scholarly journals DESAIN TATA LETAK SIRKUIT TERPADU DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERBANDINGAN HUKUM INTEREN

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 218
Author(s):  
Sudjana Sudjana
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Layout Design ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Circuit Layout ◽  
The Government

<p><em>The author discusses the legal protection of integrated circuit layout design as provided by Law 32/2000 and compares it with how the government regulates and protect other sorts of intellectual property rights (copyright, trademarks, patents, etc.). The purpose of this comparison is to reveal shortcomings as well as the strength of each different regulations. This study reveals that Law 32/2000 as compared to other IPR protections has yet to provide legal protection of inventor’s moral rights, priority rights as well as temporary decision.  At the same time, all regulations cannot be fully implemented due to the lack of or insufficient implementing regulations. </em></p>

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION AND UNDERSTANDING OF LAYOUT CIRCUITS INTEGRATED DESIGN RIGHTS Rindy Alfius Phirins

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rindy Alfius Phirins
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuits ◽  
World Trade Organization ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
World Trade ◽  
Layout Design ◽  
Circuit Layout ◽  
The World

At present, there are seven objects of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in Indonesia that have been protected by law. One of them is the Integrated Circuit Layout Design (DTLST). In the legal system of IPR, DTLST is relatively new. In fact, even today there are still many Indonesians who do not know exactly what is meant by DTLST. How is the application of Law No. 32 of 2000 concerning Design of Integrated Circuit Layout in Indonesia? What is the object and what is the role of DTLST in the IPR legal system? This is understandable because the law on DTLST was only enacted in 2000 along with three other IPR laws, namely Law No. 29 of 2000 concerning Protection of Plant Varieties; Law No. 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets; Law No. 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design; and Law No. 32 of 2000 concerning Integrated Circuit Layout Design.The law above was born as a consequence of the signing of the Uruguay Round Final Act, which was one of the results of the negotiations: the establishment of a world trade institution known as the World Trade Organization (WTO). The approval of the establishment of a WTO institution was then ratified by Indonesia with Law No. 7 of 1994 concerning Ratification of the Establising Agreement of the World Trade Organization (Agreement on the Establishment of a World Trade Organization). Every WTO member must ratify all decisions of this institution including the Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) Agreement, or agreement on aspects of trade in Intellectual Property Rights that refers to the DTLST protection foundation namely the Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits (Washington Treaty). However, regarding the Layout Design of Integrated Circuits, each member country is given the freedom to regulate itself and adjust to the environmental conditions and technological advances in the country concerned.Keywords: DTLST and IPR.

scholarly journals LEGAL WEAKNESS IN LAW NO.32 OF 2000 CONCERNING TATA DESIGN CLEAR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS Satrianah

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satrianah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuits ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Integrated Circuit ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Layout Design ◽  
Circuit Layout ◽  
Silicon Chips ◽  
Global Era

In the global era, the need for electronic equipment is increasing and year after year. Tools such as radio, television and computers are some examples and electronic products that have become a part and life of everyday people both living in cities and living in rural areas. One of the important components and products is Circuit Housed in a Platform (CHIP). The Integrated Circuit Layout Design Act aims to protect "silicon chips" or "Integrated Circuits" which are the main drivers of technological progress in the past two decades, specifically the computer industry and related technologies. (Tim Lindsey. Atall, 2002, p. 225) In conjunction with Trade Secret laws, industrial design laws, and plant variety laws, the law on integrated circuit layout design or commonly known as Integrated Circuits ( IC) was promulgated on December 20, 2000. The four laws were issued with background adjustmentsIntegrated Circuit Layout Design is a new material in the field of Intellectual Property Rights, where previously the protection of Intellectual Property Rights in Indonesia only included Patents, Trademarks and Copyright. Since December 20, 2000 Integrated Circuit Layout designs have been protected by the birth of Law No. 32 of 2000.There are some weaknesses in the Integrated Circuit Layout Design Law, these weaknesses include the registration procedure and the start of the period of giving protection. With these conditions the implementation of integrated circuit design protection will be difficult to enforce, for this reason there is a need for improvements in the arrangement of Integrated Circuit Layout Designs.Keywords: Integrated Circuit Layout Design

scholarly journals PATENTS IN THE PRODUCTION PROCESS THAT ARE LAYING ON INVENTOR

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
putri indah sari
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Production Process ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Intellectual Work ◽  
The Government

The problems in this research are: (1) Is the patent in production can be provided to the workers / employees as a inventor? (2) How will the moral rights attached to the inventor to patent the intellectual work produced during the production process? This research uses normative juridical approach. Source of data derived from secondary data that primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results showed that patents in the production process is not given to the discoverer of workers / employees. The government needs to dissemination of the patents and other intellectual property rights so that a producer of intellectual work so that they know that the law protects what they produce. Governments also need to revise the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (1) Patent Law, where the rights of patent holders fixed on the inventor.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENCATATAN LOGO SEBAGAI CIPTAAN SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
Widowati Maria Teresa ◽  
Budi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Creation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Legal Entities

With the enactment of Law Number 28, 2014 About Copyright the creation of art in the form of a logo or distinctive sign is used as a brand in the trade of goods/services or used as a symbol of the organization, entity, or legal entities can not be recorded. Logo that cannot be registered as creation may be registered as trademarks and obtain trademarks protection. Associated with the unregistered logo in the List of Works does not reduce the copyrights protection of the logo, because the protection of the logo as Creation appears declaratively. Consequences of the unlisted logo in the List of Works are logo will not get an official passage on Creation. The government needs to tighten substantive and material checks on all works listed in the field of Intellectual Property Rights and the government may take the initiative to carry out dissemination and counselling accessible to the public especially for business practitioner. Keywords : Logo, Legal Protection, Copyrights AbstrakDengan diberlakukannya Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, seni lukis yang berupa logo atau tanda pembeda yang digunakan sebagai merek dalam perdagangan barang/jasa atau digunakan sebagai lambang organisasi, badan usaha, atau badan hukum tidak dapat dicatatkan. Logo yang tidak dapat dicatatkan sebagai Ciptaan dapat didaftarkan sebagai Merek dan mendapatkan perlindungan Merek. Terkait dengan tidak dicatatkannya logo dalam Daftar Ciptaan tidak mengurangi perlindungan Hak Cipta atas logo, karena perlindungan logo sebagai Ciptaan muncul secara deklaratif. Konsekuensi dari tidak dapat dicatatkannya logo dalam Daftar Ciptaan adalah Ciptaan logo tidak akan mendapatkan petikan resmi atas Ciptaan. Pemerintah perlu untuk memperketat pemeriksaan substantif maupun materiil terhadap seluruh karya yang didaftarkan di seluruh bidang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan dapat mengambil inisiatif untuk melakukan diseminasi dan penyuluhan yang dapat diakses secara mudah bagi masyarakat pada umumnya dan pelaku bisnis pada khususnya. Kata kunci : Logo, Perlindungan Hukum, Hak Cipta 

scholarly journals Pelindungan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pada Produk Ekonomi Kreatif (Protection Of Intellectual Property Rights On Creative Economic Products)

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulasi Rongiyati
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Creative Economy ◽  
The Government

As a result of creativity, the creative economy product is an intellectual property that needs to be recognized as an intellectual work that has economic value and gets legal protection. This study analyzes the regulations established by the Government in providing protection against intellectual property rights (IPRs) to ekraf products and the application of such regulations in the city of Surakarta, Central Java and Denpasar City, Bali. Through normative and empirical juridical research methods, secondary and primary data are processed and analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research stated that IPRs protection policy toward creative economy product has been done by the government through IPRs legislations and regional policy related to IPRs protection for creative economy product referring to national policy. Preventive protection is provided through law in the form of economic benefits for the actors who register IPRs of creative economy product. However, the level of public awareness and understanding of the importance of IPRs, the communal nature of creative economy actors in Indonesia, and the nature of IPRs that must be registered for legal protection, cause IPRs protection for creative economy perpetrators is not optimal. At the level of implementation, the awareness and understanding of the perpetrators of the property rights become the key to the success of IPRs protection by the government. The lack of regional alignments has an impact on the not yet optimal economic benefits received by creative economy actors. Therefore, the government should intensify the socialization of IPRs and facilitate the registration of IPRs  for the perpetrators of creative economy. Institutional and regulatory support at the local level is also important to develop and protect the creative economy product.AbstrakSebagai suatu karya kreativitas, produk ekonomi kreatif (ekraf) merupakan kekayaan intelektual yang perlu mendapat penghargaan sebagai suatu karya intelektual yang memiliki nilai ekonomi dan memperoleh pelindungan hukum. Penelitian ini menganalisis mengenai regulasi yang dibentuk Pemerintah dalam memberikan pelindungan terhadap hak kekayaan intelektual (HKI) terhadap produk ekraf dan penerapan regulasi tersebut di kota Surakarta, Jawa Tengah dan Kota Denpasar, Bali. Melalui metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan empiris, data sekunder dan primer diolah dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menyebutkan, kebijakan pelindungan HKI terhadap produk ekraf telah dilakukan oleh pemerintah melalui peraturan perundang-undangan bidang HKI dan kebijakan daerah terkait pelindungan HKI untuk produk ekraf mengacu pada kebijakan tingkat nasional. Pelindungan preventif diberikan melalui UU berupa manfaat ekonomi bagi pelaku ekraf yang mendaftarkan HKInya. Namun, tingkat kesadaran masyarakat dan pemahaman pentingnya HKI, sifat komunal pelaku ekraf di Indonesia, dan sifat HKI yang harus didaftarkan untuk mendapat pelindungan hukum, menyebabkan pelindungan HKI untuk pelaku ekraf belum optimal. Pada tataran implementasi, kesadaran dan pemahaman pelaku ekraf atas kekayaan intelektualnya menjadi kunci keberhasilan pelindungan HKI yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Minimnya keberpihakan daerah berdampak pada belum optimalnya manfaat ekonomi yang diterima pelaku ekraf. Oleh karenanya pemerintah perlu menggiatkan sosialisasi HKI dan memfasilitasi pendaftaran HKI untuk pelaku ekraf. Dukungan kelembagaan dan regulasi pada tingkat daerah juga penting dilakukan untuk mengembangkan dan melindungi produk ekraf. 

scholarly journals INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) ASPECT IN THE FRANCHISE BUSINESS FORMAT

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Budi Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government

In the franchise business, there are several aspects of IPR involved in it, such as trademark, copyright, patent either ordinary or simple, industrial design, and trade secrets. Each field of IPR has its own character and forms of legal protection that differ from one another, while the most basic aspects of IPR in the world of the franchise business, name brands and trade secrets. This study aims to analyze the correlation between aspects of Intellectual Property Rights and the franchise business format and which aspects of the IPR correlate with the format of the franchise business. The results show that the franchise agreement can be categorized as a principal agreement, involving the government, and the parties, while additional agreements, which are purely an agreement between the franchisor and the franchise, can be in the form of an agreement to maintain company secrets.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF PATENT RIGHTS IN INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
ega yuliani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Privately Owned

AbstractIntellectual Property Rights are rights derived from the work, initiative and creativity in the form of a real man. Intellectual Property rights consist of privately owned property and Industry. Patents are part of Intellectual Property Rights in Industry. Patents are granted the right of the government and is exclusive. Exclusive rights of patent holders is the production of a patented item, usage and sales of goods and deeds relating to the import and sale of such goods store. Legal protection of intellectual property rights in the patent field ketetentuan regulated in Law Number 14 of 2001. In chapter 8, paragraph (1) time protection for 20 years from the date of receipt and can not be extended. And Article 9 set period of patent protection for simple for 10 (ten) years and can not be extended. Protection of intellectual property rights is no guarantee to the public to respect the right of initiative and the reaction and to provide protection will upload their work. The higher appreciation of the intellectual property rights of a nation then the future will be better.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCYLEGAL PROTECTION OF LURIK ART CONSERVATION THROUGH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 2 IN KLATEN REGENCY

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 354
Author(s):  
Riska Andi Fitriono ◽  
Sarwono .
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Art Conservation ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

This article aimed to analyze legal protection of Lurik Art Conservation Through <br />Intellectual Property Rights in Klaten Regency. Klaten is the area that is most<br />concerned with the survival of lurik weaving. There is someone mentioned that the<br />Klaten Regency was the capital of lurik weaving. Because the weaving of Looms<br />are not machines or Alat Tenun Bukan Mesin (hereinafter abbreviated to ATBM) <br />is a mainstay of this city. There are countless villages that become centers of lurik <br />craftsmen. This research is empirical or non-doctrinal research, which is a study<br />that sees the law not only from the perspective of legislation, but also sees the law<br />in its implementation. The results of the study show that the first legal protection in<br />preserving the current lurik art in Klaten, namely the Klaten Regency Government,<br />then stipulates the Regent's Regulation Number 53 of 2010 Article 23 Paragraph (9)<br />on the Daily Batik and Traditional Weaving Lurik Service or ATBM Striated and<br />the Klaten Regent's Decree Number : 065/1014/06 December 30, 2010 on Wearing<br />Traditional Weaving, Motives, Colors and Free Models with Attributes. Furthermore,<br />based on the Decree of the Regent of Klaten Number 050/84 of 2016 on Klaten<br />Regency's Superior Products, batik striated is one of the superior products of Klaten<br />Regency. With the issuance of these rules as an effort to protect and preserve lurik<br />art in Klaten district and referring to Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright, it has<br />regulated the forms of protection of lurik art in Klaten through Article 40 paragraph<br />(1). The Second Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Against Lurik Art, namely<br />Protection of lurik artworks, besides being accommodated in Law Number 28 of 2014<br />on Copyright (Copyright Law) and Trademark Law and other intellectual property<br />right laws. Elucidation of Article 40 paragraph (1) letter j of the Copyright Law. The<br />work is protected because it has artistic value, both in relation to the picture, style,<br />and color composition. The Copyright Act also emphasizes that it is important to<br />protect Copyright because every creator, in this case, the creator of the lurik motif<br />has the right to moral rights and economic rights.

scholarly journals LEGAL PROTECTION OF WEALTH RIGHTS INTELLECTUAL IN PATENT

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Fadel Zulkarnain
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Privately Owned

AbstractIntellectual Property Rights are rights derived from the work, initiative and creativity in the form of a real man. Intellectual Property rights consist of privately owned property and Industry. Patents are part of Intellectual Property Rights in Industry. Patents are granted the right of the government and is exclusive. Exclusive rights of patent holders is the production of a patented item, usage and sales of goods and deeds relating to the import and sale of such goods store. Legal protection of intellectual property rights in the patent field ketetentuan regulated in Law Number 14 of 2001. In chapter 8, paragraph (1) time protection for 20 years from the date of receipt and can not be extended. And Article 9 set period of patent protection for simple for 10 (ten) years and can not be extended. Protection of intellectual property rights is no guarantee to the public to respect the right of initiative and the reaction and to provide protection will upload their work. The higher appreciation of the intellectual property rights of a nation then the future will be better. Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, Patent Protection

scholarly journals Intellectual Property Rights Protection of Mandar Coconut Oil through Geographical Indications

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erlika Sari ◽  
Hasbir Paserangi ◽  
Marwah ◽  
Achmad Zulfikar ◽  
Irmawati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Coconut Oil ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights Protection ◽  
Property Rights Protection ◽  
Directorate General ◽  
The Government

Intellectual property rights support the economic development of a country.Indonesia, with its extraordinary natural resources, has not been able to optimize protection of intellectual property rights. Only 65 kinds of geographical indications were recorded registered on the Directorate General of Intellectual Property by hundreds or even thousands of products with Indonesian characteristics. This article uses a type of socio legal research with data sourced from literature review. This article concludes that Mandar coconut oil is one of the Indonesia resources as the biggest producer coconut oil in the world. This oil has some advantages so it is worth to get the legal geographical indications. The steps which can take of community and the government refers to Law No. 20 of 2016 concerning Trademark and Geographical Indications. The writers recommend that the government of West Sulawesi Province, PolewaliMandar Regency and Majene Regency Government providesupporttowardsMandar coconut oil, so it can get legal protection through geographical indications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document