scholarly journals Response of contrasting bread wheat genotypes for heat and drought stress tolerance for rhizospheric soil properties

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 1298-1306
Author(s):  
O.P. Ahlawat ◽  
◽  
T. Chugh ◽  
K. Venkatesh ◽  
R. Tiwari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Chemical Properties ◽  
Rhizospheric Soil ◽  
Available Nitrogen ◽  
Wheat Varieties ◽  
Wheat Genotypes ◽  
Stages Of Growth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tolerant Genotype

Aim: The study aimed at investigating differential response of contrasting bread wheat genotypes for heat and drought stress towards changes in chemical and microbial components of rhizospheric soil for developing climate resilient wheat varieties. Methodology: Rhizospheric soils were studied for changes in pH, electrical conductivity, cations, anions, micro-elements, major-elements, organic carbon and organic matter, and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria(PGPRs) abundance at booting and anthesis stages of growth in four contrasting genotypes during 2017-18 and 2018-19 crop seasons Results: The contrasting genotypes (HD2967 and WH730) for heat tolerance exhibited significant interaction between genotype and stage of growth for Na+, K+ and nitrogen, while genotypes (HUW468 and C306) for drought tolerance exhibited it for available nitrogen only. Significant difference for Ca2+, Mg2+, iron, manganese, nitrogen and potassium levels were recorded in drought stress related genotypes at two stages of growth. The heat tolerant genotype showed 2.54 and 10.67 folds enhancement in population of N2 fixing and spore forming bacteria at anthesis compared to sensitive genotypes, while drought tolerant genotype showed 1.51, 1.07 and 6.26 folds in P-solubilizing, N2 fixing and general bacterial abundance. Interpretation: Contrasting genotypes for heat and drought stresses responded differently for chemical properties and abundance of PGPRs in rhizospheric soils.

Tolerance of 42 Bread Wheat Genotypes to Drought Stress after Anthesis

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1330-1335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Shahryari ◽  
Elshad Gurbanov ◽  
Aladdin Gadimov ◽  
Davoud Hassanpana
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Wheat Genotypes

Effect of nitric oxide on the tolerance mechanism of bread wheat genotypes under drought stress

2014 ◽  
Vol 185 ◽  
pp. S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Hamurcu ◽  
Tijen Demiral ◽  
Merve Calik ◽  
Z. Zeynep Avsaroglu ◽  
Ozgur Celik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Tolerance Mechanism ◽  
Wheat Genotypes

scholarly journals Yield and yield traits of durum wheat (Triticum durum desf.) and bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes under drought stress

Genetika ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 717-727
Author(s):  
Tofig Allahverdiyev
Keyword(s):  
Water Stress ◽  
Drought Stress ◽  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Tolerance Index ◽  
Yield Traits ◽  
Wheat Genotypes ◽  
Spike Number

Field experiment was conducted to study the effect of water stress on yield and yield traits of durum wheat and bread wheat genotypes. Water stress caused significant reduction in plant height (PH), peduncle length (PL), spike number/m2(SN), spike length (SL), spike width (SW), spikelets number/spike (SNS), spike mass (SM), grain number/spike (GNS), grain mass/spike (GMS), biological yield (BY), thousand kernel mass (TKM), grain yield (GY) and harvest index (HI). Wheat traits such as SN, SM, BY, TKM, GY were more vulnerable to drought stress. Positive significant correlation of GY with SN, BY and HI under rain-fed condition was found. Genotypes of durum wheat were more sensitive to drought than that bread wheat genotypes. The significant and positive correlation of GY with Stress Tolerance Index (STI), Mean Productivity (MP) and Geometric Mean Productivity (GMP) indicated that these indices were more effective in identifying high yielding, drought tolerance genotypes.

Grain quality of elite bread wheat genotypes under non-stress and drought-stress conditions

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 314-334
Author(s):  
Zamalotshwa Thungo ◽  
Hussein Shimelis ◽  
Alfred Odindo ◽  
Jacob Mashilo
Keyword(s):  
Drought Stress ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Grain Quality ◽  
Stress Conditions ◽  
Wheat Genotypes

scholarly journals Genotype X Environment Interaction for Quality Traits in Bread Wheat Genotype Tested At Six Environments

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Grain Quality ◽  
Wheat Breeding ◽  
Environment Interaction ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
Wheat Genotypes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Wide Adaptation ◽  
New Varieties

The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of GEI and its magnitude on the grain quality of bread wheat genotypes in Ethiopia. 15 bread wheat genotypes were evaluated using RCBD with four replications at six different locations in Ethiopia during 2017/18 cropping season. Combine Analysis of variance showed highly significant (P<0.001) differences among genotype, environment and GEI for investigated quality traits except GEI shows non-significant difference in dry gluten and gluten index. The environment contributed more than 50% only in PC (83.6%) and HLW (56.1%). The three components, G, E and GxE made almost similar contribution to most of the quality traits (WG, DG and GI), although the contribution of the environment was a little higher. Hardness index was determined mainly by the genotype (69.3%). The contribution of GxE was higher than that of genotype in all quality traits except in HDI and GI, again indicating the important role of GxE in the determination of wheat quality traits. Genotype ETBW9045 and ETBW8065 gave the best value of protein in the favorable means (15.05% and 14.75%) respectively. The Hidase had the highest value of wet gluten (58.2%) and dry gluten (24.38%) in average for all investigated locations (58.2%). GGE biplot declared ETBW9045 (#10) and ETBW8065 (#6) genotypes as stable in all quality. These two genotypes ETBW9045 (#10) and ETBW8065 (#6) are recommended for wide adaptation and for crossing. This study demonstrates success in wheat breeding for improved quality in bread wheat. The study also provides information on the combined stability of improved quality of the nationally important bread wheat genotypes. Therefore, the results of this study could be valuable for national bread wheat breeding programs to develop new varieties with high stable grain quality.

scholarly journals Participatory Evaluation and Selection of Improved Bread Wheat (Triticum Aestivum. L) Varieties in Northern Ethiopia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. p80
Author(s):  
Berhanu Meles ◽  
Chekole Nigus ◽  
Atsede Teklu ◽  
Yonas G Mariam
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Wheat Variety ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Preference Ranking ◽  
Northern Ethiopia ◽  
Wheat Varieties ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Variety Selection

Participatory variety selection trials were conducted in 2018 G.C in Laelay-maichew, Tahtay-maichew and Ahferom districts of central zone of Tigrai to evaluate the performance of improved bread wheat (Triticum aestivum. L) Variety and to assess farmers’ criteria for bread wheat variety selection. Six improved bread wheat varieties (Mekelle-1, Mekelle-2, Ogolcho, Kingbird and Hedasse) including the most popular variety ‘Kakaba’ were used for the study at eighteen farmers (six from each district). The experiment was laid out using randomized complete block design at baby trial with three replications. Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference among the tested varieties for most of the agronomic traits except for kernels per spike and harvest index in all the tested locations. In the preference ranking, farmers used their own traits of interest which were very important in their wheat varieties for selection. Hence, common criteria’s identified by the farmers to select the best varieties were; grain yield, biomass yield, earliness, disease resistance, spike length and seed size. Accordingly direct matrix ranking by farmers showed that Ogolcho was top ranked both at L/maichew and Ahferom followed by Kakaba, however Mekelle-1 was first ranked followed by Kakaba at T/maichew.  Therefore farmers of L/maichew and Ahferom were recommended to use Ogolcho and Kakaba, whereas Mekelle-1 was recommended for T/maichew.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document