scholarly journals Primary Care Prescriptions of Potentially Nephrotoxic Medications in Children with CKD

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire E. Lefebvre ◽  
Kristian B. Filion ◽  
Pauline Reynier ◽  
Robert W. Platt ◽  
Michael Zappitelli
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Background and objectivesPediatric CKD management focuses on limiting kidney injury, including avoiding nephrotoxic medications. Nephrotoxic medication prescription practices for children with CKD are unknown. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and rates of primary care prescriptions for potentially nephrotoxic medications in children with CKD versus without CKD.Design, setting, participants, & measurementsWe conducted a retrospective, matched population-based cohort study of patients aged <18 years, registered at a general practice participating in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) from 1997 to 2017. Children with a clinical code indicating an incident diagnosis of CKD were matched 1:4 to patients without CKD on CKD diagnosis date, sex, age, CPRD practice, and number of general practitioner visits in the year before cohort entry. We calculated the prevalence and the rate of potentially nephrotoxic medication prescriptions throughout the follow-up period in patients with versus without CKD. Primary analyses included the following medication classes: aminoglycosides, antivirals, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, salicylates, proton pump inhibitors, and immunomodulators. Secondary analyses used an expanded nephrotoxicity definition that also included, among others, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Adjusted prescription rates were calculated using multivariable binomial regression.ResultsFrom 1,535,816 eligible patients, we identified 1018 incident CKD and 4072 non-CKD matches (mean age, 9.8 years [range, 1.1–17.9 years]; 52% male; mean follow-up time, 3.3 years). Overall, 26% of patients with and 15% of patients without CKD were prescribed one or more potentially nephrotoxic medication during follow-up. The overall rate of nephrotoxic medication prescriptions was 71 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 55 to 93) prescriptions per 100 person-years in patients with CKD and eight (95% CI, 7 to 9) prescriptions per 100 person-years in patients without CKD (adjusted rate ratio, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.7 to 6.1).ConclusionsPotentially nephrotoxic medications are prescribed at high rates to children with CKD.

scholarly journals Sepsis Recording in Primary Care Electronic Health Records, Linked Hospital Episodes and Mortality Records: Population-based Cohort Study in England

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma Rezel-Potts ◽  
Martin C. Gulliford ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Recent Period ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Different Sources

AbstractObjectivesSepsis is a growing concern for health systems, but the epidemiology of sepsis is poorly characterised. We evaluated sepsis recording across primary care electronic records, hospital episodes and mortality registrations.Methods and FindingsCohort study including 378 general practices in England from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database from 2002 to 2017 with 36,209,676 patient-years of follow-up with linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality registrations. Incident sepsis episodes were identified for each source. Concurrent records from different sources were identified and age-standardised and age-specific incidence rates compared. Logistic regression analysis evaluated associations of gender, age-group, fifth of deprivation and period of diagnosis with concurrent sepsis recording.There were 20,206 first episodes of sepsis from primary care, 20,278 from HES and 13,972 from ONS. There were 4,117 (20%) first HES sepsis events and 2,438 (17%) mortality records concurrent with incident primary care sepsis records within 30 days. Concurrent HES and primary care records of sepsis within 30 days before or after first diagnosis were higher at younger or older ages and for patients with the most recent period of diagnosis with those diagnosed during 2007:2011 less likely to have a concurrent HES record given CPRD compared to those diagnosed during 2012 to 2017 (odd ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.70). At age 85 and older, primary care incidence was 5.22 per 1,000 patient years (95% CI 1.75 to 11.97) in men and 3.55 (0.87 to 9.58) in women which increased to 10.09 (4.86 to 18.51) for men and 7.22 (2.96 to 14.72) for women after inclusion of all three sources.ConclusionExplicit recording of sepsis is inconsistent across healthcare sectors with a high proportion of non-concurrent records. Incidence estimates are higher when linked data are analysed.

scholarly journals Sepsis recording in primary care electronic health records, linked hospital episodes and mortality records: Population-based cohort study in England

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. e0244764
Author(s):  
Emma Rezel-Potts ◽  
Martin C. Gulliford ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Recent Period ◽  
General Practices ◽  
Different Sources

Background Sepsis is a growing concern for health systems, but the epidemiology of sepsis is poorly characterised. We evaluated sepsis recording across primary care electronic records, hospital episodes and mortality registrations. Methods and findings Cohort study including 378 general practices in England from Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) GOLD database from 2002–2017 with 36,209,676 patient-years of follow-up with linked Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and Office for National Statistics (ONS) mortality registrations. Incident sepsis episodes were identified for each source. Concurrent records from different sources were identified and age-standardised and age-specific incidence rates compared. Logistic regression analysis evaluated associations of gender, age-group, fifth of deprivation and period of diagnosis with concurrent sepsis recording. There were 20,206 first episodes of sepsis from primary care, 20,278 from HES and 13,972 from ONS. There were 4,117 (20%) first HES sepsis events and 2,438 (17%) mortality records concurrent with incident primary care sepsis records within 30 days. Concurrent HES and primary care records of sepsis within 30 days before or after first diagnosis were higher at younger or older ages and for patients with the most recent period of diagnosis. Those diagnosed during 2007:2011 were less likely to have a concurrent HES record given CPRD compared to those diagnosed during 2012–2017 (odd ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.60–0.70). At age 85 and older, primary care incidence was 5.22 per 1,000 patient years (95% CI 1.75–11.97) in men and 3.55 (0.87–9.58) in women which increased to 10.09 (4.86–18.51) for men and 7.22 (2.96–14.72) for women after inclusion of all three sources. Conclusion Explicit recording of ‘sepsis’ is inconsistent across healthcare sectors with a high proportion of non-concurrent records. Incidence estimates are higher when linked data are analysed.

Abstract 17320: Use of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Pan ◽  
Tariq Azam ◽  
Husam Shadid ◽  
Hanna Berlin ◽  
Chelsea Meloche ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
P Value ◽  
Converting Enzyme Inhibitors ◽  
Artery Disease

Introduction: COVID-19 is caused by infection with SARS-CoV2 which uses ACE2 as its host receptor. RAS inhibitors such as ACE-inhibitors and ARBs (ACEI/ARB) may increase ACE2 levels. ACE2 levels may also have a lung protective role in ARDS. There is concern over the safety of using these medications in patients with COVID-19. Hypothesis: To characterize the association of a history of ACEI/ARB use by hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and with in-hospital outcomes. Methods: The Michigan Medicine Covid-19 Cohort (M 2 C 2 ) is an ongoing prospective observational study in which detailed clinical, laboratory and outcomes data were collected from chart review of consecutive adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19. Patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection but without symptoms of COVID-19 were not included in this cohort. We identified 490 patients admitted between March 1 st and May 1 st for COVID-19, of whom all 490 had data on whether they took ACEI/ARB prior to hospitalization. We examined the association between ACEI/ARB use and all-cause death, respiratory failure and acute kidney injury (AKI) during their hospitalization. Results: 175 (35.7%) patients were taking ACEI/ARB prior to hospitalization (ACEI/ARB group; mean age 63.6 [SD 13.9]; 64% men) and 315 (64.3%) were not taking ACEI/ARB (non-ACEI/ARB group; median age 58.6 [SD 16.1]; 54.3% men). The risk of developing ARDS was not significantly different between the ACEI/ARB group and non-ACEI/ARB group (47.4% vs 43.5%, p-value 0.53) and neither was the risk death (15.4% vs 16.8%, p-value 0.97), despite a higher prevalence of comorbidities in the ACEI/ARB group including hypertension (96.6% vs 51.4%, p-value <0.001), diabetes mellitus (58.9% vs 34.6%, p-value <0.001), coronary artery disease (22.9% vs 11.4%, p-value 0.002), CHF (16.0% vs 12.1%, p-value 0.26), and CKD (32.0% vs 13.7%, p-value <0.001). Conclusions: Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, prior to hospitalization use ACEI/ARB was not associated with significantly different risk of ARDS or mortality despite having higher rates of comorbidities in the ACEI/ARB group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document