scholarly journals Development of a Web-Based Formative Self-Assessment Tool for Physicians to Practice Breaking Bad News (BRADNET) (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Christine Rat ◽  
Laetitia Ricci ◽  
Francis Guillemin ◽  
Camille Ricatte ◽  
Manon Pongy ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Although most physicians in medical settings have to deliver bad news, the skills of delivering bad news to patients have been given insufficient attention. Delivering bad news is a complex communication task that includes verbal and nonverbal skills, the ability to recognize and respond to patients’ emotions and the importance of considering the patient’s environment such as culture and social status. How bad news is delivered can have consequences that may affect patients, sometimes over the long term. OBJECTIVE This project aimed to develop a Web-based formative self-assessment tool for physicians to practice delivering bad news to minimize the deleterious effects of poor way of breaking bad news about a disease, whatever the disease. METHODS BReaking bAD NEws Tool (BRADNET) items were developed by reviewing existing protocols and recommendations for delivering bad news. We also examined instruments for assessing patient-physician communications and conducted semistructured interviews with patients and physicians. From this step, we selected specific themes and then pooled these themes before consensus was achieved on a good practices communication framework list. Items were then created from this list. To ensure that physicians found BRADNET acceptable, understandable, and relevant to their patients’ condition, the tool was refined by a working group of clinicians familiar with delivering bad news. The think-aloud approach was used to explore the impact of the items and messages and why and how these messages could change physicians’ relations with patients or how to deliver bad news. Finally, formative self-assessment sessions were constructed according to a double perspective of progression: a chronological progression of the disclosure of the bad news and the growing difficulty of items (difficulty concerning the expected level of self-reflection). RESULTS The good practices communication framework list comprised 70 specific issues related to breaking bad news pooled into 8 main domains: opening, preparing for the delivery of bad news, communication techniques, consultation content, attention, physician emotional management, shared decision making, and the relationship between the physician and the medical team. After constructing the items from this list, the items were extensively refined to make them more useful to the target audience, and one item was added. BRADNET contains 71 items, each including a question, response options, and a corresponding message, which were divided into 8 domains and assessed with 12 self-assessment sessions. The BRADNET Web-based platform was developed according to the cognitive load theory and the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. CONCLUSIONS The objective of this Web-based assessment tool was to create a “space” for reflection. It contained items leading to self-reflection and messages that introduced recommended communication behaviors. Our approach was innovative as it provided an inexpensive distance-learning self-assessment tool that was manageable and less time-consuming for physicians with often overwhelming schedules.

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Christine Rat ◽  
Laetitia Ricci ◽  
Francis Guillemin ◽  
Camille Ricatte ◽  
Manon Pongy ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Cleland ◽  
Robin Ford ◽  
N M Hamilton ◽  
Suzanne Nabavian ◽  
Kim Walker

1969 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-166
Author(s):  
Enna Catalina Payán ◽  
David Andrés Montoya ◽  
John Jairo Vargas ◽  
María Clara Vélez ◽  
Alfonso Castaño ◽  
...  

Introduction: Breaking bad news is one of a physician’s most difficult duties. There are several studies related to the patient’s needs, but few reflect on the doctors’ experience. Materials and method: A descriptive, cross-sectional research was carried out to study issues related to the process of delivering bad news which might act as barriers and facilitating skills from the doctor’s point of view. These issues were identified through a self-administered survey. Results: Participant doctors use different strategies to communicate bad news to their patients. Examples of these strategies are: to be familiar with the patients’ medical history, to ensure that there is enough time, to know the patient’s caregivers and/or relatives, to determine the patient’s level of knowledge about his/her condition, to use non-technical words, to give information in small pieces, to assess the patient’s understanding, to devise a joint action plan, among others. Conclusion: The communication barriers that were identified focused on the emotional issues of the communication process, particularly those related to the recognition of own emotions, and the limited training about communication strategies available to doctors. Consequently, there is a need to implement training programs that provide doctors with tools to facilitate the bad news communication process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine D. Westmoreland ◽  
Francis M. Banda ◽  
Andrew P. Steenhoff ◽  
Elizabeth D. Lowenthal ◽  
Erik Isaksson ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to demonstrate effectiveness of an educational training workshop using role-playing to teach medical students in Botswana to deliver bad news.MethodA 3-hour small group workshop for University of Botswana medical students rotating at the Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone was developed. The curriculum included an overview of communication basics and introduction of the validated (SPIKES) protocol for breaking bad news. Education strategies included didactic lecture, handouts, role-playing cases, and open forum discussion. Pre- and posttraining surveys assessed prior exposure and approach to breaking bad news using multiple-choice questions and perception of skill about breaking bad news using a 5-point Likert scale. An objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with a standardized breaking bad news skills assessment was conducted; scores compared two medical student classes before and after the workshop was implemented.ResultForty-two medical students attended the workshop and 83% (35/42) completed the survey. Medical students reported exposure to delivering bad news on average 6.9 (SD = 13.7) times monthly, with 71% (25/35) having delivered bad news themselves without supervision. Self-perceived skill and confidence increased from 23% (8/35) to 86% (30/35) of those who reported feeling “good” or “very good” with their ability to break bad news after the workshop. Feedback after the workshop demonstrated that 100% found the SPIKES approach helpful and planned to use it in clinical practice, found role-playing helpful, and requested more sessions. Competency for delivering bad news increased from a mean score of 14/25 (56%, SD = 3.3) at baseline to 18/25 (72%, SD = 3.6) after the workshop (p = 0.0002).Significance of resultsThis workshop was effective in increasing medical student skill and confidence in delivering bad news. Standardized role-playing communication workshops integrated into medical school curricula could be a low-cost, effective, and easily implementable strategy to improve communication skills of doctors.


Author(s):  
Gelareh Biazar ◽  
Kourosh Delpasand ◽  
Farnoush Farzi ◽  
Abbas Sedighinejad ◽  
Ali Mirmansouri ◽  
...  

Objective: Delivering bad news is the duty of specialist physicians. However, they find it very difficult due to insufficient experience. In this study, the way faculty and residents of Guilan University of Medical Sciences (GUMS) delivered bad news to the patients was investigated. Method: This study was conducted at hospitals affiliated to GUMS during 2017. A questionnaire containing 18 items on environmental and psychical support was filled through a face to face interview. The first 10 questions evaluated psychical support and the next eight environmental supports. The scoring of each question ranged from 10 to 50, with 10 indicating “never” and 50 “always”. Results: According to the analysis of 235 questionnaires, only 32 (13.6%) of the participants had been taught to deliver bad news and 195(83%) felt they need educational courses. Also, 40 (17%) believed that they had enough ability to deliver these massages. No significant differences were observed among physicians who had taken teaching courses in breaking bad news to patients. Conclusion: This study revealed that educational courses to improve physicians’ communication skill to break bad news to patients are strongly warranted.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filipe Coutinho ◽  
Anisha Ramessur

Introduction: Delivering bad news is very common in medical daily practice. Several studies have shown a lack of effective communication skills amongst medical students, particularly concerning how to deliver bad news. The SPIKES protocol allows communicating bad news in a 6-step method. The aim of this study is to investigate the perspective of students related to this subject.Material and Methods: A 45 minute lecture “Breaking Bad News” was given to 160 students in the fifth and sixth years of the Medicine course, using the SPIKES’ protocol training. After the lecture, an online survey was given to all students, and a cross-sectional and descriptive analysis of data extracted from survey was undertaken.Results: Fifty-four students (21% of overall) answered the online survey. Eighty three percent said that theme should have an important role in their further daily medical practice, and most of students rated the physicians’ role as challenging. Sixty percent of students expressed that communicating bad news was an integral part of the medical course curriculum. Regarding the SPIKES´ protocol, 48% felt that the first step would be the easiest to put in practice, and 40% felt that the fifth step related to “Emotions” would be the most difficult.Discussion: In general, the students would like to gain competencies in breaking bad news using a practical approach Conclusions: Students highly valued theoretical and practical approaches in teaching of communication of bad news. Therefore, we encourage a combination approach in pre-graduate medical education.


2020 ◽  
pp. 147775092095954
Author(s):  
Akram Sadat Sadat Hoseini

There are several models for delivering bad news, the most important and widely used being the SPIKES protocol. Cultural differences in breaking bad news in different societies with different cultures call for special attention. Muslim societies are examples of communities with special cultural and religious requirements. Then, when collecting information about a person's perception of the illness or the incident, consider his or her view of spirituality and the effect of calamities on human transcendence so as to assess the type and amount of information the patient or the family needs. When preparing a suitable setting for delivering bad news, pay attention to the spiritual needs of Muslims such as the possibility of prostration, recitation of Qur'an, and talking to God in private or even aloud. Be aware of, pay attention to, and respect particular religious views of the patient, and if necessary, correctly exploit such views to deliver bad news. Although some Muslim patients may have no demands for transcendence and human growth at the first stage, but over time and after accepting the condition, they will have demands. Therefore, health care providers must provide the necessary facilities for Muslim patients in terms of the required information, setting, and people present in the setting and provide information appropriate to the culture of these patients so as to give an excellent and comprehensive care.


Author(s):  
Miko Ferine ◽  
Gandes Retno Rahayu ◽  
Mora Claramita

Background: The skill of breaking bad news is listed in the 2012 Indonesia’s Doctor Competency Standards so that this becomes one of the skills that must be mastered by all doctors in Indonesia. The curriculum of breaking bad news is much developed in western cultural background. The curriculum may not necessarily be well developed in Indonesia because the communication process is strongly influenced by culture. Therefore, the exploration of the problems faced by the practitioner in delivering bad news in the context of local cultural needs to be done as a first step to develop the right educational curriculum and training.Objective: This study aimed to identify problems of the practicing doctors in delivering bad news to patients or their families in the context of local culture (Banyumas).Methods: This study was a qualitative research with a phenomenological approach. The method used was in-depth interviews to the practicing doctors with experience in delivering bad news selected from various educational backgrounds, sex, and age.Results: This study indicated that the doctors had difficulty in breaking bad news. It was known from the attitude of the doctors who tended to avoid by giving the task to others, to cover the actual condition of the patient or just delivering the bad news to the family. The causes identified were the lack of knowledge and skills, the lack of ability to control emotions, the lack of confidence, the anxiety on the patient’s response, the knowledge gap between doctors and patients, and the limitations of space and time.Conclusion: The main problem of the practicing doctors in delivering bad news was the lack of knowledge and skills. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a training curriculum on breaking bad news adequately for basic and advanced medical education.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Demkhosei Vaiphei Suantak ◽  

In terminal diagnosis breaking bad news is one of the most difficult tasks for every clinicians working in the palliative endof-life care, but a must in its clinical practices. It requires special skills and the ability to deliver the bad news without hurting the sentiment of the patient and the loved ones. Many clinicians working in the palliative care are incompetent in handling the process of delivering the bad news, mainly due to the lack of effective communication skills and sometime were preoccupied with fear and nervousness. A time of breaking bad news is consider to the most crucial moment where the dying individuals are mostly accompanied with several negative feelings and emotional breakdown, which require a well structure manner and well design techniques to put forward. Yet little of its skills and techniques are known among the medical practitioners as a whole in their medical curriculum during their training period. Delivering bad news requires clinicians advance preparations on how much information the patient and the family would like to acquire, quality therapeutic relationship, and emotionally well prepared. The challenges lies in breaking bad news an important domain in terminal diagnosis, but the clinicians are mostly not aware on how, when, and where to deliver in its clinical practices that usually creates a communication gap between the clinicians and the patient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document