Mortality benefit in the COMPASS trial: is it related to superior statistical power or better efficacy and safety?

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnan Shyamkumar ◽  
Jack Hirsh ◽  
Vinai C Bhagirath ◽  
Smita Sinha ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
...  

Until recently, attempts to improve the benefit of aspirin by adding another antithrombotic agent have not resulted in a mortality reduction in patients with chronic symptomatic atherosclerosis. In this population, COMPASS is the only one among six trials to show a significant mortality reduction, thereby providing evidence of a clear net clinical benefit with the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin. In this systematic review, we sought to determine whether the mortality benefit of the combination arm in COMPASS is best explained by greater statistical power or by a more favorable efficacy–safety profile than the other regimens evaluated in patients with chronic symptomatic atherosclerosis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Ćelić ◽  
Lidija Bach-Rojecky ◽  
Iveta Merćep ◽  
Ana Soldo ◽  
Anja Kos Petrak ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. M. Minten ◽  
E. Mahler ◽  
A. A. den Broeder ◽  
J. W. H. Leer ◽  
C. H. van den Ende

Platelets ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 690-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunjie Li ◽  
Yuye Shi ◽  
Zhengmei He ◽  
Qiuni Chen ◽  
Zhenyou Liu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 913-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safi U. Khan ◽  
Muhammad Zia Khan ◽  
Zain Ul Abideen Asad ◽  
Shahul Valavoor ◽  
Muhammad Usman Khan ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 1189.2-1190
Author(s):  
M.J.M. Minten ◽  
E. Mahler ◽  
A.A. den Broeder ◽  
J.W.H. Leer ◽  
C.H. van den Ende

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eliano P. Navarese ◽  
Safi U. Khan ◽  
Michalina Kołodziejczak ◽  
Jacek Kubica ◽  
Sergio Buccheri ◽  
...  

Background: New randomized, controlled trials have become available on oral P2Y 12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome. We aimed to evaluate current evidence comparing the efficacy and safety profile of prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome by a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: We performed a network meta-analysis and direct pairwise comparison analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes from 12 randomized controlled trials including a total of 52 816 patients with acute coronary syndrome. Results: In comparison with clopidogrel, ticagrelor significantly reduced cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.72–0.92]) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75–0.92]), whereas there was no statistically significant mortality reduction with prasugrel (HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.80–1.01] and HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84–1.02], respectively). In comparison with each other, there were no significant differences in mortality (HR prasugrel versus ticagrelor, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.94–1.29] and 1.12 [95% CI, 0.98–1.28]). In comparison with clopidogrel, prasugrel reduced myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.67–0.98]), whereas ticagrelor showed no risk reduction (HR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.78–1.22]). Differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor were not statistically significant. Stent thrombosis risk was significantly reduced by both ticagrelor and prasugrel versus clopidogrel (28%–50% range of reduction). In comparison with clopidogrel, both prasugrel (HR, 1.26 [95% CI, 1.01–1.56]) and ticagrelor (HR, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.04–1.55]) significantly increased major bleeding. There were no significant differences between prasugrel and ticagrelor for all outcomes explored. Conclusions: Prasugrel and ticagrelor reduced ischemic events and increased bleeding in comparison with clopidogrel. A significant mortality reduction was observed with ticagrelor only. There was no efficacy and safety difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor. Registration: URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ ; Unique identifier: CRD42019155648.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document