scholarly journals Aspek Penting Akreditasi Puskesmas dalam Mendukung Implementasi Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional

2018 ◽  
pp. 10-16
Author(s):  
Misnaniarti Misnaniarti ◽  
Putri Kemala Destari
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Services Quality ◽  
Policy Study ◽  
Self Assessment

Abstrak Puskesmas memegang peran yang sangat penting dalam penyelenggaraan pelayanan kesehatan di Indonesia. Puskesmas dituntut untuk dapat menjamin perbaikan mutu, peningkatan kinerja dan penerapan manajemen risiko yang dilaksanakan secara berkesinambungan, sehingga perlu dilakukan penilaian melalui mekanisme akreditasi. Tujuan penulisan makalah ini adalah untuk mengkaji aspek penting penyelenggaraan akreditasi Puskesmas dalam mendukung implementasi Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN). Makalah ini merupakan studi kebijakan menggunakan literature review. Informasi diambil dari berbagai sumber terdiri dari kebijakan, pedoman dan hasil penelitian terkait akreditasi Puskesmas. Berdasarkan kajian diketahui bahwa Puskesmas wajib untuk diakreditasi secara berkala paling sedikit tiga tahun sekali, sebagai salah satu syarat fasilitas kesehatan tingkat pertama di JKN. Akreditasi dilakukan melalui tahap survei akreditasi dan penetapan akreditasi. Puskemas melakukan persiapan sebelumnya antara lain menyiapkan dokumen eksternal dan internal, termasuk melakukan studi banding untuk persiapan akreditasi. Persiapan lainnya adalah melakukan pendampingan dan Self Assessment. Pelaksanaan akreditasi di Puskesmas merupakan aspek penting dalam mendukung implementasi JKN sekaligus merupakan upaya meningkatkan kualitas layanan Puskesmas. Rekomendasi bagi Puskesmas untuk dapat melakukan persiapan secara konprehensif sebelum menyelenggarakan penilaian akreditasi. Pelayanan kesehatan yang dilakukan sesuai arah panduan akreditasi secara konsisten dan berkelanjutan, pada akhirnya dapat meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan dan kepuasan pasien secara berkesinambungan. Kata Kunci: Akreditasi, Kredensialing, Mutu, Puskesmas. Abstract Puskesmas have an important role in the implementation of health services in Indonesia. Puskesmas are required to guarantee the quality improvement, performance improvement and implementation of risk management are carried out sustainably, so it needs to be assessed through accreditation mechanism. The purpose of this paper is to review the important aspects of the implementation of Puskesmas accreditation in supporting the implementation of the National Health Insurance (JKN). This is a policy study using literature review. Information taken from various sources consists of policies, guidelines and research results related to Puskesmas accreditation. Based on this study known that Puskesmas are obliged to be accredited periodically at least every three years, requirements as First Level Health Facilities. Accreditation done through several stages such as accreditation survey and accreditation decision. Previously Puskemas do the preparation consist of preparing external and internal documents, including conducting comparative studies for preparation of accreditation. Other preparation are accompaniment and Self Assessment. Implementation of accreditation in Puskesmas are an important aspect in supporting the implementation of JKN as well as an effort to improve the services quality of Puskesmas. Recommendation for Puskesmas to do preparation comprehensively before implementation accreditation assessment. Health services that implementation based on the accreditation guidelines consistently and continuously, finally can improve the quality of service and patient satisfaction on sustainably. Keywords: neonatal, emergency, hospital, referal system

HASTANELERİN HİZMET KALİTESİNİN HASTA TATMİN ÖLÇEĞİ İLE ÖLÇÜLMESİ: KARABÜK DEVLET HASTANESİNDE YATAN HASTALAR ÜZERİNDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA THE MEASUREMENT SERVICE QUALITY OF THE HOSPITALS BY THE PATIENT SCALE: A RESEARCH ON THE PATIENTS IN KARABUK STATE HOSP

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
Selçuk Yurtsever
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Private Sector ◽  
State Hospital ◽  
Continuous Change ◽  
Satisfaction Scale ◽  
The World ◽  
Main Factors

It has been known that both in the world and in Turkey a continuous change has been experienced in the provision of health services in recent years. In this sense by adopting the customer(client) focused approach of either public or private sector hospitals; it has been seen that they are in the struggle for presenting a right, fast, trustuble, comfy service. The purpose of this research is to measure the satisfaction degree, expectations and perceptions of the patients in Karabük State Hospital through comparison. In this context, the patient satisfaction scale which has been developed as a result of literature review has been used and by this scale it has been tried to measure the satisfaction levels of the patients in terms of material and human factors which are the two main factors of the service that was presented. In the study, with the scales of Servqual and 0-100 Points together, in the part of the analysis MANOVA have been used. The expectations and the perceptions of the patient has been compared first by generally and then by separating to different groups according to the various criterias and in thisway it has been tried to be measured their satisfaction levels. According to the results that were obtained, although, the satisfaction levels of the patients who have taken service from Karabük State Hospital are high in terms of thedoctors and the nurses; it has been reached to the result that their satisfaction levels are low in terms of the materials that have been used at the presenting of the service and the management.

scholarly journals The Effect of Health Services Quality on Satisfaction and Loyalty in West Sulawesi Province, Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (D) ◽  
pp. 150-157
Author(s):  
Fuad Husain Akbar ◽  
Ulfah Ulfah ◽  
Yoris Adi Maretta
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Services Quality ◽  
Community Satisfaction ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Trust Beliefs ◽  
Significant Interest ◽  
Oral Health Services

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the patient satisfaction and loyalty to the quality of community dental and oral health services from various dimensions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used a pilot pathfinder, which was conducted in Polewali Mandar District in 2019. The subjects consisted of 458 people. Data were collected using a questionnaire, which was designed appropriate to this survey which consists of 67 questions with responses in the form of bad, poor, moderate, good, and very good. Questions about dental and oral health service beliefs are grouped into four dimensions, ability, heart competence, intelligence, and trust. Beliefs were analyzed using the F-test and multiple regression. RESULTS: The dimensions of service quality toward satisfaction and loyalty were the dimensions of registration and the doctor which had an effect in community satisfaction and loyalty with p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Communities in Wonomulyo Subdistrict, and Bulo Subdistrict, Polewali Mandar District largely have a significant interest in community satisfaction and loyalty with dental and oral health services.

CQI: Meeting the Mandate for Quality

1995 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. P111-P111
Author(s):  
Carl A. Patow
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Continuous Quality Improvement ◽  
Educational Objectives ◽  
Continuous Quality

Educational objectives: To understand the principles of continuous quality improvement and to use these principles to enhance patient satisfaction through increased efficiency and improved quality of care.

Value-based dentistry: Putting the patient first

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 126-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreenivas Koka ◽  
Galya Raz
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Time Cost ◽  
Safety Risk ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Over Time

What does ‘value’ mean? In the context of dental care, it can be defined as the quality of care received by a patient divided by the cost to the patient of receiving that care. In other words: V =Q/C, where Q equals the quality improvement over time, which most patients view in the context of the outcome, the service provided and safety/risk management, and C equals the financial, biological and time cost to the patient. Here, the need for, and implications of, value-based density for clinicians and patients alike are explored.

scholarly journals Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reema Harrison ◽  
Benjamin Jones ◽  
Peter Gardner ◽  
Rebecca Lawton
Keyword(s):  
Health Services Research ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Reporting Quality ◽  
Services Research ◽  
Appraisal Tool

Abstract Background In the context of the volume of mixed- and multi-methods studies in health services research, the present study sought to develop an appraisal tool to determine the methodological and reporting quality of such studies when included in systematic reviews. Evaluative evidence regarding the design and use of our existing Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSDD) was synthesised to enhance and refine it for application across health services research. Methods Secondary data were collected through a literature review of all articles identified using Google Scholar that had cited the QATSDD tool from its inception in 2012 to December 2019. First authors of all papers that had cited the QATSDD (n=197) were also invited to provide further evaluative data via a qualitative online survey. Evaluative findings from the survey and literature review were synthesised narratively and these data used to identify areas requiring refinement. The refined tool was subject to inter-rater reliability, face and content validity analyses. Results Key limitations of the QATSDD tool identified related to a lack of clarity regarding scope of use of the tool and in the ease of application of criteria beyond experimental psychological research. The Quality Appraisal for Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool emerged as a revised tool to address the limitations of the QATSDD. The QuADS tool demonstrated substantial inter-rater reliability (k=0.66), face and content validity for application in systematic reviews with mixed, or multi-methods health services research. Conclusion Our findings highlight the perceived value of appraisal tools to determine the methodological and reporting quality of studies in reviews that include heterogeneous studies. The QuADS tool demonstrates strong reliability and ease of use for application to multi or mixed-methods health services research.

The essence, content and characteristics of medical services’ quality

2021 ◽  
pp. 40-43
Author(s):  
Constantin Etco ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Health Care Quality ◽  
Services Quality ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Total Quality ◽  
Care System

One of the priorities of the health care system in Moldova is the medical services’ quality improvement. Th is article presents various defi nitions for health care quality and the principles connected with quality improvement. An important part in this article is allocated to the structure and main principles of total quality management in the health care system. Th is part reveals the problems of the commissions that are studying the quality of medical services in healthcare establishments.

Quality

2020 ◽  
pp. 166-183
Author(s):  
Julie Sin
Keyword(s):  
Health Services ◽  
Health System ◽  
Services Quality ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
System Level ◽  
Quality Of Services ◽  
Provider Perspective ◽  
Multidimensional Concept

This chapter looks at the topic of health services quality from a commissioning and whole population perspective. Quality is noted to be a multidimensional concept and dimensions of quality are considered. The role of the commissioner in maintaining and improving quality of services is explored, and this is seen within a wider backdrop of a health system with commissioner and provider functions (if there are such distinctions in the system). Commissioners need to know whether they are securing quality care for their population for the money spent. They also need an understanding of how this dovetails with the provider perspective on this topic. Commissioners also need to be able to articulate what they wish to assess in practice under the guise of quality. Finally, at a system level there are also bearings on how to compile and interpret a picture of a population’s health if needed.

scholarly journals National initiatives to promote quality of care and patient safety: achievements to date and challenges ahead

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Dreiher ◽  
Olga Blagorazumnaya ◽  
Ran Balicer ◽  
Jacob Dreiher
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers

Abstract Background The quality of healthcare in Israel is considered “high”, and this achievement is due to the structure and organization of the healthcare system. The goal of the present review is to describe the major achievements and challenges of quality improvement in the Israeli healthcare system. Body In recent years, the Ministry of Health has made major strides in increasing the public’s access to comparative data on quality, finances and patient satisfaction. Several mechanisms at multiple levels help promote quality improvement and patient safety. These include legislation, financial incentives, and national programs for quality indicators, patient experience, patient safety, prevention and control of infection and accreditation. Over the years, improvements in quality indicators, infection prevention and patient satisfaction can be demonstrated, but other fields show little change, if at all. Challenges and barriers include reluctance by unions, inconsistent and unreliable flow of information, the fear of overpressure by management and the loss of autonomy by physicians, and doubts regarding “gaming” of data. Accreditation has its own challenges, such as the need to adjust it to local characteristics of the healthcare system, its high cost, and the limited evidence of its impact on quality. Lack of interest by leaders, lack of resources, burnout and compassion fatigue, are listed as challenges for improving patient experience. Conclusion Substantial efforts are being made in Israel to improve quality of care, based on the use of good data to understand what is working and what needs particular attention. Government and health care providers have the tools to continue to improve. However, several mechanisms for improving the quality of care, such as minimizing healthcare disparities, training for quality, and widespread implementation of the “choosing wisely” initiative, should be implemented more intensively and effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document