scholarly journals Ultrasound screening program for chromosomal abnormalities: The first 2000 women

2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Novakov-Mikic ◽  
Zoran Potic ◽  
Aleksandra Pjevic
Keyword(s):  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
External Control ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Novi Sad

Introduction Screening for chromosomal abnormalities identifies the group of women at higher risk for having a fetus with chromosomal abnormalities and the need for fetal karyotyping. In order to provide high quality screening, strict criteria for certification of operators are introduced, issued by the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), which enables annual external control of results. The aim of this study was to review the results of five-year prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities in Novi Sad, Serbia. Material and methods Ultrasound screening at 11-15 weeks gestation was performed, assessing fetal morphology, crowner-rump length and nuchal translucency (NT) according to the FMF guidelines. Risk for chromosomal abnormalities included the initial risk, based on maternal age, gestational age and anamnestic data, and corrected risk, which took into account the initial risk and the value of the nuchal translucency. The corrected risk was issued by the computer program issued by the FMF. Results During the period 1999 - 2004, 4580 pregnant women were scanned. The risk for chromosomal abnormality was calculated using the FMF program in 2245 cases and the outcome was known in 1406 cases. The majority of women were between 25 and 29 years of age (37%), and 12% were older than 35 years. NT was below the median in 43% of cases and above in 57%, 3.7% of cases were above the 95th centile. 89% of women were younger than 35, and the risk was reduced in 97% of cases. There were three false negative cases. In 3% of women from this group the risk was increased, out of which there were five cases of trisomy 21 and two terminations were done due to major anomalies. In the group of women over 35 years, the risk was reduced in 95% of cases and in all of them but two the karyotype was normal. In one of the two cases there was a large omphalocele and the karyotype was trisomy 18, and in the other fetus appeared normal, but after amniocentesis due to maternal anxiety, karyotype was 47, XYY. In 5% of women at higher risk there was one trisomy 21, bilateral multicystic kidneys were found in one case as well as one hydrocephalus. Conclusion Combined screening by maternal age and nuchal translucency is superior to screening by maternal age only - (sensitivity 66% vs 20%, false postive results 3% vs 15%, area under ROC 0.90 vs 0.69).

scholarly journals First trimester ultrasound screening of chromosomal abnormalities

2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 153-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Trninic-Pjevic ◽  
Aleksandra Novakov-Mikic
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Age ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Chromosomal Defects ◽  
First Trimester Ultrasound

Introduction: A retrocervical subcutaneous collection of fluid at 11-14 weeks of gestation, can be visualized by ultrasound as nuchal translucency (NT). Objective. To examine the distribution of fetal nuchal translucency in low risk population, to determine the detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the population of interest based on maternal age and NT measurement. Method. Screening for chromosomal defects, advocated by The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), was performed in 1,341 pregnancies in the period January 2000 - April 2004. Initial risk for chromosomal defects (based on maternal and gestational age) and corrected risk, after the NT measurement, were calculated. Complete data were collected from 1,048 patients. Results. Out of 1,048 pregnancies followed, 8 cases of Down?s syndrome were observed, 7 were detected antenatally and 6 out of 7 were detected due to screening that combines maternal age and NT measurement. According to our results, sensitivity of the screening for aneuploidies based on maternal age alone was 12.5% and false positive rate 13.1%, showing that screening based on NT measurement is of great importance. Screening by a combination of maternal age and NT, and selecting a screening-positive group for invasive testing enabled detection of 75% of fetuses with trisomy 21. Conclusion. In screening for chromosomal abnormalities, an approach which combines maternal age and NT is effective and increases the detection rate compared to the use of any single test. .

scholarly journals Epidemiological Aspects, Prenatal Screening and Diagnosis of Congenital Heart Defects in Beijing

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanchun Zhang ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Hongyan Xu ◽  
Kaibo Liu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Birth Defect ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Prenatal Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
High Risk Factors

Background: In China, congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect type, with approximately 13,000 new cases annually. This study aimed to investigate high-risk factors, prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis as a basis for clinical decisions.Methods: All CHD cases identified from 2018 to 2020 were obtained from the Beijing city birth defect surveillance system and prenatal diagnosis institutions. The prenatal CHD diagnosis was confirmed by fetal echocardiography and amniotic fluid or cord blood genetic examination. Chi-square, odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to explore the high-risk factors, prenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis of CHD. Results: In total, 6,786/594,860 fetuses with CHD were diagnosed by prenatal echocardiography. The average incidence of CHD was 11.4 per 1,000 births, with an increase of 30.7 per 1,000 births from 2018 to 2020 (P < 0.05); the average incidence of complex CHD (CCHD) was 2.02 per 1,000 births, with no significant change from 2018 to 2020 (P > 0.05). Women age ≥35 years (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.77–1.46) was at higher risk of having babies with CHD than women aged 21–34 years. Overall, CHD incidence increased with maternal age (OR1.03, 95% CI 1.02–1.03). Additionally, women who had a non-local household registration (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.10–1.22) or had diabetes mellitus (DM) (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.96–1.25) were at higher risk of CHD. As an independent factor, CCHD was related to maternal age, DM, fetal gender, and maternal education level (all P < 0.05). The prenatal ultrasound screening detection rate of CCHD was 97.59%, which was far higher than that of total CHD (51.67%) (P < 0.001). The prenatal ultrasound diagnosis rate of CCHD was higher than that of simple CHD (P < 0.001), but the coincidence rate in the ultrasound diagnosis of CCHD was lower than that of simple CHD (P < 0.001). Prenatal genetic testing revealed chromosomal abnormalities in 25.62% (279/1089) of CHD cases with indications for a prenatal diagnosis.Conclusions: Maternal age, household registration and DM were related to CHD occurrence. Prenatal ultrasound screening is a highly effective method for CCHD diagnosis, and CHD fetuses should be closely evaluated to exclude chromosomal abnormalities.

First-trimester ultrasound screening for trisomy 21 based on maternal age, fetal nuchal translucency, and different methods of ductus venosus assessment

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 680-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Wagner ◽  
Jiri Sonek ◽  
Jessika Klein ◽  
Markus Hoopmann ◽  
Harald Abele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
First Trimester ◽  
Nuchal Translucency ◽  
Ductus Venosus ◽  
Ultrasound Screening ◽  
First Trimester Ultrasound

scholarly journals Efficiency of non-invasive prenatal screening in pregnant women at advanced maternal age

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxiao Jin ◽  
Yuqing Xu ◽  
Weihua Zhang ◽  
Xiaodan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Trisomy 21 ◽  
Maternal Age ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Advanced Maternal Age ◽  
Youden Index ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is widely used as the alternative choice for pregnant women at high-risk of fetal aneuploidy. However, whether NIPS has a good detective efficiency for pregnant women at advanced maternal age (AMA) has not been fully studied especially in Chinese women. Methods Twenty-nine thousand three hundred forty-three pregnant women at AMA with singleton pregnancy who received NIPS and followed-up were recruited. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the Youden Index for detecting fetal chromosomal aneuploidies were analyzed. The relationship between maternal age and common fetal chromosomal aneuploidy was observed. Results The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of NIPS for detecting fetal trisomy 21 were 99.11, 99.96, 90.98, and 100%, respectively. These same parameters for detecting fetal trisomy 18 were 100, 99.94, 67.92, and 100%, respectively. Finally, these parameters for detecting trisomy 13 were 100, 99.96, 27.78, and 100%, respectively. The prevalence of fetal trisomy 21 increased exponentially with maternal age. The high-risk percentage incidence rate of fetal trisomy 21 was significantly higher in the pregnant women at 37 years old or above than that in pregnant women at 35 to 37 years old. (Youden index = 37). Conclusion It is indicated that NIPS is an effective prenatal screening method for pregnant women at AMA.

scholarly journals Assessment of a change of protocol of prenatal screening by inclusion of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocío Cabra-Rodríguez ◽  
Guadalupe Bueno Rodríguez ◽  
Cristina Santos Rosa ◽  
Miguel Ángel Castaño López ◽  
Sonia Delgado Muñoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Maternal Blood ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Loss To Follow Up ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Second Trimester Screening ◽  
Trimester Screening

AbstractObjectivesNon-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) is a test for the detection of major fetal chromosomal abnormalities in maternal blood during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of NIPS implemented within the framework of the Screening Program for Congenital Abnormalities of the Andalusian Health System.MethodsA retrospective observational study was undertaken to determine the number of NIPS tests performed since its introduction. The number of invasive diagnostic tests done after the implementation of NIPS in the patients included in the program between March 2016 and August 2017 was also quantified.ResultsA total of 6,258 combined first- and second trimester screening tests were performed, covering 95% of the population. In total, 250 subjects were identified as high risk, of whom 200 underwent NIPS after loss to follow-up. NIPS showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 76.84–100%) and a specificity of 99.46% (95% CI: 97.04–99.99%).ConclusionsThis test has proven to have a very high sensitivity and specificity. The results obtained demonstrate that the incorporation of NIPS in clinical practice minimizes the rate of miscarriages and reduces the frequency of invasive procedures by 70%.

scholarly journals Correlation between maternal serum biochemical markers with karyotyping for prenatal screening of foetal chromosomal abnormalities

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 4851
Author(s):  
Ketki S. Kulkarni ◽  
Payal Lakhani ◽  
Sujata A. Dalvi ◽  
Chandrashankar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Confirmatory Test ◽  
Singleton Pregnancy ◽  
True Negative ◽  
Marker Test

Background: Prenatal screening for chromosomal abnormalities can be done by biochemical screening tests like dual marker test (DMT), triple marker test (TMT) and quadruple marker test (QMT). It is important to identify ideal screening test among them which best correlates with result of karyotyping which is confirmatory test of foetal chromosomal abnormalities. This helps to decrease need for invasive prenatal tests for foetal karyotyping. This study aims to evaluate sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and correlation of DMT, TMT, and QMT with results of karyotyping.Methods: Retrospective observational study was conducted in tertiary care maternity hospital over one year- 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2015. Women with singleton pregnancy undergoing DMT, TMT or QMT were included.Results: Of the 529 women screened by biochemical marker tests, 462 (87.33%) were screen negative and 67 (12.66%) women were screen positive. In 56 women, it was false positive (83.58%) and in 11 women true positive (16.41%). In 461 women the test results were true negative (99.78%), but in one case, result was false negative (0.21%).  3/11 (27.27%)women with foetal chromosomal abnormalities were primigravidae. 4/11 (36.36%)women were below 35 years. DMT and QMT had higher sensitivity (both 100%) and specificity (90.00% and 93.18% respectively) than TMT (sensitivity 80% and specificity 82.61%). Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 1.00 in DMT. Diagnostic odds ratio was highest with DMT (DOR=115.11) and best correlated with karyotyping results (coefficient of correlation 0.4).Conclusions: Universal screening of antenatal women, irrespective of their age and parity is suggested. DMT has highest diagnostic value and best correlation with the results of karyotyping. Hence the dual marker test can be considered to be better test for screening for aneuploidy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document