to improve OA care delivery. OBJECTIVE To explore physiotherapist’s experiences with, and perceptions of, an e-learning program about best-practice knee osteoarthritis (OA) management (focussed on a structured program of education, exercise and physical activity), including telehealth delivery via video conferencing. METHODS A qualitative study using semi-structured individual telephone interviews, nested within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). Fifteen Australian physiotherapists from metropolitan and regional private practices were interviewed following completion of an e-learning program. The e-learning program involved self-directed learning modules, a mock video consultation with a researcher (simulated patient), and four audited practice video consultations with pilot patients with chronic knee pain. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were thematically analysed. RESULTS Five themes (with associated subthemes) arose: i) the experience of self-directed e-learning (physiotherapists were more familiar with in-person learning, however they valued the comprehensive self-paced online modules. Unwieldly technological features could be frustrating); ii) practice makes perfect (physiotherapists benefited from the mock consultation with the researcher and practice sessions with pilot patients alongside individualized performance feedback, resulting in confidence and preparedness to implement new skills); iii) the telehealth journey (although inexperienced with telehealth prior to training, physiotherapists were confident and able to deliver remote care following training but they still experienced some technological challenges); iv) the ‘whole package’ (the combination of self-directed learning modules, mock consultation and practice consultations with pilot patients) was felt to be an effective learning approach, and patient information booklets supported the training package); and v) impact on broader clinical practice (training consolidated and refined existing OA management skills, and enabled a switch to telehealth when the COVID-19 pandemic impacted in-person clinical care). CONCLUSIONS Findings provide evidence for the perceived effectiveness and acceptability of an e-learning program to train physiotherapists (in the context of a clinical trial) about best-practice knee OA management, including telehealth delivery via video conferencing. Implementation of e-learning programs to upskill physiotherapists in telehealth appears warranted, given the increasing adoption of telehealth service models for the delivery of clinical care. CLINICALTRIAL n/a

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1474.1-1474
Author(s):  
L. Parker ◽  
F. Coldstream

Background:The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in a rapid adoption of remote consultations in order to limit face to face clinical contact wherever appropriate, as recommended by the British Society for Rheumatology. The same clinic templates which existed for face-to-face encounters have been retrospectively adapted, without consideration of any potential difference in duration of consultations. Rheumatology practitioners from a variety of clinical backgrounds work alongside the rheumatology consultants, providing clinical care to patients with both inflammatory arthritis and connective tissue disease.Objectives:To record the duration of all scheduled telephone consultations carried out by advances rheumatology practitioners in a 4-week period.Methods:All scheduled telephone clinic encounters over a 4-week period were timed and the duration recorded in a spreadsheet. Data was collected in real time by all 8 rheumatology advanced practitioners working within the rheumatology department of a district general hospital, following each clinic episode.Results:Data was recorded from a total of 337 clinic appointments. Of these, 317 (94%) were booked as routine, 3 (0.9%) as urgent, 4 (1.2%) were expedited following an advice line contact, and 13 (3.9%) no data was recorded. 28 (8%) of the patients did not answer when contacted. 80 (24%) clinic appointments lasted 15 minutes or less, 186 (55%) lasted 16 - 30 minutes, 37 (11%) lasted 31 - 45 minutes, and 6 (2%) lasted 46 - 60 minutes. The average duration was 22 minutes.Conclusion:Within this department, remote consultations appear to have a similar duration when compared against the traditional clinic template for a fully face-to-face clinic, with some encounters lasting significantly longer than the planned duration. This would appear to differ to telephone consultations used in other settings, such as general practice where the duration is reportedly shorter1. This may be representative of the additional complexity and co-morbidity of a typical rheumatology patient, or due to the multi-faceted nature of a rheumatology follow-up appointment2. Although remote consultations are effective in limiting risk of exposure to Covid-19, they may not offer a quicker or more efficient service compared with the face-to-face model. Further study in this field is required to evaluate this widely adopted new pattern of working.References:[1]Pinnock H, Bawden R, Proctor S, Wolfe S, Scullion J, Price D, Sheikh A. Accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness in primary care of routine telephone review of asthma: pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003 Mar 1;326(7387):477-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7387.477. PMID: 12609944; PMCID: PMC150181.[2]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2018) rheumatoid arthritis in adults: management (NICE Guideline NG100). Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng100 [Accessed 05 January 2021].Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document