Limited-Stage Disease: Optimal Use of Chemotherapy and Radiation Treatment

Hematology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 (1) ◽  
pp. 321-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Radford

AbstractIn the early years of treatment for limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma there was an understandable focus on disease elimination. This has been replaced by concerns about the amount and balance of different therapies and eventually, as cure rates improve, a desire to individualize management based on risk factors at presentation and response to initial treatment. In limited stage Hodgkin lymphoma, early success was obtained with wide field radiotherapy but later combined modality approaches were employed to overcome the problem of out of field radiotherapy relapses. The acute and delayed toxicity of alkylating agent based therapies led to their replacement with ABVD and concerns about the late toxicity of radiotherapy resulted in smaller field sizes being first assessed in clinical trial and later introduced into clinical practice. The current standard of care of 3 or 4 cycles of ABVD followed by involved-field radiotherapy in clinically staged patients is the culmination of years of work involving many thousands of patients taking part in clinical trials.Our current focus is on the role of PET imaging and whether a response-adapted approach guided by PET can individualize therapy such that radiotherapy and its attendant late toxicity that impacts on future quality of life and survival can be avoided altogether in a subset of patients.

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2099
Author(s):  
Eric Miller ◽  
Jose Bazan

The incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (SCCA) is increasing, particularly in the elderly, with increased mortality in this age group. While the current standard of care for localized SCCA remains chemoradiation (CRT), completion of this treatment can be challenging with risks for severe acute and late toxicity. It remains unclear if full course CRT is required for the management of early-stage SCCA or if de-escalation of treatment is possible without compromising patient outcomes. Alternative therapies include radiation therapy alone or local excision for appropriate patients. Modifying standard CRT may also reduce toxicity including the routine use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for treatment delivery, modification of treatment volumes, and selection and dosing of concurrent systemic therapy agents. Finally, we provide an overview of currently accruing prospective trials focused on defining the role of de-escalation of therapy in patients with early-stage SCCA.


Hematology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 406-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Fanale

AbstractNodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a unique diagnostic entity, with only ∼ 500 new cases in the United States per year with a similar infrequent incidence worldwide. NLPHL also has distinctive pathobiology and clinical characteristics compared with the more common classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), including CD20 positivity of the pathognomic lymphocytic and histiocytic cells and an overall more indolent course with a higher likelihood of delayed relapses. Given the limited numbers of prospective NLPHL-focused trials, management algorithms historically have typically been centered on retrospective data with guidelines often adopted from cHL and indolent B-cell lymphoma treatment approaches. Key recent publications have delineated that NLPHL has a higher level of pathological overlap with cHL and the aggressive B-cell lymphomas than with indolent B-cell lymphomas. Over the past decade, there has been a series of NLPHL publications that evaluated the role of rituximab in the frontline and relapsed setting, described the relative incidence of transformation to aggressive B-cell lymphomas, weighed the benefit of addition of chemotherapy to radiation treatment for patients with early-stage disease, considered what should be the preferred chemotherapy regimen for advanced-stage disease, and even assessed the potential role of autologous stem cell transplantation for the management of relapsed disease. General themes within the consensus guidelines include the role for radiation treatment as a monotherapy for early-stage disease, the value of large B-cell lymphoma–directed regimens for transformed disease, the utility of rituximab for treatment of relapsed disease, and, in the pediatric setting, the role of surgical management alone for patients with early-stage disease.


2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (5) ◽  
pp. 163-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ádám Jóna ◽  
Árpád Illés ◽  
Katalin Szemes ◽  
Zsófia Miltényi

Most of Hodgkin lymphoma patients survive due to combined chemo/radiotherapy. Improved survival brings long-term side effects to the front, which may determine the patients’ subsequent quality of life and expected lifetime. This manuscript aims to analyze lung manifestations of Hodgkin lymphoma and treatment related pulmonary complications, demonstrated with own cases. The lung involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma is often secondary, and primary pulmonary involvement is very rare. The authors found 8–12% of lung involvement among their patients. Side effects of treatment consist of pulmonary infections in conjuction with immunosuppression, while on the other hand bleomycin and chest irradiation as part of current standard of care induced pneumonitis and fibrosis are reported. The pulmonary involvement in Hodgkin lymphoma may cause differential diagnostic difficulty. Lung involvement could modify stage and consequently treatment, and the development of side effects might determine later quality of life and expected lifetime. Therefore, identification of lung involvement is crucial. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(5), 163–173.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. 2548-2555
Author(s):  
Steven I. Park ◽  
Thomas C. Shea ◽  
Oludamilola Olajide ◽  
Nishitha M. Reddy ◽  
Lihua E. Budde ◽  
...  

Abstract Approximately 90% of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are projected to be cured with standard therapy, but many do not live their expected life span because of late treatment–related complications. New treatment paradigms are needed to reduce the use of radiation therapy (RT) as well as conventional chemotherapy drugs while improving upon current standard-of-care survival outcomes. In this phase 2 multicenter study, patients with non-bulky limited-stage HL received doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by brentuximab vedotin (BV) consolidation. Forty-one patients were enrolled, and patient characteristics included median age of 29 years (range, 19 to 67 years), 58% were female, 45% had unfavorable disease, and 98% had stage II disease. Based on positron emission tomography (PET)–based risk stratification, patients received 2 to 6 cycles of ABVD followed by 6 cycles of BV. After ABVD followed by BV, 95% of evaluable patients (37 out of 39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-99%) achieved PET-negative status. In the intent-to-treat patient population, the estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 92%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 97%, with a median follow-up of 47 months. All 37 patients who achieved negative PET status after BV consolidation effectively avoided RT and remain in remission with estimated 3-year PFS and OS rates of 100%. In conclusion, BV demonstrates encouraging clinical activity when it follows ABVD therapy in limited-stage HL. Early incorporation of BV may reduce the use of RT as well as conventional chemotherapy drugs while achieving favorable survival outcomes in risk-stratified patients with non-bulky limited-stage HL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01578967.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i26-i26
Author(s):  
Carolina Cocito ◽  
Mylene Branchtein ◽  
Tatyana Gongora ◽  
Nadia Dahmane ◽  
Jeffrey Greenfield

Abstract Malignant gliomas represent 6.5% of all childhood brain neoplasms with a 5-years survival rate of less than 20%. Current standard of care for these tumors include radiotherapy; recent data in solid tumors indicate that adequate radiation protocols may synergize with immunotherapy strategies for better outcomes. Nonetheless, a great discrepancy between preclinical studies and clinical trials outcomes persists, the basis of which is not fully understood. One hypothesis may be due to different radiation protocols used. We used the GL261 syngeneic mouse model of glioma to test this hypothesis and characterize the immune response to radiotherapy, with either a single dose of 10Gy, a dose often used in preclinical models, or a fractionated treatment of 2Gy for five consecutive days (2Gyx5), as fractioned radiotherapy is most often used in patients. The immune content of the brain and the blood was assessed by flow cytometry in un-irradiated (control), 10Gyx1 and 2Gyx5 treated mice for three weeks after radiation. In the brain, both radiation regimens drastically reduced the number of CD45+ cells for the first two weeks after treatment. When compared to controls, 10Gyx1 but not 2Gyx5 treated mice showed a significant increase in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (CD3+) starting from the second week following treatment. This effect persisted until three weeks post treatment. The 10Gyx1 dose was better tolerated by the resident microglia (CD45lowCD11b+) when compared to the 2Gyx5 treatment. Our data describe the dynamics through which the immune microenvironment responds to two radiation regimens over time. Our results show that 10Gyx1 is the most effective regimen to impede tumor growth and to induce lymphocyte infiltration once the system recovers from the treatment. Our work suggests that, in the GL261 model, the fractionated radiation treatment we tested may be less optimal in priming glioma cells to the immune system.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 930-930
Author(s):  
Jorne Lionel Biccler ◽  
Ingrid Glimelius ◽  
Sandra Eloranta ◽  
Knut B. Smeland ◽  
Peter de Nully Brown ◽  
...  

Abstract Estimates describing the survival and relapse risk for young classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients are of considerable interest. A recent population-based study from British Columbia focused on the evolution of the relative survival and relapse risk given that patients reached certain milestones such as two years of relapse-free survival (Hapgood et al. 2016). The study included patients diagnosed before the year 2000 who were treated with regimens that have since been refined. Using register-data from Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, we investigated cHL survivorship in the era of contemporary treatment by inspecting the evolution of relapse risk and loss in life expectancy. Inclusion criteria were: age at diagnosis 18-49 years; diagnosis year between 2000 and 2013; and treatment with chemotherapy (CT) with or without involved node/field radiation therapy (RT). Event-free survival was measured as the time from diagnosis to progression, relapse, or death, whichever came first. The five-year relapse risks from diagnosis and conditional on reaching event-free survival (EFS) milestones were estimated while taking the censoring and competing risk, death, into account. As a measure of relative survival, we estimated the five-year restricted loss in expected lifetime (5y-RLEL), defined as the numeric difference in the number of days a healthy person and a patient with cHL are expected to survive within the next five years. The 5y-RLEL was estimated taking the censoring into account and was estimated for all patients and for those reaching one (EFS1), two (EFS2), or five (EFS5) years of event-free survival. In total, 2,582 cHL patients were included (Denmark n=863, Sweden n=1,236, Norway n=483). The majority were treated with ABVD (n=1,932). Most limited stage (IA-IIA) patients were treated with 2-4 courses of CT and RT with dosage up to 30Gy The majority of the advanced stage (IIB-IV) patients were treated with 6-8 courses of CT +/- RT. A fraction of the patients (n=306) were treated with 6-8 BEACOPP 14 or escalated BEACOPP. Advanced stage patients receiving BEACOPP more often had adverse risk criteria including involvement of the bone-marrow (27% vs 6%) and/or other extranodal sites (60% vs 34%) than advanced stage patients treated with 6-8 cycles of ABVD. The five-year OS was 95.2% (95% CI 94.4 - 96.1) and the five-year risk of relapse was 13.4% (95% CI 12.1-14.8). The dynamic evolution of the five-year relapse risk is shown in Figure 1A and the 5y-RLEL estimates in Figure 1B. For patients reaching the EFS2 and EFS5 milestones, five-year relapse risks were 4.2% (95% CI 3.8 - 4.6) and 0.8% (95% CI 0.8 - 0.9) (Figure 1A), respectively. From diagnosis, the five-year relapse risk for advanced stage patients was twice as high as for limited stage patients, however the difference decreased among patients reaching later EFS milestones and was small after EFS3 irrespective of stage (2.5% [95% CI 2.1 - 2.9] for advanced stage disease vs. 2.0% [95% CI 1.6 - 2.4] for limited stage disease) (Figure 1A). The five-year relapse risk for advanced stage patients treated with 6-8 courses of BEACOPP was comparable to that of advanced stage patients treated with 6-8 courses of ABVD despite more adverse risk criteria among the BEACOPP treated patients (Figure 1A). The 5y-RLEL was limited, e.g. within the first five years post-diagnosis the HL patients were expected to live 46 days (95% CI 35 - 54) less than what was expected for the background population (Figure 1B). Patients reaching the EFS2 milestone had a 5y-RLEL of 13 days (95% CI 7 - 20) and for patients reaching the EFS5 milestone, the 5y-RLEL was 8 days (95% CI 2 - 14) (Figure 1B). Limited stage patients who remained event-free two years post-diagnosis had a minimal 5y-RLEL of 2 days (95% CI -4 - 7) (Figure 1B). By reporting five-year relapse risk and loss of life expectancy overall and conditioned on years in remission, we provide relevant patient-centred prognostic measures for young contemporarily treated cHL patients. The results are reassuring and indicate that limited stage patients who remain event-free two years post-diagnosis have a future life expectancy in line with HL-free individuals. Additionally, irrespective of risk group, the five-year relapse risk was minimal once three years of event-free survival was reached. This information should be taken into account in future surveillance programs. Disclosures Eloranta: Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Other: S Eloranta is currently employed as a project coordinator and her salary is funded via a public-private real world evidence collaboration between Karolinska Institutet and Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Fosså:Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria. Ekstroem Smedby:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Other: The Department have recieved partial funding from Janssen Pharmaceuticals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi63-vi63
Author(s):  
Ayesha S Ali ◽  
Muneeb Niazi ◽  
Voichita Bar-Ad ◽  
Maria Werner-Wasik ◽  
David Andrews ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Current standard of care for glioblastoma (GBM) includes concurrent chemoradiation and maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) along with Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields). Preclinical studies suggest TTFields and radiation treatment have synergistic effects. Secondary analysis of EF14 trial demonstrated TTFields treatment may increase the rate of distant recurrence. We report our experience evaluating areas of progression in our pilot clinical trial of concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields. METHODS: This is a single arm pilot study (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03477110). Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with KPS ≥ 60 with newly diagnosed GBM were eligible. All patients received concurrent scalp-sparing radiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions), standard concurrent TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily), and TTFields. Maintenance therapy included standard TMZ and continuation of TTFields. Radiation treatment was delivered through TTFields arrays. Incidence and location of progression was documented. Distant recurrence was defined as recurrence more than 2 cm from primary enhancing lesion. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled on the trial. Twenty were male, and ten were female, with median age 58 years (19-77 years). Median KPS was 90 (70-100). Median follow-up was 11.6 months (1.7-22.1 months). Twenty (66.7%) patients had an unmethylated MGMT promotor status and ten (33.3%) patients had a methylated promoter status. Twenty patients (66.7%) had progression, with median PFS of 9.1 months (range 1.6 to 12.9 months). Five patients (26%) of patient presented with distant recurrence, with median distance from primary lesion of 5.1 cm (2.26-9.12 cm). One infratentorial progression was noted. Another patient transferred care and location of progression is unknown. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiation with TTFields for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma may have increased incidence of distant recurrence. This finding is suggestive of improved local control of primary site. Further data are needed to validate this finding.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 716-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Volker Diehl ◽  
Annette Pluetschow ◽  
Hans T. Eich ◽  
Richard Herrmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 716 Background: There has been an ongoing debate on the best treatment for patients with early favourable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Open questions include the choice between combined modality treatment or chemotherapy only, the number of chemotherapy cycles needed and the optimal radiation dose. The GHSG thus conducted a randomized study for patients with early-stage favourable Hodgkin lymphoma (HD10) in which these questions were addressed. Methods: HD10 was an international prospectively randomized multicenter trial comparing 2 and 4 cycles of ABVD as well as 20Gy or 30Gy involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) in a 2 × 2 statistical design. Between 5/1998 and 1/2003, a total of 1370 patients from 329 centers were randomized into four arms: 4 × ABVD + 30Gy; 4 × ABVD + 20Gy; 2 × ABVD + 30Gy; 2 × ABVD + 20Gy. All patients had their initial histology reviewed by a lymphoma expert panel. Documentation was complete in more than 99,1% of cases for this final analysis. Results: Patients were equally balanced for age, gender, stage, histology, performance status and risk factors between arms. There were significant differences in major toxicity (WHO grade III/IV) between 4 × ABVD and 2 × ABVD in the overall number of events (52% vs 33%) including leukopenia (24% vs 15%) and hair loss (28% vs 15%). In terms of radiation dose, there also was a difference in toxicity between 30Gy and 20Gy IFRT (all events: 8.7% vs 2.9%), dysphagia (3% vs 2%), mucositis (3.4% vs 0.7%). Complete remission was achieved in 97% of patients treated with 4 × ABVD, 97% with 2 × ABVD, 99% after 30Gy and 97% after 20Gy. With a median follow-up of 79–91 months, there was no significant difference between 4 × ABVD and 2 × ABVD in terms of overall survival at 5 years (OS: 4 × ABVD 97.1%; 2 × ABVD: 96.6%), freedom from treatment failure (FFTF: 93.0% vs 91.1%) and progression free survival (PFS: 93.5% vs 91.2%). For the radiotherapy question, there were also no significant differences between patients receiving 30Gy IFRT and those with 20Gy IFRT in terms of OS (97.6% vs 97.5%), FFTF (93.4% vs 92.9%) and PFS (93.7% vs 93.2%), respectively. Importantly, there was also no significant difference in terms of OS, FFTF and PFS when all four arms were compared. Conclusion: Two cycles of ABVD followed by 20Gy IFRT is the new GHSG standard of care for Hodgkin patients in early favourable stages. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document