scholarly journals AS CONCEPÇÕES DA TEORIA MONETARIA DE JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES: UM EXERCÍCIO CRONOLÓGICO

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando Ferrari Filho
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Monetary Reform ◽  
John Maynard Keynes

Este artigo investiga a evolução das idéias de Keynes relacionadas à teoria monetária. Na elaboração do trabalho, o autor desenvolve a análise a partir das seguintes obras: Indian Currency And Finance, 1913, The Economic Consequences Of The Peace, 1919, A Tract On Monetary Reform, 1923, A Treatise On Money, 1930, e The General Theory Of Employment. Interest And Money, 1936. Em termos de conclusão, o trabalho mostra que, em primeiro lugar, o pensamento keynesiano move-se de uma posição na qual a Teoria Quantitativa da Moeda está inserida no seu "approach" teórico para uma situação onde as relações monetárias e reais identificam-se através da teoria monetária da produção. Por fim, a transição entre as duas teorias monetárias inicia-se com o Tract e, principalmente, o Treatise e consolida-se com a General Theory.

How, and for How Long, Did Keynes maintain theTreatiseTheory?

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-307
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Hirai
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
General Theory ◽  
Theory Building ◽  
Clear Understanding ◽  
Crucial Importance ◽  
Monetary Reform ◽  
Interesting Phenomenon ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Primary Material ◽  
Intellectual Journey

Many historians of economic theory have studied how John Maynard Keynes developed his theory fromA Tract on Monetary ReformthroughA Treatise on Money(hereafter theTreatise) toThe General TheoryofEmployment, Interest and Money(hereafter theGeneral TheoryorGT). After the pioneering studies by Moggridge (1973) and Patinkin (1976, 1982), there followed Dimand (1988), Amdeo (1989), Clarke (1988, 1998), Meltzer (1988), Moggridge (1992), Skidelsky (1992), Laidler (1999), and others. This is no wonder, for the Keynesian Revolution remains the most singular phenomenon that economic theory and policy have ever seen. Although the objective of our entire project has been to shed new light on this important and interesting phenomenon, examining and analyzing the processes of theory-building and rebuilding which constitute Keynes's intellectual journey (see Hirai 1997–99), the present paper focuses solely on one chapter in the long story of the transition through his three major works. The very fact of addressing the questions, “How did Keynes maintain the theory developed in theTreatiseafter its publication (October 1930), and for how long?” narrows the period under study to approximately two years which span roughly from October 1930 through October 1932. Our scrutiny will range over the original texts and primary material such as manuscripts, lecture notes, and correspondence produced over this period, and our findings will rest on the meticulous analysis of material of crucial importance for a clear understanding of Keynes's theoretical situation. We will also offer our comments on the earlier efforts insofar as they relate to the period in question.

scholarly journals Las traducciones al castellano de los libros de Keynes

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 819
Author(s):  
Rocio Sanchez-Lissen
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
John Maynard Keynes

Este artículo se centra en las traducciones al castellano de seis libros de John Maynard Keynes, así como en las principales referencias a España halladas en ellos, estructurándose en dos partes. La primera ofrece una breve biografía de Keynes relevante para este trabajo, y la segunda presenta por orden cronológico de su publicación original en inglés los libros de Keynes traducidos al castellano. De esta manera, las referencias a esos libros traducidos comienzan con The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919), editado en España en 1920 y terminan con The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936), editado en Méjico en 1943. Se ofrece también un anexo con la relación de libros traducidos y sus posteriores ediciones.

The Macroeconomic thought of Nicholas Barbon

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-116
Author(s):  
James H. Ullmer
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Scientific Inquiry ◽  
Economic Thought ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Major Defect

Nicholas Barbon (1640–1698) is little appreciated by most historians of economic thought. He is sporadically mentioned in a few writings—probably the most well-known being the favorable reference to him made by John Maynard Keynes (1883–1946) in The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (Keynes 1936, p. 359). The fullest treatment of Barbon's economic ideas is contained in The Origin of Scientific Economics: English Economic Thought 1660–1776 by William Louis Letwin (Letwin 1963, pp. 48–75). Letwin considers a major defect of Barbon's first purely scientific inquiry into economics, A Discourse of Trade (Barbon 1690), and by implication, his other economic writings, to be “the logical incoherence of its parts” (Letwin 1963, p. 57). This criticism is not surprising in light of the pre-paradigm period in which Barbon was writing.

John Maynard Keynes

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Kenneth Galbraith
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Government Spending ◽  
Full Employment ◽  
Government Expenditures ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Winston Churchill ◽  
Modern Economy ◽  
The Government

This chapter examines the economic ideas of John Maynard Keynes. According to Keynes, the modern economy does not necessarily find its equilibrium at full employment; it can find it with unemployment. This is the underemployment equilibrium, in which Say's Law no longer holds; there can be a shortage of demand. The government can and should take steps to overcome this shortage. The chapter discusses in more detail the underemployment equilibrium, the repeal of Say's Law, the call for government spending uncovered by revenues to sustain demand—all of which made up the so-called the Keynesian Revolution. In particular, it considers Keynes's central prescription that there should be government expenditures financed by borrowing to sustain demand and employment. It also analyzes Keynes's criticism of Winston Churchill, his A Treatise on Money (1930), and the economic discussion that followed the publication of The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money (1936).

Camp Sites: Forster and the Biographies of Queer Bloomsbury

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Piggford
Keyword(s):  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Sexual Practices ◽  
Noticeable Effect ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Bloomsbury Group ◽  
Psychological Realism ◽  
Queen Victoria ◽  
Lytton Strachey ◽  
Literary Practices ◽  
Old Friends

Members of the Bloomsbury Group wrote biographical texts influenced by the camp style of Lytton Strachey in Eminent Victorians and Queen Victoria. The most noticeable effect of this style is the subversion of Victorian biographical conventions. Stracheyesque qualities can be found in Virginia Woolf’s Orlando and Flush, John Maynard Keynes’ The Economic Consequences of the Peace, Clive Bell’s Old Friends, and E.M. Forster’s early nonfiction sketches and his biographies of Goldsworthy Lowes Dickinson and Marianne Thornton. Especially in their biographical writings these figures felt free to emphasize exaggeration, even silliness, in contrast to the psychological realism prevalent in their own and others’ fictional literary experiments. The Stracheyesque note in Bloomsbury biography provides a common quality and arguably queers readers’ expectations of modernist literary practices. As with the pervasive irregularity of their sexual practices, such textual play might be understood as liberatory and subversive.

‘No One in Our Age was Cleverer …’

2019 ◽  
pp. 99-136
Author(s):  
Alan Bollard
Keyword(s):  
Soviet Union ◽  
General Theory ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Bretton Woods ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Imf

As troops massed on the border, John Maynard Keynes had to hastily cut short a holiday in France. A government advisor, academic, journalist, and polymath, he spent the next few years working on pioneering and highly innovative economic ideas: how to pay for the war, how to apply his ground-breaking ‘General Theory’ to policy, how to avoid repeating the mistakes of Versailles, and how to set up an international clearing exchange at Bretton Woods that would eventually become the IMF. As Germany turned on the Soviet Union, Keynes became very worried about his Russian in-laws caught up in the terrible siege of Leningrad.

scholarly journals Retrospectives: Who Said “Debauch the Currency”: Keynes or Lenin?

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael V White ◽  
Kurt Schuler
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Economic Consequences ◽  
Capitalist System ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
Paris Peace Conference

One frequently quoted passage from the work of John Maynard Keynes is that “the best way to destroy the capitalist system [is] to debauch the currency.” The passage, attributed to Vladimir Illyich Lenin, appears in Keynes' book The Economic Consequences of the Peace, which became an international bestseller when it was published in 1919. Economic historian Frank W. Fetter and others have expressed doubt that Keynes was really quoting Lenin because they found no such statement in Lenin's collected published writings. Fetter suggested that Keynes based his remark on stories about what the Soviets were supposed to be saying that he heard at the Paris peace conference of 1919. It is now possible to show that Keynes based his remark on a report of an interview with Lenin published by London and New York newspapers in April 1919. Keynes' discussion of inflation in the Economic Consequences can then be read as an extended commentary on the remarks attributed to Lenin in the interview. While the report of the interview was not reprinted after 1919, it will be also shown here that Lenin responded to Keynes in a speech that was reprinted in his Collected Works.

A General Theory for Our Times: On Piketty

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff Mann
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
First Century ◽  
The Political ◽  
John Maynard Keynes ◽  
The World ◽  
Political Stance ◽  
Twenty First Century ◽  
Thomas Piketty

Thomas Piketty has offered, and many have desperately snatched at, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money of our epoch. Piketty’s affinity with John Maynard Keynes and his groundbreaking 1936 landmark is largely unreflexive. But the ties that bind him to Keynes are powerful, and manifest themselves at many levels in Capital in the Twenty-First Century. The epistemology, the political stance, the methodological commitments, and the politics resonate in imperfect but remarkable harmony. This is no accident, because the world in which Piketty’s book appeared is saturated with the specifically capitalist form of anxiety that Keynes sought to diagnose, and fix, the last time it made the richest economies in the world tremble.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document