scholarly journals Collective Trademark as Alternative of Joint Brand Protection for Dupa Harum Kekeran in Bali

2020 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 64-84
Author(s):  
A.A.A Gorda ◽  
Resti Anggreni
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
Trademark Protection ◽  
Trademark Registration ◽  
The Government ◽  
Role Of The Government

In Kekeran Village, Penebel District, Tabanan Regency, people’s understanding on the importance of legal protection of Intellectual property rights over brands are not well-established. In the village, Dupa Harum Kekeran, a kind of fragrance incense, is the product of a group of women. They use the Kekeran logo; and the logo has not been registered to the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. Brand is a sign that enables customers to identify and differentiate products of companies. As a differentiator, it can also be a marker of an item’s reputation. The study employed an empirical legal research method by using primary and secondary data which were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The study concludes that collective trademark can be used as an alternative of legal protection. It can be used to reduce business competition in the Tabanan Regency. Legal protection is preventive and can be used together to reduce the level of business competition among the makers of Dupa Harum Kekeran. In particular, the business competition is managed by the home industry. Therefore, legal protection through a collective trademark can be more effective and efficient. The government has to cut the bureaucracy of brand registration and the trademark registration can now be done online. The role of the government in efforts to provide the collective trademark protection can be said to be very optimal.

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Rights Protection of Mandar Coconut Oil through Geographical Indications

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlika Sari ◽  
Hasbir Paserangi ◽  
Marwah ◽  
Achmad Zulfikar ◽  
Irmawati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Intellectual property rights support the economic development of a country.Indonesia, with its extraordinary natural resources, has not been able to optimize protection of intellectual property rights. Only 65 kinds of geographical indications were recorded registered on the Directorate General of Intellectual Property by hundreds or even thousands of products with Indonesian characteristics. This article uses a type of socio legal research with data sourced from literature review. This article concludes that Mandar coconut oil is one of the Indonesia resources as the biggest producer coconut oil in the world. This oil has some advantages so it is worth to get the legal geographical indications. The steps which can take of community and the government refers to Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademark and Geographical Indications. The writers recommend that the government of West Sulawesi Province, PolewaliMandar Regency and Majene Regency Government providesupporttowardsMandar coconut oil, so it can get legal protection through geographical indications.

scholarly journals PATENTS IN THE PRODUCTION PROCESS THAT ARE LAYING ON INVENTOR

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
putri indah sari
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Production Process ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Intellectual Work ◽  
The Government

The problems in this research are: (1) Is the patent in production can be provided to the workers / employees as a inventor? (2) How will the moral rights attached to the inventor to patent the intellectual work produced during the production process? This research uses normative juridical approach. Source of data derived from secondary data that primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results showed that patents in the production process is not given to the discoverer of workers / employees. The government needs to dissemination of the patents and other intellectual property rights so that a producer of intellectual work so that they know that the law protects what they produce. Governments also need to revise the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (1) Patent Law, where the rights of patent holders fixed on the inventor.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENCATATAN LOGO SEBAGAI CIPTAAN SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Widowati Maria Teresa ◽  
Budi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Entities

With the enactment of Law Number 28, 2014 About Copyright the creation of art in the form of a logo or distinctive sign is used as a brand in the trade of goods/services or used as a symbol of the organization, entity, or legal entities can not be recorded. Logo that cannot be registered as creation may be registered as trademarks and obtain trademarks protection. Associated with the unregistered logo in the List of Works does not reduce the copyrights protection of the logo, because the protection of the logo as Creation appears declaratively. Consequences of the unlisted logo in the List of Works are logo will not get an official passage on Creation. The government needs to tighten substantive and material checks on all works listed in the field of Intellectual Property Rights and the government may take the initiative to carry out dissemination and counselling accessible to the public especially for business practitioner. Keywords : Logo, Legal Protection, Copyrights AbstrakDengan diberlakukannya Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, seni lukis yang berupa logo atau tanda pembeda yang digunakan sebagai merek dalam perdagangan barang/jasa atau digunakan sebagai lambang organisasi, badan usaha, atau badan hukum tidak dapat dicatatkan. Logo yang tidak dapat dicatatkan sebagai Ciptaan dapat didaftarkan sebagai Merek dan mendapatkan perlindungan Merek. Terkait dengan tidak dicatatkannya logo dalam Daftar Ciptaan tidak mengurangi perlindungan Hak Cipta atas logo, karena perlindungan logo sebagai Ciptaan muncul secara deklaratif. Konsekuensi dari tidak dapat dicatatkannya logo dalam Daftar Ciptaan adalah Ciptaan logo tidak akan mendapatkan petikan resmi atas Ciptaan. Pemerintah perlu untuk memperketat pemeriksaan substantif maupun materiil terhadap seluruh karya yang didaftarkan di seluruh bidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan dapat mengambil inisiatif untuk melakukan diseminasi dan penyuluhan yang dapat diakses secara mudah bagi masyarakat pada umumnya dan pelaku bisnis pada khususnya. Kata kunci : Logo, Perlindungan Hukum, Hak Cipta 

scholarly journals Pelindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Produk Ekonomi Kreatif (Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights On Creative Economic Products)

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulasi Rongiyati
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Creative Economy ◽  
The Government

As a result of creativity, the creative economy product is an intellectual property that needs to be recognized as an intellectual work that has economic value and gets legal protection. This study analyzes the regulations established by the Government in providing protection against intellectual property rights (IPRs) to ekraf products and the application of such regulations in the city of Surakarta, Central Java and Denpasar City, Bali. Through normative and empirical juridical research methods, secondary and primary data are processed and analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research stated that IPRs protection policy toward creative economy product has been done by the government through IPRs legislations and regional policy related to IPRs protection for creative economy product referring to national policy. Preventive protection is provided through law in the form of economic benefits for the actors who register IPRs of creative economy product. However, the level of public awareness and understanding of the importance of IPRs, the communal nature of creative economy actors in Indonesia, and the nature of IPRs that must be registered for legal protection, cause IPRs protection for creative economy perpetrators is not optimal. At the level of implementation, the awareness and understanding of the perpetrators of the property rights become the key to the success of IPRs protection by the government. The lack of regional alignments has an impact on the not yet optimal economic benefits received by creative economy actors. Therefore, the government should intensify the socialization of IPRs and facilitate the registration of IPRs  for the perpetrators of creative economy. Institutional and regulatory support at the local level is also important to develop and protect the creative economy product.AbstrakSebagai suatu karya kreativitas, produk ekonomi kreatif (ekraf) merupakan kekayaan intelektual yang perlu mendapat penghargaan sebagai suatu karya intelektual yang memiliki nilai ekonomi dan memperoleh pelindungan hukum. Penelitian ini menganalisis mengenai regulasi yang dibentuk Pemerintah dalam memberikan pelindungan terhadap hak kekayaan intelektual (HKI) terhadap produk ekraf dan penerapan regulasi tersebut di kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah dan Kota Denpasar, Bali. Melalui metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan empiris, data sekunder dan primer diolah dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyebutkan, kebijakan pelindungan HKI terhadap produk ekraf telah dilakukan oleh pemerintah melalui peraturan perundang-undangan bidang HKI dan kebijakan daerah terkait pelindungan HKI untuk produk ekraf mengacu pada kebijakan tingkat nasional. Pelindungan preventif diberikan melalui UU berupa manfaat ekonomi bagi pelaku ekraf yang mendaftarkan HKInya. Namun, tingkat kesadaran masyarakat dan pemahaman pentingnya HKI, sifat komunal pelaku ekraf di Indonesia, dan sifat HKI yang harus didaftarkan untuk mendapat pelindungan hukum, menyebabkan pelindungan HKI untuk pelaku ekraf belum optimal. Pada tataran implementasi, kesadaran dan pemahaman pelaku ekraf atas kekayaan intelektualnya menjadi kunci keberhasilan pelindungan HKI yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Minimnya keberpihakan daerah berdampak pada belum optimalnya manfaat ekonomi yang diterima pelaku ekraf. Oleh karenanya pemerintah perlu menggiatkan sosialisasi HKI dan memfasilitasi pendaftaran HKI untuk pelaku ekraf. Dukungan kelembagaan dan regulasi pada tingkat daerah juga penting dilakukan untuk mengembangkan dan melindungi produk ekraf. 

scholarly journals DESAIN TATA LETAK SIRKUIT TERPADU DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INTEREN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Sudjana Sudjana
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Layout Design ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Circuit Layout ◽  
The Government

<p><em>The author discusses the legal protection of integrated circuit layout design as provided by Law 32/2000 and compares it with how the government regulates and protect other sorts of intellectual property rights (copyright, trademarks, patents, etc.). The purpose of this comparison is to reveal shortcomings as well as the strength of each different regulations. This study reveals that Law 32/2000 as compared to other IPR protections has yet to provide legal protection of inventor’s moral rights, priority rights as well as temporary decision.  At the same time, all regulations cannot be fully implemented due to the lack of or insufficient implementing regulations. </em></p>

scholarly journals INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ASPECT IN THE FRANCHISE BUSINESS FORMAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Budi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government

In the franchise business, there are several aspects of IPR involved in it, such as trademark, copyright, patent either ordinary or simple, industrial design, and trade secrets. Each field of IPR has its own character and forms of legal protection that differ from one another, while the most basic aspects of IPR in the world of the franchise business, name brands and trade secrets. This study aims to analyze the correlation between aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the franchise business format and which aspects of the IPR correlate with the format of the franchise business. The results show that the franchise agreement can be categorized as a principal agreement, involving the government, and the parties, while additional agreements, which are purely an agreement between the franchisor and the franchise, can be in the form of an agreement to maintain company secrets.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS IN INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
ega yuliani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Privately Owned

AbstractIntellectual Property Rights are rights derived from the work, initiative and creativity in the form of a real man. Intellectual Property rights consist of privately owned property and Industry. Patents are part of Intellectual Property Rights in Industry. Patents are granted the right of the government and is exclusive. Exclusive rights of patent holders is the production of a patented item, usage and sales of goods and deeds relating to the import and sale of such goods store. Legal protection of intellectual property rights in the patent field ketetentuan regulated in Law Number 14 of 2001. In chapter 8, paragraph (1) time protection for 20 years from the date of receipt and can not be extended. And Article 9 set period of patent protection for simple for 10 (ten) years and can not be extended. Protection of intellectual property rights is no guarantee to the public to respect the right of initiative and the reaction and to provide protection will upload their work. The higher appreciation of the intellectual property rights of a nation then the future will be better.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF WEALTH RIGHTS INTELLECTUAL IN PATENT

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fadel Zulkarnain
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Privately Owned

AbstractIntellectual Property Rights are rights derived from the work, initiative and creativity in the form of a real man. Intellectual Property rights consist of privately owned property and Industry. Patents are part of Intellectual Property Rights in Industry. Patents are granted the right of the government and is exclusive. Exclusive rights of patent holders is the production of a patented item, usage and sales of goods and deeds relating to the import and sale of such goods store. Legal protection of intellectual property rights in the patent field ketetentuan regulated in Law Number 14 of 2001. In chapter 8, paragraph (1) time protection for 20 years from the date of receipt and can not be extended. And Article 9 set period of patent protection for simple for 10 (ten) years and can not be extended. Protection of intellectual property rights is no guarantee to the public to respect the right of initiative and the reaction and to provide protection will upload their work. The higher appreciation of the intellectual property rights of a nation then the future will be better. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, Patent Protection

scholarly journals Mengoptimalkan Peran Lembaga Perfilman Indonesia: Analisis Aspek Hak Cipta terhadap Praktik Siaran Video Ilegal

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Relys Sandi Ariani ◽  
Luna Dezeana Ticoalu ◽  
Herlin Sri Wahyuni
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Preventive Actions ◽  
Streaming Services ◽  
The Government ◽  
Film Piracy

The film is part of the intellectual property rights attached to the creator. Nowadays, it is commonly agreed that violation of intellectual property rights portrays in film piracy for personal gain is inevitable, with illegal streaming services. This study aimed to examine film protection, conduct a study of film institutions, and find concepts to protect films in Indonesia. The study used a juridical method with the statute and conceptual approaches. In so doing, it used secondary data processed using library research techniques. The study showed that illegal movie streaming rampant in Indonesia practiced illegal streaming movies. It violated the intellectual property rights inherent in the creator, resulting in enormous losses for the creators. There are further problems in the laws and regulations, and the government must accommodate preventive actions. This study suggested three components: correctional, supervision, and copyright protection against illegal movie streaming in Indonesia; and these components were to maximize the role of stakeholders. KEYWORDS: Illegal Streaming Movies, Indonesian Film Institute, Intellectual Property Rights and Copyrights

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION AND RESOLUTION OF BREACH IN TRADE SECRET Riki Andus Manulang

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riki Andus Manulang
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Music Industry ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Business Community ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
The Government

As a developing country, Indonesia needs to strive for strong competition among the business community. This is in line with global conditions in the field of trade and investment. Such competitiveness has long been known in the Intellectual Property Rights (HAKI) system.The era of globalization, this is arguably one of the causes of intellectual property rights violations (IPR). Like a time bomb that can explode at any time and the explosion effect can be on everything around it. Progress in all sectors, especially in the fields of industry and trade, is one of the victims of globalization. The higher industrialization flows and trade flows demanded the accuracy and speed of transactions are in part. And of course there are many problems that arise in it, because in every positive case there is a negative side. For example, in the case of "Music Industry" (Music Industry), especially in the cassette / DVD / VCD trade, sometimes people who are positioned as consumers prefer prices that are relatively cheap rather than expensive. Although of course the expensive ones have higher quality.Some time ago, precisely in July 2012 as quoted in the sitejogja.okezone.com The Government through the Directorate of Investigation of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights (HAM) handled 44 cases of intellectual property rights violations (HKI) per May 2012. The 44 cases are related to the IPR domain, namely cases of copyright, patent, brand, industrial design, and Trade Secrets violations. And according to the Investigation Director of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, Mohammad Adri, said, of the 44 cases of violations of IPR, the most cases were cases of brand violations which reached 27 cases. The second most, cases of industrial design violations (7 cases) and copyright cases (4 cases). The remaining patent cases and trade secrets. Illegal or pirated computer software problems are found in copyright cases.Keywords: HakI, Trade.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document