scholarly journals Survival of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) versus Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) at a single institution

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian de Armas ◽  
Carolina Huertas-Ayala ◽  
Randall Chan ◽  
Yueh-Yun Chi ◽  
Winston Huh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Los Angeles ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Bulky Disease

Background: ABVD, the standard-of-care in adult Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), has not been directly compared to ABVE-PC, a pediatric regimen designed to reduce late-effects. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and associated toxicities of these two regimens used in the same institution. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated a total of 224 patients diagnosed with HL between 1999 and 2018 at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), of which 93 patients were eligible having received ABVD (n=46) or ABVE-PC (n=47) chemotherapy as their initial treatment. Descriptive analyses were performed using the Student’s t-test or Fisher’s exact test. Survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method. Events included: death, relapse, secondary malignancy, need for radiation therapy, pulmonary toxicity and cardiomyopathy determined by shortening fraction <29%. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle. Results: There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the patients receiving ABVE-PC or ABVD in regard for stage, risk group or prognostic variables, such as the presence or absence of “B” symptoms, bulky disease, and extra-nodal involvement. A greater proportion of patients treated with ABVE-PC received consolidating external beam radiation treatment (XRT) either by randomization or by response compared to ABVD (59.6% vs 32.6% respectively, p=0.01). While not statistically significant, response to therapy, assessed by PET/CT where available, mirrored the need for radiation (rapid response 58.3% vs 90.0%, n=34, p=0.11). There was no difference in event-free survival (p=0.63) or overall survival (p=0.37) with a median follow up length of 3.9 years. Conclusion: ABVD and ABVE-PC achieved similar survival outcomes in our single-institution cohort

Age and Radiation Response in Glioblastoma Multiforme

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1288-1298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Susan M. Chang ◽  
David A. Larson ◽  
Penny K. Sneed ◽  
William M. Wara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scale Score ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Scale Score ◽  
Performance Scale

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Advanced age is a strong predictor of shorter survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GM), especially for those who receive multimodality treatment. Radiographically assessed tumor response to external beam radiation therapy is an important prognostic factor in GM. We hypothesized that older GM patients might have more radioresistant tumors. METHODS We studied radiographically assessed response to external beam radiation treatment (five-level scale) in relation to age and other prognostic factors in a cohort of 301 GM patients treated on two prospective clinical protocols. A total of 223 patients (74%) were assessable for radiographically assessed radiation response. A proportional odds ordinal regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Younger age (P = 0.006), higher Karnofsky Performance Scale score before radiotherapy (P = 0.027), and more extensive surgical resection (P = 0.028) predicted better radiation response in univariate analyses. Results were similar when clinical criteria were used to classify an additional 61 patients without radiographically assessed radiation response (stable versus progressive disease). In multivariate analyses, age and extent of resection were significant independent predictors of radiation response (P &lt; 0.05); Karnofsky Performance Scale score was of borderline significance (P = 0.07). CONCLUSION Older GM patients are less likely to have good responses to postoperative external beam radiation therapy. Karnofsky Performance Scale score before radiation treatment and extent of surgical resection are additional predictors of radiographically assessed radiation response in GM.

scholarly journals Prevention and correction of radiation dermatitis with basic skin care: doctor and patient consensus

2021 ◽  
pp. 167-172
Author(s):  
D. A. Khlanta ◽  
D. S. Romanov
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Radiation Dermatitis ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Post Radiation

External beam radiation therapy is widely used by doctors around the world as one of the most common form of cancer treatment. The radiotherapy can help reduce the treatment aggression as compared with the surgical intervention in a large number of clinical situations, which ensures that the patient's quality of life will be decreased to a lesser extent in the after-treatment period. However, like the vast majority of anticancer treatments, the radiation therapy has a number of side effects, which are classified into acute radiation reactions and post-radiation injuries. Among them is radiation dermatitis, which is one of the most common adverse reactions to the radiotherapy. This complication manifests as erythema, as well as hyperpigmentation, dry and itchy skin, hair loss. In addition to the obvious negative impact on the patient's quality of life, some of the above factors can result in the development of a secondary skin infection. As one of the most frequent post-radiation complications, radiation dermatitis places radiotherapists before a challenge to reduce the incidence rates of this side effect, as well as to decrease the intensity of its clinical manifestations if it occurs. This challenge suggests the search for targeted drugs aimed to prevent and treat clinical symptoms. To date, dermatocosmetic products that are used to relieve skin manifestations of radiation treatment complications is an alternate option of the effective solution to the problem of radiation dermatitis. In the described clinical case, we assess the experience of using some of the dermatocosmetic products in a patient with a florid form of radiation dermatitis. 

Correlations of UICC tumor stage and tumor regression on T2-weighted MRI sequences during definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
pp. 030089162094002
Author(s):  
Florian Arend ◽  
Markus Oechsner ◽  
Clara B. Weidenbächer ◽  
Stephanie E. Combs ◽  
Kai J. Borm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Pelvic Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Tumor Stages ◽  
Mri Sequences

Background: The purpose of this study is to detect a correlation between the preradiation tumor staging and the relative volumetric regression of the primary tumor through external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Methods: Clinical data of 32 patients with a mean age of 60±12 years treated with primary radiation therapy (RT) of cervical carcinoma were analyzed. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages were T1 = 4 patients, T2 = 15 patients, T3 = 8 patients, T4 = 5 patients; N1 = 26 patients, N0 = 6 patients; and M0 = 25 patients, M1 = 7 patients. All patients received pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before RT as well as during RT. The cervical primary tumor was delineated as gross tumor volume (ptGTV) in T2-weighted MRI sequences. We compared ptGTV reduction by stage, lymph node status, metastatic status, and grading. Results: Mean ptGTV reduction during RT was 61.4±28.9%. T1 tumors shrank by 88.2±13.4%, T2 by 67.6±28.7%, T3 by 50.8±23.6%, and T4 by 38.7±27.2%. The difference in tumor shrinkage was statistically significant between the lower T stages and the higher T stages ( p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the mean ptGTV before treatment in the group with lymph node metastases (LNM) (54.1±47.7 cm3) as compared to the group without LNM (76.6±52.2 cm3). Nonetheless, ptGTV shrank significantly differently: by 68.9±25.7% (N1 patients) and by 29.0±17.7% (N0 patients). No significant differences in ptGTV shrinkage were observed in M0 versus M1 and G2 versus G3 tumors. Conclusion: There is a correlation between mean ptGTV reduction during EBRT and tumor stages. Tumors with higher T stages shrank less under radiation treatment, and the ptGTV of N1 patients responded better than that of N0 patients.

Limited-Stage Disease: Optimal Use of Chemotherapy and Radiation Treatment

Hematology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Radford
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Late Toxicity ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Early Years ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
Stage Disease ◽  
Involved Field

AbstractIn the early years of treatment for limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma there was an understandable focus on disease elimination. This has been replaced by concerns about the amount and balance of different therapies and eventually, as cure rates improve, a desire to individualize management based on risk factors at presentation and response to initial treatment. In limited stage Hodgkin lymphoma, early success was obtained with wide field radiotherapy but later combined modality approaches were employed to overcome the problem of out of field radiotherapy relapses. The acute and delayed toxicity of alkylating agent based therapies led to their replacement with ABVD and concerns about the late toxicity of radiotherapy resulted in smaller field sizes being first assessed in clinical trial and later introduced into clinical practice. The current standard of care of 3 or 4 cycles of ABVD followed by involved-field radiotherapy in clinically staged patients is the culmination of years of work involving many thousands of patients taking part in clinical trials.Our current focus is on the role of PET imaging and whether a response-adapted approach guided by PET can individualize therapy such that radiotherapy and its attendant late toxicity that impacts on future quality of life and survival can be avoided altogether in a subset of patients.

scholarly journals Focal Therapy, Differential Therapy, and Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anudh K. Jain ◽  
Ronald D. Ennis
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dose Rate ◽  
Radiation Treatment ◽  
Focal Therapy ◽  
High Dose Rate ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Differential Therapy ◽  
Prostate Cancer Treatments

Focal and differential therapy represent an approach to improve the therapeutic ratio of prostate cancer treatments. This concept is a shift from treating the whole gland to intensely treating the portion of the gland that contains significant tumor. However, there are many challenges in the move towards focal approaches. Defining which patients are suitable candidates for focal therapy approaches is an area of significant controversy, and it is likely that additional data from imaging or detailed biopsy methods is needed in addition to traditional risk factors. A number of methods have been suggested, and imaging with multiparametric MRI and transperineal template mapping biopsy have shown promise. The approach of differential therapy where the entire prostate is treated to a lower intensity and the tumor areas to high intensity is also discussed in detail. Radiation therapy is a well suited modality for the delivery of differential therapy. Data in the literature using external beam radiation, high dose rate brachytherapy, and low-dose rate brachytherapy for differential therapy are reviewed. Preliminary results are encouraging, and larger studies and randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document