scholarly journals Questões controversas sobre a aplicação da “Lei Maria da Penha" no âmbito do Direito Penal

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (39) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico Gomes de Almeida Horta ◽  
Marina Ferreira de Melo Burrel ◽  
Matheus Pessoa de Faria
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Minas Gerais ◽  
Controversial Issues ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Protective Measures ◽  
The Rule Of Law

RESUMOO trabalho aponta e analisa questões controversas da Lei nº 11.340/2006, a partir do contexto no qual se consolidou. Por meio de pesquisas bibliográficas, análises doutrinárias e jurisprudenciais, pretende-se abordar os problemas percebidos na aplicação deste diploma no âmbito penal. Analisa-se, inclusive, um caso prático vivenciado na Divisão de Assistência Judiciária da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, demonstrando-se consequências da utilização de dispositivos da “Lei Maria da Penha” de maneira incoerente com a sistemática do processo penal constitucional do Estado Democrático de Direito. Esclarece o procedimento previsto na Lei e suas implicações penais e, a partir disso, questiona a imposição de restrições de liberdade ao suposto agressor no procedimento de medidas protetivas. Destaca, ainda, os problemas relacionados à prisão preventiva na Lei Maria da Penha, especialmente no que toca ao tempo de sua duração e à sua aplicabilidade em infrações puníveis com penas detenção ou mera prisão simples. Por fim, aborda a problemática da prisão preventiva com a finalidade de garantir o cumprimento de medidas protetivas.PALAVRAS-CHAVELei Maria da Penha. Direito Penal. Prisão Preventiva. Crime de desobediência. Contravenções Penais. Detenção. ABSTRACTThe paper points out and analyzes controversial issues of Act 11,340/2006, from the context of its consolidation. Through bibliographical research, doctrinal analysis and case law, it intendeds to address the problems perceived in the application of this Act in the criminal field. It also analyzes a lawsuit sponsored by the "Divisão de Assistência Judiciária" of the "Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais", demonstrating the consequences of the use of provisions of the "Maria da Penha Act" in a manner incoherent with the systematic of constitutional criminal proceedings created by the Rule of Law. It clarifies the procedure provided for in the Act and its criminal implications and, with this, questions the imposition of restrictions of freedom on the supposed aggressor in the procedure of protective measures. It also highlights the problems related to pre-trial detention in the Maria da Penha Law, especially with regard to the duration of the sentence and its applicability to offenses punishable by imprisonment or mere simple arrest. Finally, it addresses the problem of pre-trial detention in order to guarantee compliance with protective measures.KEYWORDS"Maria da Penha" Act. Criminal Law. Pre-trial detention. Contempt of court. Misdemeanor. Detention.

15. Challenging Governmental Decisions: The Process

2021 ◽  
pp. 405-427
Author(s):  
Ian Loveland
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Public Law ◽  
Family Practitioner ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Technical Area ◽  
Legal Procedures

This chapter examines the legal procedures an applicant must follow when challenging a government decision and explores how court decisions in this nominally very technical area of administrative law can have profound implications for the meaning in practical terms of such broad constitutional principles as the rule of law and the sovereignty of Parliament. The chapter begins by examining the historical duality with English administrative law of the mechanism through which citizens might question the lawfulness of government action. The chapter then continues to cover the case of Barnard v National Dock Labour Board; the Order 53 reforms; the case of O’Reilly v Mackman (1982); the post-O’Reilly case law; the case of Roy v Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster Family Practitioner Committee; and public law principle as a defence in criminal proceedings.

scholarly journals Investigative and the Rule of Law: A Cameroonian and Ukrainian Criminal Proceedings Law Understanding

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-538
Author(s):  
Nana Charles Nguindip ◽  
Leonid Volodymyrovych Mohilevskyi ◽  
Ablamskyi Serhii Yevhenovych ◽  
Tetiana Kuzubova
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Due Process ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Human Right ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Crime Commission ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

There is no instance in a given society that can successfully opeate and function without respecting existing standards and principles set in place in ensuring the respect of fundamental human right and dignity. The notion and acceptable rule is that, Crime commission is an unavoidable singularity in any given and documented society functioning under the umbrella of established rules and regulations. Cameroon and Ukraine has engaged huge steps in establishing credible laws, all in the preservation and protection of fundamental human right of those presumed of crime commission. This article articulates and establishes that,the only way the rule of law can be respected during the investigative stage, will only when those responsible for investigation respects the due process of the law in the course of its investigation so that their act should not contravene the right of the suspect or accused in question. It provides that when issues of investigation are carried out by Ukraine and Cameroon police, gross violations of the criminal process are always experienced, and this greatly affects the objective of criminal law being that of protecting the right and dignity of everyone irrespective of the status quo acquired during the criminal proceedings.the results of this gross violation of the accuesed rights and status during the investigative stage will affect the rationale and objective of the criminal law system which is to ensure that all criminal process should respect human standard and dignity. The reason for this is that, during the investigative process and procedure, the law enforcement ofiicers must be able in detaching their various duties assigned with due diligent and respect of the various criminal standards of investigation. To ensure that this is done, there is that need of those enforcing the jucial process and trial should that all evidences, searches, seizures, recording done by the investigative police officials should be done in accordance of the free will of the presumed criminal.

scholarly journals Zasada nullum crimen sine lege jako źródło poszukiwania językowej granicy wykładni prawa karnego?

2020 ◽  
pp. 81-95
Author(s):  
Sławomir Tkacz
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Starting Point

The principle of nullum crimen sine lege is nowadays recognized as the standard of the rule of law. This doctrine prohibits the use of analogies and extensive interpretation of legal provisions to the disadvantage of the perpetrator. The starting point of these considerations is that texts of criminal provisions vary in nature. Therefore a question should be asked about the nature of these prohibitions in relation to various provisions. A separate problem is to distinguish inference by analogy from legal interpretation. The presented considerations are aimed at answering the question whether the nullum crimen sine lege principle allows determining the linguistic limits for the interpretation of criminal law. The analyses are illustrated by examples from the field of criminal case law. The article aims to provide reflection on the acceptable limits of interpretation of criminal law, if such limits can be defined. The considerations end with general conclusions.

In Search of a Standard: References to the Rule of Law in the Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights

ICL Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-69
Author(s):  
Eszter Polgári
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Working Definition ◽  
European Court ◽  
Structured Analysis ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Grand Chamber

AbstractThe present article maps the explicit references to the rule of law in the jurisprudence of the ECtHR by examining the judgments of the Grand Chamber and the Plenary Court. On the basis of the structured analysis it seeks to identify the constitutive elements of the Court’s rule of law concept and contrast it with the author’s working definition and the position of other Council of Europe organs. The review of the case-law indicates that the Court primarily associates the rule of law with access to court, judicial safeguards, legality and democracy, and it follows a moderately thick definition of the concept including formal, procedural and some substantive elements. The rule of law references are predominantly ancillary arguments giving weight to other Convention-based considerations and it is not applied as a self-standing standard.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PERUMUSAN DELIK KORUPSI DI DALAM KEBIJAKAN PEMBAHARUAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syaputra Syaputra
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Community Life ◽  
Reform Effort ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Draft Code ◽  
The Law ◽  
Pass Through ◽  
Sense Of Justice

The Criminal Code as a legacy of Dutch colonialism could no longer follow the dynamism of community life. It is too rigid has obliterated the sense of justice which is the goal of the creation of the law itself. This is because the articles of the Criminal Code deemed unsuitable to the development of crime and offenses increasingly complex. In the draft Code of Criminal Law, as one of the reform effort is the formulation of offenses of corruption set out in Chapter XXXII starting from Article 688 to Article 702. With the formulation of the offense of corruption and offenses positions formulated in the draft Criminal Code will disregard the Law Combating Corruption although this law of particular importance because of the substance of the articles draft Criminal Code wants to make corruption has become common crimes and do not pass through handling extraordinary. Law on Corruption Eradication cannot apply even if there is the principle of lex specialis derogat lex generalis, because of the retroactive principle that applies in the draft Criminal Code so that the decision to force the law can still be applied retroactively when the rule of law that new does not regulate the offense of criminal, so punishment can be eliminated.Keywords: Offense Corruption , Corruption , Reform of draft Criminal Code

Legal challenges in bringing AI evidence to the criminal courtroom

2021 ◽  
pp. 203228442110570
Author(s):  
Katherine Quezada-Tavárez ◽  
Plixavra Vogiatzoglou ◽  
Sofie Royer
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Challenges ◽  
Criminal Courtroom ◽  
European Criminal Law ◽  
Applications Of Ai

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the criminal justice system. One of the promising applications of AI in this field is the gathering and processing of evidence to investigate and prosecute crime. Despite its great potential, AI evidence also generates novel challenges to the requirements in the European criminal law landscape. This study aims to contribute to the burgeoning body of work on AI in criminal justice, elaborating upon an issue that has not received sufficient attention: the challenges triggered by AI evidence in criminal proceedings. The analysis is based on the norms and standards for evidence and fair trial, which are fleshed out in a large amount of European case law. Through the lens of AI evidence, this contribution aims to reflect on these issues and offer new perspectives, providing recommendations that would help address the identified concerns and ensure that the fair trial standards are effectively respected in the criminal courtroom.

Die Entwicklung des Strafrechts der Ukraine

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-396
Author(s):  
Rainer Birke
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Penal Code ◽  
Science And Society ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Law System ◽  
The Law ◽  
Simplified Procedure ◽  
Procedural Rights

In 2001, a new penal code was adopted in Ukraine after a comprehensive discussion in politics, legal science and society, replacing a codification of the Soviet era dating back to 1960, obviously unsuitable for the new realities. The new penal code of 2001 has been changed many times since then. This also applies to the criminal law provisions against corruption, evaluated and commended by GRECO. However, there is criticism of the criminal law system in Ukraine. A large number of the issues have little or nothing to do with the text of the penal code itself, but with deficits in the application of the law and the resulting loss of confidence in the activities of the law enforcement authorities. The judiciary is said to have a significant corruption problem and is significantly overloaded. The latter is to be counteracted by the introduction of the class of misdemeanor (“kryminalnyj prostupok”) in 2019 that can be investigated in a simplified procedure, which has been criticized, inter alia, because it bears the risk of the loss of quality and possibly infringes procedural rights. Also in 2019, the work on a once again completely new codification of the penal code was commenced, which is not entirely surprising in view to the existing criticism of manual errors or inadequacies of the recent code. It is to be hoped that Ukraine, with the existing will and the necessary strength, will succeed in the creation of a criminal law system that is fully in compliance with the rule of law and that a penal code will be drafted that finally finds full recognition in the society.

INTER ARMA SILENT LEGES (NOTAS SOBRE DEL DERECHO DE EXCEPCIÓN)

2010 ◽  
pp. 285-294
Author(s):  
JOSÉ MANUEL CASTELLS ARTECHE
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
United States Supreme Court ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Court Case ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Current Economic Crisis ◽  
Supreme Court Case ◽  
Emergency Measures ◽  
Structural Point

Se hace notar que en situaciones de excepción, sea en un aspecto coyuntural (la actual crisis económica), sea estructural (las medidas de emergencia justificadas en razones de necesidad), se afecta normalmente aunque no necesariamente a los principios propios de un Estado de Derecho. Se aportan ejemplos de la realidad actual o de momentos claves de la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos de Norteamérica. Salbuespeneko egoeretan, dela egoera koiunturala (egungo krisi ekonomikoa), dela egiturazkoa (premiagatik justifikatuta dauden larrialdiko neurriak), gehienetan, baina ez beti, Zuzenbide Estatutuaren printzipio funtsezkoetara jotzen da. Ameriketako Estatu Batuetako Epaitegi Gorenaren jurisprudentziaren gaur egungo errealitatearen edo une gailurren adibideak aztertzen dira. It is pointed out that in exceptional circumstances, either from a temporary point of view (current economic crisis) or from a structural point of view (emergency measures justified by reasons of necessity), is normally affected albeit not necessarily the same principles of the Rule of Law. Some current real examples or key moments in United States¿ Supreme Court case law are provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document